price banding
Why not just price band by time if territoriality becomes unavailable. License your content for much $$ so rich western europeans can buy it and then price drop later so that poorer europeans can get on board when their means allow
1529 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jan 2013
why does the government get to pick and chose which lifestyle choices get rewarded or punished?
because the super-abundance thing still hasn't worked out and so life is a series of resource management choices. Personally I think representative democracy is generally not a bad mechanism for this compared to most others
Next time my kids come to me for arbitration in a fight over the TV remote or some arcane rules dispute in a game they have been playing I am going to suggest trying some of these tactics to them instead of pretending not to hear or just telling them to grow up because I am not interested.
I wasn't sure if you were making a wanking joke or not, maybe because so many of your posts seem to get bogged down with politics. Just on case you didn't know, Fnaar is a Viz reference (whose appeal is mostly about puerile swearing and knob or fart jokes - hence the popularity on el reg)
I've never had a FB account and if asked I reply that its because I'm not a teenage girl
Shirely facebook is for teenage girls' mums or perhaps grandparents these days? People under thirty only have accounts for their parents/grandparents to follow a sanitised version of their online personas. DKUPATB
All of those things are things that (some) drivers already do on a daily basis. They all sound like things that could, at least sometimes, be trivially detectable by sensors and, at least sometimes, hard to detect with human senses. My kids regularly tread mud or dog shit round the house. I'm struggling to see your point beyond automated cars will get different things wrong compared to humans. Granted, there are issues of public acceptance and confidence to be considered but I am failing to see a fundamental problem
it was the disparity of perceived volume between shows and adverts which was the problem back then
Perhaps Dabbs was too middle class to watch much ITV. I know I was so mine and my wife's childhood cultural references are a bit out of sync.
And not getting up to push a button on the TV to change channel was something I believe most appreciated
No younger siblings? In an emergency just sit within arm's reach of the telly
I used to get regular fax calls to my voice line and eventually I connected a modem up to it in order the receive the fax. It was from a museum in Nicosia addressed to the British Museum with a single digit error in the number. I replied with the correct number. Nicosia kept re-sending the fax so I forwarded it to the BM. Nicosia contined to periodically fax my line and never acknowledge my responses
Not that I once realised I'd left my wallet on the counter once I'd driven 100 miles
Well better that than getting to 100 miles before realising that you have left the removable steering wheel behind.
Incidentally, does this mean that if I use this technique to steal a VW I would be able to to join the class action suit for the emissions fiddling?
There is of course. What I was getting at in a very bad way was imposing what you believe to be right is wrong. Vegetarians/Vegans/Fruitarians make the decision, daily, to avoid animal products. They're entitled to if that's what they believe. My problem is that those who decide their child should be brought up the same way aren't doing their child any favours. I don't see a problem in a Vegetarian or Vegan providing their child with a balanced diet consisting of meat as well as vegetables and at an age that is appropriate where they can understand what is being said, you can then tell them where the carrots come from and where the lamb shank came from.
I think you are making a category error. Your argument depends on their being a set of default, non-ideological set of lifestyle choices that should be applied to all children until they are mature enough to choose an ideology of their own. I don't think that such a set exists
I'd say that's not quite as bad. It's negligence rather than imposing poor health through ideology.
Actively trying to give your child an inadequate diet is more serious.
I suspect that the straw parents you complain about would be more likely to be trying to do the opposite. I am not sure that to fail in that goal (of providing a diet that is both vegan and adequately balanced for a child) is morally worse than a failure either to realise that a junk food diet can be harmful or simply not to act on that realisation.
At no point did the article say that the proposals would jail anyone feeding their kids on a veggie/vegan diet (actually it didnt say anything about that in detail, but I would assume only enacted when a child is hospitalised and the cause found to be related to poor diet).
It is hard to tell from a google translate reading of the linked article, leaving aside whether the article accurately represents the proposed bill or not but the article suggests a greater penalty if the child's diet results in illness or injury which suggests that it seeks to proscribe certain diets. What is less clear from the article is how a "diet lacking in essential elements for growth" is defined and whether the bill includes vegan diets by definition or not. Since one might expect that failing to adequately feed a child would be covered already by safeguarding regulations one might assume that this bill is either trying to proscribe something more specific or create a more narrowly defined offence to make prosecution easier. It sounds as though the proposer has a bee in her bonnet over veg/vegan diets and may be somewhat of a populist so I would be inclined to be suspicious until some evidence os offered that the bill is not motivated by unnecessary or malicious interference. I am assuming here that basic safeguarding is already adequately covered.
Yes, the vote was most likely the result of an underlying disatisfaction with current politics more than anything else.
Was Brexit a bad outcome - probably, yes. But it has highlighted the real problem with this country. Class bigotry. And not necessarily from the 'working class' either.
That seems very consistent with a PM feature 'Brexit Street' consisting of extended interviews with people from Sunderland. Last nights hairdresser seemed to have been largely motivated by the (justified) feeling that her region has been ignored for years by the political elites and her desire was to send a message by voting against what she perceived as the side supported by those elites. I was struck by the irony of handing back more control to Westminster (hardly likely to result in more attention/resources for the North East based on past performance).
I agree that the brands article was probably more about confirmation bias meets self-promotion and I share your worries about societal polarisation.
The suspect confessed to a violation of parole. That's what the evidence is. If they want to retract the confession, they will probably have to show some reason for it
Confessions are like eye-witness reports. They sound like they ought to be good evidence but they are not.
As an aside, it's often pretty easy for me to tell if someone is being deceptive. When your safety depends on reading people's intentions it's instinctive, and I'd imagine most LEOs have something similar.
Hmmn, LEOs who trust their 'instinctive' insights. We all have them, but the wisest of us know that they should always be critically challenged even if they are a useful heuristic in a time critical situation
Would it have broken if MS hadn't decided to offer a free upgrade?
No, but if the upgrade had been paid then you could offset that mentally against the cost of a new PC with Win 10 included (I am aware that that cost would already include a Win 10 license component although the OEM license would presumably be cheaper than the retail upgrade)
I don't get the whole Pokemon thing. I've going on smartphone assisted hikes with the kids from a couple of years now. Geocaching, for which I happily pay (10 euro every three months or something). Except for the AR, how is Pokemon GO different ?
It isn't. I don't get how you could get one and not the other. Each to their own. I enjoy plenty of dull and pointless activities.
I wonder why the down-vote. I also had this is mind as a text-book example of demonstrable discrimination in selection processes. Whether it is, or is characterised as institutional, subconscious or just covert doesn't really matter. It serves as a good case study that suggests that if your selection demographics are skewed then it is worth critically examining why that is, whether you believe in good faith that they are fair or not.
When the do you want to upgrade to Windows 10 F35 pop-up appeared, did the MOD click on Ok or did they click on the red X assuming that that would cancel the upgrade. If the latter then they ought to be able to sue to recover 10k of the costs at least?
As an industrial/employment support subsidy, how does it stack up against giving Tata all the £50 notes they need to burn to power their blast furnaces as a means of defraying their energy costs if they keep Port Talbot open?
Especially for those who may purchase 'personal' accessories on Amazon, can you imagine the targeted ads for the new 12" Arsenator strap on cock popping up when you're at the vicars for afternoon tea?
Well I simply use a separate Amazon account for my more intimate purchases. Doesn't everyone? Plus, the vicar would be disappointed if my new 12" Arsenator strap on cock didn't pop up at tea time.
My face when it does --->