HTML
Yes, mate. You're telling me you've never written an SQL database server in HTML?
Pfft, amateur.
C.
3261 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
We thought that would be obvious - if we haven't detected any water then there isn't any to our mind - but we've made that clearer.
You could add 'that we've detected' to anything. There's no more coffee left in the pot that we've detected. There's no patch yet from Microsoft that we've detected. And so on.
C.
Who says we always have to be neutral? Look around - we report the facts straight, sure, but we also chip in our own views. That's kinda the point of El Reg. Headlines, sub-heads, comment and opinion pieces, analysis, columns, features, that's where we try to stand out from the rest of the IT media.
You don't have to agree with us. We've never set ourselves up as the Associated Press or Press Association of the IT world. We have opinions, which we hope are informed and help further the interests of our readers, and we'll share them.
If we think company or government X does something bad, we'll say it's bad. And though The Reg was around in 2002 - would have been about four years old - it may or may not have had an opinion on the Iraq war back then. Doesn't bother me, I was just a regular reader at the time.
A wider point can be made here. Sometimes some people think we here at El Reg are lychee martini liberals or Daily Mail demagogues. I don't think we're fixed on a particular political side. We're just against stupidity. If your side does something stupid, we'll call it stupid - it's not a left or right, west or east, rich or poor thing.
C.
"This undertaking is non-trivial and likely requires a substantial time investment"
Nah, there's no way that takes 5-10 people several days to do what's described. Maybe if they all stood around arguing it would take that long. The code would take an hour or three to write, depending on how newb you are, and maybe an afternoon of fiddling to obfuscate it. A day tops.
Think about what's happening here. You're basically making a program that finds two files, merges them, and uploads them to cloud storage. The only malicious part is that someone might use it on another's computer without permission.
And then you take this borderline malicious program and obfuscate it so that VT definitely doesn't flag it up.
C.
From the letter to drivers, the firm said it got the data because it was representing Uber in some matters:
"In connection with this legal representation, we received data regarding certain drivers on the Uber platform, which included information about you."
We'll add that to the piece.
C.
No, like pretty much everyone we write about, they'll still have PR humans who'll let us know almost immediately if they think we've overstepped the mark.
Not that we can complain much: we pick holes in what they do, PR teams quibble the words we use. Fair's fair. It's a wonderful post-publication dance.
C.
Cos having mysterious 'removed by moderator' messages in place of deleted posts, and with child replies that make no sense without the context, is just a confusing mess all round.
When we remove parts of threads, it's not done lightly. If there's a decent discussion going then we'll leave it there. But if it's just noise on noise, that's going to be tidied out of sight.
C.
Some idiot posted something stupid as the first comment on the story - and was downvoted into oblivion - so a moderator binned that part of the thread as it was irrelevant to the article and getting in the way of discussion.
We try not to get involved in moderation. We try to let discussions flow naturally. We want a high SNR.
If that idiot posted their mini rant after 50 or 100 comments on an article, it would have been buried and we would have probably left it alone. But when it's the first comment, it's just noise.
Since enough people are unhappy, we'll bring back that comment and thread. But as you can see, it's just nonsense. I don't think it fairly reflects the kinds of discussions we have around here.
I hope you can see why the comment was rejected, it's just dumb. This is the sort of chaff we trim out of threads to make the experience better for everyone.
C.
The FTC does this every so often, it reminds people that the New Shiny Thing is still subject to today's laws and regulations.
In fact, there's no new regulation or rules here, it's just a reminder from the watchdog. Or a clarification. Depends how you look at it.
C.
It's actually 6kg - we've fixed that in the piece. The 225g was the drag sail, not the full sat. The other dimensions are fine. If you spot anything that looks weird, drop us a note please to corrections@theregister.com and we'll get right on it.
PS: if you want more info on how it works, check out the project's site. It has lots of details.
C.
"It is completely normal to have a few KB of ITIM and/or DTIM on both ARM and RISC-V chips"
Yeah, true, very true. I experienced as much when I was playing with some RV silicon and also Qemu that correct emulates it.
The SRAM showing up in virtual space is very annoying, and demonstrates the part isn't for general purpose computing.
C.
If someone tries an idea in the past and it didn't work out, and someone else comes through with a similar idea and tries it again, that's still potentially worth noting.
How about this, I'm planning on building a faster-than-light drive. We'll be able to get to nearby stars in minutes, that's the dream. There, now that idea is out there, never again can anyone write about FTL drives or slower-than-FTL flight. The idea is old.
Also, I'm planning on making 100PB hard drives. All the galaxy's information in your pocket. OK, now that's out there, no more stories about hard disks until we're over 100PB per drive. The idea is otherwise nothing new.
I know this is reductio ad absurdum, but c'mon. And we linked to similar heating tech in the piece.
C.
Too many of some, not enough of others. And products are held up by the ones in short supply.
Power electronics, microcontrollers, glue logic, that sort of thing, if not available, hold up shipping end products no matter how healthy the supply of the main processors etc.
It's something the media should be better at, making clear what kinds of components are and aren't available. It's something we're trying to be better at.
C.
We're still doing a lot of written word, as you can see, and some videos, which are fun, useful, and a break from writing.
There's a reason why steakhouses have some chicken and pork on the menu as well as beef. Little bit for everyone. Nothing wrong with a bit of variety for those who prefer listening or watching.
Our videos aren't like YT where people beg for Patreon and likes and subscribes. For us, it's The Register logo, and then right into the chat, and we keep it short. It works as audio-only too if you want to listen while doing something else.
C.
Last time I visited a Google office, it had way more than that. There was an on-site movie and gaming theater, a doctor's office, hairdresser, indoor Zen garden, a tea sommelier, rooms of designer furniture to chill out in, a speakeasy within a speakeasy, the works. Perks are a big thing.
Heck, even El Reg's SF WeWork space had bean bags, table tennis, and bottomless soda and beer that we and a bunch of Aussies in the same building rinsed out until WW gave up and took away the booze.
(PS: The El Reg London WeWork space had sparkling wine on tap as well as beer. Those were the days.)
C.
So you're basically saying ChatGPT is a non-intelligent, non-impressive sentence-predicting machine, which is fair...
...but when we point out the same and that this is less than ideal for real-world work, we're the ones who are ignorant?
Doesn't that make you ignorant too? What's going on here. Did ChatGPT write your comment?
C (as in Chris, not ChatGPT).
FWIW Dish has about 8 million subscribers; suspected ransomware infections are interesting especially if they bring down production systems; and >50% of our readers are in the US. And it was published at 9pm UK, 1pm PT.
That's why we cover US-based news at this time of day, as much as we love everyone from every country. We have the ability to make certain stories appear on the homepage only for certain regions, but we only do that to avoid swamping the homepage with news about one particular region - and when we do, some people are upset they might be missing out on articles.
tldr: we can't please all of the people all of the time.
C.
All right, don't get bent out of shape over what's obviously intentional hyperbole to make a point. It's tedious caveating every sentence.
Next you'll tell me that 'world plus dog' isn't used accurately.
(And BTW everyone agrees with me, and anyone who doesn't is wrong.)
C.
The article did say:
'Supply of many components, especially those used for power delivery and automotive environments, remain heavily constrained'
And we've reinforced that with by adding some extra caveats to the piece, and I've twiddled the headline. We just thought it was a bit obvious we were talking about processors and memory, not MCUs etc.
C.
Articles are generally a collective effort, unless it's marked opinion or comment, in which case, it's solely the author's view.
As a whole, we're done with this charade. There are so many examples like this and this.
Congrats, Redmond, you bought yourself a multi-billion-dollar moron.
C.
What makes you say that - we're not using any AI for articles other than:
* Transcript generation (which is still hand edited)
* Some people are toying with grammar checking (but everything is still hand edited)
We've thought about using software to automatically generate outage stories as those need to be done quick, they're so easy to write, and everyone loves an outage story.
But even then, that would be non-AI (it's just template filling) and would be hand edited before it goes live.
C.
If we didn't include a transcript, some would say they need it because they can't watch the video for whatever reason. And if we include the transcript - which is handy for Google indexing too - then some say it's in the way.
We've moved the transcript to a second page for now. Hope this helps.
C.