Well..
We do link to the full judgment if you need some bedtime reading.
C.
3261 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
If you watch the original source, they said it was installed 26 years ago (1998) and it was designed to last 20-25 years, which all makes sense, and why it needs upgrading.
I think perhaps some of us think 1998 was 10 years ago. It was 26. In 1998, USB was only 2 years old. Netscape was 4 years old. Arm IPO'd. 1998 is hella history.
C.
"Certain exceptions" indeed, Elon.
Broadly worded clauses that ban people from discussing working conditions, employer policies and practices, severance terms and wages, conditions of employment, and related matters are likely to fall foul of the NLRB.
NDAs about trade secrets are OK, for example, but that's not what we're talking about here.
C.
Hi -- I think this says more about you than about us and your perception of criticism against Elon.
We're just pointing out that this launch went through the same sort of thing (RUD) SpaceX had to overcome. And Musk's lot figured it out, so good luck to Japan.
If Microsoft had a massive hole in its Windows login system and then Linux had a similar issue a week or year later, we'd probably reference that Microsoft bug in the Linux coverage. Pattern recognition; it's what humans do.
C.
Ah, there's more detail in the previous article that we link to. The electric gun could be solar powered or from a nuclear device. Or any other way you want to make electricity.
And I've added some more links at the start of this latest piece to more info about the tech.
C.
Yes, we've expanded that part of the article. We do know what IP addresses and P2P comms are all about.
This is a heads up for those who assumed Twitter's calling feature was routed through X servers. It's not, by default, you have to switch that on.
We felt this was something worth pointing out to people in general. Not everyone is an IT expert like yourself.
C.
Support for the crash-inducing key combination via PS/2 turned up in Win2K, etc, is what we meant, and what the article now more clearly says.
Don't forget to email corrections@theregister.com if you spot something wrong so we can get things fixed ASAP.
C.
FWIW I've added the Chinese New Year aspect. The Waymo car was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
It drove right into the middle of people setting off fireworks in the street, and if you've ever been in SF during a CNY, you know it's loud, a little chaotic, and non-stop fireworks going off from the street level. And so it's no surprise, sadly, that someone decided to blow up a self-driving car in that moment.
It's delicate because, as someone who has lived in SF for 10 years next to Chinatown, I know the community isn't like this. This was morons taking advantage of the CNY weekend.
Edit: Also wanted to say - full disclosure - I've been in two driverless Waymo rides now, including one in miserable Bay Area February rain, and it felt as safe or safer than a random Lyft or Uber driver.
C.
They are on our radar and we will cover them more. One story lately we did about them:
https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/28/cerebras_g42_china_refile/
C.
Steady on, I think that's a bit unfair. We accidentally missed off the hours in megawatt-hours. It's now fixed.
We're a small team that's trying to do a lot, and we're gonna sometimes slip up. We try our best not to, but it happens. And when we do mess up, we try to fix it ASAP. Dropping us a note directly helps us get an update out faster.
I think awful is a bit harsh.
C.
Yeah, we know, we know, we accidentally left off the hours in megawatt-hours. W is the rate of energy being transferred or transformed, and Wh is a quantity, we get it.
Sometimes articles have mistakes. We try to fix those ASAP. Please don't forget to email corrections@ to get our attention straight away - we check that constantly and comments only when we have time.
C.
Yes, we made an error. It happens. We try to avoid them. If software has bugs, articles have mistakes. We try to fix them as soon as we can, and prevent them in the first place.
It should be - and now is - MWh. It's now corrected. Don't forget please to email corrections@ if you spot anything wrong so we can sort stuff out ASAP.
C.
Hi - we can't reproduce the entire paper in an article, just take the more interesting bits from. We also always try to link through to papers and original sources so you can see more for yourself.
In this case, the methodology including full prompts etc are in the linked-to paper starting from section A (page 15) in its current version.
C.
With Google the supersoaraway search engine still, our article focuses on the Big G. If you want to see how Bing etc fared, it's a mixed bag - some good, some bad - see the linked-to report for the details.
It's why we link to reports and original sources wherever we can - not all publications do that - so that you can dive deeper beyond our take of a situation. Articles are like products: you have to make a decision to ship at some point, and we shipped this story with a focus on Google.
There's still scope for a followup that compares Google with others, and it's on the todo list.
C.