"they lack the necessary self-control not to say something stupid."
Yes, they have assistants and advisors to tweet something stupid for them.
2242 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2007
I first met BOB a little recently, and curious, I shoehorned him into an older windows version I had lying around.
Like some of the other posters I want to debate the "easier to use" line.
Windows wasn't hard to use unless you have a head injury, or are aged over 75 (I'm not interested in those darn gosh new fangled things!).
Bob on the other hand was an abortion. You had to hunt around to find anything, you didn't know if something in the room was either eye candy, or if it actually meant something. And you had to change rooms to get to other "stuff". Even though they likened rooms to folders - er, no, not even close.
The saddest part was I had to dig around for a while to get the Bob install code, and then dig further to get it running on something later than '95. What was I thinking? (probably the same thing microsoft was when they created it).
"but it’s the kind of car you’d be perfectly happy with as a company car"
So, you're saying it's a wonderful car - as long as you don't have to pay for it.
I'm wondering if the electronics is secure, or is it the same as every other car on the planet - free for all.
After the previous elreg articles on the matter, would be nice to know.
Bit of a stupid story. "People who don't read what they are installing, surprised at what they are installing". May as we be "Stupid people use computers too"
But that's my point. While it may have once been the case, today, some software has its user interface specifically structured to make people stumble.
I'll give you a 'frinstance. A fair amount of my time at one place I worked at was re-writing instructional manuals. They were fairly short at less than 4-5 pages, but were detailed instructions on programming equipment that was not user-friendly or intuative at all, so were important that everyone could do the job.
The original documents were along the lines of those "test" instructions that first state you should read all the steps, then go through a dozen steps that are essencially pointless, the very last step is to ignore the above and do something different - intended to catch you out, because they know very well humans don't work like that.
This is not helpful at all, and anyone who claims otherwise probably works for Bastards Incorporated.
"lol u mad???"
No, he's just offended that his power and bandwidth costs are (inefficiently) going towards some charity - not of his choosing - where the internal administration costs could be as high as 80%. (YMMV)
If it were "donateware", then not only could the user choose a charity with lesser administration costs, you don't have to piss power and bandwidth money up against the wall to do it.
But that's not what's happening here. It's been chosen for you, and why those specific charities? I can't help thinking there are kickbacks of some type happening here.
And the "but if you just clicked “Next, Next, Next..." doesn't fly with me. When you structure the installation phase specifically to ask multiple stupid inane questions, it's human nature to just click next repeatedly. They know this, and they're specifically taking advantage of this.
No good will come of this.
Best of all, I haven't mentioned pirate software fucking once, because it isn't relevant. Well, OK, just once.
"That's like saying drunk driving is OK so long as you're only drunk on beer, rather than liquor or wine."
It's worse than that. Statistically(*), you're less likely to get killed or injured *driving* home drunk, rather than *walking* home drunk. Drunk walking is apparently a big problem.
That's not to say that driving drunk is a good idea, the stats don't mention how many other people you kill or mame on your way home...
(*) I heard this on a Freakonomics podcast, and as we all know, statistically, you're much more likely to find more accurate information on the radio, rather than the internet. So there.
Just goes to prove that carriers still only care about their Roaming profits.
Don't be fooled by the recent pricing changes that "seem" attractive - they're structured to "look" good, and still provide ludicrous profits.
They'll shit their pants once users learn it'll be substancially cheaper to obtain a prepaid SIM at their destination rather than just roam with their own card. No wait...
This was related to a Telstra connection that didn't happen. They told me point blank, they can only action something if a telco "won't" do something. If said telco "can't" do anything (for whatever internal reason) they just throw their arms into the air and say 'we can't do anything either'.
It's a nice little loophole that absolves them of having to actually do anything.
"I'm holding off until someone can deliver something that meets both criteria."
You're quite welcome to design your own if you like, or even easier still - to join the Pebble team in their design department. At least do something.
See? Talk does not row the boat (to paraphrase an old proverb).
"If we can get good capacity batteries that aren't made of....just awful materials"
It isn't the materials that are at fault.
Lipo is a cell/battery technology that has a higher energy density than any other battery technology by far. And it's having all that energy stored in a small volume that's causing the problem - when things go wrong (and they WILL go wrong) they'll go wrong in a bigger way.
Improved charging techniques have been the staple of lithium rechargable technology for the first decade of its life, and this has helped dramatically with overcharged batteries blowing up. Improvements in making manufacturing more stable and repeatable has help a great deal too (though they still have glitches today).
The chemical makeup however is a different story, I might expect minor evolutionary changes to the recipe, but revolutionary changes require teams to do a lot of work - that takes longer and costs more money.
Your front left wheel has now been identifed as malicious, and has been disabled and quarantined for your safety.
Sorry, creating an exception to this rule is not available for that wheel.
Customer support cannot be called because your cellular modem has been identified as a threat.
The human in the driver's seat has been identified as suspect with the heuristics scan.
Deploying the ejector seat - for your safety of course.
The ejector seat has a virus and has been quarantined.
Locking the doors and deploying the poison gas.
Thank you for using Kaspersky Labs.
"So perhaps as you sit in your driverless car, you can recreate the experience of what people used to call “driving” … in 3D."
I get the same thing looking through the regular windshield now. Without the framerate limitations, though, depending on who's driving, nausea may or may not be an issue.
"Making them liable for every single identity fraud penny by all of their customers over the period sold will do the job too"
Firstly, they have more lawyers than you can fit in a courtroom, it's likely at least one of them will come up with a "it's not our fault, we didnt' know, blame the third party software".
It's a nice diversion, but ultimately, they learn to hide it better.
The single thing anyone can do is hit their bottom line - don't buy their gear. Dollars and Cents are more effective than whining who did what.
"Researchers from Ohio State University found that when confronted with examples of bullying, many users shy away from direct confrontation."
Tells it all really. These idiots haven't seen how it works out in real life.
Their answers is to talk to the bully and explain how they're hurting your feelings. All this does is reaffirm my thought that university students, sorry, "researchers", have no clue whatsoever.
The problem is bullies understand one language only - beaten into submission. But we can't have that now can we, we might hurt their feellings and that would be a terrible thing.
Your last resort is your first resort - ignore and move (from the forum). Fortunately, few have enough enthusiasm to stalk you, though, some do. Perhaps a nice beating will do?
"And in 2013, the FDA banned DNA testing startup 23andMe from selling its home testing kits as diagnostic aids,"
23andMe didn't sell it as a diagnostic aid, it was the idiot users (you can tell by the idiot gene in the results) who looked at some disease, ignored the odds, and went to their doctors demanding they be cured.
Had this been the case of them advertising it as a diagnostic, they would have just changed the web layout - now, you will never see those type of results again. Ever. Thanks to the idiots.
I was fortunate that I had mine done before the FDA made them knobble the results. Turns out, I had none of the diseases that I was at "high" risk of, but had some that were marked as average (population average).
As such, I did not go to my doctor demanding I be cured of things I don't have. Purely co-incedently, I did not indicate for the idiot gene.
"Operating system, fully patched. Latest device drivers. Nothing else."
What? With no strings attached?
"Hortensius also makes the point that Superfish was only installed on kit aimed at consumers"
If you're a "consumer" there will always be strings attached. The only way around it, is to kill everything on the drive and start from scratch - it's the only guaranteed way to ensure "nothing else".
This is not my story, I read it in an electronics rag many years ago - but worth repeating.
Service guy was working on a radio transmitter, and part of the diagnostics was to check the HT line. All 10KV of it.
The transmitter had safety interlocks all over the place, so it was faster and easier to just place the meter within the cabinet and look at the reading through the closed glass door.
Barely a fraction of a second after he flipped the power switch, he realised the meter was set to low ohms (from the previous tests).
A big bang, a bright flash, and a very impressive black charred mess on the inside of the door glass was the result.
"And how exactly are ISPs expected to get this info?"
They don't. As I understand it, Big Media <TM> tracks the IP address of the culprit down, the ISP is forced under legislation to match that up to a user in their database, and again up to the ISP to send the letters.
In other words, Big Media <TM> is making the ISPs do their dirty work for them.
We'll run out of vendors to buy from.
And when you decide to go "old school" again, the paper you write on will have a watermarked ad on it, and the pens will reveal a bikini shop website, rather than an actual bikini-clad girl.
When you're tired of that, the knife you use to slash your wrists will be engraved with the phone number of a very privately run hosptial. And since insurance won't cover you, bring you credit card, you know, the one with more ads on it. Hold onto it, you're going to need some reading material while you're waiting in the emergency room alongside everyone who had the same idea.
Since this isn't a suitable outcome, we should loudly and publically make fun of them at every opportunity. Yes, that's you, Lenovo, Sony, LG, Samsung and all the other f**kers who are going try it in future.
"Without the content you have nothing."
GovCo has been very vague about what "metadata" actually is. So much so, as things stand, it means EVERYTHING including the packet payload.
"The fact anyone you are really after likely uses encrypted point to point comms is clearly left out of the debate."
Likely not. They're also after those who don't encrypt their data, the ones who create world hunger, they bring countries to their knees, they destroy their's and other's economies. Yep, the worst criminals known to the history of mankind ever - the copyright thieves who shamlessly stole "Dallas Buyers Club". (now they're hiring third parties to collect data on who is "stealing" it)
"If I had my way, there’d be no chairs in meeting rooms"
I have arthritis in both hips. I won't be standing for a moment longer than I absolutely have to. If the meeting is as pertinent and brief as you claim, email me the details instead - I'll peruse it while I'm sitting on my arse.
Though probably after I've printed it out and I'm on the bog performing some download features - I'm sure you'll understand.
Are they saying it's ok to transfer $10K with a fingerprint that's been broken down to perhaps 5 key points?
Look, there's nothing inherently wrong with the uniquness of your actual fingerprint - as far as anyone knows, it's entirely properly unique. However, readers break it down to only a few key indicators to presumably save bit space, now it's not so unique.
And there's the minor point that you leave traces of all your fingerprints all day, every day, over your entire life, all over the place. Traces that have been verified to be duplicatable and usable on readers.
Here, as an example, guess which finger I'm holding up.
"The fact that the Stradivarius violins still rate within the same class as modern high-end instruments after 3+ centuries of opportunity to exceed their quality indicates that they are truly advanced works of craft."
And yet, they can't make a modern television's built-in speakers sound anything other than complete crap.
Driver: iCar, take me to the nearest laptop store.
iCar: Proceeding to your nearest Apple Shop, now.
Driver: iCar, take me to the nearest grocery store.
iCar: Proceeding to your nearest Apple Shop, now.
Driver: Er, no, I want a grocery store, I'm done with the Apple Shop.
iCar: We are already parked outside the Apple Shop.
Driver: Go to hell you piece of crap!
iCar: We are already parked outside the Apple Shop.
Found this on <http://www.businessinsider.com.au/samsung-smarttvs-are-inserting-ads-into-movies-2015-2>
It says "Users can disable the ads by pressing “Menu” on their Samsung Remote, scrolling to Smart Hub, then to Terms & Policy, and then to Yahoo Privacy Policy. From there, users need to scroll down and toggle an option that says “I disagree with the Yahoo Privacy Notice” to opt out."
That's generous of them, not only that, it's in a logical intuative place that anyone can get to easily. </scarcasm alert>