Re: Australia day
Death by cosmetics is now regarded by many as more gruesome than crucifixion.
Come on. Can't be any more gruesome than the Australian wildlife.....
.....or the soap operas.
4136 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Oct 2011
it's amazing how many loopy fellow passengers have forgotten what to do when it's their turn.
I'm fairly certain you lose Intelligence and Sanity points on every viewing after the first 4 repeats.
Given The average I.Q range between 70 and 130 represents about 95% of the population, a point 5 loss every three repeats is going to leave most not much more than drooling vegetables.
In RPG terms, you can expect at least one team member in your party to go beserk, but at least be unable to summon Ilfrit. If you have sprogs in your travel party, guaranteed they'll break first and harder with the added infliction of casting Embarrassment on the entire party
There's probably a sound reason for it, just like Brexit.
Going from "unknown suspect" two days ago to arrests so quickly (within two days) suggests there was some awareness of who they might be rather than requiring a drawn out investigation lasting weeks.
Or they only recently got a list of known drone owners locally....you'd think if there was some suspicion, that would be followed up much earlier, or were all the police needed to 'watch the skies'???
Not a good time to have Gatwick, airports and drone searches in your browser history....
The suspects have now been released. But there's a considerable amount of information now about them in the public domain which is very concerning. Makes a mockery of the "If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear" argument.
Their mugs splashed all over the red-tops. Peoples photos should be withheld from the papers until charged I think - but that's not conducive to selling trash news.
'If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear' has already been long mocked, just ask Cliff Richard.
I think it's 'if you look like you've got nothing to hide, you must be hiding something really nefarious.'
They are way too busy arguing about BREXIT to worry about anything like this - what's a potential hazard to aviation compared to their worries about getting re-elected after BREXIT?
They should be more worried about finding themselves in front of a tribunal of some British Peoples Republic in ten years...
Between not giving the people what they think they still want or some horrendous compromise no one did and delivering something that cripples the nation and causes widespread damage.
And what was the last fury in the House prior to and undeserved break-up for xmas? Who called who a bad name....
All round, they've not been very good this year....
this was environmental activists of some kind then it is an act of terror
Terror, I did not really see in pics and vids of the strandees at the airport.
Maybe we need another category other than over-using the terror thing, Inconveniencers?
Any other suggestions welcomed....
Apparently a photo on the daily maily front page?
Is that the only picture, or the only one to be published?
Could be an alien spacecraft or a weather balloon.
At least we now know it's not something in the water, or at least we will as long as someone checks the picture for photoshopping (only a couple of shopping days left)
Rubbish, this is exactly the same argument used in the USA about why tighter gun control wont stop people getting killed
I suppose the difference would have to be the prevailing social attitude RE: UK drone use vs. Gun use in the USA.
i.e. it's not currently (in the UK) at 'Yosemite Sam' levels, which US gun control often appears to be.
I presume all these devices work by shipping audio to a backend where all the processing is done, right? That is, there's very little local processing going on and really a lot of opportunity for snooping / data gathering.
Yes, but it's not so much 'a lot of opportunity for' as it is 'the sole reason for'
Quite a few Smart devices I would have no problem with except that they bundle everything off to some data centre for processing and back which requires a net connection and it's generally revealed that assurances that the information is deleted once the data transaction is complete are bogus.
And you can include speech recognition in that.
Trollery indeed ... one needn't hate the neighbors to not wish to be ruled by them.
Well, that's the usual exiter mindset, magnified by years of voting for British MEPs who spent more time thumbing their noses than anything more constructive.
We used to have PMs that could negotiate exceptions where they felt it was necessary, but the last couple of No. 10 incumbents clearly weren't up to the task.
Anyway, they had nothing much to lose. It's just a couple of results removed from Google, and they were fighting the removal for principle more than anything.
The principle I doubt, that includes the assumption that Google has some sort of moral standpoint - they are fighting the inevitable flood of other requests they'd have to process otherwise, nothing else - which would cost, and add to complexity of their search system.
Taking out the whole of London with such an "EMP" wouldn't be a bad idea - make the epicentre somewhere near parliament.
Bugger the EMP, drones are the least of our problems....if you had access to some form of THX1138 style brain-shunt to aim at Westminster that would be far more effective at restoring some form of peace and quiet.
It's not chaos if the the state sponsor is the UK itself.
Hey, it seems like a good strategy to stop it's subjects from spending money abroad if possible, a few meals and rather more than a few pints at airport prices is probably good for the economy.
Then there's the worry of letting too many slaves off the galley UK before the leave EU date.
Hey, they're already priming the army to ensure things keep running (I'm sure we'll all be feeling more Agile with a soldier with a gun standing behind us).
Or if you go by the dates the shops use, Christmas starts at the beginning of September. At least that is when I saw Christmas decorations for sale in stores near to me.
Christmas decorations for sale can be easily ignored - it's when the xmas loop tape gets dug out, dusted of fluff to be played instore constantly from then on.
Android was designed for sandboxes from the outset, every installed user application has its own user account that is isolated from everything else.
Perhaps the 4 people should read this:
https://source.android.com/security/app-sandbox
However I suspect they are simply too thick to understand it.
Maybe, but how come Android apps demanding too many permissions is still a thing.
a little like saying a coal fired steam turbine is a better way of making electricity.
My network is now air gapped and happily running on Windows 7pro
That's your not steam age solution?
Sounds a lot like 'let's turn back the clock, give me my software on 8" Floppy disk or reel tape please.
I would only change "centrally-controlled union" to 'Franco-German controlled Socialist Federation'
Well if it is Franco-German controlled, it's because the UK has abrogated it's historical leadership by voting in total headcases that would rather run around in a career oriented willy-waving contest and trying to fob off any non-simple modern problem by scapegoating and disappearing into hazy dreams of simple back to basics yesteryear and nebulous puritan values.
Old boss same as the new boss
Time for a cliche, Absolute Power corrupts absolutely.
I always thought Frank Herberts adjusted version of that Dalberg-Acton quote (in God Emperor of Dune. I think)
”Absolute power does not corrupt absolutely, absolute power attracts the corruptible.”
It's just a reflection of the open cesspit of humdrum borderline nasty thoughtless humanity.
Personally I don't go near it anymore than I go near Facebook or LinkedIn.
I don't like how the companies behind them operate, I mostly don't like how many people behave on them, and I don't like how they've become an almost accepted necessity.
I certainly don't believe because I have issues with these services that they should be altered to accommodate me.
I would prefer they were cleansed with fire, but individuals have to put up with the idiot herd mob wants.
The only thing I'll fight tooth and nail on is them becoming a necessity due to real public service tie-ins. Bloody Smart Phones with android/ios are almost there already....
not a huge green van with latest camera tech stuck on top like a fucking fairy on a Christmas tree
I'd not be surprised if there was not a rise in TV licence applications in the locality with such a van parked there for long enough.
There'd be no point going to too much effort at concealment when the local wildlife have less sense of being wary than the large bird species that used to live on Mauritius.
I expect not a fair few specimens are queued up hoping to get an interview for the next Big Brother.
/me notes that if EVERYONE has a firearm, criminals will be a LOT more afraid to use them to commit crimes...
If Everyone potentially has a firearm, the Police will remain jumpy on the trigger when confronting members of the public, criminal or otherwise.
Or does this come under positive herd-thinning as well?
In any week wandering around Dublin you will hear at least twenty to thirty languages spoken (not by tourists). Not one will be Gaeilge.
Possibly rare case then, of that Aer Lingus Dublin to Bologna flight I once caught where the safety message was in English and Gaelic only - no Italian, despite hearing conversational italian spoken on board from passengers.
Good analogy but eventually with time, the man in the tower will be ignored once the newness wears off. People might notice the town and be wary so at some point having the man in the tower becomes meaningless.
Didn't happen in the border regions of Ireland in the 80's over border towers. Or the ones on top of flats in cities like Belfast.
The resentment just continued to simmer and bubble.
the comments section goes bananas in shock
I think you are confusing shock with exasperated impatient outrage.
The kind of grumbling that eventually often rises to a roar, and on rare occasions results in a tidal wave sweeping across a country leaving a bloody legacy and an even dodgier authority steering.
> Ask yourself this, where is the only place at a concert where you can guarantee someone will pass? Where you scan your ticket,
Au contraire. Someone without a ticket, trying to sneak in, won't be sneaking in by showing a ticket.
Queuing up for the toilets would also be a good bet - ever been to concert where the beverages weren't watered down???
Having either so many stalkers or so paranoid that you think you have that many stalkers so you resort to deploy mass surveillance at concerts is a sure sign you've gone full farbot, or made such a belisha beacon of yourself you've become a nutter magnet.
Time to retire to a nice private island somewhere and get out of the public eye for a couple of decades.
The police therefore I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted something in return for that favour.
Well there's a sentiment the public could do without in it's law enforcement.
'You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours.', next will be the collecting of little favours in brown paper bags ever week and eventually Chief Constables will be granting favours with future reciprocals on their daughters wedding days.
It's not generally possible for legislators easily to ban arbitrary activity on grounds of electricity waste.
At least for another generation and a half when we'll be closer to Soylent Green levels of the decay of civilisation.
Up and coming requirement for waste food caddys...How soon will this include a requirement for grannys corpse to go in there too....?
Set them up an Arch Linux machine and you won't hear a peep from them...They'll never manage to get online to complain.
What? When netctl can connect to your wifi automatically for you at boot time?
Do the frog chorus 'useless' where you live?
Also Arch linux is nont the sort of distro you should set non-tech relatives up with in the first place.
will the new paradigm be personal data centers connecting to remote clouds. I am just asking for a friend.
I think the new paradigm will dumb personal devices connecting to remote cloud.
Google Facebook and the like will like it as they get to keep everyones info and mine it to their hearts content, apple for the subs and they can charge the same for a simpler cheaper device and MS for both the mining opportunities, the sub and surface devices that aren't much more than a screen connected to a net(sometimes)work chip.
1) not cake but brioche, which is more a sweet bread than cake, and
2) never said by Marie Antoinette. In fact, it dates from at least 50 years before she was born
1) As a recovering brioche addict, it really depends how much butter is in the mix as to how fattening. But still not healthy to try to live on it.
2) Whether MA said it or it was merely attributed to her is of little note in this case. Whether it was an actual sentiment shared by the moneyed or the poor merely suspected that was the sentiment is another entirely - and going by the bad example set by Bombastic Bob I'm inclined to believe it was the former.
What business is it of Google to censor the web?
Even if Google do curate their results, it cannot be thought of as censoring the web, unless you think the Google search portal is the web.
This the same issue that came up recently with users of Facebook complaining of facebooks practices.
If you don't like how a company operates - don't use them! Find a different search engine.