Re: Incognito mode isn't incognito
Tinge of irony that you post this whilst AC :)
881 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jan 2013
Bare in mind the ICO never got near it's maximum fine and continues to low ball even when hundreds of millions of citizens details have been leaked. Do we need to find life on other planets before they start handing out the maximum or does it need to be every single living individual?
There should be a bar where above that you're going to be hammered with a fine which will incense shareholders, that's the only way to impact these global businesses.
I pay £20/month for unlimited data on my phone, I tether it to my PC at home in order to download large files.. it's 5 times faster than my FTTC home broadband.
Latency is an issue with mobile, but pure download/upload (which is 3x faster) it's crazy how poor the old copper is.
Agreed, I genuinely don't think I've ever seen anyone in IT not change a default password. It's almost like a rite of passage when a device comes in to make it "ours". Same at home.
If it's sitting on default, I don't trust it and even when it's not, I still think it's an IoT piece of junk usually.
Don't know if I can bash them for Windows CE, if nothing else at least they gave it a shot.
We love bashing MS on here but truth is them entering a market has pushed that market to up it's game and yes MS then crash and burn - but without it the market would have become complacent.
Great in theory but complete nonsense when you try to implement it.
For all we know the local IT folks were all screaming for more resources, had a risk register stating how open they were to ransomware attacks and yet were never given resources to tackle it. Chances are we are talking the basics of IT, backup tapes etc. However what about staff and training?
I'm not looking to make excuses for them but having worked in some pretty ****** places in the past I wouldn't be surprised if this shower of idiots hadn't outsourced key parts creating gaps and then handed management of it to a non-IT literate manager with zero experience in running IT services and business continuity.
They don't care. The fact his views on abortion are utterly irrelevant to the conference make no difference either, it's a case of people might get upset. De-platforming has been proven time and again not to work but some can't get their head around it. All it does is make him look like the target of the deranged and irrational, rather than anything to do with his views.
They'd have been better getting him on and IF he said anything about it whilst there turning up the heat to 11 on him in public. I doubt very much he would have said a thing though, it's a singular issue.
Start out at the maximum and reduce it based on what they have done since the breach, how open they have been with those affected and investigating, any controls which were in place prior (and working) and then balance that against what they failed to do e.g. ineffective controls.
Currently breaches as with data protection fines of old sit into categories of "low, medium, high, holy**** and finally the big *we're moving to GDPR so we can finally hit them with max* "
No, they didn't learn lessons in the past as Ransomware has been around for years and business "leaders" need to sort their shit out.
I'm sick if hearing lessons learnt etc when clearly they aren't looking at mistakes others have been making for ages. I know one person businesses with better backup plans than many large companies because the person in charge is actually giving a shit.
Honestly I've little sympathy for him despite respecting his initial intentions.
He ran from the law, having knowingly broken it. He expects to be treated differently from the rest of us when he shouldn't be.
I personally hope they don't extradite him if he still holds UK citizenship, let him be tried and imprisoned here. Otherwise off he goes to the USA, Australia or Sweden, whoever wants to have him just like any other citizen.
He probably regrets not being imprisoned earlier when Obama would likely have found a reason to pardon him, which may well happen post Trump anyway. However the bottom line is that he likely has broken the law and like the rest of us if convicted should face consequences.
I'd honestly argue that having a diverse group on the council is better than having one chosen from the various Google staffer safe spaces where it will predominantly be left-leaning.
They need to get a range of people on there if it's to be useful, which I doubt it will be anyway. However there is a slim chance that it'll be more than a rubber stamping system for Google's random unethical AI plans.
Are we even comparing like for like here job wise or is it all consolidated stats to bloat the final figure?
In my department there are 2 men and 5 women. We all do different jobs so it would seem rather daft to compare salaries (which by the way would show the opposite of this survey).