Re: SpamOS?
This *Windows Mobile" you speak of. Now 99%+ of smartphones run either iOS or Android, would it be helpful to ask Nokia to piss on this burning platform to finally put it out of its misery? It wouldn't take long.
1578 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Dec 2011
And that's some crappy forms based simplest-bits-of-all-platforms failure. It's like microsoft are doing a corporate ostrich - even though the news this week is Android is teetering on overtaking global OS share for windows itself.
Boy, they must love what Nokia are doing now.
Filed specifically to take the piss out of the US patent system, the fact this was granted says all anyone needs to know about the quality of the system.
My only question with any new Pi, since it's now one of their reference boards. CPU 512M says no to me, but it surely can't be too long before one of these ultra cheapo boards does, and Google refines its IoT OS to the point I can ask my IoT toaster if my IoT cats bowl needs filling as I tell my IoT kettle to stick a brew on.
So lemme get this right - for whatever asshat reason, contractors leave and the likes of IBM, Accenture and Capita come in at 10x the cost? And HMRC consulted with who to draw this up?
I suppose the real test is if any of those self same contractors who left are hired by these parasites at the same rate they were on before and sent back to their old desks, leaving a fat 9x fee to them for doing nothing and as usual handed over from the taxpayer.
There is one thing that stays the same with IBM though, as I first encountered many moons ago whilst holding my nose having been forced to deal with them at BT - they are just the same as all the others offering the same services, but charge 10x more. Backhanders and government contracts (there's no difference) at the highest level are all that keeps them going, so it sounds like the people involved are finally wising up.
They are really insightful and always tell the people like it is.
Apple seems to think no-one can remember them apologizing already for this, then apologizing again for apologizing wrong.
It's not rocket science.
Google today makes 90% of its profit from advertising. That's so much it can even afford experimental loss making toy projects, recently spun off as Alphabet, without breaking sweat. Why was, and is, it the only player in town? Yeah, some other big names like Microsoft and Yahoo (and err... ?) have some token competing ad platform, but that's all. These ad brokers pay website owners to show their ads, the website owners can chop and choose instantly with the click of a mouse, or even run automated software which swaps between them itself for different visitors. Real competition would be healthy and serve the industry better. And still very profitable, even when shared amongst them.
Anyone every tried to create an ad publishing account with Yahoo? In the UK you can't. Full stop. For the last 10 years + you get the message "this service is not available in your region". #facepalm - this isn't even getting the basics right. For years now we've seen the reports of how Yahoo pissed away so many billions doing this, wasted it doing that, when all the while Google sits there owning the ad market quietly laughing at its antics. Their ad serving platform is only software. Microsoft too - what happened to "follow the money"? Was there something sinister going on in the early days stopping anyone but Google growing in this space? Today it must be impossible for anyone, even the top corporates, to get in due to their sheer market dominance, but it seemed the strategy of the others was to just pay lip service to it.
I'm annoyed Yahoo is about to vanish - their throw away email accounts have severed me very well for years.
They got Outsourceried?
The 21st centuries mobile losers, in order of asshattery:
1. Microsoft. Imploded because it was too smug to think it could fail.
2. Blackberry: Sat on its corporate laurels for too long.
3. Nokia: Had the chance to go next-gen with Android which would have saved it, but instead believed Microsofts burning platform bullshit. About to fix that now it's free of the beasts evil clutches, which is still a big gamble but pretty much their only hope.
Maybe he needs do draw on their experience as he formulates his plans for the Mexicans.
People really use throw-away hotmail accounts? What on earth for?
Back on topic - check out Password Safe - it addresses all these concerns. The db is encrypted and stored locally, but you can automatically sync via your preferred cloud service *if* you choose (Dropbox support is built in directly), the db never hits their servers, dunno how a limit on users could even be implemented when, as just stated, you can share the db anyway and of course its free and always has been.
This ain't an ad - it's just based on my experience of having to manage zillions of passwords which I have to change quite often.
Lot's of talk here about iPhones being mankinds saviour, and lots of talk about everyone using smartphones. Yet the iPhone market share continues to fall. Subtle. Is there some agenda here I missed?
Once the Cupertino photocopiers have started up.
And the best judges you can buy in Texas for those retrospective comedy patents.
I am writing to you to inform you of a knowing voilation of patent D767,583 describing the ornamental design for a display screen portion with graphical user interface. The violator has placed content on a website using the square areas described in the patent, and cannot argue it was unaware of said patent because it granted it.
As of writing, this site is still online at USPTO but once word spreads of such a willful violation it might not be for long.
Yours
Whistleblowin' Bob Vistakin
First it's getting its ass handed to it on a plate by Google in court after chucking its weight around, now its blabbing its going from zero market share to toppling AWS the leader in front of a live audience capable of telling it like it really is.
Here's humble Mr Ellisons answer to Steve Ballmer ridiculing the iPhone. This is why you have zero market share, asshole, and watching your desperate scramble to catch up is hilarious.
It's been hand-ringing with this irrelevant shite all week, and finally the bleeding obvious dawns on it.
Fun fact - the 450 presenters, engineers, bag carriers, emotional support therapists etc the BBC sent to cover the Brazil Olympics, all with first class flights/accommodation, cost more than the UK government spent funding sports in its entirety in the 4 years since the last Olympics.
Who's money is it again?
Other media outlet take note - kiss Apple butt or become little people.
Never mind, the way things are heading it won't be a problem for long.
IBM was a strange beast. Its products and services were no different to any others apart from the typically 10x higher prices they charged. How did they stay in business? Well, it was always the top corporates executives and governments they cozied up to. Very,very cozily indeed, if you get my drift. Lots of 2 week conferences in Bermuda, where the execs families were invited too for the half day spent watching powerpoints, that sort of thing. Not a sustainable business at all - once rumbled, never repeated..