LFTR maybe?
All the pros of current nuke with almost non of the cons.
http://blogs.howstuffworks.com/2009/12/01/how-a-liquid-fluoride-thorium-reactor-lftr-works/
3509 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jun 2007
The Russians got this right in 1950s. Why send meat to do a robot's job.
Sending robots is cheaper and simpler (one way trip, no need for in flight entertainment). If you have a few crashes then so what - there are no grieving widows. That allows you to take higher risks with higher rewards. The mission can last years with no worries about food and loved ones.
Human explorers have only performed the tiniest amount of scientific exploration. Sending astronauts to the moon was done for one goal only - politics. That they did some token science and gathered a few rocks was just an afterthought.
Whales use low frequencies which travel far. Ultrasound does not travel far and will be reflected or absorbed within a short distance.
The 50W is not getting radiated out into the ocean if it is being harvested for use by a device. There will be leakage none the less. Likely that amount of ultrasound within a room would be quite obvious to some sensors.
An OSS developer, even if not one of the high profile people, can at least give you some URLs showing their discussions, code etc.
A typical interview question goes something like: "Tell me about a problem you worked on and how you worked with other people to solve it." If the discussion was on a mailing list then you can provide backup showing how you communicated with others and did that work.
I strongly suggest involvement in OSS to anybody. trying to improve their employability.
That seems to be MS's plan.
MS had a reasonable standing in the business smartphone space (alongside RIM). It was a good sell to corp customers: buy all your servers, PCs and phones running software from one OS provider. A nice comfortable decision for the risk challenged (ie. those that call MS the sensible choice).
They also has a product for consumer space - Kin. That crashed and burned.
Now MS seems to be stripping corporate space (where they have had moderate success and few competitors) and are throwing everying into consumer space where they lack all the features that would make them successful (cool image, etc).
Self sabotage at its worst.
Now here's a plan for a cash-strapped NASA to get funding for the projects they really want to do:
1) Propose Climate Change project. Get funded for $2bn.
2) Buy plastic soccer ball + roll of aloominum foil at Kmart. Stop off at Radio shack for a few LEDs 555s and a battery. Spent $25 or less.
3) Get mates + few beers. Build shiny blinky round thing. $20 for beer. $5 for band aids.
4) Put shiny blinky round thing in rocket. Pay rocket manager $100 to crash rocket.
5) Put $1999999850 into NASA fun ad games fund.
6) Goto step 1.
Seems to be geared towards making a dual core look like an 80386 and making 4G of RAM look like 512M. That, and being tightly linked to x86, prevents it from being a serious tablet contender.
I call BS on your laws of physics though. Funny though how Mac and iOS can use fundamentally the same OS codebase, as can the wide variety of Linux devices from routers to super computers.
An organization with the resources of Microsoft should have been able to pull a capable mobile OS together by now. And no, WinCE does not count.
Tablets have always been Bill's favourite form factor. He's been waving them around since the early1990s.
What they never got right was the UI. BillG was always convinced that the Start button based desktop UI was fine for tablets.
SinceBill pulled out, tablets have not been given any priority.
I live some 70km outside of Chch so just got a minor rattling.
Internet access will depend on ISP. I lost mine approx 30 min after the quake but it is back now.
Cell and texting were intermittent for a while but are now pretty much sorted.
There are several orders of magnitude of difference between Haiti and this Chch quake. Haiti had 200k+ people killed. Christchurch has had less than 100.
Unlike Haiti where comms was out for weeks, Christchurch comms are pretty much fully reestablished so people can check on each other via phone, texting etc.
The finder thing might have been useful for Haiti where this was the only link for many, but the conditions in Christchurch are completely different meaning it is unlikely to be of any real use.
1) Who is going to back these up? When I cloud my data backup gets done by someone else who knows how to do it. Joe Sixpack will not be able to make a useful backup strategy.
2) Security: Without proper administration these will soon become the world's biggest botnet.
It is always easy to solve problems if you ignore the hard parts.
Why the fsck did I waste years at University studying BSc and thousands on text books when I should have been watching TV and Woman's Weakness?
The reality of AI is that the goals of challenging human intelligence are far too lofty.
Last night I spent 5 minutes chasing down and killing a fly. That little bastard has only a few neurons to rub together yet outperforms any robot in existence on navigation, threat avoidance, aerodynamics and survival.
The AI people would do far better to start by trying to emulate a beetle before they try to match humans.
Your argument fails because you assume that distances can be measured exactly.
Those 4 20m measurements will really be scattered about 20m. ie something like 19.950, 19.987, 20.003, 20.334
When you're dealing with non-integer values mode has pretty much no meaning at all.
But your main point is correct. The std deviation and characterization of the curve are more important. You could get a 20m average out of ten samples if one was at 200m and the rest were at 0 m.
Anyone who commoditises their product - including their labour -and sells based on price is on the road to nowhere. The only viable plan is to sell on increased value.
If you commoditise then the following happen:
* You re-enforce the idea that you're cheap and should be classified with, and compared to, the low wage nations.
* Anyone with an ounce of ability and motivation sods off to some industry where they can rub shoulders with peers. Low ability/low income becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
* The game only lasts until someone else undercuts you.
Quality on the other hand does exactly the inverse:
* Quality engineering and services are more valuable. They work out cheaper in the long run due to better time to market, better reliability and less down time.
* More attractive to higher quality staff.
* You can charge a premium for the extra value.
Through vertical and horizontal leverages stratification.
He just threw out a buzzword to make the question go away. It didn't need to make any sense.
WP7 is a commoditising platform. Getting Nokia on-board gives it some street cred. It also gives LG et al an easy prime target to undercut.
Of course Ballmer doesn't care whether Nokia survives or not.
The Law of Diminishing Returns kicks in sooner for a mobile device than a laptop or desktop,
Most phone-style platforms have limited memory bandwidth etc because of the limitations of size and low power hardware. Amdahl's Law kicks in sooner too.
Since very few people are going to use their mobile devices for running web servers or compile farms it is hard to think what 4 cores will achieve on a phone platform that 2 can't.
4 cores probably only makes sense on a tablet or greater. Where they will likely make the biggest inroads is in netbooks and servers (think server racks that don't need air conditioning).
"They can't possibly get a WP7 device out at all this year,." The phone platforms can run just about any OS you'd care to try: Symbian, WP7, Android... dropping WP7 onto the phone should be pretty straightforward.
What they will lose are all their 3rd party developers. MS surely hopes that 3rd party developers are so wed to Nokia that they will crank out apps that will then be available for all WP7 phones.
Perhaps more likely is that any 3rdparty app developers will realise that now that Symbian has been torpedoed they need to find a new platform to work with. Expect more to go with iOS or Android.
There are two ways to read that 2%....
Optimistic: It's new and unknown and was only on sale for half a quarter. Therefore 2% is really quite good and if we grow by 2% every half of a quarter well have something like 20% market share by the end of the year !! and by the 2015 we'll have 150% market share!!!
Pessimistic: We advertised the hell out of it and some people have been waiting for a while. That 2% was the mad rush of punters wanting the device. Now that they've bought theres is anyone else going to buy?
I expect reality is somewhat closer to the latter. Just like Zune and Kin.
I am in Christchurch New Zealand.
I go to bing.com. Type "library". On the five pages of results I don't get a single library site in NZ - some from Oz though.
I go to google and do the same. The whole first page is NZ libraries and the Christchurch library up near the top. I also get a map showing the location of all the libraries in Christchurch.
Using pizza as the search pretty much gives the same experience: bing -> random crap none in the town I'm in, google -> pizza joints (+map) in Christchurch.
Bing gave me absolutely nothing worth clicking on and hence no ad revenue for them. Google gives me a regular click-fest.
Considering how little traffic bing gets they could probably have a human sitting there doing the actual searching for you.
bing really need to do better if they want to get punters, particularly in mobile space. The whole point of mobile search is to give people context aware info to satisfy an immediate need. If bing can't do that then WP7 is not going to be very useful.
If this works in Seattle then I suspect it is rigged and hand-tuned just for the Seattle area so Ballmer can find pizza on his way home. Humans being used to do a job that a proper search engine should be able to do on its own. A reverse Turing test if you will.
The design of barriers assumes that adults are capable of taking responsibility for themselves.
Being over 1.95m (6ft 5) and around 130kg (240+lb) , with a good 70% of that above 1m, I can understand that it would be easy to walk into a 1m barrier and topple over the top.
The Android UI is heavily tied to the Dalvik VM. That currently makes use of some features provided by Linux and other POSIX OS, but not by Symbian. No doubt the fine people at Symbian could bodge the support into Symbian if need be.
Relative to the Linux kernel, the Symbian kernel is a bloody nightmare to work with. Its build system is arcane and based on a mashing of various bodgy scripts etc including stuff which still keeps it wedded to Windows development. Been there got the scars to prove it!
Almost ll phones are built on SOCs (system on chips) by people like Qualcomm. The SOC vendors write all the drivers for their SOCs to make their chips easy to use. If they don't provide quality reference designs then the vendors won't use their SOCs.
Why use virtualisation? That only adds more software overhead (ie. more power consumption and makes the chip slower). The SOC vendors want their chips to be as fast and low power as possible to make them as appealing as possible to the vendors.
Just because it's Linux doesn't mean people design cellphones like servers.
Going with WP7 just to snub Android that is as stupid as driving off a cliff to avoid paying road tolls.
Smartphones are high margin devices.
The low-cost candy bar phones make very little profit.
As costs get squeezed the smartphones are increasingly encroaching into candy bar phone space and in 5 years or so maybe candy bar phones will only be made in China, with Chinese branding, for third world use.
So if Nokia don't get their act together in the smartphone space soon, they will get squeezed out completely.
Perhaps the study is flawed, but there is a lot of anecdotal evidence to support the claim that people readily believe any crap out there.
An amazing number of people out there actually believe the youtube cell phone hoaxes about popping corn http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V94shlqPlSI and cooking eggs and that anyone posting that it is a hoax is just a shill for the telcos. Then of course there are all the people that believe stuff about cars running on water.
But is this a generational thing? Since forever people have believed all sorts of nonsense including religion and other mythologies.
Just as many USians wanted schools to give creationism to be given equal status to evolution, here in NZ a Maori group wanted Maori mythology on the creation of NZ to be presented with equal status to tectonics in school geography. The latter was luckily thwarted.
Stupidity surrounds us - it isn't just on the interwebs.
I live and work in rural NZ. I'm out of range of ADSL and have no cell coverage (behind a hill) and therefore no mobile internet.
For the last few years I've been using http://www.scorch.co.nz/ to get wireless broadband. I pay for 2Mbits but regularly get 3+.
The talk of 5MiB has some appeal though I really doubt most rural businesses need anything more than 1Mbits to check the weather, do emails and check on current commodity prices.
2Mbits or more is generally only useful for entertainment purposes. Sure farmers need youtube too, but this is entertainment - not business use.
C'mon folks... Is it really possible to have 4000-odd photos that need "valuable" meta-data? That definition of "valuable" is surely less meaningful than Facebooks definition of "friend".
If this block is so up himself he'd do better to put a mirror in the corner to watch a live HD video feed of himself.
I could buy the "idiots at the top" argument except that:
1) There have always been idiots at the top. Never has there been a time when there have not been idiots at the top sending soldiers into unnecessary battles with deadly outcomes.
2) Signing up for HM Armed Forces is voluntary. The soldiers can read their history books and figure out that they will end up in conflicts, many of them planned by complete bozos who don't value them like mum does.
"never got the chance..." bollocks!
There are always opportunities for further education, even at university level, while you are employed.
I did post-grad computer science studies while employed and while I was conscripted in the South African army. I had to drop one course because it clashed with military exercises but took it again the next year.
When I lived in South Africa I worked with a black guy who really had to grind to get his education. He studied computer science during the apartheid era while living in a tiny dwelling where he lived with his mother. brother, wife and kids. His only study area was the kitchen table which was only available in the evenings after the meal had been made and eaten and the kids had been put to bed. He was working full time, catching a morning bus at around 6 am and getting home at 6.30pm.
If he could make the opportunity then anyone can!
Now tell me you never had the opportunity..... absolute bollocks!