Re: The cloud strikes again
"Number 6 is pushing it."
Quite. Office 365 is much better...
3511 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jan 2013
"Why the F*CK doesn't Windows support open file systems like ZFS, EXT, etc!?"
Because it doesn't need to and there is no requirement to as near zero removable devices are formatted in those file systems? The normal Windows options of FAT, FAT32, exFAT, UDF, NTFS and REFS are enough for most of us...
"But it's OK. You can just proxy everything to get around that. As long as your protocol is supported by the proxy...."
But you don't need to proxy it. You can just route it with IPv6... IPv6 was built to reinstate end-to-end connectivity on the Internet and all connected networks.
""Can someone remind us again why the Internet Engineering Task Force decided not to make this next-gen networking protocol backward-compatible?""
Presumably because that would have been massively restrictive, and have meant lots of legacy baggage?
The move to IPv6 might be very slow, but it is starting to happen - and will likely accelerate with the widespread use of IoT - and the exhaustion of IPv4 addresses. Companies like Colt had an IPv6 backbone network several years ago...
IPv6 is at least partly backwards compatible in terms of you can easily gateway most IP traffic from one format to the other.
"The horrible irony of Microsoft waiting on its own team to fix a networking bug aside"
But this is how it should happen!
Microsoft should use and "dogfood" test all these features - and take the pain of working out any bugs before expecting the rest of us to do it....
"If you define "works" as doing what an Office package should do for about 95% of users, LibreOffice can comfortably claim that"
Working 95% of the time isn't good enough for most businesses. Hence presumably why adoption of Libre Office is still close to zero....
"Oh, and it works on a proper, official, arrived-at-through-real-consensus Open Standard rather than a bribed one that the company itself has trouble supporting"
Microsoft Office works far better than Libre Office in regards to ODF support. The Libre Office forums are full of issues with it's standards support...
"Bonus benefit: our staff can use it at home just as well - no license risks "
But many of your staff will already have MS Office or Office 365, so it then sucks when their files don't work properly, and features they used at home are not supported in the office.....
"Thats why I used the words 'had' and 'lessons of history'. Clearly you have zero knowledge of previous SQL versions."
This has been the case since at least SQL Server 2000. Back in those days, lots of things had blank or standard password by default, so hardly a lesson specific to SQL Server....
"Where the 'sa' god-mode account had a default blank password on install."
The sa account is disabled by the default install settings though. And when you enable it, by default your password policy is enforced which means that you can't set a blank password without deliberately overriding that.
(Using the current versions of Windows Server + SQL Server has given the lowest total CVE vulnerabilities of OS + Database software of any major competitor for every one of the last 10 years!)
"Those same metrics put the NHS just above the US."
Nope, the UK ranks first overall in most aspects - at less than half the cost per person. See http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2014/jun/mirror-mirror
"There are also more than 11 industrialized countries."
"the 11 nations studied in this report—Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States"
"Despite having the most expensive health care system in the world, the U.S. ranks last overall among 11 industrialized countries on measures of health system quality, efficiency, access to care, equity, and healthy lives" !
About time the colonies got proper socialist health care system like every other industrialised nation already has....
"we still have the same number of uninsured as before"
Nope:
Around 17 million people have gained health insurance since the core of ObamaCare took effect in 2013, according to a RAND Corp. study released Wednesday.
The study finds that 22.8 million people signed up for coverage between September 2013 and February 2015, while 5.9 million lost coverage, leading to a net gain of 16.9 million.
"Isn't that Windows Cloud limited by the scalability of Windows Server?"
That's a pretty high limit. See https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server-docs/compute/hyper-v/plan/plan-for-hyper-v-scalability-in-windows-server-2016
"Or is Microsoft secretly running Linux on their Cloud
They certainly run Linux on their cloud (~30% of VMs). If you mean does their cloud run on Linux then that likely would limit scalability. There are plenty of benchmarks that show that Hyper-V outperforms say KVM.
"with their Linux switches"
The SAI API is, in principle, cross-platform, defined for both Windows and Linux, but much of the vendor switch hardware is supported best, or even exclusively, in Linux. Hence why Microsoft used Linux for network hardware.
"Any business relying on cloud services for data storage needs to have the management fired along with the tech guys"
Anyone with such outdated views would be lucky to get a job these days.
Public cloud is by far the cheapest and simplest way for most companies to get multi regional data fault tolerance. If your data access is highly critical and you don't trust one vendor, you can always choose to use 2 or more providers...
"Not always - not everybody can have the resources for RAID5/50/6/60"
If you can't afford 1 or 2 extra disks, then your problem is probably resources / budget not strategy.
"And there are other storage technologies that can be used in lieu of RAID5/50/6/60."
Not that are more efficient with the same level of protection. Generally the alternative is multiple copies of the data.
"I have the feeling that LTO will be making a comeback."
Cloud based solutions like StorSimple are more likely the future imo...
"You clearly don't operate large (as in undred of TB large) data sites."
No, I work on a site with 1000s of TB (PBs)...
"Those figures are highly optimistic at best"
The fact is that overall SATA drives are FAR less reliable than most other drive types. Your personal experience does not reflect numerous studies that back this up.
"Something else will invariably bite you on the arse (MSA1000 array controllers, as a for instance)"
I use more things like EMC VMAX and HP 3PAR that are fault tolerant throughout. We would not use such a crap single point of failure device.
"This has NOTHING whatsoever to do with BER"
It has everything to do with the actual BER. For instance "We find, for example, that after their first scan error, drives are 39 times more likely to fail within 60 days than drives with no such errors." https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/disk_failures.pdf
"Once you get into the 6+TB array range there's around a 2-5% chance of _catastrophic_ failure(*) during the rebuild cycle when a drive dies"
Utter dross - completely invented numbers. I have hundreds of disks running in much large RAID 6 sets with zero hard failures ever and plenty of replaced disks over time... the chances of loosing another 2 disks during rebuild are pretty small - I gave an actual calculation above...
". In the 7 years operating these arrays we had 2 total loss events "
These are crappy low end and not fully fault tolerant arrays. Not an enterprise grade solution.
"We also had ~35 drive losses caused by the controller losing contact with the drive"
Quite. Your issues are not due to normal drive failures under RAID 6.
"If you have any evidence that non-Jews can be recruited into becoming Ashkenazy, Sephardi or Levite, please present it"
That's rather like asking for evidence of how non Christians can become English, Scottish or Welsh Christians. Converts to Judaism are widely accepted... see for instance http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/judaism/beliefs/conversion.shtml
"But you cannot just walk into the Jewish religion"
But it's still just a religion and not a race. Exclusivity does not equal ethnicity...
"It's both a religion and an ethnic identity"
You could often say that about Islam and Christianity too.
"Anti-semitic means anti-Jewish and anti-Arab. "
Technically yes, and indeed according to studies, Palestinians are apparently more Semitic than Israeli Jews - who are commonly European in genetic heritage.
However - in practice I have only ever seen it used to mean anti Jewish. As was the case in this bot instance. And as per the above, Jews are a religion not a race, so it wasn't racism. Just like say insulting Islam or Christianity wouldn't be racism.