Re: As long as they're still using Lucas...
Land Rover: Inventors of the self-releasing seatbelt.
That's not a bug but a feature. If your seat belt suddenly unbuckles maybe the driver will drive more carefully?
12882 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
I suspect the real problem is with the manufacturers own systems not being able to easily handle this natural transfer of ownership.
Some of this could be simply rectified by the manufacturer just needing to change the "owner" on the data file and lock out previous data when that changes. With the dealer "lockin" that gives the dealer the ability to pressure sell new vehicles and at this point, who's paying the dealer to this "data transfer" work? From the tone of the article, not only is this process rather undefined by the manufacturer but there's no incentive (legal or otherwise) for them to do something that costs bit of money.
Nope, not ready for prime time and yet they're trying sell those junk. Given some of the police actions of late, I'm not sure how many false positives will die but it could be enough to raise a public outcry and that's too late for any innocent who's dead or injured.
Put it back in the shed, Amazon and let the folks there tinker under the hood some more. Profit can wait until you get it right. And by "right".. that equals 100%.
Disclaimer: It should be banished, buried, and burned. Facial recognition can't possibly come to a good end.
OR less effective because enclosed areas like caves offer natural choke points where such things can easily be assessed and dealt with.
I wouldn't use explosives in a cave. The blast takes the path of least resistance and may just go back to you. Even "normal" firearms are risky when things start ricocheting and kicking rock splinters about.
First a disclaimer/background. I'm a former US Marine who put time in Vietnam. Read into that what you may but this is from my perspective.
Maybe instead of blaming the AI, blame the "fog of war"? Crap happens. People die because of being in the wrong place at the wrong time, It goes back to beginning of human civilization and warfare. Yes, war is hard on civilians. Always has been, always will be. The tactics used by Al-Qaeda are no different than that of the honored Resistance and others: Hide in civilian populations and damage the other side as best you can.
We look back at wars since wars started and civilians have always suffered the most. Ancient times, whole cities were slaughtered and destroyed. Move forward to WWII.. carpet bombing of cities with incendiary bombs, etc. The atom bomb drops. Come forward some more and we have My Lai. Currently, we have terrorists, etc. still targeting civilians.
Does this justify civilian deaths by either side? No it does not. One would think that AI does have the potential (once it's truly AI and not the current BS) of the AI giving choices and then a human selecting the targets that things might get more finely grained. Having said that.. we still have the a-bombs targeting cities.
As has been said, "War is hell". What's needed is either we as humans mature and find a way not to need war, or at the minimum, not take out civilians. I don't see the first being accomplished in our live times but maybe the second... maybe.
I do wonder about the begging bowl. There's just way to many "what if", "maybe", "possibly" in all this. Someone wants to play "woulda', shoulda', coulda' " under the guise of research and probable while getting paid for it.
This not to criticize thinking, dreaming, or speculation. There's just too many unknowns that would need to come together at the right time and in the right order for this to happen and too many things not there to prevent it from happening.
I was surprised they don't find using actual music score (or similar) works... it's the language of music encoded quite strictly. Training AI on "just the noise" is counterintuitive to me.
Probably because no one thought of that. It should be a easy solution and implantation as opposed to what they're doing now. But... this research and that means grants and degree of difficulty. Someone's just not thinking outside the box.
Things like this seem to be a common mistake. I'm guessing the bosses feel that the computers are locked up, the building is secure, but forget about that cable leaving the building for when they want to log in during off hours. The methods of access may be different due to software but the results are the same.
Admins are human and in the rush (it's always a "rush", right?) they forget the basics or get moved to another project before they finish.
One pro-Brexit British chap I bumped into, in Texas of all places, didn't even know the referendum was non-binding and advisory.
Given all the fire and brimstone surrounding this, any chance that government will just say "nope.. not gonna' do it"? Politicians like to be re-elected and hate admitting they were wrong.
A large part of contingency planning is plan for the unexpected. The planners have to assume X will happen to plan for it. For example, where I am, forest fires and flooding have in depth plans. Can't remember the last time there was a flood but we get forest fires every year. But that 1 in a million chance may come true.
There is some motive (taxes most likely) for Amazon to make it's statements about their planning as seldom does any company publicize their planning for competitive reasons.
The problem with Brexit is that facts and evidence has long since been replaced by blind belief.
The blind belief now appears on both sides of the aisle but each belief opposes the other. As this becomes more ingrained it's possible that something along the line of riots may occur. Especially if the actual Brexit doesn't fit in with the beliefs. There seems to be a slippery slope that's been trod upon here.
Blame Google for devising an OS which makes the user a second-class user unless they "root" their own device.
There's the problem.. users. Users don't understand or care about what OS is installed. They want their shiny phone, apps, and no problems. As for root... I'd wager that outside of tech types, very even have a clue what it is.
Teach the users about their phone and what knowing some tech will do for them and this whole thing may change. Seems that the old saw (paraphrased) about "an informed and educated user is the best user" should apply, but Google doesn't want that just like Apple doesn't.
Quite a few sites are using that scheme of a "unique username" and not email to log in. It should be used by all sites but most sites that I see selling products use the email addy and a password and therein is the problem. It just takes a few popular sites for you to be compromised. Funny thing is, all the sites I visit that don't sell things use the username to log in... except for that one certain tech site that should change the log in from "email" to user name. <twiddles thumbs><whistles>
From where I'm sitting they seem to have been remarkably effective.
Indeed and probably beyond their wildest expectations. Trump, family, and friends were surprised he won the nomination. To say they were floored that he won the Presidency would be an understatement from what I've read in various sources on both sides of political spectrum.
It's not just Huawei.. it's practically all of the printer and router makers for home use fall into this dark hole. Updates are not easy to find if you're Joe Average User and the manufacturer's stop support pretty damn quick. IMO, printers and routers need an automated way of updating much like Windows where it's pushed, notice given, and the consumer can make the choice. Most users I've met haven't a clue about how to update these devices or that updates might actually be available.
Before the white man arrived in Africa and various Pacific island cultures, clothing was pretty much unknown as was sexual attacks (separate those from war conquests). Only after the white man came (read as "missionaries) and insisted on "proper clothing" did sex crimes really start among those populations.
The best way to "protect" children is to expose them to many things at the appropriate times otherwise they end up as "snowflakes" and attempt to eat the forbidden fruit before they're ready to handle it. (Sorry for the mixed metaphor but appropriate methinks).
I'm a tad bit surprised that they haven't drawn certain other religions universities into this pit. Quite a few preach that a woman's body is sinful and should not be seen except by her husband. Punishment is often severe for violators. But then again, not working is other religions because they are "false" is also in the mindset.
I believe the biggest threat comes from corporate interests.
Therein is perhaps part of the puzzle as such. If you're using encryption, the likes of Google can't read your mail and figure out how to target more ads. The individual's safety isn't a concern where corporate profits are involved. There's a long history of this especially in the drug industry and very evident in the Web world.
Sounds like the "wonderful" button some field service guys attached to system power controller many years ago. Customer had complained endlessly about the equipment even though nothing was ever found to be amiss. They installed the "wonderful" button, told him to make things "wonderful" again, rotate it clockwise and never ever counter-clockwise. After that, no more service calls until the power supply finally died.
if you tried to argue it in public against a Jesuit I fear you'd come a very poor second.
Jesuits are one's you'll never win against. Doesn't matter the topic and they don't need in depth knowledge. On the up side, many do know the best local brews.