Re: Dude, I'm a comet. Do you even have a landing permit?
Dude, I'm a comet. Do you even have a landing permit?
So what if I don't...? Screw you!
4735 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2013
Well, to be fair, it probably depends on the exact context. On the other hand, I do believe a really good assembly programmer will produce shorter and/or faster code than a really good higher-level programmer every. single. time. No exceptions. How much longer it would take him is another matter...
The iPhone is powerful enough to run OSX, but it wouldn't be an optimal experience for the user.
My definition of "powerful enough to run" something is not ability to execute the instructions but ability to interact with me without me EVER seeing the UI snagging - in 2D or 3D (and I'm not talking about games now). With that idea even actual desktops don't quite fully qualify - but they're a heck of a lot closer than any ARM-level stuff.
That is all nice and well until one morning you walk into your office and find that not a single computer in the building is of any use beyond playing Angry Birds simply because a router popped somewhere, or a fishing boat's anchor snagged an undersea cable, or, you know, someone just forgot to renew a DNS entry or certificate somewhere - and then it only takes sixty seconds for the brass to decide you need your computing power kept locally...
Telling me that a sysadmin can keep some servers running from a handheld is absolutely nothing new, and has absolutely nothing to do with "the death of the PC".
Exactly; being able to do a job where your main tool is to immediately telnet into something else - which by definition makes whatever hardware is right in front of you irrelevant beyond a keyboard and some screen that can display text in a readable fashion - hardly says anything whatsoever about the general relevance of whatever you're using as nothing more than a teletype console...
Now if the ground is hard when Philae fires the harpoons, won't the recoil kick it back into space with no way to get back
The thing has some built-in "suspension" - when the feet touch surface, the main body is still moving towards the comet. Of course, if the harpoons fail to grip...
On the one hand, I do understand the nature of software development and how bugs are an inevitable reality. On the other hand, I'm getting quite tired of the perpetual realisation that even with the best intentions, the highest security an internet-facing machine can achieve is about as airtight as a damn fishing net... For a machine that has a practical role to fulfil, is there any meaningful sense left in the word "security" at all?!?
I keep hearing this "unsecured hotspot" thing - huh? Yes that would make a difference for a private user, but how would it change anything for a "commercial provider" like a café? In my experience they generally DO use a password, but it's freely available on request or directly printed on the menu. It's not like anyone gets identified or authenticated MORE than they would be on a completely open hotspot, so what gives?!?*
*Yes, I am aware some hotspots block your access until you visit a gate-page where you have to sign up in some way with them first - but I've only ever seen this done 2x (twice), grand total; possibly because dedicated apps not designed to redirect you to a webpage simply fail on any such network, and people rarely use the data connection for actual browsing in cafés these days.
We were promised OLED TVs for bloody ages now, always 1-2 years away (much like fusion, only in decades). Instead, we got "LED" TVs that are actually boring LCDs backlit by LEDs - which are SO much better than classic LCDs (no they aren't) - and IPS LCDs - which are SO much better than classic LCDs (only compared to LCDs...). If they give up on OLEDs and pull the same fast one on QD technology, ending up offering "QD backlit LCDs" instead, I'm just gonna flip the fuck out...
There is this little thing where information is intended to be conveyed not so much by the truth content of the sentences spoken / written, but rather by what is being said when, and how (yes I know this is a troublesome concept for a lot of men). While I'd say nobody argues that negligent handling of firearms is a good idea, that's not what this pamphlet is about - instead, it's the equivalent of shouting "SIT!" to your dog, or spelling out "the only reason you folks get to play with your guns is because we allow you to - for now", practically expressed almost ad literam in the pamphlet itself (if it's genuine of course). Making thinly veiled threats is hardly a way to make friends, unless your point has never been to get friendly in the first place...
Try telling me with a straight face that you could announce today owning slaves becoming legal again in the southern US without as much as a single soul setting out immediately to attempt to buy some. Go on, I could use a good laugh. Social perceptions of what is or is not acceptable may evolve solely on their own as well - but without the occasional law declaring something unacceptable basically overnight at a time when large sections of the population still see nothing wrong about it (it has 'always been this way' after all), it might take several centuries longer to get to the same conclusion - if ever.
I for one am perfectly happy with my electro-mechanical Casio bought literally decades ago. Has the date right on my wrist, still waterproof after several battery changes (as in liberally submerged, no problem), re-set twice a year for DST shenanigans and never more than one minute off (don't know exactly how much less, I just don't bother). If it keeps this up, may well be the last watch I'll ever need...
While I share the sentiment that 3D printing currently is way less useful in general terms than the zealots would have you believe, I did see an (admittedly very niche) application where it is indeed very useful even today: people working on restorations or in any similar field where casting metal is required can use it to produce casting patterns of arbitrary complexity in a relatively short time (compared to having to fabricate it traditionally), easily iterating over variations if necessary. It makes a world of difference...
I'm not so sure about that - it's true today because mainstream languages are far more similar to each other than they are different, in how they go about turning text into code. While I'm not expecting that to change in the next decade, I take issue with the stance that it's flat out impossible to devise some method of conveying desired functionality that makes typical programming errors hard if not impossible to commit. It would still make it perfectly possible to specify a different functionality than the one you mean to mind you, but I don't think it's impossible to deliver that functionality in a robust, fault-resistant way. And before you ask just how one would go about doing that - well if I knew, would I be sitting here commenting on El Reg....?!?
The tail feathering is designed to operate at ludicrous speed, its whole point is to get the spacecraft through the high speed "re-entry" phase. It is not, however, designed to be operated while the engine is still firing - you can see it would point the engine a significant angle away from the direction the craft is supposed to be travelling when feathered. Obviously that would mess things up more than a little bit...
Microsoft's problem is being in clear denial of having lost the ability to dictate people what they can and cannot do - from merely sticking with what they have to moving to other OSes or simply, erm, "installing whatever they want without asking MS for permission", people have a range of possible ways to refuse to comply. Redmond just flat-out pretends none of those are viable options when in fact they clearly are - and apparently preferred to W8 too.
This sort of thing (and their well-known stance on copyright) makes me as far from being a Disney fan as one possibly can be - but I simply can't bring myself to hate them quite as much as I'd like considering they just went and released more or less the whole Lucasarts back-catalog for sale on GOG, DRM-free. Arrrrrgh! KHAAAAAAAAN!!!
A much better light quality for starters
Not from where I'm sitting, right now - as long as you're not trying to compare to the absolute cheapest junk, of course. Even though I'm seriously squeamish about "bluish" CFL light, ever since incandescents went out of style I've been using some half-decent warm CFLs in my room, and I have zero problem with their light "quality" (whatever that's supposed to mean - do they have a "bouquet" too?). They're also soldiering on quite nicely so far - I don't expect them to outlast me, and I'm definitely not willing to pay a princely sum for such a (rather dubious) feature either.
...that one can surprise most people by stating that Voyager 1 is actually getting closer the Earth sometimes rather than farther all the time - while it's certainly whizzing away in normal terms, in a cosmic sense it's not moving all that fast, so whenever Earth is moving towards it in its orbit around the Sun, we handily outpace Voyager, briefly catching up a bit...
FTDI's problem is they seem to be delusional enough to think they can just go and rip out the spine of a jaywalker (whether or not he was walking on their lawn) and then keep standing next to the mauled body with a victorious smile, still being "the good guys". Taking justice into your own hands with zero regard to the cost or the collateral damage is always an option, but they should have been aware it is usually *frowned upon*.
"I think paedophile is rapidly replacing Nazi for the purposes of Godwin's Law."
Exactly. Anyway, why isn't there a browser plugin yet that would automatically replace every instance of the word with either "hairdresser" or "telephone sanitizer" at random, so at least I'd get a good chuckle out of it...? C'mon internet, step up to the plate...!
Yeah, I noticed that immediately too, and it doesn't aid my confidence in those statistics at all. Also, I happen to think that if that specific difference is what makes your plan work, your plan is so marginal it's not even funny - you're preparing to fail...
Google tracks you even closer when using Maps, for example
What makes you think I ever allowed any Google service, maps included, access to location, with any degree of accuracy? You're not supposed to need that if you're only looking at the map, but I'm using a different - get this, an offline one - map app anyway that has the side advantage of actually being freely correctable if it happens to be wrong... Now, Google may or may not go behind my back and track me without consent anyway, but I'm certainly not going to make it easy for them.
If they think they can do the same thing they did with pilots with car drivers (ie. glue them into a seat with absolutely nothing whatsoever to do for hours, yet require them to react at the first sign of trouble) they're way more delusional than I thought they were. First off, pilots are carefully selected people who have to prove they can do that (and then even they fail to fight off boredom every now and then, but we only hear about it when it ends up having dire consequences, at which point it usually transpires that whatever was to blame is actually a common thing) - whereas Joe Average car driver is guaranteed to fail to react instantly after long periods of nothing to do. Second, as perilous a thing it is to fly, people tend to forget that once you're doing it half-decently there's really little that can go wrong: there's (relatively) nothing to hit up there, and even when things fail horribly, you generally have minutes until you meet the dirt - as opposed to a highway, where you either react within a second or don't even bother. All those things she said about drones - they may well be true for fighter aircraft; but next to none of it applies to the road...