Re: Fake news!!!
Welll... To be fair it once veered wildly off course, disintegrated and was then explosively terminated by range control.
4422 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Mar 2012
ABS plastic is never as good when recycled as when new. For Lego this means they can probably recycle a small amount of fresh factory waste (Sprues and such) by adding a small percentage to new material but used Lego bricks cannot be recycled to something with sufficient quality. You can probably make other stuff out of it, but it is usually much weaker plastic.
It seems to me this is also at least in part caused by the loss of their central great magnificent jesus Jobs. Shit like this would get people yelled at, so they had a central focus point of: "It has to work well enough for me not to get yelled at by Jobs".
Without that central focus point everybody is working for some manager or another that is not really communicating with anyone else. Meaning there is no focus at all.
I doubt they are correct there. The bunny hopping wasn't because of the suits, it was simply the most effective way for us bipedals to move in the low gravity environment (Compared to what we are used to).
And the falling will happen too. Because humans are clumsy and not used to a low gravity environment.
Can we please NOT mention FLARM in discussions like this. Imho it's a fucking disgrace of a system that should never have found widespread use in the way that it did, and is actively detrimental to flight safety in many areas. It has it's uses in mountain flying when stuck to a ridgeline doing 200 km/h in a glider, or for a paraglider pilot on that same ridgeline, but over flat or merely hilly land it's a nuisance and pilots rely on it too much. The fact the company that sells it holds a monopoly and is actively working to keep it proprietary and closed (With the price of new systems rising higher and higher too) doesn't help either. The fact that they brought out updates that actively break the system by stopping the updated flarms from seeing unupdated ones is to me a reason the whole GA community that used them at the time should have just told Flarm to fuck off.
The people who get harassed, stalked, attacked and or lynched, who suffer real consequences because people who DO participate read the false rumours and lies spread about them would certainly care. That is the point. You don't need to participate to suffer the consequences of anti-social media!
In my backyard would be a bit tricky (or it would have to be a very small reactor), but I wouldn't mind living close to a nuclear plant. It's highly unlikely I'd ever suffer any negative effects from it, any worse than I'd be exposed to now (several now shut down reactors in Germany, a few operating ones in Belgium (Doel and Tihange), and 3 in the Netherlands (Borselle, Petten and a small research reactor in Delft) are all close by in geographical terms).
It doesn't actually even require a sighting of a drone. Given there's still no evidence at all anyone actually saw one. A kite with some LEDs in the twilight will achieve the same thing (Also illegal to do btw), or possibly even just a frisbee with some LEDs and a strong arm.
You make sure the frame is strong enough to withstand the likely wind forces (easy-ish to calculate), make the siding/skin strong enough to withstand those wind load and that all holes and vents can be plugged up to prevent over-pressure inside the building. Then you remove anything in the vicinity that could be turned into a wind blown projectile. After that the steps should be easy: Cross your fingers, pray to whatever deity you prefer and hope for the best.
Oh and minor nitpick, to get the same energy as the Chicxulub impact you need a bit more than a few thousand Tsar bombs. Copied from Wikipedia:
The Chicxulub impactor had an estimated diameter of 11–81 kilometres (6.8–50.3 mi), and delivered an estimated energy of 21–921 billion Hiroshima A-bombs 1.3*10^24 and 5.8*10^25 joules, or 1.3–58 yottajoules). For comparison, this is ~100 million times the energy released by the Tsar Bomba, a thermonuclear device ("H-bomb") that remains the most powerful man-made explosive ever detonated, which released 210 petajoules (2.1*10^17 joules, or 50 megatons TNT).
My own calculation based on the numbers in the article would come at just over 3 million Tsar bombs, so I don't think the number of little johns in the article is entirely accurate.
Planes can (and do) follow a set of waypoints. And have been capable of doing that since the introduction of Inertial Navigation Systems and today they use GPS backed up by INS. Nowadays, theoretically planes COULD be built that do the entire flight autonomously if everything keeps working. Currently you need a human in the cockpit to handle comms, switch settings, press buttons, and handle anything out of the ordinary. The systems we have to do unmanned flight are not as reliable as having a well trained human in the mix, so nobody wants to use them. And it's very likely it'll stay that way for quite some time. On top of that those systems only work if everything keeps working as expected. Throw a failure into the mix (even something innocuous) and things will go bad fast. No matter how slim the chances, I'd like a plane I'm on to be flow by something that can handle something unexpected. Be it something small (like an engine exhaust running hot and diverting to an alternate before something goes bad) or something large (like the Gimli Glider or the Sioux City DC-10 crashlanding). It's not a guarantee for success, but it gives a chance.
As Vulch said, it's all about thermal management. Lunar nights (because they are so long) are very cold. While the electronics themselves don't mind, most batteries can't survive such low temperatures, meaning that as the sun rises again there's no longer a power buffer available for things that take a lot of energy in a short burst (like transmitting data). While the craft might not be completely dead, effectively it is.
Due to the length of the night just adding more insulation isn't enough to keep things warm, you really need a heater. Spacecraft design is always a balancing act of vehicle weight versus the power available from the launch vehicle and decent stage. In this case they probably decided more instruments outweighed the benefit of extended mission time.
Depends on what the mode is. If it's mostly young twenty something guys with a few outlier daredevil octogenarians you could say it's (mostly) young males getting injured. If it's mostly 50 something midlife-crisis types with a few 18 year olds to pull down the average then it might not be the right conclusion. Averages can be very deceiving.
"Fast charging stations are for the development version of electric cars. Production electric cars will have easily replaceable battery packs constructed to a universal standard."
It's been tried (the model S was capable of this battery pack swapping in it's first prototype iteration for instance), but it turns out the amount of peripherals you need to do this safely makes the economics of it just not measure up to any gains in efficiency. On top of that, it turns out drivers of electric vehicles aren't too keen on having to rely on an unknown battery pack with an unknown lifetime charge cycle count (And it's very difficult to actually measure how good or bad a battery pack is.)
Tesla started with 18650s, but are now using a larger size cells (21700) for the Model 3 and Model Y. They've also stated they'll continue using the larger cells for any future models.
It's not easy to scale up manufacture of battery cells. For one China currently has a near monopoly on some of the elements required for battery production, secondly it will require building several MASSIVE factories to come even close to the scaled up demand that is expected. It's a financial gamble and outlay that not many companies can easily do. Not to mention the challenges of actually making lithium (or other type) cells that are actually reliable in the long run.
It's easy to place people on the general political spectrum. Peterson is definitely on the center-right. There's nothing all that controversial on his position in a general view of the world. Most of what he's known for is his resistance to the whole gender pronoun thing and can be summed up by: "I should not be FORCED to have to go out of my way to use very specific language just so you don't have your feelings hurt". And quite frankly I agree with him on that.
As to the funding from Rebel Media, that's not entirely the story. His research grant from the University of Toronto was cut off (for somewhat dubious and badly argumented reasons) and Rebel Media (amongst others) started a crowdfunding campaign to give Peterson the money he needs to continue his research (That's not his salary btw, but money to hire and pay PHDs, fund the execution, etc). That means the money he's getting isn't coming directly from Rebel Media. Sure some of the crowdfunding "sponsors" might be right wing extremists, but that can't and shouldn't influence the research itself The results are still scientific work, they're still publicized, it's still open for peer review. If the work he delivers at the end is of all this IS indeed far right wing ideology then maybe we can take something from it, but so far, none of what he has published is really far-right wing material. And even if it were, the correct way to fight it is to provide peer-review and data to refute his research.