Re: I don't get it..
no.. it wouldn't.
But you also can't write lowlevel runtime libraries with Ada either.
It is either too slow, or the language itself prevents you from doing the things necessary.
741 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Nov 2012
To be fair, Kay has a habit of not fixing his own bugs. And this problem WAS his bug.
From what I understand of the bug, the system deadlocked - systemd is the init process, and it is SUPPOSED to record and empty the log buffers... But it was spewing so many messages that it never got around to start the recording before the system deadlocked.
Linus doesn't have problems with programmers doing stupid things once. Even twice.
But that third time, the programmer should have learned - or should get out of the field.
The KERNEL doesn't have a problem.
SYSTEMD is acting as the system init process... and is so screwed up it doesn't work. KERNEL options are not supposed to be interpreted by ANY userspace application. Yet SYSTMD does.
Totally in violation of the rules.
Second, this is NOT the first time this person has violated the rules. He broke the usb subsystem... and then said the kernel should actually do it instead of actually fixing the bugs he created.
Sometimes it really is necessary to cuss someone out. If you are in the personal presence, you get to do things like pound on a desk for emphases.
In text, you don't have that ability.
I think the US DoD counts for real work.
As does Spain, Brazil,... And a fair number of cities in the US.
The list of "outliers" is quite long.
Munich was careful. How long do you think it will take for some organization that large to Migrate to Windows 8.x from XP? hmmm?
"a problem that doesn't exist"??? overpriced software.. underperforming software, virus repair, constant outages for the same... Constant money pit...
Besides, they saved a boatload of money.
And will continue saving every year.
:)... Reminds me of a support call that occurred at a supercomputer center running several Cray YMP/C90 systems.. some nut wanted to run VB on the Cray so he could get his answers fast enough... Staff had a bit of trouble getting him to realize not all systems belong to Microsoft...
No wonder they get broken into regularly.
All of the Windows servers I've had contact with have had anti-vrirus programs running on them. If they didn't, they weren't allowed a network connection.
And Windows has finally caught up to UNIX of 1990. No need for a GUI on a server... <sarcasm on>big advance.<sarcasm off>
No government/DoD Windows system is allowed to go without an ant-virus application. Too dangerous. That gets them into severe problems (like the drone control systems... infected.. even though they were a server - so now they use Linux instead).
I think Osbourn was before Apple, 1981 as a matter of fact.
Then there was Compaq, Grid, Epson, Poqet (with a netbook equivalent)
Apple? doesn't show up until 1991 with a Powerbook 100, though there was a Macintosh Portable in 1989.
Quite a while before Apple was "one of the pioneers in portable computing".
Rewriting history?
Yes. It is intangible.
It is no different than directions written on a piece of paper.
And as you can't patent an IDEA in the first place, you can't sell it either.
Now, if you invent a specific piece of hardware then you have something - it is called a "transformation of matter".
Writing is not transformational - it is recorded language. And it doesn't matter what can read that recording, it remains a recording.
Mathematics is an idea.
Hope they fixed the security problems...
The original problem was that there was nothing preventing a user from loading data into the GPU, then downloading it into any location in physical memory. Been there saw that. The Cray MP line would crash (most often) because of that.
All they had to do was add an IOMMU to the board. That way the host system would be able to limit the IO to just one user... and if they chose to crap on them selves it didn't matter.
I know the Cray nearly didn't pass evaluation on low level security audits because of it. Only the nodes without the GPU passed.
According some currency translations:
499 Euro is $682... and that is the price with the keyboard. The article reports $648... a $34 discrepancy.
The 399 Euro is $545.644 (without the keyboard), The article report $499 without the keyboard... a $46 discrepancy.
I'm used to Microsoft over charging for overseas sales... but still, this seems a bit odd, It is supposed to still be a foreign manufacture - I wasn't expecting the MS "tax" on it for overseas sales yet...
Not saying goggle hasn't made mistakes; but it really depends on which country you are in as to what is illegal.
Google doesn't have anything in France, so how Google can violate French laws is a bit confusing.
EU laws, on the other hand, maybe - but there are so many different venues it would be easy to violate one.
"supported versions cost far more to license", no they still cost 0. What may cost is the support - and how much support you want.
"it has far more security vulnerabilities", no it has fewer due to the fewer lines of code, and less complex threading. It also supports more than what Windows can do. More CPUs, more memory, more architectures...
"it is much more expensive to integrate", definitely false as it is based on standards which Windows is not. Granted, the kernel/device interface isn't standardized, but if drivers are released and accepted into the kernel they tend to get updated for you.
"more limited security capabilities (e.g. no constrained delegation, or dynamic access control)" also false. It has more security capabilities than Windows starting with the basic UNIX design, adding real POSIX capabilities, and with SELinux on top to organize capabilities.
Uptime obviously.
Most countries are not large enough to support two such server systems.
If a problem with either communications, power, or other occurs in Ireland, it will more likely affect any OTHER servers ALSO maintained in Ireland.
In the US, it is possible to have that backup server in different sections of the country - which have separate power, communications, and other infrastructure needed for operation.
Brazil is large enough (geographically) for two, but not necessarily economically large enough.
The same goes for the EU, but there it is more the varying tax rates that make things uneconomical.
"So Americans must go to Chinese of Indonesian courts to complain about products bought in USA but made in those countries?"
Actually, yes they would have to. The company that is in the US that bought them from the Chinese is the only one they can sue.
Had they bought them from the Chinese directly, then they would have to go there to sue.