and yet, most of Google’s services profit centers are unavailable in China,"
FTFY. Google has been cut out of a large, untapped market. Profit and income are king so.... following the money leads us to China.
12882 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
Er... Google and Microsoft.. hmm.. one's a money grabbing bastard with some (not many) ethics where profit is king and most products work as intended. the other is just a money grabbing bastard where profit is king and none of their products are presumed to work as intended. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out which is which.
Why weren't they called the moment the owners walked in and saw all the ne're-do-wells?
That would have been my 2nd step after saying something like "oops, wrong address" to whoever opened the door and then turn and go back to the car. Better off to let cops enter just in case the idiots inside are armed, or bombed out of their minds.
Well, the telcos' board needs to feed their families, buy new mansions, new cars, etc., etc. So they justify it and the shill just wants to be part of the gravy train. So basically, unless things change and someone gets some morality <cough> nothing will change. We're not the land of the free but the land of the greed.
Windows users tend to have a very strong case of Stockholm syndrome.
That and Windows has been around and dominant so long that the average person doesn't know any better. Most haven't a clue how fix or even make minor changes to improve things. They don't know about sites like this where prudent people will sit back after an update is released and what breaks or test it themselves. I think the term "Sheeple" is how MS views it's users/customers.
After watching this country as a citizen for most of my life (I'm well past my retirement date) it will probably get worse before it gets better. I would have moved out decades ago but the question of "where" made me realize the whole planet is seriously screwed up.
It's not a question of what they HOLD (though that is affected by GDPR, it's hardly different to what they need to do), it's a question of what they DISTRIBUTE. Which should, quite literally, be... nothing.
The answer is in the article and other articles... lawyers. They want free access. It's particularly the media lawyers for take down notices, fines, and lawsuits. When in doubt, follow the money.
...they deserve to have their heads on pikes at the front gate.
At some point, the enforcers of GDPR should do this as an example to others. At this point, heavy fines are just a threat. The law might have teeth but the implantation doesn't so where's the motivation for companies to comply? Or two heads on pikes would go a long way to getting others into compliance.
Actions have consequences, so suck it up.
Exactly. From the west side of the pond, it appears to be the norm that things are not thought out by those in power. While Brexit may or may not have been a good idea and purely politically motived by those in power, no one thought further than the vote. Too many times we've seen where actions have re-actions and consequences far beyond the initial action.
El Reg would think the risk that a country's traffic could be hijacked for espionage would argue for more encryption, not less.
Ah, but you and the rest of us IT types understand the details. The IiC* only think about what will get them re-elected. They usually don't understand "consequences" unless it applies to themselves personally which is "do as I say, not as I do". A good example is the stink now being raised about a certain President's daughter using her unencrypted equipment to conduct "official" business. We'll have to have a large box of popcorn to watch how this turns out.
*IiC = Idiots in Charge
Bob,
You are correct. However until Congress gets it crap together and becomes functional, the only way to deal with regulatory issues is via the courts. Per the Constitution, the laws, regulations can be pursued through the courts based on constitutionality and legality so yes, the courts could rule to kill the law or provisions and then it's up to Congress to fix it.
Now obviously that would be a big red flag to switched on guys and gals, but you'd be surprised how many will accept the offered choice when they can't see what it is they are getting...
It should be but isn't. Seems most people will open it out of curiousity. Techies (or semi-techies) according to recent article here at El Reg, are even worse because "we has skills"....
Well, the last part here sort of says it: "As Microsoft prepares its army of unpaid testers for another Bug Bash in January, a swathe of fixes is really what the company should be focusing on.".
MS is putting more effort into polishing the turd instead of fixing the problems.