Re: Quite Clever
"No-one except TVR, perhaps!"
The Cerbera didn't come with airbags. Presumably, because it was designed as a race car, in the event you hit anything, the airbags will be wearing you for protection anyway.
2242 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2007
"It's understood the FTC was particularly interested in hearing Apple's take on how it will protect gathered data from hackers, advertisers and other miscreants."
Conveniently leaving out all the insurance and advertising agencies they'll intentionally selling the data to?
But they're not defined as "hackers, advertisers and other miscreants" so that's alright then...
The guy needs the spacial awareness to keep track: He doesn't want Girlfriend #1 to find out about Wife #1, and especially neither to find out about Girlfriend #2.
If he asks directions, he risks the [Small World] factor to kick in and alert one of the above to his indescretions. He could find himself in a pickle that way...
I don't think anyone gets it here.
These will not be drones that you think of when someone says "drones", look at "Unmanned aerial vehicles".
These will be full-sized planes (well, perhaps small ones) under full computer control, just like regular planes, except the pilot will be sitting on a chair back at their "flight centre" somewhere.
The "drones" are stocked full of crates, and sent to some airport somewhere. At said airport, regular truck drivers will transport stock the rest of the way.
The savings come in through: (I'm speculating here) but since they're going to be mostly flying on auto-pilot, you could conceivably get one pilot to drive more than one plane, er, drone. Not sure what the exact pilot requirements are here, but if they're lax compared to regular planes there could be double duty performed here. Not only that, from what I've been able to scrape, UAV pilot licencing requirements are more lax than regular pilots, so I'm guessing Amazon could save a bit on pay packets there too.
"[you can ask a Nand chip 'who made you']"
Remember, there are fakes around. Writeable CDs and DVDs are plauged by this problem, you read the manufacturer ID as someone reputable, but in fact, it was made in someone's backyard.
I've seen fake transistors (low-spec q's replaced the proper silicon), fake ICs (that actually did nothing), Even seen tops of ICs sanded off with new "regular label" printing on top. They worked, but you had no idea what black magic (or running hamsters) were inside - especially not why it was "rebranded" in the first place.
"Surely if it is archive you want a sort of drive where the data is just burned in and read only preferably with no, or minimal, moving parts?"
It depends entirely on the technology you're using. Regular writeable CDs and DVDs won't last too long, unless you use the gold based chemical CDs (claimed to be 100 years).
Once you get to flash or spinning rust drives, they're a lot more complex, and a lot more can go wrong.
The current consesus, is tape will last the longest, even if it has some downsides (data access time can be a bit rude if you store off-site). But the article is based entirely on the fact they want to access that stored data quickly too.
So their "best" suggestsion of Flash is suited for that useage case. If other factors are more important to you, such as raw data retetention life and cost, then as the saying goes, "your milage may vary".
"Possibly the weak components are "wet" electrolytic capacitors which degrade if left dormant. Presumably that would be, or already is, addressed with improved versions?"
Yes, newer electrolytics do age better (well, a little better at least), but most if not all drives now use tantalum types, that would last longer than the media they're running anyway.
I use qi because it's cheap. The other options are either not available or pricedly stupid.
That said, with the case on my phone and the additonal distance involved, the positioning is so tightly restricted, I have to vary it by millimetres to get the phone to admit it's charging.
If it's particularly tempremental one day, I give up and use the USB charger instead.
It still has some work to go.
"Autonegotation over 10 (if supported)"
Auto negotiating speeds isn't the issue. It's more how vendor A handles it, vs how vendor B handles it, and how they work together (or not work as the case may be). There's not only speed, there's full/half duplex, whether one side is willing to auto negotiate, and, if there's a mix, it's up to the auto negotiator to find out what's going on. And everyone handles it a bit different.
Depending on what you read, some make it look like it's a wonder it works at all.
"The driver for this is 802.11ac, since it's silly to have multi-gigabit wireless access points served by blue cables that can only limp along at 1 Gbps."
Not really. Actually, not at all.
Once you factor in real life speeds, you're looking at 60-70% of gigabit cable capacity, as long as the ac devices are within a few feet of each other - plenty of headroom. But also note, that case would probably not be seen too often, rather than the more realistic two walls and a whole lot more feet and the associated further reduced speed.
Stating 802.11ac is capable of "multi-gigabit" speeds is as pointless as stating USB3 is 10x faster than USB2. Which has been debunked as bullshit many times over with real life tests finding closer to 3x faster.
Don't get me wrong, I welcome the faster cabled speeds. There's more than a few applications that push gigabit cable to the limit at a sustained rate, and this would help that at least a bit. But don't quote raw WiFi speeds compared with a wired medium that is clearly faster, and expect me to swallow.
"What I want to know is, what happens to the gold case? Or are Apple going to make all their Watches the same size - so that you can just pop it out, and update to the next model?"
As Dr Phil would say, relative past behaviour is a good indicator of future behaviour. Going on Apple's past, it hasn't happened before, so not likely to happen now.
I would hope however, that they have a good workable strategy on firmware upgrades. It's likely the functionality in future won't be in the first version of firmware.
Which raises another question: Current phones don't have 8 core CPUs for kicks you know. We're pushing significantly more out of our phones today than we did in the last 5-10 years... How are they going to increase functionality without an engine replacement? Are the gold watch users of 10 years in the future going to be happy with the same relative horsepower of today?
All this may be moot though, Apple's battery replacement policy has been less then stellar - are they going to allow battery changes after a few years on the $5K gold watch, or are they going to let the third-party Chinese market take care of it?
From the article, I can't help thinking that said "Genius" is just as pretentious as the customers he's complaining about.
If you pick and choose, you'll find an arsehole for every occasion. If you average things out, you'll find that life isn't the complete shithole you had been complaining about.
There are some very specific Microsoft products highly recommended and used, with a mere passing mention of some other very generic systems.
After reading the "Microsoft's TV product placement horror: CNN mistakes Surface tabs for iPAD STANDS" story, I can't help thinking this is another Microsoft ad gone wrong.
"Worst was the final season or two of Warehouse 13, where they sold out for product placement for some car (I think it was a Toyota..."
It was of all cars, the bloody Prius.
My favorite bit was how they used the "built-in" sat nav to navigate within the Warehouse. Under the iron roof.
Then, they try to Evil Knevil style jump the Prius, with clear warnings you should not try this at home. Shame, that's pretty much all the car is good for. And remember everyone who downvotes for that comment needs a "Smug Alert!". If you don't know what I mean, look at South Park. If you don't know wha that is, the fact you drive a Prius is the least of your concerns, you need help.
"If people want to remove embarassing information they have to get the website to remove it. I know that this is impossible but frankly getting Google to censor information makes me feel uneasy."
True, and it maintains the possibility of someone else keeping track of the link-that-shall-not-be-named.
There are two recent cases that come to mind of "right to be forgotten" laws that were enacted and reported in one of our fairfax papers. They pretty much outlined the entire incedent, what happend, why they want it scrubbed and how to find this information. The Streisand effect came to mind first, then the fact the paper itself is searchable and outside the control of the Google laws. Mainly because the paper's search function is a core feature for paid users - if you can't search for stories, then why the hell are you paying for it?
"I don't see how consumers/interested parties will get to your site by guessing."
You don't. That's what google/bing/et al is for. Guessing didn't even work back in the old days when there were so few domains you may have tried to guess.
"I understand it allows resellers to make money from the gullible, but if you are considering one of these domains, ask yourselves what benefits the investment will make to your customers?"
Nothing. If they're using Google to look for you, they just click the link. If it's a Q-Code, they don't click a damn thing. If it's written in a magazine, they just repeat it. With the market flooded with .com domains, it'll get past the 'curious' stage really quickly.
My point is, stapling a huge price tag on something (especially when the customer doesn't see any of that) means nothing - it does the same job as all the garden variety TLDs.
The car manufactuers don't seem to have any qualms about this. They advertise using overseas vehicles, driving on the wrong side of the road, with features that do no, can not, and will never appear on the Australian modified versions. They have a disclaimer during the ad stating this, while at the same time you're teased with something you're never going to get. Ever.
Can you picture this ad's disclaimer? "Pet green iguanas are not available in Australia due to import restrictions".
Yep, in the fear we've become the same as the US, too late, our disclaimers are getting to be exactly the same as the US.
"but if one of my computers goes TU, the first question that occurs to me is "what have we just changed?"
This only works if you're a tinkerer, and you're changing things all the time.
I constantly get "my tv/car/toaster/whatever is broken, and I have no idea at all what's wrong - it was working fine yesterday".
Firstly, the "I have no idea why" is moot, because you're not trained, qualified, instructed or experienced in the device to make a judgement like that. Secondly, the fact it was "working fine yesterday" is no indicator into what went wrong. Faults are like that.
The locking of handsets is unrelated to contracts. The carrier goes to great lengths to make sure you're going to pay whatever is outlined in the contract, should you choose to stay the distance, or leave early.
The locking is icing on the cake for them, a form of "if we can't rort you, we'll make sure no-one else can either".
Australia for sale! Australia for sale! Forget all those bridges the scamsters have been trying to sell you, now you can buy all manner of all data ever held by any Australian ever.
"iiNet's chief regulatory officer Steve Dalby says the industry will be seeking lowest-cost build for data storage, raising the possibly-unlikely scenario that the data will end up stored in China."
No problem! Just call us the Australian Republic of China.
"BTW, after the secret TPP is rammed through, copyright infringements will be criminal offences."
They already are. Sorry, did you miss that? So did everyone else - they passed it at the same time as the "relaxed" VCR/PVR recording changes. Now copyright infringement isn't a civil issue anymore, it's criminal.
Rather convenient the media (and everyone else) skipped that bit when telling us that recording a TV program to watch the next day is legal now (after we've been doing for 20 years), and how great the changes are. The bastards.
"What's depressing is that Australians probably won't take to the streets about this issue. It's unlikely they'll read even a handful of the stories about the data retention regime. And thus does a country sleepwalk into a Stasi-like regime."
Don't count on that. Once a couple of "if you don't do anything wrong, you have nothing to fear" wankers get thrown in the clink for something they had on their PVR for longer than a week, it'll get noticed, and the normally compliant sheep will fight back - and play dirty.
Meanwhile, I'm looking for a stable wormhole, er, VPN that's not based in any Australian or US-affiliated country.
"... after all, who else is going to protect us from all those paedo-terrerrist-drug-dealers out there?"
You forgot about the software and media pirates. If the software, music, video and other media mongouls are anything to go by, THEY'RE the paedos, terrorists and druggos.
"Guess what, if you don't want someone to pay attention to what you say, then don't say it on the internet. How stupid are these people?"
I need to put my 2c in here.
I've had more than my fair share of firends who were either suicidal, or had suicided. None of them, not even close, where drama queens or attention seekers. But then again, none of them were social media users either.
Take from that what you will (Facebook, Twitter et al, kills brain cells).
"Makes as much sense as Twitter itself. The kids these days growing up on Facebook and Twitter are truly drama kings and queens."
Good point. It's not everyone, but enough that it works backwards.
My niece is doing a school project on making a pamphlette to assist teens with depression and/or anxiety.
Being invovled in mental health myself, I was called upon for suggestions. Of all the websites, and people to talk to that we suggested, Social Media was NOT one of them. And for good reason.
As well meaning as you think it is, the only word I can think of that might fit, is a big data version of 'clusterfuck'.
I recall perhaps a couple of years ago, a facebook user who dared mention her depression. She was actively messagebombed and hounded to the effect of "hurry up and kill yourself, why are you taking so long?". And soon after, she did.
This is the type of 'council' you're getting from Facebook. No truer anywhere else than here, "with "friends" like these, who needs enemies?". Indeed.
"legally required". Are they kidding?
As some others have already mentioned, since all the notable social media sites are outside of australia, said social media sites don't have to even lift their legs to fart on the "legislation".
As per usual, all talk and hot air coming from a bunch of politicians who have no idea how real life works.
"It's not as if WiFi ever gets remotely close to the maximum theoretical bit rate"
A computer rag did some speed tests a while back on the then new AC routers, and found unless you were no more than several feet away, you are never going to get the fastest speed it's capable of (and as you said, nowhere the "theoretical" speeds).
Once you go past a couple of walls, and a couple of dozen metres distance that would be typical in a home setup, the speeds drop to just barely over what cat5 could do. And considering Cat5e is "good enough" for ethernet gigabit speeds over short lengths, not only does cable win, it's by far more reliable, stable, and repeatable than wifi.
WiFi is useful for convenicence, and it has its place there, but if you want speed and stability, stop reading the bullshit theoretical numbers and use cable.
"Whats the point of even having External SD anymore?"
I have a 64Gb card nearly full up with maps, PDFs and other data that is either not suitbable for cloud storage, or I do not want it on cloud storage for security reasons anyway. Soon, I'll be considering one of those newfangled 128G cards too.
64G phones are rare, or so stupidly expensive it's not worth it, but even if I had one *right now*, I'd be about full up to the brim anyway - so it's not good for me anyway.
My only option is to use an external card you you say there is no point of.
Without that slot, I will not be buying that phone, and from the looks of things, I'm not alone with those thoughts.
"To be fair afaik the military have no right to force you out of the firing area, they can ask politely but you can choose not to and they'll have to wait."
That's hardly conductive to a result now isn't it?
How about "We're firing in 10 minutes. If you hang around till then, we would recommend you put yourself in the brace position and kiss your arse goodbye. Thank you and come again.".
I'm quite sure their fishing would take a lower priority then.
"Many of those named and shamed were hardly surprises. The list includes markets in Bangkok, Beijing, Dehli, Jakarta, Odessa, and São Paulo, for example. But one culprit most people don't usually consider when talking piracy made the roster, too: Toronto, Ontario."
They forgot to mention Australia, where they keep inisting we're piracy central of the fucking universe.
Or are we in fact nobodies compared to Toronto? Either way, either the MPAA are liars, or idiots. Or both.
I'll go with both.