Re: Oh FFS !
No one gave us £50 million
Obviously the crew in the C-Suite have missed an opportunity. Don't let the stockholders know or they'll demand the C-guys be fired.
12884 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
And US based companies wonder why there is no loyalty anymore.
Another poster is right. They don't wonder. Back when companies were founded and owned by the family, they did care. A lot of the old guard owners preached loyalty and believed in it. When they died off and the family didn't want to run the business, they sold stock.. which leads to MBA's.. which gets us to where we are today.
Back in the 70's/80's timeframe, when the Japanese were kicking everyone's corporate butt, they had the old school philosophy of loyalty, we do well and so will you. There was a joke that all we needed to do to bring the Japanese economy to it's knees was export some Harvard MBA's their way.... I think it worked.
Bingo.. spot on. I've seen it where manglement will go out of their way to piss someone off who's been around for more than 5 years. As soon as they quit, they hire a replacement for a lot less money.
It was happening with such frequency that the employees in the call center knew the clock was ticking from the day they started.
Perhaps if MS started concentrating on security instead of useless 'bells and whistles' that no-one wants (Windows 10, I'm looking at you) we wouldn't have so many patches to install year after year.
Possibly. But it's possible that they just toss bodies at the Win OS and the old saying about "too many cooks spoiling the broth" applies. Especially if there's not much being done to check the code or test it.
Having read what I just wrote, I wonder about all those thousands of employees... mostly sales, PR, admin types? Not enough coders or testers? I realize there's probably still zillions of lines in legacy code in Windows, but crikey... this shit seems to get worse every month. I would hope that at some point, a complete code review would occur and all the old, useless, vulnerable stuff would be stripped out. Expensive? Yes. Doable? Maybe not so much in reality.
Yes, Linux is on standby for 3 of the 4 machines here at home, with one already happily running it.
Predator and Reaper spend most of their time flying autonomously with humans only dropping into the loop as needed.
Generally, there's one human for each of those in the air. Will the same be needed for cars? If there's an emergency, getting a "please wait for the next available driver" won't cut it. Given the nature of companies, they will keep staff to a minimum which means "wait"....
Let's add: health insurance companies that outsource the processing of your claims to another country. Once that data is on the wire and headed to the processor, anyone can get it. And there's no telling what the processor will do with it or who has access (legal or illegal) to it.
Valid point. The problem is the politicians themselves.. most haven't a clue about this. The second problem is the lobbyists.
However, all elections boil down to basically one or two issues depending the target population. Brexit is a good example of this with some voters only paying attention to the immigrant problem and other only paying attention to the "let's send the ,money we save to the NHS" bit.
Voters don't seem capable of making choices on complex issues. The listen to one guy who hits them with an issue. Like abortion, or guns, or "free-college"... Once they seize on that issue, nothing else matters.
Facebook has very little regard for its users, or the content that they produce that has made it a corporate monster, at least at an individual level.
The only privacy that's important is Zuck's. He's made that point clear a zillion times. The monster has grown because of his beliefs about users and how they they're just a bunch of stupid suckers. His interviews should be mandatory before anyone is allowed to sign up to the service. Then if they want to deal with his company, let the door be open.
I know the yanks won't like it, but its high time we get some serious consumer protection, to protect us against "free" trojan horses
I can't speak for the rest of the people here in the States, but I believe most would agree that some serious protection is needed and not the lip service we've been getting from our government minions who are doing the corporate's bidding.
I, and others, believe that as in the past about this, it is just wishful thinking. As other commenters point out, given the distances, the speed of light, tech improvements in communication, even if there is intelligent life, our chances of eavesdropping on them is probably slim to non-existent.
If they're using the Apollo lander code as an example.. it's tight code. Nothing fancy like startup code or libraries. Just pure "do this".
Writing for the assembler isn't the hard part. It's writing for the chip and board. Methinks if it's embedded, they're not giving the coder a lot of space.
Hmmm.... maybe this is one reason security is crap on these devices. The "oh we only have enough space for the make-it-work-stuff... something else will have to provide the security."
There's one other small problem that seems to be ignored and it's not just about the ships It's the aircraft itself. You might have your 24 F-35's by then, but how many will actually be flyable or available for active duty? Some will be needed for training by both pilots and ground crews. There's the inevitable "hanger queens" in active units that end up basically as a spare parts bird. Then there's repairs... some by wear and tear and others by misadventure. Lastly, there's overhaul and "hours checks" where the planes get thoroughly inspected and parts replaced as deemed "unfit".
To have 24 available, I'd think you'll need at least 12 more just for the other purposes.
Their use of advanced IR detectors brings into question the whole value proposition of radar stealth and whether it is giving US pilots a false sense of security.
It's not about the pilots having a false sense of security but about the politicians and the DoD procurement folks. I'm sure the pilots know they're sitting ducks.
just like those do the morning after the game. We weren't there. Was the shooter in an enclosed area? Was he firing out of windows? How entrenched was he? The stores mention that negotiations broke down and the gunman resumed fire on the police. Just police or civilians?
If there's open windows, gas would not be an option. Possibly ingress and egress were limited and that limits a SWAT team rushing in? Sniper? The sniper has to be able to get a clear, clean shot.
This is still murky at best... While the Dallas Police have a pretty good reputation for being forthright in their dealings, the situation currently will taint anything said or done. I do hope for some "post-action" analysis as to the "why" it ended this way.
I do remember the Philadelphia Police bombing a sniper on a rooftop back in the 70's IIRC. Killed him/them and burnt the building down. Sometimes decisions are made on the tactical situation of the moment... sometimes they are good, other times they are bad.
I think any judgment in this is a bit premature as we don't have all the information.
Well, they expect overseas porn websites to comply with their age verification demands, so...
I'm sure if they offered the positions for that, they could charge the raters.
I'm thinking along lines of Woody Allen:
Michael: Did you get a job?
Victor: Yes, I got something at the strip-tease. I help the girls dress and undress.
Michael: Nice job.
Victor: Twenty francs a week.
Michael: Not very much.
Victor: It's all I could afford.
You raise some interesting points. The Windows group supposedly is the driver at MS. If not company wide, at least for themselves. He's marketing which is how to push sales, cash flow and profit. I'm wondering if his leaving isn't related to the GWX nightmare. MS has had enough bad press about it, people are resisting, etc. And then there's issues with the OS itself not being ready for prime-time.
Maybe he's falling (or being picked up and tossed) on his sword over this?
Reports are they're looking for two black suspects. This may be the beginnings of some very bad times. Reading the media stories and the comments on the articles makes me wonder where the hatred is coming from. Something more polarizing in the US than any of us understand.
I don't think I'm paranoid but there's just too many senseless killings from the cop side and the civilian side. The cops covering their tracks (if proven) seems to point to something other than coincidence.
How can you have every customer record spewing out for that long and not have someone make the correlation?
How? Simple.... you take security seriously but put Bob the Janitor in charge of security. Bob, because he's a) cheap and b) used to cleaning up messes.
I will give them one point for confessing up. But I'll take away 10 points for them being idiots.
Whatever the outcome, she''s either a nasty piece of work or has some serious mental/educational problems of her own to deal with.
Not "either/or" but "and"... I'll add "despicable". She reminds me of those who stand on the sidewalk chanting at someone threatening to jump to "Jump.. jump... jump" and then applaud when the jumper actually jumps. I'm just not sure how she can look in the mirror at herself.
FTR: In many states it is illegal. It's a legal ploy to allow the state to get you mental help. Or was at one time before RR started shutting down the mental health institutions and dumping those folks on the streets.
In all fairness, I don't think we or any other country can feel superior about the their police forces. There's bad apples in every department and dealing with the public service sector's regs on firing, it's tough to weed the bad ones' and the ones unsuited for the position out.
I'd like to think it's getting better out there, but reality is, it isn't. I can understand a cop being jumpy about someone with a gun as the rotten cops have made all cops a target. But the video points out too much incompetence to be believed.
Sidenote: The fact that FB pulled not only the video but the uploader's profile shows a definite knee-jerk reaction to this.
Part of the problem isn't just the financing of these things. It's the media frenzy that goes on. Most reporters don't seem to have a clue but they jump on the bandwagon and pretty soon.. it's "common knowledge" about such-and-such. And once a few brain-dead celebs take it up... all bets are off. A look a the case of vaccines and autism is a prime example of this.
There's another category... self-destructive drunks or maybe it's suicidal. Depressed and alcohol makes it worse.
I've run into a couple of those over the years. They'll get drunk in a bar, go outside and proceed to bang their head on lampposts, etc. One I knew, fell on a fire hydrant (he had a history of self inflicted wounds while drinking - intentional not accidental wounding), then bashed his head on the pavement. Bystanders duly called an ambulance and the next day in the hospital, he claimed some cops beat him up. Witnesses and street CCTV showed no beatings. Only one cop showed up to take statements.
The other one would run into the street in traffic and jump at the cars. Before he lost all driving privileges he wrecked 3 cars by driving them into brick walls.
told the authorities he feared the company was watching him.
Well.. they are. And not just him. We're all being watched and not just by Google. Seems every one, companies and TLA's have their collective ears to the pipes.
I guess I should add that except for the TLA's who just want to watch all of us, everyone else is not just watching but selling us, also.