Re: Oracle Corporation
Exactly. Every company I can think of would be tickled and gladly pay for someone exceeding quota by more than 250%. Or does Larry need a new sailboat?
12884 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
This might be the best thing. Let the government get embroiled infighting, finger pointing, and the blame game and all will be well. Nothing bad can happen. I reference the old saying that "life, liberty, and property are all in jeopardy when Congress is in session.".
On a more serious note, this is just the tip of the iceberg. The US was downrated to a "flawed democracy". Note that this rating happened before Trump took office. It still tells a tale and the latest antics seem to prove it. Maybe gridlock is the best thing for awhile as it might slow the downward spiral we seem to be in with all the protests, in-figihting, etc. going on.
I know I'll get downvoted but hey... Hillary would probably be in a similar situation also but perhaps for other things. I was not a supporter of either of them as I thought they were both the wrong people for the position.
So how many infections can the average (for some value of average) "gadget" get before being overloaded with crap? I'd think that unless the new infection overwrote the old one, it wouldn't be too long before the device crashed. Which is maybe the plan by the manufacturers... device crashes, user buys new one.
They can even go further. Been awhile since I read it but some of the orchards set sensors for each tree which sends back to the main computer data such as wet/dry (needs irrigation), pH of the soil, Given the data and connections in the orchard, they selectively water trees or go investigate if something is off...
There's a vineyard here locally that has similar equipment but includes motion sensors (for birds) along with cameras to check the vines for health.
Fascinating stuff all in all.
Part of the Constitution allows disagreement with our elected officials. So criticizing isn't a problem as long as it's rational and promotes discussion. Screaming, rioting, violence, etc. do not promote the free exchange of ideas.
If it weren't permitted, I suspect most of us would be in the Gulag getting re-educated.
The fatal flaw is that any manufacturer worth their salt will point to fearless leader and say, "when he moves his clothing company's production to the US, we will too.".
Point of reference is his clothing line is made Vietnam currently. IF he won't, why should anyone else be forced to do it.
So the real citizens are those who think and vote like you? I disagree. I voted not for Clinton or Trump but another. The current system is broken and we really need to open up elected office to something other than the usual political hacks in the "good old boy network" looking for handouts.
Will Trump deliver? Who knows. So far, his choices for Cabinet positions send a very mixed message. Most are from the money/industry side of things and not really outsiders.
I say this as a former Marine who took the oath of service very seriously. It's not about protecting and supporting the "man" in the office, it's about supporting and protecting the Constitution. The Office itself exists because of the Constitution. The man in the Office doesn't merit that support and defense. Never has, never will.
having the brake and gas pedals being at the same level and similar size facilitates heel-and-toe driving so one can brake and shift at the same time.
That works for those of us who have done it and practiced it, usually in a racing environment. Much like power sliding around a curve... Most of the population can't do it.
I think it was the F111 that had a "centerline" (or "centerline") on the HUD for the pilot to follow in terrain-following mode. The problem was that the pilots depended on it too much and several were killed when got into a car and drove... and followed the centerline on the road. This could be an urban myth but it was a very common one back in the day.
What I'd change is this: America's government and the multinationals who control it is are it's own worst enemy, However, and this is reality... other than LEA's being involved, how is this different than what business is doing to our privacy?
The real test of the new administration and the people will be the next election in 2 years for CongressCritters. Will the Dems return? Will there be a 3rd party that starts moving in? Hell.. the bookies are giving odds on impeachment at this point. There's no telling where this will lead.
Reading the latest, even the Repubs in Congress are having second thoughts about Pompeo and some other Cabinet level officials. I think Congress will need to be the ones to make the TLA's refocus their missions and reasons for existence. However, given the nature of many of those in Congress, they haven't a clue.
Both candidates for President made me fear for the future of the Republic. Until the corporates, Wall Street, and the TLA's are reined in, I'll still fear for the Republic.
Ultimately, it will be the people that will decide. Just how they decide to act remains to be seen.
I'm glad you brought this up and beat me to it. That is a lesson any contracted person should know. Start the new assignment and scrimp/save whatever it takes. If the job suddenly terminates or the environment is bad... go for the door. Don't hesitate.
Decades ago I did contracting and all the contracting companies were keen to tell anyone they hired about this. It's a necessary survival skill and gives one the freedom to follow their conscience when they get into a bad situation.
If one shouts too much about history and who used to own what and how that should all be put back, you'd also implicitly be supporting a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, the restoration of bits of Germany and Russia to Polish administration, you'd be raising question marks over whether the Alsace should be French or German, whether Ceuta should be Spanish or Moroccan, the return of Alaska to Russian administration on its way to independence, etc.
On the other hand, the US would have to be divided up by England, France, and Spain. Hmm... do you guys really want us back?
No certs here either like many others. Our company set out at one point (new CTO) to certify everyone they could. After about 3 months, they decided it was ridiculous as most of us could have taught the course better than the "certified vendor instructors". If all a company cares about is the paper then they have a problem.
Footnote.. that particular CTO lasted less than a year. His replacement was there for almost 10 years.
The ads will have to be subtle... like the "best coffee" example or "where's a good café near by?". The answer will need a bit of a look up for paid sponsors and offer one of them first. Then there will be the "you had coffee yesterday, can I recommend this place for coffee today?"
Yeah.. monetize and sell the hell out of everything instead of just information.
From way back when I worked in Defense to the present, DARPA has always been the think tank kind of agency. Not so much "we need this item" but more of a "let's try this and see where it leads" type of place. Basically just research with the occasional (for some value of 'occasional') wild idea that actually leads to something. I kind of like what they do. Toss an idea out or get an idea from someone else, and see where it goes.
As for this type of shell.. who knows where it will lead. It could be that the end result is something already out there like what was mentioned about the Isreali/Russians/French do. Or it could lead to somewhere else, like maybe collision avoidance in self-driving cars. No telling where it will go.. even tossing it into the trashbin is possible.
Before that they were a bit fixated on I Love Lucy reruns, but Trump's election demonstrated that we weren't as harmless as they thought. They're gearing up to correct that oversight
Oh. did I miss a Tweet? Did he come out say we need to deport all undocumented aliens from the solar system?
There's another quote that was misspoken... He added: "In the next phase, to me, [is] how can we democratise this access, versus worshipping the four, five, six companies that have a lot of AI.
I believe it was supposed to be: He added: "In the next phase, to me, [is] how can we democratize monetize this access, versus worshipping the four, five, six companies that have a lot of AI.
I'm hoping all this hype about AI just falls into the marketing toilet of "dead buzzwords". Until a machine can actually think about it's actions and have some ability to create/invent things, it's not intelligent. As my mentor pointed out to me decades ago... "A computer is only as smart as the person who programmed it. It can't change what does anymore than a tree can get up and walk to another forest."