Re: Re downvote
...however now can you explain who is going to pay for this treatment that you would freely give to people that have broken the law by moving into a country they are not entitled to live even though there is due process for people to claim asylum where it is genuinely needed and said people are not just moving due to economic reasons?
The cost is socialised through taxation silly, just as it is for you and me or anyone else without reference to any moral judgments you or I might make about them. Some of that tax income is generated by economic activity of illegal immigrants. Given that younger working age adults are over-represented amongst illegal immigrants (high economic activity/low health care costs) I wouldn;t be surprised if there wasn't a surplus.
I also ask where should you draw the line because if you don't then you end up with a third world country because you can't afford to sustain yourselves.
Probably at some point before we become what I guess you mean when you say 'third world country'. I think we are a long way from being a country that isn't lucky enough to be able to afford to provide universal healthcare
Legal immigration for people that want to integrate and become part of our society is absolutely fine but people that try to game the system and take what they want for free are not.
I don't think anyone here has argued against immigration controls or enforcement, just against mixing it up with healthcare provision. Knowing a little of how the home office administers asylum claims in practice, not to mention their general reputation for competence in any area, my default position would be to side with almost any immigrant or asylum seeker until given a reason not to.
There is a certain logical consistency in your position if we assume a certain level of justice and efficiency in the causes, processes and history of migration or we simply ignore it and consider a narrow legal question without any context but but I am not sure that the first can be justified and in the second case a simple counter argument of confidentiality and data protection can be mounted.
TL/DR I think we should provide free-at-the-point-of-delivery universal healthcare because we can