Re: London time??
"Remove London from the UK, remove that particular problem."
But who will pay for your benefits then?
3511 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jan 2013
"If all they needed was NAS why were they running a Windows server OS anyway?"
For starters lots of features not available on many other NAS solutions - like SMB 3, compression, dedupe, encryption, tiering, replication, DLP categorisation and selective rights management, active active clustering, etc, etc, etc...
"and now Windows server for free"
Errm no. They are giving customers a small amount of benefit back from the stupendously large extended support fees being charged for Server 2003.
Nothing is being given away for free here.
Microsoft are still charging vastly more than the value of any discounts in support fees if you keep Server 2003 after EOL.
"If Microsoft, or indeed anyone else, could tell me what the appropriate replacement for 'Gateway for NFS' is, I'd be grateful."
The replacement is to migrate your legacy file systems to a Windows Server (or NAS) which can then provide both NFS and SMB sharing capabilities.
Or you can install Services for Network File System (NFS) on the Windows clients and access your old systems that way.
"UK public sector clients that refuse to migrate are seeing on-premise desktop software prices soar"
I am seeing my clients / peers licensing via the cloud model to get the lowest cost, but sometimes then just using the desktop software entitlement that is included and not always migrating to the included cloud services.
To be clear, this specific price rise is because the UK public sector have chosen not to negotiate a replacement for an expiring discount scheme - "PSA" - and have replaced it with a cloud focused agreement - "CTA" , not due to any across the board price rises that would effect everyone as the article title might imply...The UK government have chosen to push in this direction - not just Microsoft!
"True, but at least Linux will run on open architectures like OpenRISC, a platform that Windows will probably never colonise."
Only because there is no demand for it. OpenRISC doesn't really protect you from anything as there are so many other hardware and software dependencies involved.
Windows already supports Arm, IA-32 and x64 which are by far the largest current market segments. And Windows has previously supported Alpha, MIPS, Itanium and PowerPC, so additional processor support is not a problem if there was a need for it...
"There's also a corresponding preview of System Center 2016 that includes – of all things – better management of Linux and LAMP software stacks, including Desired State Configuration (DSC) support and native SSH support."
"Of all things"?! People do still have legacy *nix stacks to manage you know....
"So you're happy if Microsoft fucks me over, as long as it makes life easy for you?"
I imagine that the popular vote from Joe Public would overwhelmingly endorse that view, yes.
What we also need to remember here is that Microsoft supposedly are not releasing any more Windows versions - and that updates will be on-going and incremental. Therefore if lots of people disable them, it might leave Microsoft with a fragmented user base and lots of compatibility issues.
If you are technically competent enough to be managing updates yourself on a consumer version of Windows 10 then it's not exactly much of a challenge to disable the relevant service. Anyone who can't manage that likely shouldn't be disabling them imo.
Yes there is a risk that Microsoft will bork something with an update, but System Recovery is pretty good these days and it's a task of minutes to roll your PC back if you ever needed to.
"Of course Windows users are over represented and Linux is under represented."
Any evidence of that? I would have though lots more Windows users would be running advert and script blockers due to the much larger number of advert nasties and browser toolbars targeted at the more prevalent platform...
"Can anyone tell me when the Internet went from an interesting source of information and asynchronous communication to a reliable data link with a 24/7 SLA with all the parties between your company and Redmond?"
It didn't - but then you don't have to go via the Internet to reach Microsoft: http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/expressroute/
And anyway, Exchange 2016 is usually an on premise solution. Are you thinking of Office 365?
"Because Gnu/Linux is a lot better operating system than Windows"
Not when it comes to having optimal performance graphics drivers apparently. Direct-X 12 has widened the gap recently as well. So if you want the optimal high end gaming platform, Windows 10 is the only option - for now at least.
"Linux is like a good scalpel"
Like a good scalpel that can only be used via a robot that only accepts instructions via complex and obscure text files...
"ODF was invented in Libre/Openoffice"
Nope, OpenDocument is not the same as the older OpenOffice.org XML format and these formats are not directly compatible. ODF was actually developed by OASIS.
"It's MS'es implementation of it which is flakey."
Nope - MS have by far the best ODF implementation that is currently available - and it fully support the latest ODF version - even in Office 365. If you look through LO support forums and bug trackers you will see that there are loads of issues with it's implementation of ODF. For instance crashes saving a file that can be opened / saved in other Office packages.
Just a few examples:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1292360
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1412448
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1072033
Also there are vast numbers of bugs when handling MS Office formats - that most businesses rely on.
"But for 99% of users it is perfectly adequate"
In any sort of normal work environment, I think you mean more like for 9.9% of users it is perfectly adequate.....
For starters there is no VBA support, very flaky ODF support, loads more bugs, it is much slower, and is missing lots of features and integration options compared to MS Office.
"the US has two separate opportunities to get a copy of ever incoming and outgoing email."
It's at least 3 goes. Don't forget we also give them a direct slurp feed of all our telecoms and satellite links.
Probably our secret services want them to have a copy anyway so that they can "keep an eye" on things by proxy without breaking any British laws...Much like the Americans do with their citizens via GCHQ.
"Gun restrictions are enacted by States, not by "America"."
Clearly that's part of your gun problem then. You won't ever get rid of them and return to a civilised situation without proper universal control of guns.
See http://www.humanosphere.org/science/2014/03/visualizing-gun-deaths-comparing-the-u-s-to-rest-of-the-world/ for some illustrations of just how far behind the rest of the civilised world the USA is.
Here in the UK you can have guns, but they have to be licenced, registered and stored in a locked steel cabinet when not in use, and the Police visit and check all registered guns are all accounted for and securely stored at least once a year...
"Photographing someone on their private property, from within the property boundaries and without permission"
The drone was apparently ~ 30m above the property, so not on the property, or within any conventional boundaries, so unless it was restricted airspace presumably it was perfectly legal.
"The main difference is that a clay is quite unlikely to suddenly change speed, direction or altitude"
Clays are very fast moving though. The average drone isn't usually too fast or random in it's flight (unless maybe the owner was expecting incoming fire!)....drones also often hover - making them even easier than a clay - particularly when the camera is in use....
"it's one heck of a shot to knock down something from that distance with a single shell of No. 8 bird shot."
It really wouldn't. Normal range of a shotgun is about 40M for practical uses like killing things. At 80M the spread of shot would be pretty wide, so accuracy is not such an issue, but it would still be quite capable of causing damage. It probably only needs a single pellet to hit to take out a relatively fragile drone...
"You don't even need to do that much. The old .se domain redirects automatically to one of the new ones anyway."
But several UK ISPs do block the HTTP address. For instance if you try on Virgin Media without an SSL connection you will get a blocked page....
You will note that that even if a redirect does work, it will usually switch you to an HTTPS connection for this reason.
"everyone ends up rebuilding their Windows machine because it has become really slow and annoying."
No need to do that anymore. If your Windows 8 or 10 OS gets slowed down by cruftware, you can just 'refresh' the install to clear all the crap without a full reinstall:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-GB/windows-8/restore-refresh-reset-pc
"Why not just import the XBox One libraries into Windows 10 so you can run the games natively on you PC"
Mostly to prevent piracy I expect, but also there is quite a lot of custom on chip hardware in the Xbox One so it might not be that easy.
"Where is it stated that the BitLocker recovery key is stored online ?"
See http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows-8/bitlocker-recovery-keys-faq
For non domain joined PCs using a Microsoft account, the BitLocker recovery key is stored online in OneDrive, which for most users is likely a good thing as encryption is now enabled by default.
"if somehow those keys were hacked and extracted - seems to be a high security risk."
Well they would also need physical access to your device to use them. And as a non Domain joined user then probably you wouldn't have required a PIN or enabled 2 factor authentication - so if they have your Microsoft account, they could login to your device anyway...
However if you have something that you really want to protect from the NSA, law enforcement, foreign governments, etc, then the keys can easily be viewed and deleted here:
https://onedrive.live.com/recoverykey
"Does everyone get an online account automatically with Windows 10 ?."
Nope - you can choose to use a local account or a domain account only if you want to.
"“I eat, breathe and sleep in what some would call old-school, on-premise domains."
All this works with both on premise and Azure AD just fine.
" Every time I go near something new from Microsoft now, its three, four or more stupid logins, with access credential demands and licence-trudging misery"
Not here - single sign-on works just fine and licensing is a simple yearly true up, and is never a front end user issue. Sounds like you need to get someone competent in Office 365 / AD involved?
"I'm staying with Windows 7 for the foreseeable future, and at least until MS comes back to its senses and allows us as users/power users/admins control of exactly what updates get onto a PC"
I think you are misinformed here - admins still have full control of this - assuming you are using the enterprise edition of Windows 10 - as you should be in any sort of business function. Users should never have control of this is a business imo (other than deferring reboots to a convenient time).
Apparently you need to have BT Internet service to take their TV! That's a show stopper for me.
The regulator should force Virgin, BT and Sky to unbundle their packages. For instance I'm forced to have a Virgin phone line (that really is virgin as it hasn't ever had a phone plugged into it!) because my TV would be more expensive without it - even if I don't use it!
Streaming games from Xbox One to PC works just fine at 1080p / 60fps too. Lag really isn't noticeable on a wired network at least. The Xbox One has full on chip hardware video encoders (unlike the PS4), so there is a minimal CPU / GFX / latency impact for streaming.
As the Xbox One is 4K capable in hardware, and as Microsoft are now apparently working on streaming from PC to Xbox One, hopefully greater than 1080p resolutions will be supported!