Re: 40mm Glock
"Serious gardening needs railguns"
My word! Are those really triffids in your garden?!?
4735 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2013
"Yes, I could remember that. But why should I have to when there's no need?"
Funnily enough that exact reason is why I have zero use for "searching" for programs. I simply have no idea what they're called - what was that again, "fruityfoglia"...? Ah, no, "Piriform defraggler" - and I would have found it even in my sleep right in the "System Tools" start menu folder where I keep such things. Yes, I can remember "Visual Studio", but I can't remember the names of 90% of the tools I use - I just know to hit up everything I find under "Recovery Tools" whenever something gets deleted that should not have been. Same for various media conversion tools. Or audio editors. Or esoteric CAD format viewers. Or hex viewers. Or CPU fan speed / temperature testers. Or whatever else. I have no idea what any of those are called, so I CAN'T search for them. But I sure CAN browse, and let me assure you, my first-level start menu is a single column wide. I can reach anything I have within 2-3 levels, tops. But search is NOT discoverable - and Windows is welcome to shove it where the sun don't shine just as much as Ubuntu is, as far as I'm concerned.
Fortunately, the good folks at Firefox HQ seem to have anticipated this and pre-emptively endowed their browser with a stochastic counter-measure: every now and then (whenever FF feels like it) I can type in half a sentence before I realize it has been (fully randomly) either a) held back then typed out instantly, b) held back then typed out one letter per second or c) redirected to /dev/null (presumably).
The quoted definition is a horribly poor one anyway - it only applies if everything concerned is deterministically influenced solely by the user input and nothing else; if any uncontrolled variables are present (yeah, welcome to the Real World) the definition of insanity would be rather to expect the same thing to happen every time...
My only problem with this is that one needs to use something the size of the Arecibo radio telescope dish to make RFID work farther than 40.000 mm away. Granted, RFID also uses that energy to run the chip itself which I gather is not the case here. On the other hand, RFID usually has a half-decent sized loop - again, not the case here. *Yoda voice* ...curious piece of tech this is...
I can only assume the "turn on when power returns" thing is there to let your bulb emulate a traditional one - ie. let you control it by light switch; the poor bastard has no way to tell whether it just got powered on because an outage ended or you flicked the switch. A central control hub may or may not help here (you have to wait for it to boot after an outage - so what do you do as a bulb when you get powered up? If it's not replying, don't turn on? That's a slippery slope right there...). Of course, there is nothing preventing them to add a setting that would define what to do on power-up (unless there already is one...).
Regarding intelligence - that's utter nonsense. You'd need a proper, fully functional and self-aware AI integrated with everything happening in the house including the (correctly populated) personal calendars of the entire family to actually take sensible decisions by context; anything less will just leave you with a bunch of "scenarios" - glorified batches of commands - which will always be slightly off for anything but the most stupidly straightforward actions, prompting you to rectify undesired side-effects manually; where's the fun in that?
As it is, the most we can hope for is the ability to pre-heat one's home or check that all lights are indeed off remotely - whether that justifies the security risk it introduces is left for each of us individually to decide...
"I doubt they lied. Most of them don't know what they are talking about but will give you an answer anyway."
Exactly. They just figure out what you want to hear and let you have it. The _right_ way to ask that question is "these things _can_ be updated remotely and _do_ have always-on remote telemetry, right?". Then if the answer you get is "Ummm, no, sorry", you know you're onto something...
Perhaps somewhat unrelated, but science in Iran seems to be done at a high enough academic level for a Lawrenceville plasma fusion research lab to see fit to invite an Iranian professor over to the US to help them with their bleeding-edge research (apparently scientific collaboration was _not_ under embargo so this was perfectly possible). Of course, leave it to the good old Uncle Sam to grant the guy a visa only to change his mind five minutes later...
...are those bloody stupid but increasingly common sites that insist to open with a full-page full-motion 4K video loop in the background. Guess what that does to bandwidth / CPU load / power consumption (especially if I don't switch to the relevant tab right away after opening it, so it gets to play in the background for eternity - and before anyone says "it's not running while not in focus" I hope you're aware it's perfectly possible to fully watch any number of Youtube videos in parallel without actually seeing any of them play...)
Naaah, Three Wolf Moon shirt, clearly. But you do have to wear it ironically.
Your definately wrong, its quite possible to be a native speaker and still be unaware of alot of errors irregardless. And weather you've had you're coffee or not can certainly effect your concentration - just loose focus for a moment and viola! Sure, the OP could of tried harder but to be honest, I could care less...
"the "slightly used rocket" has a proven track-record of making a successful flight, which includes stresses and regimes that you just can't test for. "
I'm not quite sure where to factor into that possible metal fatigue / starting hairline cracks / wire harnesses on the verge of getting interrupted / shorted / abraded / melted in hard-to-reach places etc. It clearly wouldn't be practical to unbolt every single nut after every single launch, although I'm sure that's exactly what they'll do for the first time...
I'd prefer to see some "Dark-Matter/Dark-Energy-in-a-vial" produced by boffins first before I'm convinced it is something that actually exists... Hmmm, perhaps we could try to produce some using appropriately sized Dark Suckers...?
"Personally, I usually quite like superhero movies, for the simple reason that they are mindless escapism, much like James Bond for example. If I want to be challenged intellectually I'll read a book."
To each his own I guess, but I have to say superhero movies don't work for me at all - the glossy, sleek CGI feels like a cheap veneer of plastic to me and everybody being over-the-top strong/resilient/etc. makes it much harder for me to care for any of them than for Lt. Bullit for instance. There is really nothing at stake, we all know it all too well. As for intellectuality, Hopscotch or Charade (heck, even Love and Bullets) are hardly Eisenstein-level heavy duty stuff either, but I enjoy them even today incomparably more than the 101th incarnation of "bad guy shows up, kicks the hell out of good guys, good guys regroup, barely manage to defeat bad guy, THE END". I think I can handle a bit more challenge than that...
Indeed. I strongly suspect that anyone attempting to exclusively cultivate "wonderful, creative, funny, smart, and silly communities" only will find it harder than creating a magnetic monopole. There's that pesky thing about no matter how small groups of people you study you grind up magnets, they keep developing opposing poles...
Yup, definitely everyone is losing money on making Android phones, no question about that. Well, except Huawei, probably. And ZTE - yeah, that goes without saying. And likely Oppo. And Lava, Micromax, and Blu. And, of course Gionee. But other than Huawei, ZTE, Oppo, Lava, Micromax, Blu and Gionee, what did the Ro... erm, definitely everyone is losing money on Android!
Yeah wouldn't it be nice. Except even though I have Flash set to "Ask to activate" I have to activate it literally dozens of times every day, to access content or services I'm absolutely NOT willing forego. Security is always secondary to actual functionality, and while I would certainly prefer to be less vulnerable, uninstalling flash will not happen a long as I'm forced to use it or accept being locked out.
I suppose it's the age old "just because I have no use whatsoever for this property of mine doesn't mean you're allowed to use it instead, even if that would mean zero inconvenience for me" argument - one of the classic cases where what's legal and what's moral are at polar opposites. I wonder when, if ever, will people finally realise that "lawful" implies no correlation whatsoever with "reasonable", "moral", "the right thing to do", "decent", "sane" etc.
In other news, arbitrary definition of "planet" is arbitrary. I prefer to define "planet" as "orbiting the sun but not as a moon of another planet" and "round" (reserving the right to exclude accidentally spherically shaped pebbles). I promise not to be bothered by whatever definition the boffins choose to agree upon as long as they leave me alone to use mine and that's that.
Unless he was either flat-out lying about those reasons or he was explicitly designated to do quality assurance I don't see how any of that was his concern. Ignoring a fault you know about is one thing, not bending over backwards to find other people's mistakes just so your employer doesn't sack you is quite another. People are employed (and paid!) to do a specific job, not to carry the weight of the universe and perform miracles routinely.
Valid point, but in different circumstances where standardized "monitor+keyboard+mouse" shells were practically ubiquitous, the idea of only having to carry your phone around to always have access to your own laptop-like computer does have merit (even if only between home and office - I know which I'd prefer to carry, a laptop or a phone...). And that doesn't even start addressing more far-fetched use cases where projected keyboards and tightly-rollable / foldable / projected screens might give you the same thing completely integrated in a roughly phone-sized package. To be honest, the logical conclusion of "personal computing" started by the PC _is_ the piece of hardware you already carry everywhere - your phone. The rest is details...