Re: Offence
"now where can I vent my spleen?"
I'm sure Greggs can find some pastry and shelf space...
3511 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jan 2013
"Skype cannot decrypt those"
For Skype user to Skype user they might be able to get away with that. But when they pass a call to the PSTN they would have to intercept it... Skype's model currently terminates encryption at the servers though, which is fine for most of us, but terrorists, etc would be after end-to-end encryption which would require a different design.
Currently that's not an issue for most corporates because Skype for business terminates the secure connections from outside clients within their network and under their control. However, if they move to the Office 365 hosted Skype model then it becomes something to consider as it might be possible for say the NSA given sufficient resourcing to tap such calls / messages...
" and nor (even with GCHQ's supercomputers applied to the problem) could the authorities."
Bearing in mind the holes (some deliberate) we have now found in previously considered secure encryption and hashing algorithms I would not want to bet on that...
"An impediment has been put in place against specific individuals from reading statements made by @realDonaldTrump feed"
Nope - nothing to stop anyone reading them. All this means is that you don't get automatically notified of them and that's not the same thing at all.
>RCL MD David Levy told us: “We are not interested in commenting to The Register due to its repeatedly biased reporting.”
Uhm, but doesn't the opportunity to comment give you a chance to tell another side of the story if there has been any error / inaccuracy ? I can only assume that there isn't one and everything is 100% accurate and true....
"As demonstrated by the man from across the street, who grabbed his ASSAULT RIFLE and put it to good use, no doubt saving lives in the process."
No, the massacre was over by then - the guy was trying to escape - and killed himself anyway so it saved no one. It just created a cross fire that could easily have hit a bystander. The primary thing that would likely have prevented this would have been less easy access to firearms.
nb - at least 2 US based studies have also shown that having a firearm in your household INCREASES the risk of death by firearms to everyone in it!
"The legislation will require ISPs to block websites that offer VPNs and similar proxy services that are used by millions of Russians to circumvent state-imposed internet censorship."
I note that NordVPN already added an "obfuscated server" mode under advanced settings to defeat this and i expect others will follow. Cue a large game of Whack-a-Mole. And I dont remember any government ever wining one of those.
"that is what they would like but ultimately someone has to repair and innovate."
But that becomes largely a highly skilled job for AI and robotics, not a working class role..
"If you buy in tools and neglect your own people"
There will just be fewer people required that will in general be highly skilled and relatively well paid. Companies mostly wont give a crap about the proles.
The real question is - what will happen to those that are not that smart and / or don't have a trade / education? Whilst there will always be some working class jobs, I think jobs for that sector will gradually become in short supply. For instance we could already pretty much replace train drivers. (And that cant come soon enough imo - £60K for pushing a button and they still strike all the time?!)
"Robots cost serious money compared to increased computing power for brainiac work."
Not necessarily. An automatic vacuum cleaner for instance costs a couple of hundred quid.
"The low hanging fruit is in white collar stuff -"
Disagree. The lower hanging fruit is lots of types of manual labour that can be automated. Johnny Cabs are coming soon!
"And arguably, all of Google's revenues are Cloud"
Good luck with that argument. The vast majority of Googles revenue is from advertising. They are so far behind Amazon and Azure in cloud computing they need binoculars to see them.....
"You must be fun at parties."
Someone as rude as you wont even get an invite. Resorting to insults generally means you know you already lost the argument.
"You’ve still not proven that what I said is wrong."
It was clearly misleading posting a fact pertaining only to Kinect V1 on an article that was about Kinect V2 and required a clarification. If you cant accept that then the problem lies only with you.
"It sounds, from what they are saying, the whole set up was rigged against them."
No the playing field was even. There was nothing to stop VIASAT doing the same. Inmarsat took a calculated risk that a more practical and flexible solution would eventually be permitted.
"If your cloud customer has taken an interest in what silicon you're running, they are doing it wrong."
Only if you have a very limited and small scale understanding of cloud. The performance of a vcore can vary significantly between CPUs and the maximum scalability of an instance varies too. And it also impacts available IOPs on clouds like Azure and AWS as max number of disks is related to #CPU cores.
Someone with an enterprise understanding of cloud will look at both the type of underlying hardware and the #vcpus per VM to optimise cost versus performance....
"But if you worry about this level of infiltration, then you can't possibly be running any standard OS with standard connectivity!"
Given the amount of effort needed to code and execute such an attack, they are probably primarily going to be developed by government agencies. However recent history shows that eventually either such attacks are discovered in the wild or the exploit installers leak. And therefore it's quite possible that one day these attacks will be used by something zero day in the wild. So no harm in being paranoid and patching whenever there is a fix. Baring in mind the potential insidious nature of such malware once installed, prevention where it exists is probably easier than a cure.