The DA's statement says more about protecting the image* of lawyers than about the law.
* image -- I guess they have one other than what we mere mortals think or at least think they do.
12884 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
It makes more sense if you replace "security" with "bullshit".
That pretty much sums up every companies' response to any issue. I don't know why they even bother to say it since it automatically sets off the Bullshit Alarm.
Icon: BS klaxon just about worn out from overuse.
Of all the stupid, idiotic products one could come up with. The sad part is that it probably will sell very well. On the upside, Darwin will be happy that his "law" will once more be validated. The sad part is that too many people (mostly parents) will by their sprog one and then launch sueballs if said idiot child gets hit by a car while playing with it.
A pint of piss for the lazy implementers.
It's not lazy, it's about cost and corporate profit. A few cents here, a few cents there, and pretty soon, the shareholder value takes a hit. Public agencies don't answer to corporate bosses but taxpayers and no taxpayer wants taxes raised to "fix" IT stuff since they don't understand it. <sigh> There's the right thing to do and the corporate/public agency thing to do. One would hope that the corporations and public agencies would for once do the right thing.
No just the bad guys and victims, but anyone including CongressCritters, administration officials...might as well get the goods on those who control the purse strings of their budget.
Gotta' love their belief that a backdoor isn't crackable by miscreants. Or maybe the know that and just don't care?
Mostly spot on but there's a problem. Voters of all ages seem to be only able to look at a single issue and sometimes it's not the issues, it's only about the party. All a hopeful candidate has to do is find that "magic" issue and side with the majority and he can shout bollocks about everything else and still get elected. And that "magic" issue doesn't even have to be valid from past elections where one's linage, marital status/fidelity, etc. are concerned. Start a smear campaign and there's no need to even take a stand on any issue. Politics is poop.
Depends on the poet and the genre. In this case it's not classical but more "modern". According to some sites like the one below, there's something like 50-100 types of poetry.
http://www.writersdigest.com/whats-new/list-of-50-poetic-forms-for-poets (Google "poetry types list" )for more lists and confusion.
Microsoft bravely suggests that just as users need different people to service cars or offer financial advice, they could use two different digital assistants to manage work and home, while also needing them to collaborate.
Different people to service a car? Financial advice? Nope... one mechanic for car and one finance type for advice, etc. and I trust both the guys I use one helluva lot more than I'd trust Amazon or MS. So why the hell to would anyone want two invasive pieces of crap in their house and talking to each other unless it's to the financial advantage of the suppling companies.
This case is one of them. Pai took the high road in this, granted. Yet, there's still too many screaming for his head on other matters. But politics makes for strange bedfellows and even stranger decisions at times. I'm not defending the actions that he should be held accountable for but in this case, one has to be fair. The CIO rightly fell on his sword over it.
Pai shouldn't be let off the hook on the other issues and maybe Congress will regain some common sense (if they ever had any) and go for what he's done for his buds at Sinclair and also for big cable with the net neutrality fiasco.
So how many times are we going to see such technical decisions that are made by people who have no idea of what those decisions imply?
They're politicians not techies. Here in the States there's only a couple of legislators who have a grasp of the issue. The rest (not tech knowledgeable types) want votes, not solutions and thus they come up with stupid solutions to complex problems. It's not just tech stuff, but pretty much anything more than a decision on the dinner menu and maybe what wine goes with what dish.
You can't spin bullshit if your audience is 100x more knowledgeable than you.
See above, not for us techies but votes and <cough>campaign contributions<cough>. So far, techies have been ignored or (in the case of Zuck's appearance in Congress) asked about issues that pretty basic or downright wrong. The "baffle them with BS" answers seemed to have satisfied those legislators.
Being a "trade secret" is a lot different than a patent. Trade secrets are generally very closely held by the company whereas a patent is published. For example, the recipe for Coca-Cola isn't patented. If it had been, the recipe would be in the wild and anyone could make the product.
If you need them, you've failed.
Actually, no! My wife bought this model because of the stylus. She has several physical issues that the stylus and the screen size solved. Other than every thing seeming to "update" (looking at your apps Google), she's pretty happy with it.
All very well. The problem is that people who don't know about Islam prefer getting their facts from the UKIP-EDL "scholars" interpretation of it.
Apparently, certain groups (Al Quida comes to mind along with ISIS) seem to interpret things in the Quran:differently. Christians have the same problem with some churches/sects preaching the exact opposite of what the Bible says. So even devoted followers get mislead.
They have their own problems, as Al Gore will attest after losing to George W Bush due to hanging chads.
Actually, no. The old mechanicals that the OP mentions had no paper at all. Some models did have a paper roll inside for a backup tally but they were rare. So no chads, just a very satisfying "clunk - clunk" as you pulled the lever to register your votes.
People in the same room as the incident were wandering around dazed for minutes, like zombies.
I'm surprised that there's no mention of flash burns. They got lucky. I saw an electrician drop a large screwdriver into an power box in factory once. People 10 feet away got flash burns. The electrician didn't die but he was badly burned and off work for year.
Seems that the current military/civilian leadership ( such that it is ) lost sight of the basics in Vietham and haven't regained it. The basic rule is: "take the ground and hold it". If you don't do that, you'll never win a war but just spend money and lives and go home broke and in defeat.
And if this were a Clinton administration, your comment might be relevant. As t is, it's just whataboutism to distract from the issue at hand.
Actually, I find it very relevant. Seems that too many in power seem to believe that they are above everything and everyone else and thus, don't need cybersecurity as no one would dare hack them.
So chances are they got your account number? Then there will the idiots in the crowd who will go on FB to ask the bank a question and give their account number.
I'm assuming of course that FB isn't asking for every customer's details... err... crap... now that think about it, they probably are.