But wait...
...there's been a stay of execution!
http://tech.yahoo.com/news/nm/20090603/tc_nm/us_tivo_1
446 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jun 2007
Further greetings from Oregon, where much jingoistic amusement has been garnered from reading quotes and opinion pieces from concerned British people who believe that rampaging gangs of beavers will need only a few years to fell the forests and murder all the salmon in the country. Especially good was this suggestion that it's all a vile Anglo-European plot against the Scots:
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/spectrum/Eager-for-beavers.5271704.jp
...that the overriding Nerd Law principle here should be whether the programs were doing what the creators alleged they were intended to do. AdBlock Plus: the point is to block ads, and so disabling the ones on the NoScript site was well within its purpose. NoScript: the point is to control JavaScript, and changing your ad filters is definitely not part of that. NoScript is in the wrong here.
And I say this as someone who uses NoScript, and finds it blocks enough ads (after cleaning out the default whitelist) to not bother with AdBlock.
The court further finds that the term "Nerd Law" is useful and plans to use it in the future.
So is the issue here that some law defines "at such-and-such location" by where the TV is plugged in?
If you're visiting a friend in a different part of the country, does that fall under the "travelling" exception or do they not count because their house is not a public or commercial space of some sort? (Suppose you visit a hotel owned by your friend near where you live?)
Paris because I feel like I understand this about as well as she does.
My best guess for another factor, at least within the US, is gender balancing at the top-tier universities. They're faced with an applicant pool which is now majority-female, and, just as they do for other minority groups, give preferential treatment to male applicants so as to get a more balanced set of students. This probably works wonders for gender equality in traditionally female subjects, but is one more thing that will shrink the number of women in these traditionally male subjects. (You could get around this with gender balancing by field of study, sure, but most US universities don't require incoming freshmen to have already decided what they're going for a degree in.)
"... other groups of people than Europeans have set out to colonise places in the modern era and done very well: whereas being moved across the oceans as slaves doesn't seem to help people at all."
So, basically, if your ancestors were first to grab a piece of the globalized pie and hang on to it, you're more likely to be rich.
In the US, medical claims are the territory of the Food & Drug Administration, but the FDA's current rules say that it does not regulate vitamins and supplements. So you'll notice all those claims come with disclaimers in tiny print that say this is merely a nutritional supplement and is not intended to diagnose, treat, or prevent any disease.
"WRONG!!!!! I do not even live in the US, but I know that most electronic voting machines DO not register vote for the president when you select straight party ticket."
What the electronic voting machines do depends on the state laws for straight party voting. In some states, if you select straight party and then mark a preference for one partisan race*, that invalidates the straight party selection and then only your votes in specific races count. In others, the straight party selection is a default for all the partisan races where you don't vote, even if you do express specific preferences in some of them.
(Full disclosure: I learned this from being paid to proofread a manual for an electronic voting machine a couple times. If you think that pays a lot, consider me a paid lackey of the e-voting industry.)
*Note for readers outside the US: Adding another layer of complexity, only some of the races on the ballot will allow party endorsements. Generally your city- and county-level offices are nonpartisan elections, and your state and federal ones are partisan (with the notable exception in many states of judicial posts).
New York State has a unique law regarding how the ballot is presented. It's worded in such a way that only the lever-operated voting machines are legal there.
Paper and pencil would probably be an improvement. The only time lever voting machines don't come out as the most unreliable way to vote in the US is when a study doesn't bother to include them.
I recoiled at first, but then I noticed that by adjusting my window width just so, I can see all the stories and no ads. The comment form has text leaking out past the nice line boxes, though. (Firefox 3.01 + NoScript, on XP).
Phooey on the change of comment icons! I especially miss the dead vulture.
Perhaps this is all part of a clever experiment, to be revealed in an upcoming episode, demonstrating how urban legends spread. Will fans accept Adam's explanation, or will deeply held beliefs about evil companies conspiring to hold back the truth prevail? Tune in next week!
Green may not be a more inherently damaging color, but having the higher-powered lasers be green does make a good heuristic for knowing how carefully to treat them.
There are green lasers in use at my workplace (a heavy manufacturer) for measurement purposes. When they were installed, we were warned that if you stuck your hand in the beam, the resulting injury would be "like a bad sunburn". I can only imagine what they would do to an eye.
(I wonder if you could get an extra-powerful red pointer through Australian security, though, on the grounds that "only the green ones are dangerous".)
"What, in all seriousness, is wrong with requiring disabled people to take an able-bodied carer of their own choice -- and, therefore, presumably whom they trust -- to help them cast their vote?"
1. Because then it's not a secret ballot.
2. Suppose they are unlucky enough to not have someone in their life who they trust and is available to them on voting day?
The way this is normally handled, actually, is for one of the (presumptively neutral) pollworkers to provide assistance.
Mostly this just comes down to disabled people wanting to be able to take control of their own activities like real adults. There are a ton of advocacy sites that can explain further.
"Also, what was the rationale for going to a purely computerized voting system ?"
The biggest reason is usually cost, in not having to buy tons of paper and ink (which is one of the reasons there's so much resistance to voter-audited paper trails) or replacement mechanical parts.
There's also the speed at which the result is announced. Even optical-scan ballots can take hours to count. (And there's cost again-- less overtime paid to fewer people.)
And there's the Help America Vote Act, which among other things says that blind people have to be able to vote unassisted. Your options there are either finding a way to get he ballot printed in Braille, or buying an electronic system which includes an aural feedback mode.
Mechanical voting is more reliable? No matter what study you read, if it includes lever voting machines, they get rated less reliable than punch cards, hand-marked ballots, or electronic systems.
Just mark the piece of paper next to your choice? We do that here in Oregon. Believe me, people can mess it up: marking multiple choices, writing in illegible names...
And here's a failure mode which I believe is unique to Oregon's system: In the last election, when ballot envelopes were opened for counting, a few hundred (IIRC, the story's stick behind a paywall now) contained things that were not ballots-- random receipts, shopping lists, nothing at all. A bunch of people took a sample ballot from an ad urging them to vote no on a ballot measure and just mailed that, apparently thinking it was a valid ballot.
Ah, but this wouldn't happen if people had to go to the polls and vote under supervision? Okay, find the volunteers who can spare a Tuesday to be your pollworkers. If we hadn't all gotten focused on a few dozen hanging chads in 2000, the big story in Florida would have been the *thousands* of voters allegedly disenfranchised because their polling places opened hours late and they gave up waiting. Oregon probably would never be able to switch back from vote-by-mail for lack of pollworkers.
Full disclosure: I developed an interest in election technology through having a relative who worked on voting-machine software. You haven't heard of the company because they've never been the cause of an election fiasco, real or hypothetical.
Mr. Gehry is perfectly capable of creating buildings that don't work in California as well. He's also responsible for the Walt Disney Concert Hall, whose curvy, shiny aluminum roof had to undergo an emergency lowering of albedo after it was discovered to be creating hotspots in the buildings next door.
The problem with eMusic is it's only 28-43¢ per song if you download the maximum per month. That is the one and only reason I never signed up with them. Most of the music I listen to is on minor labels, so the catalog looks great to me.
I have some quibbles with the Terms of Service (http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/105-6510517-0173254?ie=UTF8&nodeId=200154280) though. Can't lend the CD you burned to a friend? Umm...
Writing from the part of the US where NASCAR has actively tried to kill its own local series, I feel compelled to point out that there are other stock car sanctioning bodies in the US-- ARCA, ASA, and Pro Cup spring to mind, and not being a huge fan of stock cars myself, I've probably missed others.
I think the the committee that approved this marketing idea looked at the unusually high cost (due to the box and having to stuff it full of shredded paper by hand) : "If this marketing campaign costs $X more than usual, it must be X better than our usual mailings!"
(And, for the C and C-like programmers reading this, the number of =s in the title is intentional.)