Ask the NSA
If life exists they would be spying on it already.
3509 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jun 2007
Rewind tape to the 1950s and you can see this all over again.
In the 1950s everyone looked forward to a bright new technology-enabled future. Science could do no wrong and everyone wanted to be in on the game. Then in the 1960s technology started to lose its bloom and the anti-techs started to rise. We had Silent Spring and all that building up a picture that technology/science are evil.
Then in 2000 the whole internet revolution really hit its straps. The internet could do no wrong. Internet everything. Web everything whether it makes sense or not. Google is the ultimate part of the web - being able to find stuff. Then the surveillance concerns (always there) became mainstream and people start to worry more about the potential downsides. Now people don't want to be found.
These cycles are just part of human nature. They will continue forever.
It depends...
You can only be charged with contempt of court if a judge tells you to do something within his powers to command and you fail to obey.
He cannot command you to wear a pink miniskirt, for example.
Since there is a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence_in_England_and_Wales, it is only the RIPA act that could give the court any teeth.
I have been closely involved in a two patent cases, one of which was a defense against a well known company with a chair shortage.
They hired two expert witnesses, both at over $400 US per hour. Both swore in their statements that this fee did not impact on what they had to say and both lied their pants off.
Expert witnesses are not witnesses in the general sense of the word. Like good accountants, they can spin the facts any way you want them to.
"FTC can't stop MPHJ from sending letters claiming patent rights, because such letters are protected under its First Amendment right to free speech."
First Amendment does not protect you from charges of mail fraud, blackmail or extortion.
You can be pretty sure that when anyone pulls out the First as their defence, they are skating on very thin ice.
There is a Metro language. It's all the new terminology to describe the UI features and the associated verbiage. No more clicking icons, you now swoosh tiles or some such bollocks.
Then they have charms.
Now I can understand having things called charms on My Pink Pony OS designed for 9 year old girls along with other UI elements called sparkles, tassels, gloss and glitter.
But how is any corporate user meant to take it seriously?
If Joe Sixpack phones up tech support and they tell him he needs more charms they will think they're taking the piss. He will go down there and give 'em a right kicking, no doubt with support from HR.
That's the kind of crap that isn't mature yet. They need to take off the lizard marketing pants and put on beige if they want the corporates back again.
We're here to do work. The computer is a tool, not a lifestyle appliance.
"So many people are missing the point. Metro is there to provide a consistent interface across different devices,"
Why does a car have a steering wheel, a bike handle bars and a horse have reigns?
Technically we could have the same UI across all and, by your logic, this would help people and lead to better road safety. But after 100 years of co-existence, these UIs have not merged.
If you are holding something in your one hand and manipulating it with the other, then a touch screen makes a lot of sense. To do touch well requires a certain screen layout (eg. bigger targets, and not changing the screen behind the user's finger). Due to the natural feedback in your hand/eye coordination, touching something you are holding accurately is child's play. Even moving from stylus to finger touch was a massive UI change.
A desktop is primarily suited to typing on a real keyboard and for precision pointing (mouse). That means you want more text entry, have smaller targets and can pack in more info. ie. a completely different UI.
What you certainly do not want is to mix the two. Having a touch screen monitor on a desktop is just plain terrible. You have to reach away from the keyboard, lean forward (back strain etc) and touch the screen. It is hard to do that accurately and fast. Accuracy and speed are essential for any corporate desktop and MS need to get corporates right otherwise they fail.
"Perhaps the rest of the world could start (accurately) calling them British imperial units, to help the USA readjust?"
Judging from USAian sitcoms, you have to be a bit more obvious than that. Try
"Imperial units only licensed for use in British colonies to keep them subjugated"
"found innocent "
They are very seldom found innocent, but they are often found not guilty.
The difference is that guilt needs to be determined above a "beyond reasonable doubt" threshold.
If someone is though most likely guilty, but there is a bit of doubt, then likely they will be found not guilty.
In general, most cases for drink driving are due to procedural issues allowing a shiny-suited lawyer to have evidence dismissed.
"If there's any problem with ARM it is the fact that every SOC is different."
If there is a problem with Intels it is the fact that SOCs don't exist.
The whole reason all those ARM SOCs do exist is because ARM is easy to design around and is worth designing around.
The reason Intel SOCs don't exist is that Intel keeps all its designs private and plays "Father knows best".
Market forces determine the rest...
"We don't have a Microsoft server product for ARM and it would be a huge deal trying to build one. Anyone running ARM servers is going to run *nix anyway. When this catches on we're screwed. So let's just do what we always do: throw FUD around and hope some sticks."
If MS product developers were half as good as their FUDders, MS would still be a great company.
"I sent a quick email using my iPhone"
It's called creative writing... Lots of detail, even if irrelevant, helps paint a more vivid mental picture.
The assasin drove up slowly in the black Audi, its tyres crunching the gravel..." Black, Audi and crunching gravel sound are all irrelevant.
There are some experimental flow systems in use, but so far the biggest limitation with flow batteries has been concern over the electrolytes getting spilled during crashes. So far these have been noxious substances. If a more friendly electrolyte can be found then flow batteries could take off.
Quick battery changing for solid batteries is not practical. Different vehicles will want different battery shapes and it is impractical for the filling stations to invest in piles of different battery sizes/shapes to support a wide range of vehicles. Imagine coming into the filling station and seeing they still have piles of the square batteries, but you need a round one and the last round one was just sold to the last customer. Also, battery exchange of heavy batteries would be troublesome, needing jacks, cranes or such.
Flow is much handier. Just pump it. It takes on the shape of the tank. One size fits all. The motorist is already familiar with the idea of pumping so there is one less psycological barrier.
You seem to think the NSA cares about who is in power and are a presidential play thing that can be used for the president's purposes.
You would be wrong on both counts.
Firstly, the whole R vs D thing is a false dichotomy. Do you want blue Frootloops or Red Frootloops? It really does not matter; you're still getting Frootloops. The NSA, and all other 3-letter organisations, carry on business regardless of who is in power. They really don't care. The false dichotomy is, however, a nice diversion that keeps Joe Public from paying too much attantion.
Secondly, if - and we may as well assume they are - the NSA is gathering info on presidential candidates, that will be for their own use when one gets in power. They will certainly not diluting the power of that information by using it to bolster the other. It makes no sense to try to fiddle the results because the results really don't matter.
And anyone that believes that Obama can stop Merkel's phone being tapped is a fool. The NSA will continue to tap any phone they see fit, regardless of what the prez or anyone alse says.
It is no longer there to protect the people.
It is no longer there to protect the people in power.
It is now there to protect itself.
Without proper oversight these secretive 3-letter agencies soon become paranoid about the outside world. Everyone else is the enemy and they end up spending vast amounts of their resources protecting themselves.
" One powerful atomic explosion about 50 miles over South Dakota would probably create an EM pulse that knocks out the entire US, lots of Canada, and probably a chunk of Mexico as well... "
Apart from in apocalyptic discussion forumns where the tin foil is plenty, but the physics is little, EMPs just don't work that way. Building and delivering a device needed to cause widespread destruction is beyond the ability of any nation, let alone a rougue state.
The only EMPs to get worried about are solar electromagnetic storms and no amount of NSA spying is going to stop those.
"The NUC (new and old) is very quiet indeed, despite the active cooling"
Until the fan bearings get sad.
When I look at this box I wonder what the hell Intel is really trying to accomplish. There does not seem to be any "killer app" for this device. Intel don't really seem to know either else they would have got the peripheral mix right.
A few people might use these for niche applications, but they require special care and feeding. This is never going to be something that gets bought by Joe Punter.
"HIstory has repeatedly shown that any such cull or dieback is more than made up within 2 generations."
Has it really?
It was certainly the case for WWW1 and WW2, but that is because there were other huge changes at the time. Rapid advances in energy, transport, medicine and agriculture - all independent of the war - gave rise to rapid population growth through the 1900s.
Now that agricultural technology & medicine etc are largely stagnated, perhaps a good old ding-dong war might have an impact.
In a democracy, the voters choose who they get and thus ultimately the policies they get. The voters are not capable of operating scientifically, but instead want policies that fit their pre-conceived thoughts.
The decision was made long before any reports were written.
Expecting any due diligence or scientifically driven methods misunderstands how democracies work.
"a "pause" during WWII"
Bollocks.
If anything, agricultural and industrial activity in UK and many other places **increased** to feed the needs of war.
Besides, 6 years is not long enough period to measure any useful climate data.
Here's an analogy. Go to the beach and do an instantaneous measurement of where the water meets the sand. Five minutes later do another. Now from those you really cannot tell whether the tide is going in or out. Even though tide is a huge change over the long term, there is so much natural short term variation that there is no way to draw any sensible conclusions from anything.
These arguments are complete bullshit for many reasons:
1) Pulling up the ladder: Europe used Africa, as well as coal etc, to "get ahead". Now when China, Africa, India et al want to use coal to advance their economies it is all bad, bad bad.
If the west wants to tell the rest of the world to save the rain forests etc and forgo economic growth for the sake of the planet, then perhaps Europe should set an example. Tear down the cities in Europe, dig up productive agricultural areas, stop using energy and replant with the original pristine wilderness that was there before the humans screwed it all up.
2) "Great cost to Africa". That is surely a huge myth. Where is there any proof that Africa has been disadvantaged by China or Europeans that came before? Over the last 100 years Africa is healthier (live longer), more wealthy, eat better and are better educated than ever before.
Instant disqualification if you mention slavery as an example of whites disadvantaging blacks. Slavery existed in Africa long before the white man ever turned up. Slavery in Africa has never been whites capturing and selling blacks. It was black slave traders finding they could get better prices from white slave buyers than black slave buyers. When slavery came to an end in Europe/America the slave trade in Africa continued - into the 20th century.
Given all the stigmas and illegality, homosexuals would have been wide open to blackmail.
"Got some nice pics here of you and young Freddie here. Imagine the humiliation your mum would feel if these were given to the police and you were dragged through the courts..."
Remember too that this was soon after the shambols of Guy Burgess and the Cambridge Five too, which would have put the spotlight on homosexuality and spying.
I don't understand why you were downvoted for making a perfectly reasonable point.
While there was certainly a huge stigma attached to homosexuality at the time, there was also a huge stigma attached to suicide.
Giving his family & friends the option to think it an accident rather than suicide would be a possible comfort.
Sure, to you or me it is bollocks to hype up terrorism so much....
... but others can spin this the other way too:
We've been able to keep terrorist deaths so low through being hyper-vigilant. We need to keep this up or the terrorists will get ahead. We make no excuses for saving so many American Lives.
The main skills in RC are being able to actually fly the plane and know how to figure out things like remembering to switch directions when flying towards you.
I know this because I lack these skills and have written off RC planes. Twice.
Drones, OTOH, have inbuilt stability control. They don't have to actually flown, just told where to go. No piloting skills required.