Re: Hmm.
That's only true for the 1.0 version. Mark II will include patented lightsaber technology, and the photons will stop propagating past half a meter or so from the screen...
4735 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2013
A mod of this needs to go on Kickstarter, stat. It should read "USB inverter with 220V output! Plug in your power brick and power your laptop from its own USB port for free indefinitely!" If things go the usual way, the campaign would be at least halfway through before anything happens...
"I to hate all adverts which is quite strange because as a kid I used to love them, especially near to Christmas. I guess for me adverts are no longer relevant because I'm not that materialistic anyway but also because I tend to do my own research about any products that I'm looking to buy and no amount of advertising will change that. "
...or, just maybe possibly, now you're paying for stuff with your own money. </cynical> No offense whatsoever intended. I know no ad can talk louder than money can, as it says "good bye" walking out of your wallet...
Yes, well, ads don't ever sell products - they sell "the experience". That's why the point is not how the beer tastes or how much the car consumes, but the blissful smile of the ruggedly handsome bloke doing the drinking or driving (hey, I did say OR!) potentially besieged by attractive supermodels. That's why everything comes with a full-size photo of the idealized family (complete with 2.5 super-lovable children) grinning wider than the Atlantic. You're supposed to covet that "experience" - you're supposed to want to feel like that, damn the rest. If you ask what horsepower that cherry-red chainsaw has instead of gawking at the babes surrounding the Paul Bunyan holding it, the ads have already failed miserably...
Straying slightly off topic, this is why VW's defeat device was such an incredibly stupid idea. "It takes years to build a reputation, and seconds to destroy one"
Disclaimer: this may work somewhat differently on cynical bastards like me. As far as I'm concerned, VW destroyed or lost precisely nothing - I'm certainly not going to applaud them for what they did, but I'm absolutely convinced all major players either do something similar or do some entirely different but equally unsavory other stuff. So I'm convinced that righteously fainting in horror and going to someone else would gain me (or protect me from) a big fat nothing.
On the other hand, I've seen their engineering - I happen to have a short PDF detailing the workings of my over-20-years-old dirty euro-2 class diesel engine on a technical level, and it left me rather amazed. Having some sort of fallback for the malfunction of two thirds of the few absolutely vital sensors the engine has is one thing - but this thing is prepared to keep trucking even if its dual-redundant throttle-by-wire sensors completely fail! It just blindly raises the idle and lets me limp slowly to a service the best I can! And that's an engine that doesn't even know OBD-II exists!
That is the sort of attention to detail (and I see signs of more of the same all over the car) that commands my respect and loyalty - I'm fully aware it might be long misplaced, and they may or may not be making a lot crappier stuff these days; but I know what they're capable of when they're really trying, and that's a lot more than I know about their competition - so I'll let them sort this mess out the best they can, and if this car ever needs replacing I know what I'll buy again.
Hold on - are you saying there are supposed to be ads on my phone...? I must be very lucky, I can't remember ever seeing one. Well, that, or self-selection - if it needs "network" permission, it's either a browser or it doesn't get installed on my phone (or if I absolutely cannot avoid it, it faceplants straight into AFWall+).
"There's no such thing as bad publicity?"
That only applies to a very special class, people who make their living based on being known - like pop-starts, actors or politicians - for who there really is nothing worse than being forgotten. Anybody else making their living with something else that the ads only promote actually stands to lose quite a lot by sufficiently negative publicity.
"You OBVIOUSLY do not understand the problem!"
Well it's a good thing then we have someone like you who does. Except of course that what they are actually trying to protect is that portion of the 5Ghz band (if your router only does 2.4GHz stuff, the FCC's new stuff doesn't even care about you) that some... ugh... bright spark both left open for unlicensed use and also employed as a weather radar band. Routers using that band are supposed to continuously listen for radar chirps and if they receive any they must back off and stay the fuck off that channel; existing routers in that band already contain code that takes care of this. Apparently, some alternative stuff makes it possible to hose that functionality and apparently some clueless people managed to turn it off resulting in nicely "shadowed-in" sectors like this - that's what they're so pissed about.
"All of these will, eventually, come down somewhere which may not be easily accessible, leaving a mess for someone to clean up..."
The whole idea behind the project is that they can take advantage of wind conditions at different altitudes to exert a reasonable amount of control over which way the balloons go and where exactly they land if there's no suitable "return wind" and they have to be brought down. I wouldn't expect them to land on a dime, but I'd think the large spaces meant to be covered would provide suitably large landing opportunities...
"The balloons are going to be tethered to the ground"
Care to point to a citation for that, mate?
"Isn't that the very definition of a prototype?"
No. It isn't. A prototype should do everything the final version is supposed to do, as the final version is expected to do it, without necessarily being made up from the actual components of the final version in their final form of assembly. If it's a production prototype, the only difference is actually not having one beeelion of them only the first (few). In other words, it can be a breadboard with a laser pointer and a bunch of loose wires, but it has to shave exactly like the final one is expected to.
Indeed. All those claims about something being vulnerable but "requiring nation-state resources" to attack - only to see some twenty-something coming forward at a security conference with having thoroughly pwned the thing using only $123 worth of mostly off-the-shelf kit - are getting rather annoying. All you need is sufficient incentive, available technical data (or the hardware itself) and reasonable skill in the art...
"clarity was urgently needed"
Nono, those "medium-sized companies" know full well there's a snowflake's chance in hell they'll suddenly stop sending data overseas; the clarity sought is regarding what new piece of legal excuse can they use to justify going on as usual...
"it's hardly a chore to press the button with your thumb to cancel them"
A chore it may not be, but I can tell you with utmost confidence that I cancel my indicators at least ten times as often as I actually engage them, as a reflex - for fear of the odd "forgot them on for the last ten miles" case that still happens sometimes. Curiously though I'm pretty sure I read in the official manual for my bike (I got none with mine, it was a second-hand buy) that they _are_ actually supposed to self-cancel; naturally, they do no such thing.
Not sure at all about those superior statistic skills requirement. Mark one eyeballs suffice. Instead of "hmmm, let's see, I reckon I have approximately 23.8479% chance of getting caught and doing XYZ time for it so let's give it a try" I think it's rather "this guy I know has been doing it for ages and he's doing quite well for himself, and so does that other guy over there, and so does his cousin..."
Me, I'm a big fan of the PA suggested ones - especially the eff-your-sprog one - and I don't even have an FB account!
"...they don't want to pay for it."
Guess what, if I can't afford to go on a holiday anywhere out of town I'm sure as hell not going to pay for yours in Hawaii, no matter how much I value privacy (I do) or just how paranoid about it I can be (very...)! Oh, and I'd like to see how exactly are you securing my communication if I do have your handset/software, but none of my friends does...
" I genuinely wish somebody would step up and give Apple a push as their software has been getting sloppy, but it doesn't seem to be happening."
Hey, if you have the VC cash mountain required to start up the real-world Sandbenders, I'm game...
"That's an interesting definition of 'from scratch. In times of yore..."
To you young whippersnappers I say bah humbug! In my time you had to dope germanium yourself atom by atom using nothing but a screwdriver and a hammer and gramps was building wired-or logic gates with nothing but crystal detectors cobbled together from a sharpened graphite pencil lead and rusty Gillette blades*! Now get off my lawn!
...shall we continue this tomfoolery or is it sufficiently apparent already how ridiculous nitpicking what "from scratch" means is?
*equally ridiculously, that actually works as a diode...
Doesn't even need to be connected to that; in that region Eastern cars are practically universally ubiquitos - nobody drives anything western unless as a deliberate choice and/or as a status symbol - and Toyota is one of the most common cars in use. What else would they expect to see the beardy guys drive FFS?!?
Sounds awfully like "software and/or diversity makes everything better, just trust us!" except sorry, no, software cannot conjure a single milijoule of extra energy out of thin air once the battery is flat, and no matter how many different ones you bundle, none of them can last longer than the best of them which we already know to be woefully inadequate in most cases.
Re: battery belt (I propose we do it properly and make it a bandolier) - I do believe it would grant the wearer absolutely awesome battery life superpowers, but for the love of $DEITY don't EVER try to enter an airport or a bank wearing one (and absolutely, positively NEVER EVER try to wear it at school)...
" It's a hell of a lot more useful than just calling it shitty code"
Oh HELL no. That does convey "this is not good". What that doesn't convey at all is the very important message "this was supposed to be much better than that, you fucked up, get your damn shit straight because THIS IS NOT OK!"
If you can do work you actually enjoy then you are vastly more fortunate than most and if you can afford to treat 0s in your income so chivalrously then you clearly aren't affected by the more gruesome ways money makes the world go round for people who can barely afford to pay for their continued existence even when they do still have a job. And no, you don't have to go to Asia or Africa to find armies of them. One could argue you seem to be ill-equipped to try solving their financial problems I'd say...
"Trying to do DTP with a word processor is like trying to nail jelly to a tree"
On one hand, you're quite right. On the other hand, do please tell me who ever set out to "nail jelly to a tree" instead of wanting to stick an image somewhere and have it STICK THERE. Why do these pieces of shit called "word processors" exist at all?!? Halfway between "text-with-rigid-layout" and "bucket'o'ASCII with (some form of) linefeed", they make exactly as much sense as being "half alive"...
"I mean seriously, the people working at that company think..."
Amen to that! Seriously, "script kiddie" is an academic title compared to the level of crass amateurism going on on that site. I have to reload the front page about three times on average just to have it finally load at all. You get completely different front page for the exact same URL coming from outside or from within the site. You can search directly for a creator's name (featured prominently IF you find the guy by other means) and get zero results just because it's not their page's "official title" (so you better know that one or have a direct link...). There is absolutely no way to prod them to re-try charging your card for pending pledges if you ever hit a snag - you just try to muck with your payment details randomly hoping they'll retry when you hit "update" on the exact same card; sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. You can write them with explicit complaints and they'll thank you, admit you're right and promise to do something about it ASAP then of course nothing ever happens. It's just... ridiculously bad.
"Is this a good time or a bad time"
I'd say that depends a lot on the specific secondness of the hand in question - for instance, my double-decade old VW diesel never purported to be anything other than Euro 2 and I don't think it will suddenly develop any difficulty in sticking to that, so its price should not be impacted at all - whatever you'd consider its residual value to be. I can tell you it still runs great though, so I'm not sellin'...
"So why is it vital to keep Bletchley secret from the Germans in 1979?"
To play the devil's advocate here - it's choice 4, plus the fact that "knowledge is power", exclusive knowledge exponentially so; therefore even if it wouldn't actually matter a miserable iota whether anyone else knew or not, them *not* knowing is demonstrably, quantitatively *moaaaar power* than letting them know - so obviously we don't, even if we have no other justification whatsoever to keep it secret. Which is not even the actual case - you listed a few reasons yourself...
Naaah, they found that HP printer....
"it is highly likely that they will want to help you sort it out"
That's irrelevant. They won't have the authorisation to do so. First off, they'll be mighty annoyed that you are holding up the already endless queue with your unsolvable data mismatch. Second even if by some miracle they still find it in themselves to actually sympathize with you past that, they'll just patiently explain to you (several times while your tone goes up) that there's absolutely nothing they can do with your data screwed up like that - even if anyone can see what's wrong and what the right data is - because there's no way in hell they're allowed to override the existing data no matter how obviously wrong.
For that, you first have to go to the High Authority who has such powers, but do keep in mind they're only open during the lunch break (while they're out getting lunch, much like Major Major Major Major) and they also take about a month to look up some sort of proof to your claim even if it's neatly sorted in some cabinet in a room right behind the office you're standing in (SELECT DISTINCTROW is, like, haaaaaard in the real world, maaaaan....). That is, of course, assuming that (at least some branch of) said High Authority does actually reside in your own city - all bets are off if it doesn't. And you better be hoping said error is not something propagating through multiple documents, because if it is not even an elf's life span will suffice to get through the bureaucracy involved in fixing them all...