Re: Why does Trump want Greenland anyway?
'Viking' propaganda finding it's last victim'?
4136 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Oct 2011
I companies are quite willing to hike prices up come renewal with some automated process that picks the most expensive for the consumer deal.
While, of course, telling you they are competitive - which they are, quite willing to elbow anyone out of the way to win.
Fleece the sheep
"doubtless sold thousands of bags of popcorn across the English-speaking tech world"
Yeah popcorn? Maybe a very small punnet.
Really, I think only the 'stakeholders' (or more probably steakholders - something more tasty to nom on, and perhaps a bloody one something to throw to the baying of the lawyer hounds).
Most I cold manage is a small box of chocolate raisins with the highlights.
Your average Reg reader can, yes.
Personally, I really try to avoid any It gear that with a locked on or otherwise pre-installed OS.
We just like to be bitter about IT companies fleecing the average non-techie punter.
Personally, I live my life by the same motto as the alcoholic from Mr Jolly Lives Next Door
"Never ever, bloody anything, ever."
patent troll?
Probably, might not be 'IBM' by then anymore (possibly hasn't for some time)
Just wait for when it finally transforms from IBM to ICBM
It'll be a remnant 'radioactive' piece of IBM shrapnel with a half-life far longer than SCO.
Transforming to selling cloud like every other iT company? Well, better hope the market doesn't have second thoughts on that strategy.
i can see LOTS of people firing up requests to know how their chats were used
I can't.
Certainly not as LOTS that there should be.
I doubt there'd even be a blip on statistics compared to the population using these 'services'.
Sometimes it just feels like the majority of the population are fine with being tracked like cattle and sheared regular.
privacy? They might have herd of it, but are not bleating about it.
Sorry but this tech should scare the crap of anyone with a rational functioning brain.
Unfortunately (or thankfully for some), those are in short supply.
The product quality control was never any good, non-existent returns policy, extremely poor warranty and repair little better than retro phrenology.
It is the Darwinian way of survival. Those who can resist the dopamine will survive. And, it will reduce the population to manageable size too. How is that not a win-win situation?
If'n it's combined with the 'f' logo people, we're looking at the fall of civilisation. Given their will to experiment with the population willy-nilly, deceitful nature, sheer greed and the populations willingness to ignore all that and continue to use it.
Another remainiac totem falls flat on its arse.
UK Employment Tribunal though.
I've always suspected a fair bit of effort has been going in these last couple of decades to moving the UK closer to US values.
The sitcoms are just the vanguard of the propaganda campaign.
consequently they can play their little games without us
Did we get a vote on Googxit?
I'd bet the honorable? Members of Private Enterprise wouldn't have been as keen to rush that one through...as long as Alphabet kept the brown envelopes coming regularly.
Nope, Google we don't get a choice in leave means leave, you can only minimise your contact.
I think my main concern with this technology is how to stop the signal being blocked by, for instance, someone walking between the transmitter and the receiver.
There was an episode of Max Headroom : Twenty Minutes into the Future, where Bryce was experimenting with high power lasers for communication purposes
So high power, they could supposedly bisect anyone walking through the beam...
It wouldn't stop anyone, but they wouldn't do it again.
"What did we do wrong? How could they get it so wrong?"
"Not that wrong, only five percent lacking."
But that isn't as exciting or 'Storm the winter palace' as your version.
And neither as badly scripted as the reality in which those who were meant to take charge argued over redlines and political posturing and handed the same deal repeatedly and thought they were canny bargainers.
May tried to force her vision on the country over the head of Parliament over this, and Boris is looking to do the same, this alone should scare you.
The article over at Ars Technica says Google had to ask the FCC to allow them to use more powerful transmitters.
Now, you'd expect permission from a federal authority would ensure safety and the best interests of the customer at heart.
But with the current incumbents in the offices, this may no longer be the case.
I see the antidemocratic hate Britain love the EU echochamber
Is in full fatuous self congratulatory mode today.
No doubt all the sysadmins here will be pulling the plug on the mainframes to make sure that Brexit is as chaotic as possible come November 1st.
@ relevant A/c
You really aren't a good judge of people, any El reggers that are sysadmins I have little doubt are much much too professional for such shenanigans
There really is no need for any sort of skuttling of the fleet when the new captains of the country are letting the country sink in aid of some form of barrotery.
Eternal Darkness was bloody good - might have gotten more attention if it were not a Gamecube exclusive though.
The Sanity effects ranged from disturbing paintings and scenery to hearing footsteps and what can only be described as hallucinations during gameplay to sudden cuts to fake gamecube system messages reporting the joypad cable was unplugged as well as health impacts.
Many countries have successful and stable coalition governments, so no reason why it shouldn't work in UK.
Our lot would need significant retraining - the result for a couple of decades is likely to be akin to when the Swedes switched what side of the road they drove on...
Knife fights in the Parliament bar would need less, they'd only have to change to stabbing in the front.
a request from the Queen
That is 'meaningless' pomp formality - it's not as if she can refuse with the excuse 'He's a slimey, oafish oik with unkempt hair and moronic ingratiating grin.'
I expect the conservative MPs know he's got a lot of personality (a lot of the other contenders had none), and the British public makes allowances for a 'bit of a rogue personality'
"inappropriate" content off the site
Doesn't work - there are still very disturbed people there (optimistic, but disturbed) the type that think collecting contacts like Top Trumps** will somehow make them CEO of a huge corp - not that it matters, every small businessman with => 1 employee delusions calls himself CEO on LinkedIn).
** Or Pokemon, maybe.
Trump cannot be trusted. Riiiight because we could trust Obama, and we could trust Bush, and we could trust Clinton
There are levels of 'trust' - You could trust Obama not to make the US look like an ass (he was presentable, and had a professional air, unlike Trump), Clinton, it depends, the husband you probably couldn't trust to be alone with a pretty secretary, Bush got over his problems with the bottle, but the whole 'God wanted me to be president' was a little worrying.
stopped only by the democratic processes
That's optimistic, when has any piece of badly thought out legislation been stopped by the 'democratic process' - delayed maybe, then some patsy in the next government proposes a similar set, or the same set of loons get into office again, and off we go to the once and future dystopia all over again.
or Cheap walkmans, smartphones or [insert favourite device or toy that broke moments after taking ownership].
I find doing all my transactions on my debit card easier, but I do feel guilty as I know, the more that do this, the sooner cash will be a thing of the past (there are some convenience advantages to cash - just as there were for cheques).
Facetious or delusional, either way, I'm pretty sure most of those centuries of historically loyal voters, were not longer around to vote.
Was the European Parlament anti-euro vote not totally taken by not-conservatives?
I think you just want to blame the conservatives for Brexit failure - mostly, you might be right, but partly the main pro brexit players are all grandstanders and egomaniacs who enjoyed having the PM over a barrel too much the last few years. Almost all of them are extremists who should be off in their own party except they know they'd get nowhere without being attached to the conservative brandname.
Almost all of them will retire to a cushy boardroom gig afterwards and leave others to pick up the pieces.
It's a bad policy pursued by madmen and lunatics.
Why do you assume I meant the brexit decision alone.
There are other examples....
The 48% very probably have exactly the same concerns as the 52%, they just feel leaving is not the right fix.
Problem is for Brexit is there are too many factions with questionable public support dipping their oar in to the proceedings on the spurious claim of popular support.
Problems for remain in the last Euro elections is the support was split between several parties, while the exit vote was scooped up almost totally by one party, which inflates their perceived support.
Meanwhile those 'in charge' in Blighty...
The Leadership takes a position and sticks to it no matter who and how many people tell them they are being idiots.
If you think about it, which is more frightening....?
An administration that might change it's mind given time to think, or one which leaps on a rash and ill-conceived idea and decides to stick to it, no matter how damaging for country, economy or international reputation....
Might be a slight scaling issue, but mostly due to the extreme ineptitude of Home Office, GDS, Crapita etc. in planning and project management.
The broken part is not the previous attempts, which as usual were corruption built in, and not designed with the convenience of the general public built in but the convenience of the state and any corporate groups contracted to run it badly/cheaply.
The broken parts are Home Office, GDS, Crapita etc.