Re: So... The Reg editorial line is in favour of geo-blocking? Didn't see that one coming.
Chill out, mate. It's Friday.
C.
(PS: We don't do 'editorial lines'. And the above article is a comment piece.)
3261 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
Very smooth. I mean external buses, or separate interconnects between on-die components. There will always be some kind of bus between the RAM and whatever is reading from or writing to the RAM, but the HSA people want to do this with one cache-coherent bus and one portable programming model.
One thing springs to mind is bandwidth: jamming everything on the same interconnect may be a problem, so I'll look into that. The specification allows you to break up the physical memory into pools if you really want to, as long as you stick to the standardized programming model.
C.
"It's unacceptable, ElReg!!! Comments now are being censored?"
It's absolutely acceptable. Our house, our rules. We see nothing wrong with curating comments that appear under our articles.
You're always welcome to email our writers if you feel your opinion isn't being heard.
C.
"Even though the title says Austrailians... this applies the world over."
This article was written for our Australian/APAC audience in mind, but I felt it was worth extending to our wider readership so I opened it up to everyone to see.
For context, Australia's leaders are considering retaining people's communications metadata.
C.
Fair points. But, and playing devil's advocate here, what's the difference, really? Whether it's discrete, SiP or SoC, it still looks the same to software, even low-level code.
I meant to put in the article (and TPM on our sister site The Platform mentions it) that it's not truly a SoC (like a bunch of ARM cores with an LCD controller and USB and power management glued alongside in a single package) but I forgot, probably because it's not that important.
I just don't think it really matters, personally, but I'll add a tweak to this story anyway. I just worry this affair has a whiff of holy war about it.
C.
Yeah, I guess supply is an issue. It's also what to do with one of these ODROID SBCs in a way that can stretch to 2,000+ words, personally speaking.
I bought a Pandaboard and got burned when TI dumped OMAP, so I'm hesitant to trust another manufacturer (outside the usual) unless I've got an interesting project or two for it.
No, not a media center (I don't own a TV). No, not a NAS. I don't have a home network to speak of.
C.
systemd
on Monday
Internet Explorer in the Windows 10 Preview and Windows 8.1 was/is flagged up as vulnerable on freakattack.com. It is the same problem. Microsoft warns:
"Our investigation has verified that the vulnerability could allow an attacker to force the downgrading of the cipher suites used in an SSL/TLS connection on a Windows client system. The vulnerability facilitates exploitation of the publicly disclosed FREAK technique, which is an industry-wide issue that is not specific to Windows operating systems."
C.
Very good question. One way is to guess or work out the version of the Linux kernel allegedly used by Vmware in its vmkernel, compile that Linux kernel for x86 and compare common blocks of code between the two binaries – looking for shared function signatures.
It's happened in the past with Linux: people who spend hours looking at compiler output can spot similarities in other code. Obviously, there will be some small blocks that are the same (start and end of similar functions, for example), but chunks of copied code are easy to spot.
That's just one way. But essentially, you don't always need the source code. Binary analysis is possible.
C.
The Platform is our new sister site, launched by former Reg writer Timothy Prickett Morgan and co-editor Nicole Hemsoth, both expert journalists in the field of HPC.
The site focuses on supercomputing and other really big iron. Don't take my word for it – it's all explained here :-)
C.
Those websites are completely wrong. The uniques are way off, it's not even funny. How can they record our traffic better that our internal analytics when we're the ones with the log files?
siteanalytics.compete.com is off by at least 3 orders of magnitude. It also thinks the Daily Mail website, the most-read news site on the planet with 150m uniques a month, got only 20m uniques in January. That would make us about as popular as the most-read news site on the planet. I'd be bathing everyday in champagne if that was the case.
And the Google thing is about searches. People don't get to us by searching for "theregister." They get to us through aggregators, RSS feeds, a bit of social media, or searching for stuff and us coming up top in Google. Eg, right now, Google search for "OpenSSL". Link 1 is openssl.org, link 2 is Wikipedia, link 3 is the news story we published 7 hours ago about the FREAK attack.
This is seriously pathetic trolling. You don't like the design? Let it go, let it go. Can't hold it back any more. Let it go, let it go. Turn away and slam the door.
C.
"A year-to-year basis isn't exactly germane in this conversation, now is it?"
Actually it is. It's a phenomenal increase.
"Old techie adage: If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Screw that noise. That's how you end up sleeping in a dumpster wondering why you can't afford a bag of rice. 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it' applies to airport runways, motorway bridges, and third-hand COBOL code you've convinced an IT boss you can maintain when everyone knows you barely know how to install a Win32 scanner driver.
If a redesign means there's more money to be made, bank it. Our traffic is up: people love our redesign, and so they should.
C.
"Why not run a poll and see what the users of the website tell you?"
Or we could look at something far more accurate, non-self-selecting, and valuable: our actual traffic stats, which are showing increases in individual unique visitors across the planet, on a year-on-year basis.
C.
"Why is ElReg in denial?"
There are 1,100 posts, but nowhere near 1,100 individual people posting. I reckon a couple of hundred people tops, maybe 300? 400? 500? Frankly, that's not even a rounding error compared to our monthly pageview/uniques tally.
Or let me put it another way, 99.999...% of individual unique readers in January read our stories without commenting on the design tweak.
Not everyone will love the new design, and that's a shame, but you can't please everyone all the time. We're still motoring on nicely in terms of traffic, shifting ads, paying the bills, causing mischief, having fun.
"persistent navigation-bar"
It's pretty cool, isn't it? The rollover expansion is balanced so it doesn't get in the way unless you pause your pointer. Other sites expand immediately, which sucks. We're way better than that.
C.
"On the other hand, you limit both yo–"
10: If you don't like it, don't apply. The Register is a face-to-face organization. We communicate electronically across continents. if it's important, we fly to meetings.
"It seems a bit odd that a journal that covers the cutting and often bleeding edge of technol–"
Proper engineering and boffinry is something to celebrate. But, generally, technology sucks. That silicon chip you designed or bridge you built? Brilliant. That web chat toy? Your fancy web app? It's bollocks. You know it's bollocks. I know it's bollocks. Everyone knows it's bollocks. You're swallowing the hype.
Goto 10.
C.
You must be able to come into the office, yes. In some circumstances, we work from home, but most of the time we're in the office if we're not at conferences, etc.
Why? Because it is vastly more convenient and productive to discuss ideas and bounce around headlines, puns, contacts, background info, and so on, if the team is all physically present. Although we have a staff IM system, actual face time is much, much preferred at The Register.
Our office is quite all right. We don't have a whisky bar or a pool table, but we're in a nice part of The City: Maiden Lane.
C.