Re: Sewerage workers
What? You missed the Toxic Avenger?
741 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Nov 2012
"Current Xbox sales".... has only barely broken even over the long term.
"Surface sold"... So they just barely covered the losses from just ONE year. And according to other sites, did that by not even selling one million units. At $1000 US each, that still isn't covering expenses. The key to making profit is to have the sell price greater than the manufacturing cost... And Surface still isn't quite that.
All depends on how you use them.
While I was working, we setup a single display... with up to 64 root windows, one for each system being monitored, plus one for a summary display. The largest number of active systems was about 30... 5 primary (supercomputers), plus one for each of the supporting systems, with a common console log for ALL systems.
CP/M worked just like OS-8. And OS-8 had MMU support (that was how you addressed more than 4k of 12 bit words).
UNIX didn't require a hard disk - a floppy was sufficient. The original UNIX ran on a single 1.5 MB had disk - thus it would ALSO run on floppies when they reached 1.5 MB. Also remember, the original UNIX only required 16k-24k (or thereabouts) for the kernel.
The major modern problem is that the device controllers don't have an MMU the way the VAX systems did.
Part of the problem is that I/O devices and controllers do NOT have MMUs - yet, they have full access to memory.
Which allows a huge vulnerability when it comes to plug-and-play devices, from mice, keyboards, audio/radio, networking, and storage devices.
Where? the major problem is in Windows and the MS policy of mixing applications, OS tools, and kernel, with the default that everything is an executable...
And the easy circumvention is to not use Windows.
The same can be said of MS trying to get systems labeled "Pirate" if they aren't sold with a MS operating system...
It was successful for quite a while.
As for building engineering... you forgot the design failures that has cathedrals collapsing. They still are - foundations cracking, structures are unsafe (they wouldn't even meet the building codes of 50 years ago, they all were grandfathered in).
You missed part of the writeup.
Many/most CPUs DO have MMUs... But what DOESN'T have an MMU every time are controllers...
And a controller is just another name for a CPU. Thus hacking a controller bypasses the MMU...
"* Permissions (read/write/modify) on a per-value basis." trivial. UNIX has done that for 40 years.
"* Ability to push changes to users..." also trivial. changing a single value can't alter any other files. And if you put multiple values in a single file then you are idiots. Use LDAP for one. cfengine for another, there are a number of alternatives.
"* User/machine setting separation, with the user settings able to move with the user between machines as a single, trivially synchronised file." Relatively trivial. It has been done on UNIX systems for at least 20 years. NIS originally, LDAP currently. Or if you want cfengine or other tools that are available.
Not a very good database...
And according to all the XML enthusiasts, yes it could be replaced with text files.
and based on the fact that it is a key->value database, YES it could be replaced. If nothing else,a directory using a file name for a key and the contents of the file for the value.
Oh right - just like UNIX systems have used for 40 years.
Unfortunately, loading the FPGA is slow.
Synchronization among FPGAs is slow.
Saving context will be slow...
The network described looks the same as the old Cray T3. And that beast took several seconds just to get ready to start the job. Granted, once setup it was quite fast. But job setup time took forever - as did shutdown times. A single checkpoint could take 15 minutes if all the processors were used by one job.
And this doesn't look any different.
a reliable, mass-producable qubit will have IP of incalculable value...
Yes... either it will be worth millions... or nothing.
After all, once the value is measured it collapses into a value.... until it is measured it has no value...
And with Microsoft doing the measuring it will be "incalculable"... and if somebody goes to buy it, will find it running some virus or other... and of no value.
Yes... true. But what is happening instead is that the balloon bursts BEFORE reaching the maximum height - due to the pressure overload on the skin. Releasing that overload should allow a higher altitude. Venting some gas would also reduce the weight (less gas needed to maintain the same volume). Of course there is the offset of the weight of the valve..
In the old days, this was handled by having a balloon only 1/3 filled. As the balloon rises, the envelope does expand... and due to the larger envelope, does not burst. (reference to the "rockoon" launches --- still going on).
Now one advantage to having the balloon burst is that you don't have to worry about cleanup :)
Only one person noticed this paragraph?
""Certainly the Bing technology has been the key to us learning how to do large-scale data centers," Gates said. "And Bing lets us see what's going on on the internet, so that as people are interested in various topics, we know what's new, we know when they're typing text what it might mean. So I see that as a pretty fundamental technology for the company – even for its Office business, which is a very, very core business.""
so much for their vaunted privacy. "We know when they're typing text what it might mean".
so don't use Bing to search for anything competing with Microsoft... They might take offense. :)