Of course it's not dead!
...it's just resting. Or pining for the fjords - take your pick...
4735 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2013
"Apparantly, it does not actually exist."
Congrats on citing the exact same press release in three different places. "Chinese Export" doesn't exist exactly the way Santa Claus doesn't - it may not be an actually real thing but somehow the presents still get delivered in the form of stuff a) definitely coming from China b) definitely lacking any proper CE approval and c) definitely bearing the improper version of the mark. It looks like a duck, it quacks like a duck - it just "doesn't exist". Oh, sorry - "the EU isn't aware of its existence"...
Nonono, ring -3 is where the Master Control Program lives. But it's all very hush-hush you know...
"Take my vehicle's radio"
Amen to that - except I have the same problem with my wallpaper changers: I have about a thousand lovely panoramas queued up, but I only ever see about 50 of them, no matter what wallpaper changer I test. Rather astoundingly nobody writing these things seems to have heard of the "any random item picked from the ones that haven't been shown yet" strategy. Seriously, how hard is it to keep a list?!?
"What does Yahoo! actually do anymore?"
Well, for one, provides the (literally) only free email service that a) isn't Google b) isn't a shady Russian portal and c) can be accessed directly through a mail client and not just through some webmail portal (although inexplicably they seem to... erm... not advertise this feature)*.
*- Yes, I'm aware of GMX, they just happen to boot people out of their own accounts without any appeal or justification; so no they don't count - there's something wrong with their definition of the word "service".
"But if the robots are already making all the spoons we need then why not have painted nails?"
Because spoons either became cheaper due to the increased productivity (in which case I might decide that once I get some change back buying a spoon I might also want a fork - great for the existing fork makers who will happily ramp up production possibly even hiring some of the desperate jobless for half their old wages in the process, but does nothing for the ex-spoon-makers still out of a job because painted nails are way down on my list) or they don't really become cheaper at all (great for the 1%-er bastard who owns the shiny new robo-spoon factory but does nothing for the ex-spoon-makers still out of a job because I haven't any new income to spend on them).
"How long do the 4 * CR123 cells last?"
I can only guess, but if they are continuously processing video looking for movement it might eat juice fairly hungrily. Which is why (well, that, and the smaller "dome" under the lens) I suspect they might actually use a good old fashioned PIR sensor to sense movement and only turn the camera on then - it could last for quite a while that way.
"...kids, particularly when left unsupervised, will viciously bully, harass, and sometimes even attack robots pets other kids anything that moves, being the adorable little bundles of pure concentrated evil that they are. Some actually stay that way growing up, usually securing a comfortable position in higher management with great ease." TFTFY.
That's what got me wondering too, actually. Such a sequence is fine for _keypad_ devices that transmit keypress after keypress as distinct messages, but what is it doing in a _keyfob_ device that is supposed to transmit its code within one single message, inevitably flanked by a bunch of other bits that identify the code part as such?!? This smells fishy... Did that garage door opener setup also have an external wireless PIN-based keypad too perchance...?
I'm quite weary of analogies in IT (especially car analogies which work oh-so-well as we all know - "you wouldn't steal a car" now, would you...) because they're all inherently flawed and mostly just attempt to draw a strained parallel with the pet peeve of whoever does the arguing (and I'm no exception). But if we must, here's a car analogy for you: Driving a car is like driving a car - broadly speaking all you have to do is not hit stuff directly in front of you. Writing software, on the other hand, is rather like driving ALL cars in New York simultaneously - not exactly something the human mind was tailored to do. We do our best, but pervasive failure to attain perfection should not come as a surprise. As long as we are the ones doing the coding and as long as our tools do no more to prevent failure than they do today, we should NOT expect this to change.
There is some truth in there in the sense that it does indeed take far less effort / sobriety to _drive_ (sitting in a seat) than it takes to _walk_. One can perform the former long, long after the latter is categorically out of the question. Not that this should be practically demonstrated, of course - but it is definitely true.
I'm kinda wondering what would he do if someone were to tell him there's an awful lot of MUCH higher frequency "electo-magnetic smog" sloshing around, also known as "thermal radiation" (and even worse - "light"!) which he could completely escape only by leaving the solar system entirely (not a bad idea, actually)...
Well, not exactly. In that case neither the Sun nor the Earth would "pull" on DSCOVR and it would fly straight off tangentially. The actual L1 point is not where the two gravitational forces are equal, but as Wikipedia puts it "The Lagrange points mark positions where the combined gravitational pull of the two large masses provides precisely the centripetal force required to orbit with them". Not quite the same thing (incidentally, also explains why there are not one but five of them - the rest are definitely not anywhere gravitational forces alone could be "equal and opposite")... :)
"What might work is having a whole bunch of blank or coaster discs marked "Top Secret" so that they have to check each one"
Ever since Lem's blue bolts in the "Cyberiad" it has become quite obvious that the impossibility to prove something really isn't concealed damning evidence can be a fairly significant problem once you decide you'd rather come clean.
"It doesn't make any difference how many bits of encryption you have in your locker if your keystrokes are being gathered."
And that is exactly why I find USB-drives with on-board encryption and an on-board keypad appealing. After all, in the proposed scenario even if you do everything perfectly, you're still supposed to plug and mount that thumb drive into / on the machine you plan to copy documents from - and if there's any logging involved there, they already have your passkey...
Of course, there's a frightening amount of ways an autonomous USB drive with internal encryption can be well and truly screwed up, sadly - as long as one can de-solder various bits and read off storage keys and whatnot (or sniff them in-transit on the PCB) you're still SOL. But at least in theory, it could be done properly and it should offer more protection that another drive that relies on a host machine for its user interface.
"Note for LG: Even us old people have learned how to text."
I, for one, would absolutely murder whoever necessary without thinking twice for an up-to-date full-qwerty Android. Emphasis on "FULL" though - none of that "portrait" Blackberry-style nonsense. And yes, my typing accuracy after several years of touch-torture is still under 50% (as in over half of letters typed go in wrong). Sigh... one can dream...
I have a theory that printer manufacturers simply try to recapture the increasingly elusive patronage of the consumer: basically nobody, absolutely nobody I know buys original ink - most people simply buy a no-name replacement (at a _small_ fraction of the original's price) or simply have their old cartridges refilled (there are countless "refill shops" around here - and yes, they mostly know how to reset the cartridge chip as well, unless you straight-up bought one of the ubiquitous self-resetting ones). What the smarter ones do though is buy an add-on CIS (continuous ink system) for their existing printer (kits abound) which basically lets you pour in large amounts of whatever dirt-cheap ink you can get your hands on without ever thinking about how much you might use or waste.
Apparently CIS (and the other workarounds) have become sufficiently popular that manufacturers just can't pretend that everything is still fine anymore: Epson came out with a whole lineup of sub-$200 printers that now have CIS factory-built-in (L120 / L130 etc.) followed by a bunch of somewhat more expensive ones. Brother seems to do the same with DCPJ100 / DCPJ132. I suppose it's an "if you can't beat them join them" sort-of-admission of defeat...? At any rate, if I get a new one, it will surely be something like these - the only thing is, I hardly print at all these days...
"Free examination, cheap lenses and absolutely extortionate frame costs."
Dunno about that - in my experience it's rather free examination and reasonable frame costs, dwarfed by a lens cost that should qualify as a crime against humanity (all I ever ask for is light sensitive ones, considering wearing sunglasses is not an option for me). The net result is that I doggedly resuscitate my current specs again and again whenever the frame breaks somewhere: I just can't afford to get new ones and the perfectly good lenses "can't be" transferred to another frame (yes, I _am_ employed. In IT.)...
In respectable Brent Sienna tradition - outdoors, to thee I have only this to say: HSSSSSSSSSSSS!
"I dont like the massive invasion of privacy, but there is little I can do..."
It's called "learned helplessness". Look it up. It's also false.
"...or really want to do tbh im too lazy,"
Oh, now that's an entirely different issue, innit. "The Grasshopper and the Ant" comes to mind. After all it's clearly profoundly dumb to "work hard" if "food is plentiful"; unfortunately, by the time it's not, it's too late.
"If any of this spying really did stop any bullets flying..."
NO. The biggest fallacy of any and all discussions on the matter is the inevitable derailment into debating whether mass surveillance is effective at all - a fallacy because that's irrelevant. It would be wrong even if it could stop 100.0% of the things it is allegedly meant to stop - because it could also stop the other 1000% of stuff it never, ever should be able to stop. That's all.
Oh, you better believe _some_ people donned their math hats before playing the lottery - and this is the (highly entertaining) story of what happens when even the lottery knows they've been "played" on an industrial scale for years on end, but goes along with it nevertheless...
@Rumournz: Thanks, I didn't know that. I'll definitely have to look into this!
@Paul Crawford: Thank you, that's certainly sound advice for a fresh install - but as it it, my HDD is already full partitioned into NTFS drives for Windows use (which I expect to mount under Linux), except for a ~50GB slot I reserved for a Linux system drive. Splitting that up yet again seems a bit much trouble if possible at all without upsetting the existing partition table (non-GPT); I guess "home" will have to stay on the same drive until the next PC upgrade (probably quite a few LTSs away - I'm a highly-averse-to-change kinda guy, it always takes too much effort for nothing).
"The problem with Windows 10 is not that they might charge for new features down the line..."
So, ummm, how do you feel about paying a moderate monthly subscription for not seeing ads between two games of Solitaire...? Oh, it 's all cool? Okay, cool...
"Personally I think the fact that by next month there will probably be more installs of Windows 10 than Linux Desktop..."
You seem to make the unsubstantiated claim that Linux fans give a shit about how many of anything really gets installed. I can only speak for myself but I really couldn't care less who else installs what.
This is ludicrous. I certainly hope Mr. Woods gets a rude wake-up call regarding the realities of the intertubes. There should be a revocable license granted before one can be a Person Of Public Interest which should include an extensive course on How To Disregard Every Dumb Thing Some Schmuck Might Think (And Write) About Me.... Epic fail, Mr. Woods. *slow clap*
Much like Shrek, I rather like my "rancid free-for-all swamp" pretty much as it is, sorry. But those thrilled by the not-too-far-fetched prospect of seeing an image of a sunset only to have helpful little windows pop up with "Would you like a large print of this picture for only $12.99? Special offer: framed only $29.99 with free delivery if you order right now!" are welcome to like it to their heart's content...