Probably only for OPS*, not their own from the way the article and the links read.
*Other People's Stuff/Shiitte.
12880 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
It doesn't matter as the politico numpties will believe there's a magic wand lying around to allow the agencies to get what they want. The fact that the agencies can't deal with all the traffic now is irrelevant to them and also seemingly irrelevant to the heads of those agencies.
Which, when I think about it, is peculiar. The heads of the agencies want it also and yes, I know they're not tech heads. Is this so they can monitor the government and funding, etc. more closely? Or just to CYA... "well, we knew about them but didn't have the assets to follow up... more funding please"?
Exactly. We built a new remote office.. increasing staff from 150 to 400+. Come the day for the moves, server, network, PC-types, all running around and doing last minute things while the movers moved everything from the old office to the new except the old hardware. We even tested the back up gens by killing main power at the building input (power company had to that part).
Things looked good at lights out Sunday night. Monday morning all hell is breaking loose starting at zero-dark early. Seems someone misconfigured a local switch to point any machine wanting to open a file on an MS server (local) to the IP of the mainframe at the main office. Took them 2 days to figure this out and 5 minutes to fix. Murphy is a mean son-of-a-b*****.
I realize there's no "one size fits all" for a desktop, but is there a place one go to find comparisons, reviews, etc. without all the snideness, potshots, ego, etc. that newbies to Linux take when asking questions? I've been to some forums and it's a real quagmire of questioners asking and being shot full of holes for not "doing their homework" or "asking imbecilic questions"... What I hear around El Reg is basically recommendations for the flavor/favorite of the week with a baseline as to uses, etc.
It doesn't matter.... the company is now in "target lock-on" mode and the firing switch set for "max effect" to "return shareholder value". I read that as it's about to be broken up, fed to the pigs, and the activist investors get to count their money on the way to the bank. The game is all but over.
It is funny to read comments here. When you Brits are being shafted (and in many ways, the rest of the world) you're very calm. When it's the US being shafted (and again, the rest of the world), it's gnashing of teeth and rending of flesh by you guys. What gives? We're all getting survielled by everyone and we should be angry about it. I would have expected 50 or 60 comments from angry commentards by now.
Uh... yeah. They've some totally stupid rulings over the years and then there's that matter of the mine tailings in Colorado, I believe. The sense is that the EPA is staffed, managed, and controlled by extremist greens. I should add that they have contributed massively to shutting down quite a few industries that might still be viable if weren't for their setting standards beyond the achievable.
I'll get downvoted but that's the perception of a lot of folks.
You're probably closer to the truth than you think. The FBI director is a political appointment, not one based on this technical or legal expertise so he answers to political masters. He's still thinking of the previous 20-30 years of how information was culled. Much like the military always fights the "last war".
We've been through this here and I'm sure the experts have counseled the government execs on the tech aspects but it hasn't sunk in. They still must "do something" and whatever they do will be as ineffective as they are doing now (probably more ineffective) or expose everyone to the miscreants worse we are exposed now.
Our politicians (especially now that election silly season is underway) are prone to wanting to be seen doing something about terrorists, paedophiles, and whatever else they can use to get elected and stay elected.
As I recall it was on a post-it note on the former scout's PC. For the Astros to force a PW change means nothing if he re-uses the one from the previous employer. There's no way a new employer can guarantee that all passwords have never been used before by an employee. Except with a password manager than randomly generates the password and such that the employee never sees any passwords except the one to use the manager. Convoluted, isn't it?
Ideally, every company would issue a password manager on each computer. This would stop a lot of this type of intrusion. Plus, it would stop employees from using their Facebook password as an example as their login password at work. But.. dollars and profit and all that.
Which requires this... if the androids do everything, will there be any people left other than corporate bosses? Who will buy the things they make? Why would they even make them then? There's a disconnect that we see in early forms now. Outsourcing overseas and then the corporates wonder why those displaced aren't buying their tat.
I'm wondering what just happened... I'm quietly reading comments and suddenly I feel like I've been run over by a bus...or did some bad drugs. Like WTF....????
Somehow, we're all to blame for something is all I've figure out. I think I'll wander to someplace quiet and let my head clear.
My comment was more directed at the "response" of outrage, etc. They haven't been outraged at anything else along lines of security breaches until now. OPM is dragging it's feet on this and yes, they need to be looked at very carefully. But, being an election year, there's a sense of drama here.
The breach should never have happened. All those documents should never have been facing the web. It is an outrage and it should be fixed. I wouldn't be surprised if the documents are still available to a breach.
Well.. we need to stop smoking (and vaping), no more bacon, no more pastrami (or any beef), no more alcohol. Even veggies are unsafe.. organics for the e-coli, etc that happens frequently here in the States and non-organic because of pesticides, etc.
There's nothing left then to live for... except work and paying taxes. I wonder if that's the plan....
Well... the second one explains the first one which results in profit. This is a bit scary when you think about it. Your camera or maybe CCTV in a shop will direct the sales types to your side and know exactly how to get you to make that purchase. I can see that certain political types would like this too... tailor the speech to the audience on the fly with better results than they get now.
I'm surprised that "improving the user experience" wasn't tossed in somewhere to justify this bit of snooping privacy invasion.
This isn't a problem with data, 'big' or otherwise, it's a problem with dumb people doing things in a dumb way, drawing dumb conclusions, and taking dumb actions. And then forgetting to monitor the outcomes.
Ah.. politicians and most of the inhabitants of the C-Suites then.
I suspect that goes back to a "feature" in WinZip to make self-extracting files. It's a relatively simple step to turn "extract" into "extract and execute". Or maybe their just playing with a header to hide an exe as a zip? Either way, this is something who's time is long past and should be shutdown at the OS level.
Do the easy thing.. GWX Control Panel. It seems to have stopped the downloads of the "updates" and definitely all nags on the 4 computers here my house. I've passed it around to friends and relatives and they all say it works.
Disclaimer: It is still working at least for now or until MS decides that some other strategy will get your machine converted.
A big part of the problem would seem be the camera, or looking at the ground. If you're flying an R/C airplane, watching the plane fly, controlling it, etc. is the name of the game. With drones... it's obviously the video from the drone that's the big part.
So I may own the ground and the FCC may own the air. But who regulates the camera? If the drone were just something you'd fly and zoom around like the R/C aircraft, no problem. Photographing what's on the ground (like a sunbathing neighbor) is something else.
These two need to be blended somewhere. Once upon a time, it was common courtesy that you didn't intrude on the neighbor's privacy. Now it seems the norm. Privacy from all sectors, tech, government, and now the neighbors is becoming hard to find.
Therein is the real problem. Their "current state of the art" if reports are to be believed, is that what they have hasn't been miniaturized enough to work as an ICBM warhead. Once they hit that point, it will be easy enough to be transported by boat, lorry, etc. If, say ISIS wanted one and could cough up the cash, the Middle East may very well turn into a sea of glass depending where it was detonated and who retaliates. As I recall, many (but not all) of Saddam's Scuds came from NK so there is precedent and yes, NK is cash-hungry after all these years of sanctions.
to net himself tens of millions in annual compensation
Tens of millions each year? Really. Did you RFTA before jumping up on that soapbox?
Foxconn and other slaves shops should be forced to pay proper compensation and benefits to their employees equal to what Timmy boy gets
So, every Foxconn employee should make $10 Million a year? Not a bad idea but very impractical. Fair compensation would be fine but what you suggest is beyond the pale.
Damn me... I fed the troll....
Corporates are funny in many ways... and not ha-ha funny. They don't like employees using Twitter or Facebook but seem to insist on it also. If you use it, you're a time waster and a security risk. If you don't use it, you're not being a team player and helping to push the brand. I won't even go into the BS if heard shoveled about LinkedIn...
I wasn't looking at Wikiwhatever. I was looking at when I lived in Southern California back then. The term "heavy metal" back then referred more to the names and their on stage presence than to the type of music. I don't recall that term being used much outside of Southern Cal until much later. In musical style, yeah.. Motorhead wasn't heavy metal.
It sounds like you're suggesting that the FLA's/TLA's control the Home Secretary. Much like they control the Congress, etc. here in the States, perhaps?
Most of the elected officials have no idea of what they speak when it comes to anything internet, IT, or technology (any tech including toasters) matters.
The consortium will work together over the next three years to explore critical issues in privacy, ethics, trust, reliability, acceptability, and security,
So it's unis... some government money.. and some industry types and their money... right?
Being a committee, it'll be sometime around the heat death of the universe before they agree and then there's the issues.. I don't see any that this or any other IT related industry would have an interest in. Unless it's "none". The goal of profit overrides any of that.
I think a better analogy than a needle in a haystack is a chunk of chocolate in a septic tank (or treatment plant). Too many folks would think the solution is a bigger magnet. The reality is the good info is indistinguishable from the noise unless you sample every bit.