* Posts by imanidiot

4405 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Mar 2012

When civilisation ends, a Xenix box will be running a long-forgotten job somewhere

imanidiot Silver badge
Holmes

Digital archeology

It is the year 2087. After the great plague, a team of intrepid whizzkids travels the now empty countryside, searching through abandoned buildings to find the hidden digital treasures within. With their skills in long forgotten codes they intend to find out the function of these strange boxes, hidden in corners and backrooms amongst the detritus of a civilization long gone.

NASA boffins seem to think we're worth saving from fiery asteroid death so they're shooting a spaceship at one

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Hollywood Fantasists

The idea isn't to destroy the object or necessarily to move the entire rubble pile in one go. But if we can impact the asteroid early enough, even if it "blows apart" the collective trajectory of the rubble (before or after coalescing again will have moved enough to miss earth. The idea isn't to intercept and deflect an asteroid on a straight line impact course for earth just a few thousand km above our atmosphere, because that's likely beyond the realm of physics. The idea is that we can detect an asteroid that will impact earth one or two orbits later and deflect it before it passes through a "keyhole" where a minimum amount of deflection will already sent it on a widely different orbit.

imanidiot Silver badge
WTF?

Re: Hollywood Fantasists

Understanding how to do it on something "small" and "light" (at approximately 160 to 170 meters diameter and a mass of 2170+/-350 kg, I'd prefer it not to land on my house) means we also have much better understanding on how to potentially do it on something much larger, heavier and faster.

I still don't understand why you think this is pointless. Generating understanding and data on this is a useful tool for understanding asteroids, our universe and for pushing the boundaries on what we can do to save our planet in the unhappy case we ever find something hurtling towards us. Yes, it'll have a good chance of blindsiding us like it did the dinosaurs, but I'd prefer if these boffins did their best to come up ways to give us a sliver of a chance. I won't be losing any sleep over the possibility of it happening, but it's good that the efforts are made.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Hollywood Fantasists

We're getting better and better at detecting NEOs and are working on solving a lot of the other ifs. We'd never get anything done if we take into account all the ifs.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Hollywood Fantasists

Why wouldn't it work? F=ma and E=1/2*mv^2 tells us that it does. All other outside influences eliminated hitting something heavy with something much lighter moving at a high relative velocity will change the velocity vector of the heavy thing. What is being demonstrated here is just how efficient such a high velocity impact will be, and that the technology required to find such a target in the vast emptiness of space, rendezvous with it and precisely target the impact works. The math on WHY it works is simple. The technology to actually do so is far from trivial.

Swooping in to claim the glory while the On Call engineer stands baffled

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Hands On

"Electro Education"

I prefer Electron Assisted Learning.

Robotaxis freed to charge across 60km2 of Beijing

imanidiot Silver badge

I've never been in a taxi in Mediterranean countries so can't really say anything on that. I have experienced the "driving on the hard shoulder, overtaking trucks, in the dark, with one headlight out, 30km/h over the speedlimit" and similar shenanigans in a few asian countries.

imanidiot Silver badge

I don't feel the current tech is safe enough for either the taxi occupants or those around it on the streets. While the bar of the average asian taxi driver (I know, broad brush, it's not that bad everywhere, etc) is a pretty darn low standard to meet, I still think all these robot systems are only fine in "everything normal" situations. Throw in some bad road wear, a missing sign, some fog or smog, etc and things suddenly don't work so well anymore.

ESA's Solar Orbiter will swing past Earth this week – sure hope nobody created a big cloud of space junk up there

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Maybe switch to Moon flybys in future

You'd still be planning most of your maneuvers about the earth gravity well, but then you also have to plan it in such a way that you can get into the earth gravity well and slingshot around towards the moon at just the right time that you can THEN do a slingshot around the moon. Makes for a REALLY tricky maneuver. And when SO was launched nobody expected someone to do an ASAT test at that altitude (Because it also endangers the ISS and many other useful low earth observation orbits). By the time the ESA team would have known about the ASAT test debris they were already inexorably committed to making this maneuver at that altitude. They've probably got a proverbial window up there of only a few dozen square kilometers that they'll be aiming to fly through.

LoRa to the Moon and back: Messages bounced off lunar surface using off-the-shelf hardware

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Off the shelf equipment?

Possibly unique in the world. The dish they're using was originally built for scientific research (and was the largest in the world for a bit). In 2007 it was given to a group of amateur radio astronomers and they've spent a lot of time rebuilding the dish and making the whole thing operational again. Since iirc 2016 the radiotelescope is now available for amateur radioastronomers and other people interested in doing something with large dish like that who can convince the people running it that what they want to do makes sense and won't break the thing (barring apparently some internal kerfuffles within the organisation running the scope and the whole global virus stuff).

See also: www.camras.nl and the wiki page on the Dwingeloo radio telescope

Rust dust-up as entire moderation team resigns. Why? They won't really say

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Those who can, code.

Depends entirely on what the purpose of the team is. If the team is there to execute whatever someone else though up, having 1 brain with 12 hands might very well be much more efficient and lead to better outcomes than having 12 different brains with 12 hands.

When it comes to any software, that which has value eventually boils down to the code and how well that code functions within the framework of the software. In that regard the measure of value of someone's output IS in that individuals code.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Sounds like the team

If applied properly WD40 should form a film/coating and keep stuff from rusting (if protected from direct exposure to the elements)

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: A shame...

I get the suspicion there's actually something going on within the core team that the Mod team feels they should act on, but can't because Core is blocking any such action. And they're avoiding actually mentioning any of that because it's bad enough it'll make all of them look very bad.

Server errors plague app used by Tesla drivers to unlock their MuskMobiles

imanidiot Silver badge

Tesla QC is horrible even for Dacia Sandero territory. I've seen Austin Princesses put together better than some Tesla's. I've seen a model 3 where I couldn't find a single straight consistent panel gap, the interior had bad gaping, seat stitching coming loose, etc. All basics that other car manufacturers have all figures out for a long time.

imanidiot Silver badge

And this is why I hate always connected cars

How in the Ruttin' world does an update like this get pas any sort of testing and released to user cars? And why in the world can a software or connectivity glitch prevent something as basic as opening the car or turning it on?

Oh, your dad had a heart-attack, might not have long to live and you need to get to hospital? Or you're just driving the kids to soccer? Well sucks to be you, car says No "500 Server Error"

Makes me more and more inclined to just stick to my good old 2001 Volvo.

Truckload of GPUs stolen on their way out of San Francisco

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: But how would the buyer know?

That makes the assumption that the product was cheap and the buyer could have known better. But with the current dearth of availability those carts will probably be sold with just as much markup and premium as "gray market"/scalped stock from resellers operating within the law.

imanidiot Silver badge

But how would the buyer know?

Since the only way to get a GPU nowadays seems to be through scalpers, how would a buyer ever know if what he's buying was stolen or not?

Russia's orbital insanity is almost beyond redemption – but there's space for improvement

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Can we update Dr Strangelove?

If the Cold War ever turns hot (No, the cold war hasn't ended, it just went even colder for a few dozen years), one of the first things that will happen is both sides either selectively destroying all known opposing nav, ELINT, comms and ground observation satellites by use of ASAT weapons or just an indiscriminant destruction of all such sats by use of a few nuke detonations in space. If either side is going to launch a large scale attack the last thing either wants is the other side having GPS/GLONASS, intelligence or communications. There's a reason most military doctrine is still relying on NOT using space based systems. Those are usually considered a "nice to have" but not a "will definitely be available".

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Russia bashing

I have no idea what you're referring to here.

The ideal sat-nav is one that stops the car, winds down the window, and asks directions

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: The make-up later on compensates like tech never can provide

LEFT! Past that big tree. NOT THAT ONE, THE BIG TREE!

imanidiot Silver badge

My go-to for navigation has been Here WeGo for a long time, but it's been getting progressively more shit with each new update imho (like now forcing the use of the Google-y Android voice synth, which sounds like an absolute bitch barking commands at you no matter what voice you choose. I vastly preferred the previously available recorded female voice as she sounded much more friendly, was much more comprehensible and didn't bother reading superfluous information like street names). The one bright shining feature it currently still has is being able to download maps for offline use. Because even though phone companies CLAIM you'll have perfect reception everywhere, any time in northwestern Europe, the reality is that in my experience that isn't the case. Especially when you're "roaming" on a different network in a foreign country and your data connection suddenly makes a 56k dialup modem seem like a FTTH gigabit broadband connection.

Google Maps navigation routing in my experience has a tendency to choose weird routes because they're 100 meters shorter and theoretically faster if you ignore the traffic lights and the tendency for people to be complete idiots. Which means the routes Google Maps chooses are usually slower, more shit and more stressful. It also seems to indicate turns and highway exits either stupidly early (such that you've forgotten them again by the time you get to the actual turnout, or you need to pay attention so that you don't take an exit too early) or stupidly late (such that you can't actually make the turn or take the exit safely).

BOFH: You drive me crazy... and I can't help myself

imanidiot Silver badge

I think the main idea behind the quicklime is to destroy any external traces. It's fine ne if they can determine someone died by blunt force trauma and that the pattern of bruising seems to match the keyboard of an early model Thinkpad, as long as they can't find DNA traces or other clues as to who was wielding said notebook, the BOFH in in the clear.

Former Broadcom engineer accused of pinching chip tech to share with new Chinese employer

imanidiot Silver badge

I'd estimate it takes about a minute per machine for both EUV and DUV litho machines to destroy them beyond easy repair without help from ASML. A good smack to the lens column with something heavy will do it for a DUV system, EUV systems have to be kept in vacuum, deliberately breaking that (especially with wafers in the system) will make recovery very time consuming and require replacement of lots of very expensive parts (at the very least the entire optics train). IF the PRC ever invades the Republic of China then I doubt they'll allow TSMC litho equipment to remain operational. Even if they did, keeping litho systems running without the spare parts supplies would be tantamount to being able to build your own systems anyway.

imanidiot Silver badge

The US and other high-tech players have been practically shoveling their IP into the PRC as fast as they could. Now that they're finally starting to realise their errors, the peoples republic will find other ways to squeeze more data. It's only a matter of time before China develops it's own semicon litho equipment (though it'll probably be a long while) and when they do, they've basically lost all dependence on "the western world". At that point, there will likely be trouble.

Rolls-Royce set for funding fillip to build nuclear power stations based on small modular reactor technology

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Nuclear powered shaver.

At roughly 20 tons of CO2 produced per ton of carbon fiber produced that's... not exactly true.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Fusion

"all of them expecting to die from the radioactivity, but so far not one of them (afaik) has"

IIRC one or two workers have in the process of their duties (also before the "disaster", which should primarily be referred to as the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, not the "Fukushima disaster" imho) been exposed to a radiation level above a certain threshold and subsequently developed a form of cancer which entitles them and their families to certain payouts for "workplace injuries". This incidence rate is however not outside the naturally occurring incidence rate so not indicative of much of anything.

imanidiot Silver badge

They're an obvious solution to the professional nuclear engineers too. It's just that obvious solutions aren't always easy to build. Fusion reactors are also an obvious solution. Doesn't mean we know how to build one.

Thorium reactors have their drawbacks too, they're not the end all of nuclear energy, but they could certainly be another tool in the box of tools of energy supply.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Nuclear powered shaver.

As opposed to the millions of kilograms of fiberglass reinforced polyester/epoxy composite in windturbine blades and the millions of kilograms of bonded silicon and glass solar panels that are all completely un-recyclable and also dangerous and toxic to be around (heavy metals and other toxic compounds) that are currently the paraded "solution" by the greenies that won't actually reliably keep our lights on long term.

If the hippies didn't so heavily oppose nuclear fuel processing and plutonium containing MOX fuels then the environmental impact of nuclear in terms of greenhouse emissions for mining and processing Uranium would be even further reduced and the problem of high radioactive waste would also strongly diminish. But no, we can't have that.

Oregon city courting Google data centers fights to keep their water usage secret

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: how much?

and a problem we'd never have in proper Reg units. Is that imperial, US gallons, US dry gallons, Winchester or Corn Gallon, Henry VII (Winchester) corn gallon from 1497 onwards, Elizabeth I corn gallon from 1601 onwards, William III corn gallon from 1697 onwards, Old English (Elizabethan) Ale Gallon, Old English (Queen Anne) Wine gallon, London 'Guildhall' gallon (before 1688), Jersey gallon (from 1562 onwards), Guernsey gallon (17th century origins till 1917) or Irish Gallon?

Atleast with olympic size swimming pools we can point to FINA rules.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: I admire water usage in Abu Dhabi, if not its source

"but they have little choice apart from using solar stills"

They do have a choice, that whole smegging city should simply NOT BE THERE!

The only way that place can stay in existence is by burning extremely large amounts of oil and oil dollars to spend silly money on keeping the aircon and taps running. And many of the high-rise buildings aren't even connected to the sewer so they have to transport it to the treatment plant by ruttin' truck!

IMHO if a place is too hot or dry to live in without enormous expenditure of energy for air cooling and water treatment, maybe people should simply not be living there.

Amazon hasn't launched one internet satellite yet, but it's now planning a fleet of 7,774

imanidiot Silver badge

The ones in a low enough orbit (below 500 or so Km) will de-orbit by themselves soon enough (within a few years) by atmospheric drag. The ones above that will take much longer to deorbit if this is not done actively. While all the sats will likely have the equipment to do so, and the plan is to do so, with 7000+ sats up there even a 1% failure rate due to unforeseen hardware problems (or micro-meteoroid/space debris impacts) means 70+ sats left up there out of control. Just from this constellation alone.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Climate change?

Because Raptor can't throttle down far enough. A single raptor at minimum throttle (40%) still puts out nearly the same power (750kN or so) as a Merlin at full thrust (850kN roughly)

The landing burn is done on a single Merlin at nearly the bottom of the throttle range (500kN or so) and even then it's cutting it close in terms of lighting the engine and performing the divert maneuver to actually reach the barge or pad (since the rocket aims just to the side during the free-flight phase of the return so as not to hit it at "oops the rocket didn't work" velocities). That "hover slam" maneuver is designed to reach as close to zero fuel, at zero feet altitude and zero velocity as possible. For a rocket like F9 in that weigh/performance class the weight ratios can't really change, so with a raptor engine with much more thrust the time between lighting the engine and the rocket coming to a dead stop (or rising up again) are too close together to light the engine, divert course to end up on the barge/pad and come to a stop at 0 altitude without some seriously risky aggressive maneuvering angles. Plus lighting an engine at that higher thrust level also puts more forces and stresses on the air frame, which the structure might not like very much.

The whole point of F9 is that the engines are no longer the super expensive bit either, since they don't get thrown away after every launch. Sure you could maybe stop the assembly line of Merlin engines, but that line is basically on "tick-over" as it doesn't need to supply new engines for every launch. The expensive bit for engine production has been done already anyway. The production line exists, the engineering is done. Other than a continued cost of personnel and upkeep keeping it going is not super expensive anymore compared to the umpteen million spent on building the line in the first place.

Redesigning F9 to take Raptors is probably not going to save more in Merlin production line costs than it costs in engineering time investment alone to redesign F9 from the ground up to take Raptor engines. That is the paradox of engineering. Sometimes it's cheaper NOT to do something, even though every fiber in your being as an engineer SCREAMS that something can be done cheaper, better, faster and more reliable. If you're only going to be building maximum 30 of something in the next 10 years, and you might save 50.000 per unit (so roughly 1.5 million in total) but it costs you 2 million in engineering and tooling costs, does it make sense? Only if you expect to keep building the thing for the next 30 or more years.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Nightmare scenario...You just know it will be a constellation of satellites...

All you could ask for and more

Because ofcourse Randall Munroe looked into that already ;P

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: The future's so bright i gotta wear shades

That's what I'm saying. You DON'T see the individual satellites. But together they reflect enough light to still be a nuisance.

imanidiot Silver badge
Boffin

Re: Climate change?

"which I'm guessing will find their way into the Falcon boosters before long."

EXTREMELY unlikely. That would involve a ground up redesign for Falcon 9, which doesn't make economic sense. Nor can the F9 really use the (much more powerful) Raptor engines as they can't be throttled down as much in general, and using fewer more powerful engines means you can't just shut a few down and use only a single engine for landing. Using Raptor on F9 would mean giving up re-usability.

Theoretically it MIGHT be possible to redesign the Merlin to run on liquid methane, but that would still be a massive effort that they don't really need. I'd find it more likely they'd invest in making synthetic liquid fuel from methane that the Merlin 1D can run on without modification (which is proven to be possible, just currently not economically viable).

imanidiot Silver badge
Flame

RIP Astronomy

Can't let science get in the way of making dollars now can we?

imanidiot Silver badge
Boffin

Re: The future's so bright i gotta wear shades

With that many satellites in orbit even their low apparent magnitude is going to wash out the sky and cause a "glow" that makes the milky way and stars much harder to see. It's definitely NOT just long exposure telescope photo's that are affected.

NASA advised to study up on what open source, free software, and permissive licenses actually mean

imanidiot Silver badge

But CAN NASA even comply with OSIs defintion?

Looking at their list I'm seeing several points where likely NASA will have problems complying one way or another simply because of other laws or restrictions placed on it by the government, contractors, suppliers or international regulations like ITAR.

True, it'd be nice if they could be consistent in what license they release stuff under, and it'd be nice if they could use more widely used and recognized licenses, but the problem with "Open source" is standards. And opinions. Everybody's got one, and they're all different. (But in the end they're like *ssholes. Everybodies got one and most of them are full of sh...)

Hibernating instrument on Hubble roused as engineers ponder message problem

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: "...A software workaround for an iffy component looms. Sound familiar?"

It could have worked fine if they had used 3 sensors and implemented a "voting" system to reject spurious data. The fault wasn't necessarily "fixing it in software". The fault was in doing so badly, ignoring the added hardware requirements and not providing training. Oh, and lying to aviation authorities about the nature and effect of the new systems of course. That's kind of a big issue all by itself even if it hadn't gone wrong.

Airbus has very similar systems in all their aircraft, the difference being that they implemented them properly and pilots are trained in their existence, effects and failure modes.

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Use the backup

Corollary rule of government spending: build two, pay thrice the price!

- Me, probably

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Use the backup

Building a single copy of all your unique instruments right from the get go is a seriously stupid idea though. The actual hardware isn't the big cost (apart from the main mirror, that's a very expensive bit of hardware). For all the other stuff you make 2 and start assembling at least the more basic stuff, pick the best and then integrate all the best choices into a single vehicle for launch to orbit. I highly doubt the museum piece would be fully functional and orbit capable hardware. At the very least it'll be missing a mirror (they only made one. Incorrectly as it turns out)

Blizzard co-leader Jen Oneal leaps into escape pod after just three months in the role

imanidiot Silver badge

sure...

"I am doing this not because I am without hope for Blizzard, quite the opposite – I’m inspired by the passion of everyone here, working towards meaningful, lasting change with their whole hearts"

But apparently it's such a pile of hot garbage she doesn't want to be anywhere near the company when the smell comes out again

Samsung releases pair of jeans that can't do anything except cover your legs and hold a Galaxy Z Flip 3

imanidiot Silver badge
Paris Hilton

"Who needs big pockets?"

Given the deafening squeeing that happens any time someone of the fairer sex finds a garment with ANY pockets and the volume of that squeeing seemingly directly related to the size of those pockets, I'm guessing everyone.

-->Probably wondering where she's going to put stuff

Of course we've tried turning it off and on again: Yeah, Hubble telescope still not working

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Hope

Problem is that HST wasn't really made to be easily serviceable at the best of times. It's certainly not designed in a way that would be conducive enough to a robotic mission (autonomous or remote control) to get it to make sense

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Hope

Next gen hubble is basically the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope currently in development. Not exactly a direct replacement for hubble as NGRST will be a wide field scope (so wider angle image, a bit like a shorter focal length camera lens). NASA theoretically already has another spare spy satellite bus lying around to build another Hubble class telescope on (HST is also strongly based on the previous generation of spy satellites), but the costs of building it are not in budget.

imanidiot Silver badge
Unhappy

Re: Hope

Not really. Expect the first 100 (or more) Starship launches to be unmanned. The current plans for the manned version don't include any provisions for on orbit capture and repair/service work or "space-walking" like a manipulator arm or airlock. And there's no other spacecraft currently in the works that could. Even if they were to start now, they wouldn't be able to get anything remotely mission ready before HST was truly dead. Even with the shuttle still flying, preparing the service missions took years of advance planning and they no longer have the luxury of having a spacecraft set up to do exactly what is required for this sort of mission.

If they can't get HST back up, that's it. That's effectively the end. And it's a crying shame.

Remember the 'guy in a jetpack' seen flying close to passenger jets? Probably just balloons, says FBI

imanidiot Silver badge

More evidence

That when it comes to drone/jetpack/ufo sightings, pilots aren't the definitive authority. They can make mistakes too. All too often the comments below videos about this sort of phenomenon devolve into "but it was a pilot who reported it, he knows what a normal plane looks like, so this MUST have been a UFO!". Which is utter bunk. Pilots can be just as much idiots as any of us.

Tesla slams into reverse, pulls latest beta of Full Self-Driving software from participating car owners

imanidiot Silver badge

Engine ECU's are nowadays a tiny (and mostly inconsequential) part of what a car does. Most of it's functionality is dictated by a central computer (often the "infotainment" system) that is not directly the ECU. And that includes stuff like controlling light modules (now controlled though a CANbus interface, instead of switching 12V on or off), heater controls (instead of a knob pulling a cable to open or close a valve it's now a 3 levels deep menu on a touchscreen controlling a stepper motor on a valve. Probably again through a CANbus interface to some intermediate module. Airbags? CANbus to intermediate module(s). Seatcontrols? Probably CANbus. Dials/gauges? Electronic screen that will mysteriously die 2 weeks after warranty ends and will be unobtainium in 10 years, controlled through CANbus of course. Serialised too so you can't put in a different one if it breaks. And no, mileage is usually stored on several OTHER modules, not on the instrument/dial cluster itself nowadays so it's not that either.

There's lots and lots and lots of stuff in modern cars that is basically proprietary electronics/programming that means it becomes harder and harder to make/buy aftermarket stuff to repair cars that are broken. You can currently keep a now 15 year old car on the road for a very long time with the spares available to purchase nowadays. Repairing a 10 year old car is very tricky as lots of stuff is no longer available. Cars that are now 5 years old will very likely be completely repairable 10 years from now because of some stupid electronics stuff that is completely unnecessary to the function of the car and completely unobtainable by that time preventing it from working. If you don't believe that, just keep a look out for how many slightly older model VAG cars you see about with the early generations of LED lighting and how often they're failing. But they're monolithic units and extremely expensive to replace so nobody does it. And all this is WORSE with electrical cars because they all use basically entirely and only proprietary equipment in their battery, BMS and driveline. Tesla's are very difficult to fix by design for instance and lots and lots of their functionality can be disabled remotely by Tesla at their whim. There is no way to opt out, no way to prevent that. Tesla owns your car, you're just allowed to use it. And the same will go for many others.

Data transfers between the EU and the US: Still unclear on what you're supposed to do? Here's an explainer

imanidiot Silver badge

Re: Pointless

So stats say well over a quarter of people voted leave. Seventeen million, four hundred and ten thousand, seven hundred and forty two people is not exactly a "tiny" number of people. It's not even a small amount of people.

I don't care whether Brexit was a good or bad idea (UK's f*cked either way imho) but stop trying to paint Brexit as a problem caused by a small number of stupid people because that's NOT the reality of the matter and the sooner you face that reality the sooner you might be able to actually steer your politics into a constructive direction again. I am sick and tired of the constant and incessant winging of anti-brexiteers about "a few stupid people did X" AND the pro-brexiteers constant winging about "we voted out, we're out, why still X?" Brexit happened. It's the reality now. MOVE THE FRIG ON! The rest of the world doesn't really care about your rainy little island. Every single EU topic is 50% or more "Buhuhuhuh blubber blubbber brexit" from both sides of the isle.

Google's 'Be Evil' business transformation is complete: Time for the end game

imanidiot Silver badge
Facepalm

Re: Wishful thinking

Because Chrome isn't a hot mess of a browser?