Re: How do they get the vacuum in there?
...not only that, but where does the vacuum go if you let in the air? You can use a one-way valve so nothing can come out while the air goes in, and in the end the vacuum is still gone! How?!? Spooky...!
4735 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2013
...sooo did the Loons drift with pinpoint accuracy over half the globe from South America to Sri Lanka, did they teleport there directly, or were there simply some trials earlier in South America leading to the freedom of said getting revoked there then reinstated in Sri Lanka...?
"VGA will work over a 30, 40, 50m cable even and produce a picture good enough"
Dunno about that. Last time I looked around in-line standalone TV tuners, none of them was capable of relaying the PC's screen through the two pieces of 1.5m VGA cable without clearly visible smear / shadowing / etc - and it was a fairly modest resolution, around 1366x768....
- If you just want to go up, balloons are great; if you actually want to hold a certain altitude, decidedly less so. It's not really possible to just stay neutrally buoyant passively, and fiddling with the buoyancy invariably gets messy. Major altitude changes are even worse - if you let out gas, you're not getting it back...
- Balloons tend to have the equivalent aerodynamic drag of a flying olympic swimming pool, so even with some propulsion moving them is unwieldy, moving them fast is out of the question, and basically pretty much any wind gets to sweep them away when they just want to stay put.
- Solar wings might be a large-ish target but they're nothing compared to the target surface of any balloon; not good if the point is to avoid detection and/or a rocket on its way up.
- Whether you use hydrogen (ay carramba del los santos kaboom...!) or helium, those tiny atoms tend to just slip through any material and go bye-bye sooner rather than later - now you're either carrying heavy tanks with reserves or you're definitely not staying up "never land" style..
- Plus a million other reasons I can't think of right now but I'm sure exist... ;)
"Has anyone ever typed wikipedia.com into the address bar first, then searched for their desired article?"
Oh, I don't need to - I just type whatever into the address bar and the wikipedia result page comes right up, since Firefox is sufficiently retarded to insist always using the search source selected in its search box for address bar searches too (and I keep that on wikipedia). It's a bit hard to fathom what the f### is the use of a dedicated search box if it will only search the exact same source as the address bar would at any given moment (instead of having the address bar stay dedicated to, say, Google and the search bar selectable)...
The only problem is, at the current pace, the year of Linux on the desktop will come and go before ReactOS reaches production-level usability and stability. Yes, they have something that runs and looks like a windows desktop from far enough. No, it's nowhere near a complete, functional OS.
"We are insignificant."
I strongly object - in fact, I'm on par with a wizard: I can see colours that don't exist! Like pink and magenta! Well, technically so can you (unless you are colour-blind in which case I'm sorry to tell you that you, Sir, are no wizard!), but that only makes my point stronger...
BWAHAHAHAHAA.... no, dude, they could never possibly touch the monumental amount of damage you did to your own reputation with being a colossal dick - TWICE. I know I'll never, ever design an FTDI chip into anything ever again - there is no such thing as a guaranteed supply chain unless one buys from YOU directly, and that's not something everyone is able to (or want to - see delivery times) do. Oh, and by the way - the clones were actually MORE faithfully following your spec than your own damn chips did - which is why you could erase VID/PID in a clone with the exact same code a "genuine" chip failed to execute due to a bug...
"Having read this article, I honestly have no idea what has been achieved, and if it's impressive or not."
In other words, they can now recognize / match handwriting without ever having seen either the written sample itself or the result of the match operation. There, not so hard after all...
"Do Microsoft R&D and production actually ever talk to each other?"
Don't be silly, of course we do! Now here, take this totally free screen saver and please don't be so rude as to ask why it constantly pegs one of the cores or why it connects to the internet occasionally...
"I think you may have bigger issues than Firefox, mate."
Don't worry (or rather, DO) they're about to become your issues as well - see "Enforced Add-Ons Policy Deferred" and by the way, they say it's already in since 43, only it can still be disabled. For now. In 44. Until 46 lands (which by Firefox version update rate should be in... *whips out pocket watch* ...hold on... just a sec...).
Of course it is. Considering the logical conclusion that the only way to avoid blocking of ads at _some_ level is to own and wall-off the entire computing chain from browser to computer to monitor, cue HDMI DRM focus shift from "not allowed to steal content" to "not allowed to not watch all these commercials" in 3... 2... 1...
Not gonna work. Just the other day I went to the effort of explicitly removing a specific DIV frame from a certain website's layout (which wasn't even blocked by Ad-block) simply because I don't go to read tech news (or whatever I do at that site, already forgot which one it was) just to be repeatedly presented with perfectly legit, non-animated and silent images of bare feet in excruciating waves of hot, colourful pain that could oh-so-easily be averted simply by using XYZ medicinal compound (oh hi there Lily the Pink).
Exactly. And there seem to be some native, built-in feedback mechanisms that converge towards the large players managing to tacitly arrive at much the same customer-screwing conditions even without overt collusion: take it or leave it, except there's no-one else to go to - they all do the same shitty stuff. Also, anyone trying to counter that with "that's an opportunity for someone else to do it better and steal the establishment's business" needs to wake the f### up and realize that the first thing players in any mature industry do is close the door behind them, lock it and weld it shut - to make sure barriers to entry prevent anyone from doing just that.
"For the rest, (irritating text-based adverts, lightboxes and popups), disable javascript."
You know, funnily enough, every now and then something randomly breaks execution of javascript in Firefox, so no scripts run after that until I restart or at least reload the tab. And guess what - you know how I know when that happens...? I know because starting with the very next click the website in question becomes inoperable and unnavigable - nothing happens, because many, many websites just don't use any actual HTML links much anymore. Any action and all links are performed / substituted on-the-fly by scripts - it's like those integrated single-blob-single-url Flash websites, only with less Flash and more javascript (hey - web twopointoh, hell yeah! Wooo wooooo!). So yeah, good luck to you disabling them on anything more elaborate than Wikipedia...
I dumped Chrome for good the millisecond it decided it was in charge of arbitrating what add-ons I may or may not run with it, without any override (yes, that's a thing that already happened). Currently using Chromium instead whenever I feel like watching videos without flash (thanks a lot for nothing Firefox).
"There's probably a gap in the market for actual qualified engineers to get in and do things properly"
You mean like some of those recent smartphone security oriented startups that were allegedly built on the premise of doing it right, only to be proven just as pwnable as the rest...? Yup, that'll do it...
I'm just winging this from memory so i could be easily wrong, but a mere five minutes into being involved with font design (no matter on how amateur a level) one rapidly comes to appreciate the significant difficulty of rendering all font glyphs _just_ the way they were meant in every possible corner case. If I recall correctly, one of the ways they tried fixing that back in the day was incorporating "instructions" into TTF fonts that were supposed to aid proper rendering of that particular font - as in a sort of full-blown virtual machine provided by the font renderer. Fast forward to a decidedly less innocent world today and I suppose you can see the writing on the wall...
Apparently the unchanged fact that most solid-state electronics are most of the time happily chugging along for decades without any issues (and why should they have any...) is nowadays planning its retirement in favour of the planned-obsolescent modern perception of things being necessarily junk after a mere few years. Let me offer a tentative rule of thumb: does it have a filament or moving parts? No? Then is should bloody well still be working regardless of how old it is...
"That's a fair amount of employment"
Is there though...? Not that I have any actual clue, but in the long term, somehow I don't imagine a finished, functioning telescope site crawling with contractors or hot-dog stands or whatever. I mean, they probably don't even need a night guard... maybe a "day guard"...?
"Users were served the unicorn-of-fail page"
OMG! Sparklelord! GitHub reads Doctor McNinja?!?
So when do we expect Home Depot and Harbor Freight to start "renting" hammers via monthly subscription instead of selling them? They could even come with a few dozen nails thrown in for free each month! What a steal!
...let me spell this out for you: NO! For me to recurrently pay you each month, you have to actually DO something for me each month, not just allow me to keep doing the same thing I did last month. It might make some sense if we'd be talking about something you do very infrequently - renting a crane or a forklift to lift your brand new lathe into your shop makes more sense than buying one, yes. But software tools just aren't like that - if you needed Photoshop or AutoCAD this month, you'll be needing it next month too - and the next, and the next. And damn if I'm about to start renting my hammer.
"Do you have any proof of that?"
It's a very insidious scheme. The chips automatically detect any attempts to test their existence and remain silent; also, any of the billions of commercial cash test units in use automatically switch places with a non-NFC capable counterpart from a parallel universe as soon as they detect tampering attempts. Finally, clerks willing to disclose their use of the technology (as well as any parties receiving the disclosure) get a visit from the MiB and have to choose between staying silent or disappearing without a trace. </sarcasm>
As a surprisingly minimalistic but quite funky salute to the 747, I'll just leave this here...