Re: Emojis... where's the one for *vomit* ?
There is a vomit emoji in Skype and unicode.
5759 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Aug 2011
I am really uncomfortable with the idea that the past or people can be forgotten. That's North Korea's job.
Two issues here.
1. People forgetting about things like conventions being spent.
2. People trying to fix 1 by applying various "rights to be forgotten".
There is no easy answer especially considering that penalties for any value of 1 are no longer of the form of "pay your debt to the society". So people, quite rightly, look at it and say - I do not give a damn that his/her conviction is spent.
It's not difficult to provide the expertise & experience it just requires the will of business.
Absolutely identical observations while working for a UK company 2001-2007. No act of god would have been sufficient to make the CEO hire a UK graduate regardless of the fact that a back of the fag packet showed them to be ~ 60% of the cost of imports from soft and humid climes.
If people look at the lifestyle you get with 55k here, compared to 40k in India/China?
Look at it as ratio to national average salary. It is the most clear indicator of "attractiveness".
UK - average software developer salary to national salary is: 1.1 the national average. Probably the lowest one in Europe.
Eastern Europe - average software develoepr salary to national salary is: 2.4 the national average (using Bulgarian and Romanian data).
There is nothing more to discuss really - you cannot attract anyone with that any more in the first place.
according to the rocket equation
What f***ing equation?
Orbital velocity by the station remnant - 8km/s. ~50-70% of orbital velocity by the interceptor - they do not reach full 8km/s. If you are lucky and you manage to match them perfectly head on - 12km/s relative. If not - you are still looking at > 8km/s. How much energy did the rocket expand is irrelevant. What is relevant is what speed did it reach relative to the target.
Let's assume 10kg (it is more) and we get a nice rounded number of 1.44 TeraJoules. One Kiloton is 4.88 Joules. So we are looking a nearly 300 tons of TNT equivalent. Even if it was just hitting at 8km/s you are still looking at > 100 tons equivalent.
There will be NOTHING left from the station if it hits. The "if it hits" is the big if - they do not have a very stellar record.
I doubt we have a missile that can do much to it. The US have used an SM3 to kill a malfunctioning satellite, but that is a big box of bits. This space station is basically a big empty tube.
mv2. While chinese and russian interceptors have warheads and are proximity based, USA does not. It is a direct impactor. Depending on trajectory you are looking at impacting with several kg at an intercept velocity in the km/s range. The energy release is equivalent to a small nuke. There will be nothing left regardless of its shape or size. If it hits. That is the key issue with direct impactors - they have to hit which is not easy if the relative velocities of the impactor and the target can exceed 12km/s (that is what you get for a best case intercept scenario).
so that lots of smaller pieces of metal can hit them instead.
The smaller pieces at that speed will simply burn up in the atmosphere.
A random shaped piece up to 1kg in size has practically zero chance to survive re-entry. A piece > 100kg coming in at Earth orbital velocity has a significant chance of reaching the surface. Something approaching a ton will pretty much hit the ground unless it breaks up in-flight.
So whacking it with one of the precious "mid-course" interceptors - the ones that miss 10 out of 10 is the only chance of making sure it does not hit someone on the head.
This is something which is possessed by 3 nations - USA (demonstrated), China (demonstrated) and Russia. Russia except bits of Caucasus is outside the impact zone so it is giggling and twiddling its thumbs. China is being Chinese. That leaves the USA to do the job. I am surprised they have not done it so far purely for show-off purposes.
Hit the US?
Where are all those AEGIS missiles when you actually need them? Oh forgot, they are just for show and pork transfusions.
The only way to minimize the chance of a large chunk landing on someone's head is to whack it right now. It is under the altitude of all satellites so disintegrating it will only do good at this point.
https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4110
I remember updating after seeing the Bugtraq posting.
This time El Reg is a bit late to the party, everyone has gone home already to sober up.
Additionally, the article is incorrect. Reading the POC exploit you need to have AUTH enabled. While you do not need to AUTH successfully, the server in question should be set to authenticate users. That somewhat limits the scope as "pure" mail relays would not be affected.
Britain, the last country on the planet where newsagents still carry war-glorifying WWII-related comics for kids after 1960 ... 2018 and still the same ... so yeah ... hopeless
Britain is nowhere near the top of the scale on "Remember the War" syndrome. Your post makes it very clear that you have never been to Russia, especially around the 9th of May. Here is some educational material for you so you get an idea just how deep does it run there:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7avPl6jB5w
It is not the only place either. I was in Monte Negro last summer. There were fresh flowers on the resistance graves at the Kolasin cemetery and there were still people paying their respect there - 70 years later.
Sure, you have idiots including ones we sponsor like the Bulgarian, Czech, Polish, Baltic, etc "democrats" that have constant erasure of history on the agenda. Even they have difficulty erasing it - it runs too deep. You can think of it as a grand canyon made by a river of blood. It will take millenia to fill it up even in places where people are actively working on doing this like Ukraine.
Apparently the fatal shell not only penetrated the Hood's deck armor, but also several other decks, set off the aft magazine, and then the flash from that explosion traveled up some unblocked shell transfer passageway to the forward magazine and blew that up as well.
Not having the bulkhead doors closed in battle? This is the first time I hear it, but it does not surprise me. Grand idiocy for which in any other Navy from the beginning of the days of steam all the way to today you would have been court-martialed. You cannot do planned flooding of counter-compartments after a hit unless all bulkhead doors are closed to start off with. If they are in open state to start with by the time you get around to close them you are either capsizing or on the bottom.
The difference in between having them open and closed is also well documented - multiple German ships at the battle Jutland had hits in the gunpowder storage resulting in loss of everything vertically in that area including the guns on top. The ships continued fighting.
I say those Bismark gunners made their own luck
Exactly.
Everything points to Hood failing to avoid a straddle - even the report by the official board of inquiry (*). It was ranged - shots over, shot under and it should have been manoeuvring like hell out of the incoming salvo in the middle and it did not. So it took the incoming salvo straight on the chin.
(*)It tries to add various adjectives to it like "unlucky", etc, but the essence is exactly that - it was declassified even before the war was over and is available for all to read.
Ask Allen to look for the Russian fleet at Tsushima...
That is that. There is also Rurik's final resting place which for some distinctly Russian reasons is is honored more than any of the ships lost at Tsushima over there. Though the coordinates are known - it is a listed war grave.
There are also quite a few WW2 Arctic campaign wrecks which have never been located precisely.
What's with the WWII obsession?
Once again, which bridge did your progenitors hide under during the war?
I know where mine were at the time. They were definitely not hiding under a bridge(*).
(*)My granddad was not really buried - there was so little left from his fighter coming down from > 5km altitude that it was his coat and medals that went into the casket.
Doesn't this just tell you that bullets are cheap?
Bullets are cheap. You do not fight a war with just bullets you know.
Artillery rounds are in the hundreds of pounds per shot range, maybe 1000s for large calibre or armour piercing rounds. An unguided missile is usually in the several grand zone. Guided missiles start at 10s of K and go into the millions for a cruise missile.
I am not sure if this number includes missiles. If it does, the British Army should not have enough money to run basic readiness exercises for anything but infantry.
Drones does not necessarily mean slow, weak quadcopters. Small fixed wing devices would be better, faster, smaller, carry a bigger payload further. Say 100km/hr for 50 km. Give them a gun or just explosive.
That is exactly what was used for the attack on the Russian base on Latakia.
But a swarm of drones is a different world.
The limit for number of simultaneously engaged targets in the most advanced missile systems out there is 40. That is where that number comes from. If you throw > 80 at at time against a target it is pretty much history.
Since when has winter tyre and snow chain legislation existed in the UK?
That is my exact point. About time to introduce it. While there is no point making it mandatory for everyone, enforcing it specifically during warnings so that people heed the weather warning should do the job.
As far as the legislation it does exist. The definition of "roadworthy vehicle" is up to the court and IS dependent on the actual road conditions. There is precedent - plod can start handing out tickets for "non-roadworthy vehicle" because you took a car in summers out on a road in the middle of a blizzard. The last time it was done by either Lancashire or South Yorkshire about 12-15 years ago (cannot remember, it made the beeb - you can find it). All tickets were upheld in court.
However, instead of doing it once in a decade (and only when they get annoyed) it is better to codify it and get it done once and for all. If the met has said orange and you are in summers you really do not belong on the road. You are endangering everyone.
How about doing something with an economic value instead?
Like for example:
1. Failing to control a vehicle equipped with summer tires within an official yellow snow/ice alert zone declared by the met office is a mandatory 3 points and 500£.
2. Driving (in control or not) a vehicle with summer tires in an official orange snow/ice alert zone is 6 points and 1000£
3. Not having appropriate equipment, namely snow chains and a shovel and being out and about in a red alert zone is 9 points and 2000£.
Something similar for lorries and wind would be nice too.
That will put an end to the ridiculous weathermoans where the whole world is laughing at the clusterf*** resulting from 1 inch of snow.
Economic effect here and then. If the numbers from the last week weathermoan are to be belived - 1Bn there and then.
Yeah... I know... Doing something useful is much more difficult than doing tea leaves guessing on future developments in an area where we are not likely to see any numbers for years to come.
Can we stop this WW2 regurgitation nonsense. We are not in the late 1940-es and it is not that ID card.
The norm worldwide is to have a photo ID and to use it for the purpose of proving who are you on the voter roll. It is only US and UK continuing to fret on the subject about underrepresented minorities. Under-represented minorities also party on Ibiza you know and for that they need a passport (definitely was the case last time I flew there).
There are plenty of countries which are SIGNIFICANTLY more liberal and democratic despite having a National ID and requiring a photo ID for nearly everything including voting. For example - I have not noticed any Scandinavian country going to the dark side of fascism just yet.
It is not like the UK govt does not have at least several complete databases covering everyone from the cradle to the grave. Not having an expression of that in the form of ID is actually a HUGE extra cost which we pay for every time we deal with services, elections, credits, mortgages or even basic things like enforcing traffic offence tickets.
Radar and AI controlled railguns could surely see the return of more guns on ships and perhaps bigger ships with lots more guns?
Not really. The range and killing power of a realistic naval railgun is the same as the cost and killing power of a modern multiple rocket launcher which costs a fraction of the cost per projectile and can fire cassette warheads with guided projectiles and observation drones (to see how well your bombardment is doing).
A converted trawler with a 9A52-4 (or its NATO counterpart) mounted on it costs less than 3 million per unit and in the several thousands to tens of thousands per shot, does not need an expensive power source and can be built "in quantity".
So if you actually CAN get within long range artillery range, long range artillery stops making sense. It is totally outgunned by battlefield rocket systems which cost peanuts and can be easily converted for marine use. The only reason they are not is because that would remove the justification for ridiculous pork projects like the gun on the Zumvalt class destroyers (which costs 1M per shell fired).
Somehow I have this picture of the 18:15 being ejected from Euston like a massive projectile.
Wishful thinking goes both ways. Unfortunately most railguns will eject it exactly as it goes in real life after ~ 50 shots.
That is not as bad as it seems by the way. Most WW1 battleships needed an overhaul of the main caliber after ~200 shots if using a full charge as needed for the maximum engagement distance. After that their precision went to hell.
So if a railgun manages to reach several 100s shots without deteriorating it is actually fit for use as main caliber. We are not that far off from that.
Yeah, I'm sure the Chinese have hundreds of strategic icebreakers.
Today - no. You should remember that they have a talent for buying "scrap" to be turned into floating casinos and that scrap somehow ends up getting out to sea in a pristine freshly painted state and launching fighter jets from the main deck.
and when you turn the key to “off”, the electronics also goes dark.
This will definitely stop being the case for a plug-in hybrid or electric vehicle. It will also define a clear idle state (while charging). A lot of the connectivity issues also go away - you can even talk low bitrate over the charging cable.
Exactly as I predicted 2 days ago:
Next stop on the line is the European commission competition review of the merger.
Spanner meet works, works meet spanner.
What is communist about this ?.
The insistence that any element in a value chain does something productive and the application of financial instruments to do so and labelling anything that does not significantly increase the value of the goods as an economic parasite to be eradicated.
It is a cornerstone of modern Western economic theory that the amount of entities which goods and services pass through before they reach the consumer is irrelevant and the "economic parasite label" is something regurgitated from communist ideology. This is the whole idea behind VAT - to facilitate the smooth flow of goods and services across an arbitrary length of chains with the tax paid at the end (everyone else in-between gets a rebate).
The fact that we are labelling elements in the Holy VAT chain as parasites and using turnover tax to tackle the issue is as communist as communist gets. You can open any textbook from their 1980-es economics courses - there is a whole chapter on the subject singing odes to the virtues of turnover tax.
As I said before - the truth is somewhere in-between. In its pure form turnover tax is evil. Similarly, at the global level VAT is evil as you can always find a way of evading it. The truth is some combination of both - applied to every one so that the field is level.
Eastern Europe used to use Turnover Tax instead of VAT.
The rationale was exactly that - to prevent endless chains of "low value/no value" addition and to ensure that anyone in the chain actually does something instead of being a letterbox for tax reduction.
USA and Western European economists had a field day chastising the arrangement and it was one of the first things to go once the wall has crumbled. It is quite funny how what goes around, comes around and we have resorted to Soviet Block economical methods.
The current proposal is somewhere in-between as the truth is somewhere in between. VAT in a 20Tn+ market results in the creation of a large amount of "tax efficiency" entities which parasitise on the economy. Pure turnover tax immediately creates vertical monopolies compared to which Amazon is a minnow. The truth is somewhere in between. 18VAT + 2Turnover sounds about right. It should be applied universally instead of targeting the valley.
There is a limit to the usefulness of this strategy.
The amount of strain on your neck muscles from left-right movement is significantly less than the amount from left right.
I have a 2560x1440 32 inch monitor and it will be unusable if I turn it 90 degrees. My neck will need rehab by the end of the day as it is very difficult to force yourself to use only eye movement to look up/down.
If it was 27 or even 24 - maybe. At that size however, the advantages of higher res than 1920x1200 are rather slim - your eyes will strain too much.
If I ever have to extend the amount of video real estate I use it will probably be one or two small 1440x900 turned 90 degrees on the side. Once again, if there are more you get into diminishing returns from neck/eye movement.
unless every other lamp post is a basestation.
It will be a basestation.
Why are you resisting your location, breath rate, heart rate, blood sugar level, adrenalin level and blood pressure to be known in real time citizen? You are clearly a potentially subversive element, the reeducation task force has been dispatched to your location.
My exact thought. Your average clip on a "popular website" of your choosing is between 10MB and 25MB per minute for HD resolutions. 15GB is 600 minutes of HD video compressed to more or less standard web download settings. So this is either 4K or someone not knowing how to formulate a correct ffmpeg incantation.
I had one of these micr SDX cards fail on me a little while ago.
The exact reason Sandisk is not a popular brand in this family. Their sd cards tend to have some "interesting" failure modes. There is never any gradual deterioration. It just suddenly starts reporting itself as zero GB in size and this is the end of the line. So if I have a choice I will chose Samsung - it has shown itself to be significantly more reliable including working in some of the razzies and bananas I have out in the sticks which remained operational from -27C ambient to +45C. It just kept on ticking.
If the EU puts up barriers because nobody else is 'good enough' the people within the EU will find themselves further cut off.
Cut off from what. Share what you are smoking.
To put it bluntly, a megamerger today has to clear at least the following authorities(*) in this order.
USA - committee on foreign investment
Eu - competition
USA - competition
China
Korea
If a merger is blocked by any one of these, that merger is dead.
While from an obnoxiousness viewpoint the congress cfi leads the pack, from a competition perspective, Eu is actually the most important:
1. Eu + EEA size exceeds ANY economy of the planet. Including USA. Eu with EEA is > 20 trillion, USA is 18 trillion, China is 11. Like it or not - it is the biggest single market economy on the planet.
2. Eu does not have the lax attitude of USA to "organic" monopolies and applies competition law based on the definition of "significant market power". It does not matter if you own 10, 30 or 90 % of the market. If your market share is sufficient to distort pricing, especially in other markets - you are a subject to the legislation.
Eu commission says jump, the answer is "how high". Then you do it a few times. Smiling while you are doing too - it is good for public relations.
I always find it funny listening to the 3 blind mice and the one under the command of the potted plants. My thought always is: "Have you opened some statistics lately?"
(*)Japan is usually not involved unless it is a Japanese company. Its internal market has different dynamics so what is gross market distortion there does no affect us and vice versa. Russia is ignored under the pre-text of sanctions and the Brazil/India/etc block is still not organized enough.
Unlikely, as the debris from the attack
What debris at >5M? It does not even need a warhead. mv2 by itself is enough to vaporize whatever is left.
If it does not, their existing Tornado missile batteries at Latakia will clean up the area. That is one of the reasons they are there - to sterilize a spot where they have lost something which they do not want NATO to recover. They already use kit like that there in order for it to clock combat hours. For example - the Su-PAKFA fighters.
So far they have not needed to use "sterilize the area", but they are perfectly capable of doing it (without blowing up Chinese embassies "by mistake" as a collateral).
Ask your parents what secretaries were.
Some of us are old enough to remember (put some joke alert tags on your post next time by the way).
To the ones not old enough - the secretary is a mythical minor deity, which while fickle and capricious at times could usually be pacified by a box of chocolates and some flowers.
Primary purpose of this minor deity - to ensure that the bosses tantrums, jerk attitude and overall arseholeness is buffered and tuned down before it is unleashed on his direct reports. They were the lubricant which made an old style company work. Unfortunately as with any deity, their power was proportional to the belief in them. As we do not believe in them any more they have waned and disappeared as ghosts into the twilight.
It is something which is in the recruitment policy of a lot of the large tech companies and not just in the USA.
So if the court rules it illegal the fallout will be on the "nuclear winter" scale. If the court rules it legal, I would suggest our Silly Valley, M4 corridor, etc colleagues to immigrate somewhere where they still hire on merit like Eastern Europe. Funnily enough they do not seem to have any issues with having a lot of women in STEM either (pretty ones too).