ongoing cost of paying
Presumably by paying up, you self identify as a good bet for further fraud
1529 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jan 2013
>>"Doesn’t that mean they’ve already won?"
That is always the most potent argument
In rhetorical terms it is just another think of the childrun emotive flourish. It is only superficially attractive if matches your own opinions or predjudices. This issue is too important not to deploy mostly logos and ethos in the argument
if you switch off access to people who don't have MTPAS you might leave someone at the top of a burning building or under collapsed rubble with no means of communicating.
Wait, if it isn't live tweeted it isn't really happening no? So does that mean the punter is ok now or not? If not, perhaps nomophobia will distract them from worrying about impending death.
Some channel partners reckon the restructure signals the beginning of the end for EAs and one told us he’ll be glad to see the back of them. [...] The fees channel partners get paid on EAs have shrivelled in recent years as Microsoft established a list of global accounts it sells to directly.
In other news, Christmas polling still low amongst turkeys.
El Reg hasn't accidentally fallen for the tweet old content as if it were new trick has it?
To be fair they did churn the press release when it was fresh too.
Assuming you're referring to Abu Hamza al-Masri...
I think the PP is conflating his Abu Qatada al-Filistinis (bff of UK home secretaries and acquitted by Jordanian courts) with his Abu Hamza al-Masris (he of the prosthetic hook hands)
You do realize that if they have enough expenses to actually write off 100% of their earnings they aren't making any money, right?
That depends on the extent to which expenditure which the conslutant would have made anyway in a personal capacity can be re-categorised as an allowable expense. Personally I am just as much of a tight-arse with the company's money as with my own
Whilst I agree with your point for the most part there is some intersection between the set of people likely to comply with registration and the set of idiots likely to fly in restricted airspace or otherwise recklessly so the terrorists won't register argument is not fatal to the general principle of attempting to regulate drone use
Indeed. I had a gig at a company with lots of uk call centres recently. Some sites where quite pleasant with "wind down" leisure facilities and others were like a custody suite because the staff would vandalise anything that wasn't hardened. Treat your staff like arseholes and they'll rise to the challenge
It should have been the default setting!
Strava doesn't know your address by default. Would it be better for them to gather further data for them to lose. In any case, who is to say where you want or need a privacy zone? I need several that aren't at my house. As has been noted, you do get prompted to set up a zone and you have to enable ride sharing
I have a lock on my front door but that doesn't make it a good idea to publish an inventory of my house contents.
I think the OP's point was that neither would it be a good idea to pass such an inventory to a third party and ask them not to tell anyone what was in it
Let's hope that come the last day for digital 'returns', that HRMC has enough bandwidth / processing power to cope with the traditional surge
I started off hoping they don't spend the next 15 years spunking 100 times any projected savings on systems that never come close to being fit for use and end up costing another 50% more to walk away from at the termination of the contract but then I thought that was unrealistic so now I am just hoping that I get a piece of that pie myself.