Re: Meh...
Do you think they wouldn't be worried to lose the UK market?
4302 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jun 2007
Initially I was shocked to hear about this "ping URL, and was about to go into all "Daily Mail" mode...
Though thinking about it, as long as the 'ping' ability doesn't have a way of setting local data (cookies etc.), then they could gather the exact same data without ping.
Any website subscribed to some service that used it would instead only have to forward their access log to the real url onto the advertising service.
Sure, it would require a bit more collating and organising of data sever-side, but it wouldn't be much.
What am I missing? Don't get me wrong, they should get rid of it altogether - it should not be up to the clients to aid tracking of any sort... But without it, what more data could they actually retrieve?
Probably similar. Mine was actually on a Perq 1 unix workstation, running its own version of windowing software.
It was one of these: https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102674684
Used with one of these: https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102673876
Attached to one of these: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~pmaydell/PERQ/ !!
The difference is that anyone who says "woke" without irony is demonstrating that they have a low IQ, and due to their lack of critical thinking capability, their opinion is not worth reading.
"PC" is a valid term. "woke" is used as an insult, usually by those trying to make excuses for their unjustifiable opinions.
A less-political version of "libtard", so to speak.
O'Rourke is all style and no substance. He orignally ran with a progressive agenda, and said he'd refuse corporate donations... That went out of the window after the primaries.
He also voted for TPP, and has voted with Trump 30% of the time. One example, he voted with republicans to undermine the consumer financial protection bureau, and has voted twice to weaken Obamacare.
He's a republican in democrat clothes pretending to be a progressive.
Here's a good breakdown of his record: https://youtu.be/lF93q-kmoRY
I'd recomment the old Nokia E6 - unfortunately, its software is so out of date, it doesn't even support TLS (only SSL)
If it had uptodate software, it would be great. As it is, despite owning loads of android tablets and tv boxes (typing this one one now), the E6 with it's battery lasting a week is still my go-to phone!
http://www.welshgit.net/misc/nokia-and-android-desktop-20190323.jpg :-)
Indeed. And they are also using sneaky tactics to spin the numbers they admit. The linked article includes the following:
My Facebook insider said access logs showed some 2,000 engineers or developers made approximately nine million internal queries for data elements that contained plain text user passwords.“The longer we go into this analysis the more comfortable the legal people [at Facebook] are going with the lower bounds” of affected users, the source said. “Right now they’re working on an effort to reduce that number even more by only counting things we have currently in our data warehouse.”
And one commentator to that article writes:
Facebook’s employees aren’t even employees. They are all contractors — most of whom are overseas. Manila is their largest operation. I think the number of people contracting FIRMS is 4,500.
[ I've not attempted to fact-check the above 2 quotes ]
I agree. And at least as far as 5.1 lollipop, many permissions could be gotten around. It was easy for any app with no granted permissions at all to get things like mac address, and router mac address.
These days, the play store groups permission requests to make them "simpler" - grant a permission group, and any subsequent app update can specify any other app in that group and it will be granted without the users knowledge.
Oh, and internet access is a given now. I've seen all sorts of abuses by even "respectable" companies... It's all rather like the facebook situation, where facebook 'trusted' third-parties not to abuse overly permissive permissions.
It's intrinsic. The only way to have any chance of control is to block all apps internet access at the unix level, or via the router (though the latter option makes it harder to allow specific apps access!)
... and if you google chmod 777 www-data, your heart will sink even further...
$ find . -name "*.bak" | xargs rm
*ouch* :
$ mkdir -p 'game /etc/passwd over.bak'
rm: ./game: No such file or directory
rm: /etc/passwd: Permission denied
rm: /over.bak: No such file or directory
Even "cleverer" scripts can be thrown with the following variation:
$ mkdir -p $'game\012/etc/passwd\012'
$ touch $'game\012/etc/passwd\012/over.bak'
$ find . -name '*.bak' | xargs rm
Door knobs?