Re: And so?
This means what, exactly, in the 21st century?
Possibly that there's still a lot of really tall buildings that don't have a 13th floor. Seems to be the older ones that don't however.
12880 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
I'd think any 'serious' site would get a respectful "...o..k..a..y, thanks" if they emailed users with "we don't want you to lose your hard-earned money/house/job, and we noticed an insecure password and would you please change that to a better password (and here's how)."
Probably 50% (ok... some % above 1% and less than 99%) of the users would see the email.. assume it's malware and dump the email. Unless of course, you promised them a nudie video of some celeb.
He might have been bright and intelligent but he wasn't smart. He got caught using his real name, etc. I can see why Department A wouldn't want him. But yeah.. there could have been a plea bargain deal and he could make something worthwhile of his life.
OTOH, the Marines are looking for a few good men with his skills.. maybe a tradeoff...?
Sounds *remarkably* like the stuff that German politicians were saying in (roughly) 1935..
Yep. However The Big T himself has invoked Godwin's law repeatedly in his Tweets/Twits. I guess it's to get us used to the concept.
I think you pretty much hit the nail dead center except for one point. My tendency at one point if someone told me to "suck it up" wasn't, shall we say, gentle. I'm calmer now. Less traumatized.
The point I take issue with is that actually, people like what you mention shouldn't be in charge or even near a war-zone. They're the ones who toss lives away and do more harm to their own side. Patton to some degree, was an exception but not completely.
Bob,
I quite agree about MS rifling through the OneDrive files and comms... but there's more to this then porn... murder, violence, extreme child porn.
I do believe there would be some serious mental trauma to anyone viewing it day in and day out. Seeing someone killed in the military is bad enough to push many people into PTSDland. Seeing kids taking the hit is worse, IMO. It's certainly not a job I'd want and I am a combat veteran (Vietnam) who saw my share but not day in and day out like these guys.
That's not terribly surprising, really. If you asked someone what they liked best about their car, I bet the response "it can transport me from A to B" wouldn't make the list either.
I'd be more inclined to say that many users don't do phone calls. They text only. We have many friends (for some value of "friend") and relatives that will never pick up a call but will grab every text sent and respond. Many of my business acquaintances have noticed the same thing. Perhaps one day, the phone part of the 'smartphone' will just disappear.
Germany did not, strangely enough, really fully go to a war economy until fairly late in the game,
The German mentality at the beginning of the war did create a lot of problems. They tied fighter production to the number of pilots that could be trained. Thus, no spares. When the air war moved to Europe and Germany, this hurt them badly as they could recover pilots but had no planes for them to use.
I seem to remember Chuck Yeager being an advocate of the F5 as it was Cheap, Rugged and most importantly not a hanger queen.
Yes.. cheap and fairly impressive as it was picked to be the 'aggressor' in the Top Gun type of wargames as it mimicked the flight characteristics of some Russian fighters very well. But it was cheap and thus, not much pork there.
The data on the phone has some value, sure, but not enough to encourage someone to commit several serious crimes in order to gain access to it (theft of the phone, hacking charges for unauthorised somputer use, fraud/extortion/other charges for misusing any information gleaned). So for me this particular security versus usability equation comes out on the usability side,
The data on your phone is pretty much useless to probably 99% of the phone thieves. They want the phone to sell on the black/gray market for cash. So your fingerprint is probably all that system needs at this point. IF the crims ever smarten up and figure out they can use your bank details, then the fun and games start.
Maybe I'm being simplistic here and I realize the problems it would create but unplug those critical infrastructure systems from the Internet. Yes, you'll have to have techs available 24/7 but presumably that would be a private LAN without an Internet connection.
Banks and the like are a problem as they need an Internet connection. But if a system can be disconnected from the Internet, it should be. Emails and attachments are headache I'm not sure can ever be solved except not allowing any email system to ever be attached/connected to a control system.
I'm a little surprised it's taken this long for someone to challenge the whole NSL
It's lawyers and government and bureaucrats. Re-reading the article gives us that Cloudfare has been fighting this for quite awhile which, given the players involved, would be normal by their standards. I just hope the courts will look at the Constitutional aspects and agree that NSL's do violate the Constitution.
RATO/JATO bottles have their own set of headaches. Might work, but there's the instant impulse thing when the rocket fires which might be a lot more than the airframe could handle. Aircraft like the C130 (and others) were built for this system and as such the airframe is properly reinforced for those stresses.
We should have catapults (probably steam!) on the new ships... they are bigger than the aircraft carriers we had in the '70s which successfully launched jets from steam catapults... so these must be able to do the same.
The fallacy is in your first statement. These carriers are gas turbine powered, not steam (nuke) powered. No steam, no steam catapults. EMALS would work as it's electric powered however, not allowing the proper space to install it kills that idea. I'm not sure what it would take to rip apart one of your carriers and retrofit EMALS but I'd wager it would be more expensive than just redesigning the carrier and building a new one with EMALS.
That's one of my biggest gripes with Win10... ads in the OS. That should be just "no. not now. not ever"... If malvertising gets through.. you're screwed. But at more basic level... I buy the OS, so ad should not even be an option or available. Sadly, MS is so greedy, they don't care.
Maybe some of us will do a startup for something like AdBlock for the OS?
Don't hold your breath on that.... It may very well pass given the way things have been going lately. I'm not sure if things are actually getting worse or if the idiots are getting more press coverage since the election. There's a another state pulling a similar stunt.
Some things are just un-frikkin-believable... and this is one of them.
If Apple pulls this off, than I can see a lot of businesses riding their coattails. Order components and assemble them here.. no duty, no taxes. As a consumer, I could probably see a case for buying a box of parts (basically a kit) and assembling it at home... I'd save some money on duties and taxes.
Hmmm... maybe.. might just work but not in the way Trump envisions it.
While many countries have their ways around such things due to no Constitution or no Free Speech amendments, etc. we do. It's been twisted, chewed on, challenged and it still stands. It's also been used to stretch the limits of credibility in some cases.
INAL, but while prostitution (Nevada excepted), child porn/prostitution are illegal, there are those who will argue that advertising is a Free Speech issue and this is a Constitutional problem. It is a corruption of the spirit of the Constitution. I personally think child porn/prostitution producers, distributors, and customers should be shot on sight, there are laws that deal with that. If the act is illegal than so should be advertising it.
Certainly they don't have a person reading all the Reg articles looking for ones applicable to their customers.
Maybe not knowingly... but the site developer might and possible he forwarded it as a gag... or it's just another round of Stupid Human Tricks*.
*Apologies for David Letterman.
Have a downvote. Certain courts in the US were giving young men the option of joining the military or jail back in the Vietnam era. It didn't work out well for the military or for those who ran into these lads after their military time was up. True, there were more than a few who straightened up and flew right. But overall... it didn't work out. The military currently does not accept anyone who's been convicted of a crime.
I don't know how much of this stuff is true, but I'm quite certain some stupid cases like this have been brought, and won, with silly payouts given.
More than a few it seems. One can't put a deadfall on a window that's been used repeatedly for breakins. Homeowners/businesses have been sued because the burglar climbed in through a skylight and the beam/lightfixture/whatever broke and he fell and was hurt. It makes for sad and sometimes mind-boggling reading about some these lawsuits.
Seems to me there was website that carried these some years ago, but I don't know if it's still around.
More and more people seem to be infected by Trump Derangement Syndrome, which is worse than Bush Derangement Syndrome or Obama Rainbow Pony Syndrome. Hopefully this will burn itself out or will have to activate the FEMA trailers.
I wouldn't count on it dying out. Both the previous two Syndromes are still running amok... and it seems that the same people are behind them. Hell.. we also still have the Clinton Is Perfect Syndrome* types running around.
*Take your pick on which Clinton is involved.. there's overlap.
-- people will have to talk to each other instead of being glued to FB etc.
Only if they remember how to do that. With texting, FB, etc.... not much happens in the way of real face to face conversation among certain groups of people. I am continually amazed by the number of people that if I call, they'll say "text me".
Trust the FBI? Right... about as far as I can toss them. J. Edgar didn't do their reputation any favors with many of the stunts he pulled but he did set the precedent. LEA's have been pulling this kind of stuff for a long time... and getting away with it. The War on Drugs is a good example also. where the cops planted evidence because they knew the person they planted it on was a bad person.
It's more than a bit scary.
The Bad People don't get put away, and the Bad Things keep happening.
Actually, they don't have to convict or even really get into the trial. The alleged perp has been convicted in the court of public opinion just by being arrested and charged with the offense. The media grabs it and the next thing one knows is that their name is spread nationwide. Any potential employer who Googles them gets the full story. Friends, neighbors, etc. will shun them.
So reality is... they don't need to put them away or try them to ruin the alleged crim.
Just wow!!! Unbelievable what's there. I'm hoping Musk will pick me for the Mars trip... one-way is fine as I don't want to be here anymore after seeing some of this crap which, naturally, is "smart" and "you need it". I fear for the future of the human race.
*Just plain jaw-dropping and mind boggling.
Well... he is pretty pissed off about the new guy running "his" show on TV. Apparently the ratings have dropped and he blames Arnold. I would think that as President-Elect that he has more pressing issues to sort out than a TV show.
What the hell have we got ourselves into... two equally miserable candidates for President and no matter who won, we'd all be irritated as hell with them.
I do use Firefox as well as Chrome. Seems Firefox is having "issues" with memory and slowness. I'm hoping for a new build release (I'm using the current one) soon... very soon.
IE is the pits for some of the forums I use as there's a few bugs in IE 11 that won't let it play nice with them.
No age, race, religion, disability, etc. on a W-2. True, they could somehow get the IRS to fill in some of the details but not all. Given it's the government... they want a PowerPoint, basically so they don't have to do the digging themselves.
As others point out.. it's a government contract and Google knew what was expected going in. No BS excuses from them can change that.