* Posts by handleoclast

1287 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jan 2012

Don't worry, it'll be all Reich! Googler saves Grammarly nazis from hacker invasion

handleoclast

Grammarly adverts work!

A few months ago Youtube found a way around AdBlock Plus so I kept seeing shitloads of Grammarly ads. They worked. They compelled me to find another way of blocking annoying ads and I'm now a very contented user of uBlock Origin. Had their adverts not been so intrusive and annoying I might not have bothered looking for an alternative to ABP and simply put up with them.

Oh, and Grammarly has made its way onto my list of products I would never buy or use and would strongly recommend others never to buy or use. I cannot repeat that strongly enough: avoid Grammarly at all costs.

So Grammarly adverts certainly changed my way of thinking and modus operandi. They work!

South Wales cops crow about facial recognition arrests on social media

handleoclast

Yes, it is too much to ask

@Prst. V.Jeltz

A little common sense isnt too much to ask surely?

The thing about civil service (I use the term broadly) procedures is that they are designed to achieve consistent results. Consistent in that no matter which civil servant (or plod) deals with you, you get the same results. So that if something goes wrong, you complain, the way your case was dealt with is checked against procedures and, in the case of a procedural error, is fixed. Theoretically.

The same process also stifles common sense. Because you may get somebody who uses initiative and gives you a better result than if you'd been dealt with by a different civil servant/plod. Which causes envy and complaints by others. So the common-sensical civil servant/plod is punished for not following procedures.

It's above the pay grade of those in the trenches to question strategy. That might lead people to conclude that the generals are fuckwits.

So yes, common sense is too much to ask.

Hmmm, what's the opposite of /s? I need something to show that although the above may read like it was sarcasm it's actually serious.

Nunes FBI memo: Yep, it's every bit as terrible as you imagined

handleoclast

Re: How to get rid of fleas on your dog

@ Michael Thibault

You pour scorn on the idea that Trump has any influence whatsover, concluding with:

Trump is not a god. He's not an emperor. He's not a king. He's not a dictator. He's just the President of the United States.

The thing is that Trump has fired up a significant proportion of the Republican party. His "base." The approximately 30% of the population that are mouth-breathers who feel under attack by a mysterious "them" and fear the "other." And that presents problems for Republicans in Congress. The base determines the outcome of primaries whilst the population as a whole determine the outcome of an election. Any Republican who fails to support Trump completely might do better in an election but would never get past the primary. Any Republican who whole-heartedly support Trump will win the primary but may well lose the election. Rock and a hard place. Most have chosen Trump and are hoping for a hail Mary pass, a significant number have thrown in the towel and aren't seeking re-election.

Tony Blair once exerted a similar thrall on Labour MPs. They believed that without Tony they'd lose the next election so fell in line with his every moronic whim (such as the Millennium Dome and invading Iraq).

So yes, Trump does have the power to coerce idiots like Nunes to lick the dog shit off the soles of his shoes. Those who do not comply will lose their primaries. Even though Bannon is (mostly) off the scene, the fear remains.

I'm trying to remember another populist politician who exerted similar power over the 30% of the population that feared the "other." As I recall, that didn't end well, but he was very popular right up to the very end when he shot himself in his bunker.

handleoclast

Re: How to get rid of fleas on your dog

There's an old saying "where there's smoke, there's fire" and there's been an unbelievable amount of smoke over this issue.

More than smoke. Actual fire. The Republicans are happy to trash the reputation of the FBI and intelligence agencies and to reveal operational details that will make them less effective. This to me, seems to be the equivalent of ridding your dog of fleas with petrol and a match (a point which has gone over the heads of 12 people so far).

It's hard to imagine even Republicans being so stupid as to cause this much damage if Trump has done nothing wrong. If Trump has done nothing wrong then let the investigation complete, laugh when it finds nothing, and point to the Democrats as being paranoid loons.

Of course, if you throw enough shit then some people remember the shit even if none of it stuck to the wall. As Republicans have frequently demonstrated in the past, with things such as Whitewater, Benghazi, and Uranium One. Some Republican voters still believe those things even though they've been thoroughly debunked. So I can see Republicans worrying that some people would vote based on what Trump has been accused of rather than what he may eventually be convicted of. But this is insane overkill. The equivalent of setting fire to your dog to rid it of fleas.

When the attempts to divert, distract and deny are this frenziedly crazy, it's very likely there's something deeply wrong they're trying to conceal. It's massively disproportionate.

The second-most likely explanation is that Trump has done nothing that is actually criminal but he is so narcissistic he cannot permit anything even slightly detrimental to his reputation to be revealed, so has coerced Nunes and others into this shitshow. Even if that is the case, it shows that none of them are fit to hold the positions they do. If anything, that would reflect even more badly on Trump. Covering up corruption/treason/whatever is bad enough. Going batshit insane and trashing the reputation of the FBI and the effectiveness of the FBI and intelligence agencies over trivialities would be far worse.

handleoclast

How to get rid of fleas on your dog

Douse it with petrol and set fire to it. No more fleas.

How to get rid of an investigation into Presidential wrongdoings...

Answer is left as an exercise for the reader.

Hint: if your answer includes the word "president" your answer is incorrect, but if it includes the words "FBI" or "Justice Department" you're probably a Republican.

Bluetooth 'Panty Buster' 'smart' sex toy fails penetration test

handleoclast

Re: Armor Gummiwaren

Not to be confused with this.

Ignore that FBI. We're the real FBI, says the FBI that's totally the FBI

handleoclast
Coat

Re: Ignore them.

Bog paper - what constitutes a very good foundation for bog paper?

Gideons International provides emergency bog paper in (large) booklet form in hotels.

Dinosaurs gathered at NASA Goddard site for fatal feeding frenzy

handleoclast

Re: My eyes are the age of that slab...

This doesn't upset the 5000-year-old-earth believers since they think it's all fake

Only some of them think that. The Answers In Genitals crowd, led by Ken Ham, have a rather more "creative" explanation. Noah took some dinosaurs with him on the Ark. The rest of the dinosaurs perished in the Noachian flood (which deposited all sedimentary rock at the same time). After the deluge, the animals (representatives of each "kind") mutated into the many species we see today (reducing the number of species required on the Ark). So "microevolution" is possible and occurred at a very much faster rate than we see today. For example, one pair of cats evolved into all the feliforms we now have, but "macroevolution" (dinosaurs evolving into birds) is impossible because reasons. Oh, in that digression I forgot about the dinosaurs carried on the Ark. They died out, because it was important Noah carry them on the Ark so they could survive the flood in order to die out (again, because reasons).

I'm not making any of this up. Ken Ham built a theme park (mostly at taxpayer expense) called The Ark Encounter and now keeps pulling dodgy tricks to avoid having to pay resulting taxes.

Noted creationist fucktard and convicted tax evader Kent Hovind has Dinosaur Adventure Land pushing similar Noachiosaurian bullshit where kiddies can ride dinosaurs just like Jesus did. Every time I think of Kent Hovind I end up watching this.

Fujifilm, Xerox throw each other a US$6.1 billion lifeline

handleoclast
Coat

The venture needs a snappier name

"Fujifilm Xerox" sucks as a brand name.

"Xefilm" sucks even worse.

"Fujirox" is a bit better.

"FuX" sounds best of all.

YMMV.

FBI slams secret Nunes memo alleging Feds spied on Team Trump for political reasons

handleoclast

1933 all over again

Forget cyber crims, it's time to start worrying about GPS jammers – UK.gov report

handleoclast

Re: Cost saving

If they're doing it properly, then they're feeding the GPS timing pulses into ntpd (or equivalent). If they're doing it properly, then ntpd is configured to record how much the system clock is drifting from UTC (as supplied by GPS). If they're doing it properly, then ntpd will be configured to also use networked references (some of which will also be GPS, some of which will derive from atomic time standards). If they're doing it properly, then ntpd will be configured to use the system clock, as compensated by the recorded drift, as a last resort.

With a sensible set up, you'll know the time with less than one second of error for days after GPS fails and all the networked time sources also fail.

It's neither hard nor expensive to get right.

Blockchain bros' London powwow: Regulation, education, oversaturation

handleoclast

Re: I still don't understand

@phuzz

There's already transaction fees for Bitcoins,

That just makes it seem even less workable when new shitcoins are no longer issued. Transaction fees will slowly, but surely, bleed all shitcoin into the hands of those who process the blockchain until nobody else has any shitcoin.

This doesn't happen with "real" fiat money, mainly because of inflation. But when shitcoins hit their mining limit there cannot be any inflation.

So what am I still missing?

handleoclast

I still don't understand

It's probably been explained many times before but if so I haven't seen it (or I didn't understand it when I did see it).

Correct me if I'm wrong on any of these points.

1) Blockchain transactions are verified by multiple people.

2) The first person to verify the transaction is awarded a newly-created fraction of a shitcoin [the generic term for this virtual specie]. This is known as "mining" because you put in the work and may get a nugget of reward for it (or you may just find worthless dirt).

3) Bitcoin (and probably many other shitcoins) has a limit built into it of how many coins can ever be created.

4) Once the Bitcoin (or other shitcoin) limit is reached, no new Bitcoins can be created.

5) With no new coins appearing, miners cannot be rewarded with fractional Bitcoin for verifying blockchain transactions.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the whole thing seems to fall apart once that limit is reached because nobody will be prepared to put in the work to keep it going. Yes, there could be a transaction fee to replace the shitcoin mining reward but I haven't seen any proposals for such a thing.

So have I just missed seeing proposals for transaction fees once shitcoins hit their limits or am I missing something? If I'm missing something it's bound to be something blindingly obvious, so you can have a lot of fun correcting me.

Crooks make US ATMs spew million-plus bucks in 'jackpotting' hacks

handleoclast

Washington Post report

The WaPo report (published on the 28th) covered the same ground as the article and also mentioned use of a modified medical endoscope to access an internal port to install their malware.

Firefox to emit ‘occasional sponsored story’ in ads test

handleoclast

Re: Glad to have jumped off the Mozilla Firefox train wreck long ago.

@AC

What kept me lingering on with Firefox was the Downloadhelper add-on. It's no longer necessary as you can easily download a Youtube, Facebook or Twitter video via special websites e.g. Keepvid.

I got fed up with Keepvid trying various methods to get me to pay for the improved version (usually not letting me download at the highest res). And of it regularly stopping working with various sites for a few days. And various other annoyances.

Eventually I installed youtube-dl, and I'm very pleased with it. It's a command-line tool, but available in Linux, Mac OS X and Windows flavours. Works with most of the popular video sites. I've heard it even works with PornHub (not that I'd know).

There's also a cross-platform GUI for it, but I've never tried it.

handleoclast

Firefox must die

Seriously, it's the only way. They persist with these twuntish ideas. Pocket. The hard-wired list of web sites that show up when I start to type a URL - sites I never visit yet remain at the top of the list. Etc. The UI that gets shittier and less usable with every major release. Now this.

Firefox has to die. A mass exodus that leaves it dead. They occasionally revert some of the really execrable ideas when enough people stop using it, but then they come up with even stupider ideas. Firefox must die pour encourager les autres. Ideally, the manglement and marketroids who come up with these ideas and the coders who implement them must all be branded as pariahs, never to be employed in IT ever again. If possible, those sanctions should persist even unto the seventh generation.

If Firefox get away with this shit then others will do it too. Firefox must die.

UK infrastructure firms to face £17m fine if their cybersecurity sucks

handleoclast
Paris Hilton

Poorly named

The EU Network and Information Systems (NIS) Directive should have been called the Pan-European Network and Information Systems Directive.

Icon is of somebody who would love to come to grips with that renamed directive.

Thar she blows: Strava heat map shows folk on shipwreck packed with 1,500 tonnes of bombs

handleoclast

Musical chairs

@Stuart Halliday

Every couple of years, the Government reassess the situation and so far the experts say leave it alone again.

Translation...

Expert: We could try to remove the munitions, but that has a serious risk of setting it off.

Minister: And if we leave it alone?

Expert: It could go off anyway, but there's far less chance of that.

Minister: So we could do something with a small chance of success, and if it works we'd probably not gain much in public approval. Or we could do something with a small chance of success and it all goes horribly wrong, then we lose the next few elections. Or we could ignore it and hope nothing happens until the other lot are in power. It's a no-brainer.

Bonus video: Tom Scott's summary of the situation.

Bonus bonus video: Tom Scott explaiing what happened when a large amount of explosives went off by accident..

Google can't innovate anymore, exiting programmer laments

handleoclast

Re: OpenStreetMap

This leaves no place where OpenStreetMap has value to me

It's a good job you have no desire to visit my neck of the woods. There are streets around here where one side of the street has house numbers (some houses may also have names) and the other side has house names with no numbers (as far as I can tell, numbers have never been assigned). Which is a bit of a problem with Google Maps, which only has numbers (and sometimes gets those completely wrong). Also a problem with OS (but a lesser problem) which has some (but not all) official house names and doesn't map unofficial house names (which the owner may have put up without registering it and then uses the name rather than the number to refer to the house). If a mapper has put the effort in, OSM will display whatever house name is visible from the street, be it an official, registered name or an unofficial, unregistered one.

OS doesn't show most types of shop or office (pubs and banks are some of the few exceptions). Google Maps, like OSM, shows shops and offices that people have bothered to map. Around my area, Google Maps is far less complete than OSM with regard to shops and offices (a year ago, before I started mapping, the situation was reversed).

OS doesn't show opening hours, telephone numbers or URLs of businesses. Google Maps and OSM can show these things, but only if some mapper has added the info.

OS and Google Maps don't show listed buildings or scheduled monuments. OSM can show these if a mapper has added them.

OS and Google Maps can't show hygiene certificate ratings, or types of beer sold, OSM can (if somebody has bothered to map them).

All three have good points and bad points. I see them as complimentary not competitors. In some situtations one is preferable to the others; in some situations it may be worthwhile consulting all three. There is a place for all three. Writing off OSM seems somewhat short-sighted.

handleoclast

Re: Google Maps?

@AC

In places, one of us is having difficulty comprehending the other.

> OpenStreetMap may have more detailed information than Google, depending on where you're looking. It can also be rather sparse.

Cut the hand waving and show us a few different places where Google has more detailed (and ideally, accurate) mapping information than OSM.

You ask for clarification of something I did not say. OSM can have more detailed info than Google but OSM doesn't necessarily have any detail at all. I know this from where I live. Before I started mapping it had far fewer businesses marked than Google and there was less detail (they were marked as nodes, not outlines). Now there are more businesses mapped than Google and they are mapped in greater detail than Google.

If you want to check this, find a rural area and look for buildings (farmhouses/barns/whatever) At high zoom with Google you'll at least see a (faint) box which is a very crude approximation to the building ouline (taken from whatever out-of-copyright map Google used to bootstrap their maps). Do the same thing on OSM and there may be no sign of a building at all.

Yes, OSM has the capability to hold more detail about an object but it doesn't mean that such detail has been added or that the object is even in the database at all. OSM has the potential to be better than Google, and often is, but often is not.

As for intentional copyright theft by Google, that depends. Maybe you have seen enough evidence to be sure, I haven't (but I wasn't looking for it). I don't doubt cross-fertilization (both directions) occurs, but I don't know the extent or the intent.

OSM newbies sometimes use Google and/or Ordnance Survey maps to get details for armchair mapping, although they shouldn't. Similarly, anyone can submit suggestions and edits to Google, so that could be one way OSM data gets into Google, if somebody sees something on OSM and adds it to Google. Wrong, whichever direction it transfers, but not sanctioned by either organization and probably not wide-scale.

How about if one of Google's local "guides" (people who submit changes and vet changes submitted by others) occasionally looks at OSM and if he/she notices a change makes an effort to go and check it for himself/herself? Not technically wrong (as I understand the legal issues, which is to say not much) but might give the appearance of copyright violation.

How about if Google processes OSM changesets and send out "suggestions" to local "guides" that they ought to go out and survey certain things? Still not technically wrong (same proviso) but would be much more likely to look like widespread copyright violation.

You seem to be suggesting that Google is processing OSM changesets and simply adding them to their maps. Maybe they are. In which case they're being very naughty. Or maybe it's one of the other scenarios I outlined, and they're not being naughty at all. Maybe the evidence you've seen (which, technically, is hearsay) allows you to be sure.

handleoclast

Re: OpenStreetMap

@AC

This is a huge issue to me as I have no way to determine where their mapping is fantastic and where (like local to me) it is badly wrong, so I can't trust any of it.

This can have numerous causes. The offset you mention could be due to your own GPS (cheap units can take a minute or two of being stationary to settle) or the mapper's GPS or the parallax of the aerial imagery used, or the supplier of aerial imagery got the offset wrong (mappers can compensate for offset errors in aerial imagery if it's obvious). The essential topology ought to be reasonably good even where the absolute co-ordinates are offset.

Where OSM can beat Google (if a mapper puts in the effort) is greater detail. In my area there are streets where one side has numbered houses and the other side has named houses (no number ever assigned). One street has this arrangement except when it turns a corner the sides swap between names and numbers. Google is no help if you're given the name of a house that's on a long street, and often the house numbers are wrong (sometimes wildly wrong). Google occasionally gets the extent of streets wrong when two individually-named streets join to form one longer street. Google even gets street names completely wrong, occasionally.

If your local area is wrong, there's something you could do to fix it. That may not benefit you much, but it may benefit others and they, in their turn, may improve the mapping in an area you want to explore one day. That's one of the fundamental properties of Open Source: you can contribute and you gain from the contributions of others.

BTW, Ordnance Survey occasionally gets it wrong, too. They're smart enough to claim their errors are actually protection of copyright, so if they see those errors on somebody else's mapping they can assert copyright violation. A very smart way of covering up your errors. :)

handleoclast

Re: Google Maps?

OpenStreetMap has much more detailed maps.

OpenStreetMap may have more detailed information than Google, depending on where you're looking. It can also be rather sparse.

Also OSM's maps are not really intended for the general public but as an aid to mappers. The general public are meant to use offerings provided by others which are based upon OSM data. OSM itself has nothing comparable to Street View. Yes, you might be lucky to get a few snaps from Mapillary or OpenStreetCam but you probably won't be that lucky.

I'm not knocking OSM. But the only reason OSM gives a lot of detail around where I live is because I've slowly been adding it myself (and there's still a lot left to do). Some parts of the UK have many more active mappers, others have nobody. OSM is not (yet) a complete replacement for Google maps.

FYI: There's now an AI app that generates convincing fake smut vids using celebs' faces

handleoclast

Re: Not as good as claimed

Even simple open source projects generate video (generally horses and zebra for some reason) that are essentially undetectable to regular viewers.

Your regular viewers are not very discerning, are they?

Apart from the fact that zebras and horses have subtle differences around the head and that fixing those would be harder...

First problem is that the stripes seem to be suffering from Moiré fringes. That could be an artifact of the small size of the image and GIF compression. Maybe.

Second problem is a bigger one. When the zorse? hebra? turns to move right-to-left. As it faces us the stripes on its face slide and swirl. It's a rather disconcerting effect. Especially when a stripe momentarily covers its left eye.

It might fool machine vision, though. :)

handleoclast

Not as good as claimed

At least, going by the sample clip in the article, it's not that good. Good enough to fool plenty of people when the fake video hits twatter, but not everyone.

At first glance it seemed fine. But that clip looped and it soon became obvious it was faked. In the final portion her neck swells up slightly on the left side (her right). Sorta like Alien deciding to come out of the neck instead of the chest.

It would pass casual inspection but you don't need fancy forensic tools to realize there's something dodgy about it. Of course, it's bound to improve. But not, I suspect, to the point where it will fool forensic analysis.

Camels disqualified from Saudi beauty contest for Botox-enhanced pouts

handleoclast
Coat

Re: Well at least....

@ukgnome

it was only pout enhancing and not their toes.

Did you just mention camel toes?

£60m, five years late... Tag criminal tagging as a 'catastrophic waste' of taxpayers' cash

handleoclast

Re: Radical Suggestion...@Doctor Syntax

Go look up HM Gov data on re-offending rates. Those released from custodial sentences have higher re-offending rates (49.2% reoffend within 12 months) than for non-custodial sentences (33.9%).

Hypothesis:

Stupid criminals get caught doing things (e.g., mugging) that earn them custodial sentences rather than non-custodial sentences. Because they're stupid, they get caught most of the time they re-offend. The brighter ones get caught less often.

Just a thought.

Aut-doh!-pilot: Driver jams 65mph Tesla Model S under fire truck, walks away from crash

handleoclast

BAC

Interesting DUI laws they have in California. If, as the article states, his BAC was 2 times the legal limit and he was passed out then that implies their legal limit is a lot higher than here.

'There was no monetary incentive for this' = not what you want to hear about your tattoo

handleoclast
Coat

Tattoos are useful

In the summertime (what little we get around here) tattoos help me distinguish tourists from locals. The women are wearing short-sleeved. Women tourists don't have visible tats. Local women do. When the circus pays its annual visit, they have an untattooed lady, and the audience gasps in amazement at such a thing.

Playboy is suing Boing Boing over Imgur centrefold link

handleoclast
Coat

Boing, Boing, Bone

Take a former NSA head hacker, a Raspberry Pi, weird Kiwi radios and what do you get?

handleoclast

The video

A video of him constructing his Xmas display and operating it is here.

Smut site fingered as 'source' of a million US net neutrality comments

handleoclast

One man, one vote

Trump is firmly committed to the policy of one man, one vote. Just as long as he is the one man who can vote.

Thanks, Pterry.

New Zealand joins the Space Race

handleoclast

Re: Lots of fun aside. Two things to note about Rocket Labs achievement

Make that three things.

3D-printed engine.

Text bomb, text bomb, you're my text bomb! Naughty HTML freezes Messages, Safari, etc

handleoclast
Coat

Re: typographical bells and whistles

Some scripts take that to extremes, with what appears to the user as a single shape being made from multiple code points the combine in complex ways.

For more on combining modifiers, see this.

Goodbye Netscaler, Xen. Hello Citrix SD-WAN, Citrix Desktop, Citrix...

handleoclast

Product rebranding

is the software equivalent of rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic.

YouTube turns off cash tap for automatic video nasties

handleoclast

The idea is sound though.

Upvoted for the pun.

Wanna motivate staff to be more secure? Don't bother bribing 'em

handleoclast

Re: It's a common problem

They all force us to change passwords regularly

This was a good idea when computers were big, very expensive, and the only reason you'd be using one was because it was handling stuff that was classified. Things like computers for designing nuclear weapons back in the 60s.

These days it's a bad idea. See this advice from CESG (which is a division.of NCSC, which is a division of GCHQ).

What do Cali, New York, Hawaii, Maine and 18 other US states have in common? Fighting the FCC on net neutrality

handleoclast

Re: I'm in favor of net neutrality, but

@DougS

How can they sue claiming the FCC doesn't have authority to use an administrative action to reverse an administrative action the FCC did a couple years ago?

Because that first administrative action complied with all the rules about the procedures that had to be followed between proposing an action and implementing it. Like consulting with those who would be affected. Things like that.

The second administrative action ignored all those rules and procedures and just implemented the decision. The FCCs decision to make, but only after it had correctly followed all the mandated processes. It didn't.

There are rules to prevent Federal organizations implementing stuff at whim. They have to follow a process designed to stop some corrupt fucktard fiddling with things, for example, to give his covert paymasters an advantage over everyone else.

That is why there is potential for legal action here.

Private submarine builder charged with murder of journalist

handleoclast

Re: WTF???

He got off on the stabbing of Ms. Wall, not raping her?

Call me pedantic, but I just don't see that as sexual assault. Just assault. What matters, it seems to me, is the effects upon the victim, not the motivations of the perpetrator.

It's entirely possible Donald Trump gets off by screwing people out of money (reneging on contracts, etc). I wouldn't class that as sexual fraud even if I saw him creaming his jeans as he ripped people off.

Thinking about it, maybe he stabbed her more in sexual areas than other places. But whether even that constituted sexual assault would depend to some extent on whether it was pre- or post-mortem.

As far as I can see it's murder and all lesser charges are irrelevant. Maybe, with good lawyers, he could plead it down to sexual assault resulting in accidental death. For some reason I hope he wouldn't get away with that.

handleoclast

WTF???

"sexual assault without intercourse of a particularly dangerous nature"

You can have sexual intercourse in dangerous ways? I didn't know that. Well, obviously you can have sexual intercourse in dangerous situations, such as on a railway track, but sexual intercourse of a dangerous nature?

referencing multiple stab wounds found on the body.

None of my sexual experiences, and none of my fantasies, have ever involved stabbing. Stabbing definitely constitutes dangerous behaviour, but stabbing is dangerous sexual intercourse???

BTW, we need a question mark icon to go with the exclamation mark.

Frenchman comes eye to eye with horror toilet python

handleoclast
IT Angle

Where's the IT?

Oh, it's a very lame pun.

What next? Some guy giving his wife a perl necklace?

Drone perves defeated by tinfoil houses

handleoclast

It's been done before

They had it in Thunderbirds.

Not only that, the Thunderbirds device could tell if it was being photographed by film cameras.

China's first space station to – ahem – de-orbit in late March

handleoclast

Re: The other big firework display

Nobody likes finding random butts on their screen.

A lot of people who use PornHub would disagree with you.

Customers reporting credit card fraud after using OnePlus webstore

handleoclast

Re: iFrame

The implicit suggestion that the iFrame method is superior stems from the idea that whoever hosts the iFrame (be it a bank or a payment processing intermediary) will have done a better job of securing their systems, rather than purely technical reasons.

Doesn't matter if you hand off the transaction processing in an iFrame or redirect to the payment processor's URL, you still must secure your own site.

Otherwise, I hack into your site and amend the relevant URL (the iFrame or the redirect) to point to my server. Job done.

Oh, and after you've secured your site (a never-ending job) you really ought to monitor the payment stuff frequently with a full test to make sure the URL hasn't been tampered with, despite you thinking you'd secured your site.

Oh, and then you ought to regularly inspect the code itself, to make sure I haven't hacked in a test to see if the transaction is being initiated from your monitoring address and in that case send out the correct URL.

These are the things most admins avoid thinking about, lest those thoughts give them sleepless nights.

Junk food meets junk money: KFC starts selling Bitcoin Bucket

handleoclast

Re: Oh the irony

On the other hand, I learned something : it costs $50 to make a Bitcoin transaction. Well if it cost me that much to use my Visa I'd be using cash all the time.

KFC could switch to only accepting payment in Bitcoin and the Bitcoin transaction fee could rise to £1,000,000 and it wouldn't make the slightest difference to the amount of KFC I consume.

Hawaiian fake nukes alert caused by fat-fingered fumble of garbage GUI

handleoclast

Compounded by the second problem

Apparently Hawaii had an agreement with FEMA which allowed them to broadcast the emergency alert but had no arrangement which allowed them to use the same services to broadcast a cancellation.

Compounded by the third problem. It took 45 minutes to come up with a waiver that allowed the cancellation to be sent.

This stuff isn't rocket surgery. Anyone with any sort of sense would ask themselves "What happens if it turns out to be a false alert?" Wouldn't they?

OK, Google: Why does Chromecast clobber Wi-Fi connections?

handleoclast

A wild guess

See title: this is a wild guess...

My guess is that this is some fuck-OOPery. There's a timer somewhere bunging "send DNS multicast" events into a queue. When the device is asleep, because this is a typical fuck-OOP, instead of the timer ceasing to add events to the queue, some handler merely suspends processing the queue so the queue lengthens and lengthens and lengthens. And then the device wakes up...

Yes, you can achieve the same stupidity in non-OOP languages. It's just that people are less likely to make mistakes like that in non-OOP languages because you have to have some sort of understanding of what's happening instead of putting Lego™ blocks together according to some "pattern."

If I were to have an even wilder guess, I'd say Java.

OK, I'm being cynical and ranting non-justifiably against all things OOP merely because I hate OOP. It's Monday. Maybe I'll be in a better mood tomorrow.

'Mummy, what's felching?' Tot gets smut served by Android app

handleoclast
Coat

Parents should not give their children smartphones

It's that simple. The internet is not a toy for children.

If the little fuckers insist on having a smartphone then they can work down t'pit until they can afford to buy it themselves.

Next; tech; meltdown..? Mandatory; semicolons; in; JavaScript; mulled;

handleoclast
Coat

Re: Tabs v spaces

That's what you get for using a language where white space carries a semantic content. It really is a misguided design.

Python's semantic whitespace is clearly an inferior imitation of Damian Conway's Acme::Bleach module for perl. From the description: The first time you run a program under use Acme::Bleach, the module removes all the unsightly printable characters from your source file. The code continues to work exactly as it did before, but now it looks like this:

use Acme::Bleach;

Plenty for the tab vs space people to argue over!

PC lab in remote leper colony had wrong cables, no licences, and not much hope

handleoclast

Re: PIR

A capacitive dropper. Very common in cheap crap. OK as long as it's done well. Sounds like yours wasn't.

There should be two resistors. One in series with the capacitor (or the input side of the bridge) to limit inrush current in case it gets switched on at a mains peak. Otherwise the zener could get overwhelmed, leading to a bangy-bangy situtation. The other should be across the capacitor, to discharge it. Otherwise you can get a belt if you unplug it at a mains peak then accidentally touch the mains pins, leading to a cursey-cursey situation.

Of course, there can be other, more serious implementation errors. Although the capacitor/zener drops the voltage down to the (say) 5V the circuit uses, one side of the circuit is still half-live (live on alternate halves of the mains cycle) or even full live. Not a problem if the thing is double insulated. There is a potential [groan] problem if the thing is only single insulated and suffers a little damage. And a big fucking problem if your circuitry is like this Double-death gay Dalek camping light (courtesy Big Clive).

Of course Uber allegedly had a tool to remotely destroy evidence

handleoclast

Claude Shannon sez

Information content is related to unexpectedness.

Uber doing something wrong is no longer news, it's just noise. Uber doing something legal would be news.