Umm, China's in the Northern Hemisphere...
Posts by Ken Hagan
8168 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jun 2007
Page:
- ← Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- Next →
Show me the money, America! It's time to learn how to pronounce 'Xiaomi'
Ex-NASA boffin dreams of PREDATOR-ish tech in humble microwaves
Re: How about FLIR capability in a smartphone?
You can get them for cars, too, and that was always supposed to be the mass market application that brought prices tumbling down. These things are a lot cheaper than they used to be; 20 years ago, $300 wouldn't have bought the box your camera came in. But yeah, not quite "toys" yet. Perhaps the Chinese will oblige. FLIR-the-company is on the pricey end of the FLIR-the-product market.
So who just bought the rights to .blog for $20m? A chap living in Panama
I guess ... not many, but waaay more than "none"
I have a ...me.uk email address and still suffer from both of those problems. (The rest of the address is just lower case letters, dots and hyphens, so I'm assuming that some fool is complaining about the domain. Perhaps we should ask t.berners-lee to see if he's ever had problems with his amazingly unusual name. Oh, and as I write that, yes I'm thinking now of our regular commentard with the name O'Brien who is, if you'll forgive the phrase, "beyond the Pale".)
Happily, raised eyebrows amongst otherwise-tech-savvy colleagues doesn't stop anything working.
Sadly, email "validation" code does. Perhaps we need to send that memo round again:
You (yes, you, personally) cannot validate an email address. Every time you write code to try to do this, it costs you time to do it, time to deal with the customer complaints, and lost customers from those who can't be bothered to complain and just take their money elsewhere. There is no business case for trying to validate an email address. It just makes you look like an idiot when it goes wrong (as it will, see above). Stop it, you cretinous fuckwit. Go back over your life and remove all such checks from code you have written in the past.
Elon Musk's Tesla set to unveil home storage battery
Off the top of my head
It needs to pay for itself on a timescale less than the period for which you have a reasonable hope of predicting the price of electricity.
Deployment will be limited to those properties that can retrofit the battery and that itself may be costly if the battery is large. New builds would be fine, though, and that may be a large enough market for starters.
On the plus side, if this can be deployed widely then it is a game-changer for electricity generation because you wouldn't need power stations that can switch on and off at short notice.
So, um, what breakthrough in battery technology makes this possible in 2015?
Skin colour's irrelevant. Just hire competent folk on their merits, FFS
Patch now: Design flaw in Windows security allows hackers to own corporate laptops, PCs
Re: Server 2003
If I understand it correctly (and posting here is the easiest way to find out), your internet cafe customer would have to be connecting to an SMB share that had been made available on the public internet (not via VPN). Furthermore, to let the attacker use fake group policy to take over your machine, you'd have to be logging into a domain via the public internet. If you are doing either, then I don't think you give a monkeys about security and you are probably already running a rootkit both on the client and the DC.
It's an interesting case, but I think there's a reason why the design flaw went unnoticed for 25 years.
'Giving geo-engineering to this US govt is like giving a child a loaded gun'
Watch it: It's watching you as you watch it (Your Samsung TV is)
At the third beep, the Atomic Clock will be 60 ... imprecisely
Basic minimum income is a BRILLIANT idea. Small problem: it doesn't work as planned
Half a billion wearables... and guess whose kit has to support all that data, asks Cisco
Video saturation?
There must surely come a point when everyone who wants to watch web videos is using their only two eyes already and watching at retinal resolution. You can't just extrapolate current trends indefinitely.
My guess is that the developed world is closer to that point than some pundits recognise. If you spend too much time watching cat videos, you don't earn enough to pay the mobile data bills.
SWELLING moons of ice dwarf Pluto snapped by NASA spy-probe
Anthem, America's second biggest health insurer, HACKED: Millions hit by breach
Re: Love it...
"But everything you need to obtain loans, credit cards, driving licenses, property and on-line payment services were compromised."
So, logically, all the businesses that currently used that combination of information will have to start asking for a different combination, because that combination is now public domain and only an idiot would want to stand up in court and admit that they dished out a credit card with nothing more than public domain info to identify the holder.
This is the real cost and it is a cost to the rest of society. Not for the first time, we see security as a cost that is largely externalised. On the bright side, it *is* probably about time that companies stopped using SSNs as a key.
Microsoft tells big biz: No free Windows 10 for you, crack wallets open
Regin super-malware has Five Eyes fingerprints all over it says Kaspersky
"Considering the extreme complexity of the Regin platform and little chance that it can be duplicated by somebody without having access to its source codes, we conclude the QWERTY malware developers and the Regin developers are the same or working together."
"Extreme complexity"? This from people who have just reversed engineered both of them. Modest, huh?
OTOH, it is to be hoped that their claim is correct. Part of GCHQ's job is to develop stuff like this so one would hope that they were investing at least some of their budget in such things and getting usable products out of it.
Developers, developers, developers! But WILL they support Windows 10?
Re: Perhaps if Microsoft stops treating developers like dogshlt...
"they should just release some open source platform that works with all of it products and leave the rest to the developer community. Java-ize it."
Without wishing to dispute the possible merits of open-sourcing some platform, I don't think you are wise to describe that as "Java-izing". There's been this little court case recently about just how open Java actually is.
Holograms? Really?
I don't suppose this will have any effect, but can I just mention that "hologram" and "holographic" already have long-established meanings in the field of imagery and display and (here's the rub) ONE MORE FUCKING DIMENSION THAN YOUR HEAD-UP DISPLAY.
The innumerate tosspots in Microsoft's marketing department may not care about this small detail, but I do. So, Microsoft, when you produce a working 3D display technology, you can call it holographic. Until, then, I suggest you stick to the established meanings of words.
If you don't, we may decide to start calling your displays "wanky". Yes, I know the word "wank" already has an established meaning which doesn't accurately describe your new display technology, and our choice naturally leads on to an even more unfortunate nomenclature for the applications that use it, but it's OK to appropriate existing words because language evolves, right?
SURPRISE! Microsoft pops open Windows 10 Preview build early
Re: Read privacy statement
"Examples of data we may collect include [...] phone call and SMS data; [...] voice, text and writing input; [...]"
I really can't see *that* surviving in the EULA of the final release. How would Microsoft ever hope to sell a single copy into the business market with a threat to record pretty much everything you do on the device?
OTOH, I'm not concerned. Participation in the beta program is optional and I will read the EULA for the final release. (Microsoft ought to be a little concerned that the population of their beta program might be heavily skewed towards those who don't care about privacy (or, equivalently, towards those who aren't using the product realistically or with an honest ID). If MS are using beta program stats to guide design decisions for privacy-related features, they'll be getting the wrong answers.)
Windows 10: The Microsoft rule-o-three holds, THIS time it's looking DECENT
Re: Loved?
"here's not a chance in hell that I'm going to touch another MS OS at least until it's second or third SP."
This *is* Windows 8 Service Pack 4-ish. In fact, if you can see your way past (or disable) Metro then it is Windows 7 Service Pack 6 or Windows Vista Service Pack 9. Under the hood, MS have done sweet FA for the best part of a decade, except slowly scrub out the warts in Vista that weren't intended.
US military finds F-35 software is a buggy mess
Microsoft will give away Windows 10 FREE - for ONE year
Re: Security is going to be a big feature...
"Who spends as much on securing their products as MS? "
Probably no-one, but a fair proportion of that cost results from the fact that it is always an afterthought.
Security *is* an inherent part of most OSes, even Windows. The problem with Windows is that every time someone comes along with an existing app that depended on a small hole in the design, Microsoft reason that *their* customer is the end-user, who buys a Windows upgrade and expects everything to carry on working. Therefore, every version of Windows must be backwards compatible with every security hole ever used (even accidentally) and a second layer of attempted security has to be poured on top.
Contrast this with the Linux approach which consists of Linus bawling out the "f*cking cretin" who made the "buggy pile of shite" and then issuing a new kernel that plugs the hole.
Lastly, for extra points, compare and contrast the market share of the two approaches. Then explain to me why it is worth caring about security in the current business environment. :(
Re: I'm free!
Since Win8, the kernel has required CPU features that didn't exist when XP came out and which weren't universally available until the middle of the last decade. I imagine that offering a free upgrade to a load of consumers with XP-era hardware would have been a support nightmare. Yes, you would rig the upgrade process to check before changing anything, but you'd have to tell the ineligible users that they weren't in fact eligible, contrary to what they'd read in your adverts. Good luck with trying to explain instruction set extensions to Joe Public.
Also, they probably figure that anyone still using XP after last years doom-mongering is unlikely to have done so purely on grounds of price, and Win10 won't actually run all those IE6 intranet apps.
Re: What about new computers?
I doubt it. The cost of upgrading an old PC has been in three digits for the last version or two. Lowering it to zero will make a big difference to how many people bother. The cost of buying that same version on a new device is about a tenth of that and is in any case hidden in the cost of the device.
Re: Where's the profit for Microsoft then?
We'll know soon enough when we see the EULA for the upgrade. (At that point, we'll also discover whether all forms of Win7 and Win8 licence are equally eligible for the "service pack".) However, my guess (hope?) is that even Microsoft aren't so clueless as to opt for your "pay after one year" model, not least because it might turn out to be unenforceable in those jurisdictions where EULAs have been deemed "not as enforceable as a real contract".
Since Win8.1 is just a lean version of Win7 once you've put a decent shell on, I reckon this may be how MS intend to get around the end-of-life issues around Win7. (It is clearly easier that adding SHA-1 support to the Win7 kernel.)
It also raises the interesting question of how long software developers will continue to support Win7. In the past, the answer would be "as long as we have paying customers" and this tends to be a block on using features that were only introduced in later versions. However, that logic has never applied to (free) service packs. (Plenty of vendors will expect you to have installed all applicable updates.) Maybe Microsoft are trying to convert their 7+8+8.1 market shared into a 10 monoculture, so that they can push the platform's new features.
OTHER EARTHS may be orbiting our Sun beyond Neptune
Scary code of the week: Valve Steam CLEANS Linux PCs (if you're not careful)
Re: Achievement unlocked: The Scientist!
I doubt that an employment tribunal would reckon you had reached the required standard of proof there. "#scary!" is a comment and therefore non-executable. It proves nothing except that the author has a different sense of humour from you.
Legend has it there was once a comment in the UNIX kernel that said "You are not expected to understand this.". See http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/odd.html for an explanation by one of the authors. Would you sack him?
"Research revealed I needed: [...] rm -rf /tmp/.??*"
Thanks. I'll bear it in mind.
However, is there a sane use-case for the rm command accepting ".."? (For that matter, accepting any path that is either the current working directory or one of its parents would seem to me to be overwhelmingly likely to be a pilot error rather than a really clever piece of scripting.)
Australia tries to ban crypto research – by ACCIDENT
Re: ...everyone follows all the laws
Even better would be a system whereby an MP's vote in the legislature was weighted according to the number of people who voted for them relative to the total turnout. Voting for none of the above would then weaken whoever won. Not turning up, however, would achieve nothing.
Weighting MP's vote would of course require rather more hi-tech than the UK Parliament uses in votes, but most other legislatures seem to have electronic tallying these days.
Windows 7 MARKED for DEATH by Microsoft as of NOW
"I haven't used Windows in years: have Microsoft fixed the laughably slow file copying yet?"
Yes, but they haven't fixed the bug whereby the two pane of Explorer (folder tree on the left, folder contents on the right) can be pointing at (ie, have selected) a different folder. On the other hand, they do claim to have UI tested every version of Windows in the intervening period with millions of real end-users, so maybe it's just me who thinks that is bonkers.
Re: Oh noes! We've only got 5 years!
Actually you may have fewer than that. See http://blogs.technet.com/b/pki/archive/2013/11/12/sha1-deprecation-policy.aspx.
Starting in 2017, MS may stop accepting code signing certificates using the SHA-1 algorithm. Now, whilst Win7 is happy to support SHA-256 for applications, its kernel only recognises SHA-1. Consequently, if you want to sign a driver after 2016, you will need a certificate that was issued (using the SHA-1 algorithm) before 2017.
I assume that MS will issue themselves a signing certificate soon (if they haven't already) that has a decade or so of validity, but third-party vendors will be affected. Since certificate vendors variously offer 1, 2 or 3-year validity on their stuff, driver vendors who don't notice the date may find that their last remaining SHA-1 cert has expired (in Jan 2018, say) and they are therefore *unable* to issue driver updates for Win7. (At least, not without also explaining to end-users how to fiddle with their system to tolerate unsigned kernel code.)
The security landscape for Win7 could start getting interesting well before the 2020 cut-off.
(Edit: I'm assuming MS can't/won't retrofit SHA-256 to the Win7 kernel, since if that was possible/economic, it would have made sense to do so before they announced the deprecation of SHA-1. I also note that the same argument applies to Server 2008 R2.)
Re: No new features for Windows 7...
Quite. MS adopted a policy part-way into the XP era of not slipping new features in with service packs and as far as I can see they've followed it quite religiously, introducing no new features with anything ever since. I would guess that the last new feature added to Win7 was Win7.
Memo to MS, a service pack with the last few years worth of patches rolled up would be nice.
Re: Never forget
"To be fair, Win7 IS more stable than XP"
To be fair, that isn't my experience. I've run a number of VMs and Ghosts with XP and Win7 (and others) over the years and the only XP system that needed to be tossed and rebuilt was XP64, whereas several of the Win7 ones (and all of the Vista ones) have eventually died of old age. (That is, eventually, the monthly cycle of updates left them unbootable.)
Bacon-smoking locals provoke noxious Chinese smog
Are you running a Telnet server on Windows? Oh thank God. THANK GOD
Re: More evidence that Microsoft have finally caught up to the 1980's
Poor choice of target, since NT 3.1 had multiple desktops back in 1993. The fact that MS have never bothered to make it a standard feature of their shell simply reflects how useless the feature is. (Multiple monitors are useful. Multiple desktops on a single monitor are no more useful than the ability to minimise a window. I tend to switch the feature off on my Linux desktops, since for me the only effect of leaving it on is that I can have all my screen contents disappear if I accidentally hit the wrong key combination.)
PlayStation-processor-powered plutonium probe prepares Pluto pics
Re: Routers... in Space!
" Interplanetary comms relies on a massive dish/array at one end (for ease of logistics, we tend to keep that one on earth), and a small dish at the other "
To elaborate, the distance to Neptune (Pluto's orbit is irregular) is about 30AU. A dish near Jupiter (5AU) would spend roughly half of its time on the wrong side of its orbit and would actually be further away than Earth, so let's assume you have several. Even at its closest point, it is still 25AU from Neptune and to be worth doing, the dishes around Jupiter would need to be at least 5/6 of the diameter of the one on Earth. (They need to subtend the same solid angle.) Then they have to re-transmit the message back, but that's a much easier problem because the transmitter can be only 1/36 of the power of the one near Neptune and still deliver the same signal strength to Earth.
Move the intermediate to Saturn, at 10AU, and you need only 2/3 of the diameter of a dish on Earth, but you've got to get all the dishes out as far as Saturn *and* the retransmission needs to be four times more powerful.
It would appear that the economics are overwhelmingly weighted in favour of a single hop to a bloody enormous dish on Earth, where construction costs are essentially free (by comparison), power consumption (for transmission back to the craft) is no object, and there's always the options of technological upgrades and repairs whilst the mission is in progress.
Insert 'Skeleton Key', unlock Microsoft Active Directory. Simples – hackers
What do UK and Iran have in common? Both want to outlaw encrypted apps
Re: Am I a wrung'en?
The security for my online banking serves two purposes. Firstly, it stops others from seeing what transactions I am carrying out. If, as you suggest, the authorities are able to demand that banks hand over the transaction details afterwards, this still means that no-one else can spy on me. The banks probably don't care one way or the other.
Secondly, it stops me from turning round to my bank and saying "I didn't do that". I really, really doubt that the banks would be happy with that. If Dave really did manage to enforce a ban on encrypted connections within the UK, the City of London would have to find another country to exist in. I really, really doubt that Dave would be happy with that.
Google v Oracle: US Supreme Court turns to Obama in Java copyright war
Re: Is Microsoft watching this case?
And anyone implementing some kind of VM for x86 is infringing on Intel's instruction set and IBM's PC architecture, large chunks of both of which have to be emulated with precision for the VM to actually work.
Fortunately, my understanding is that over in Europe it is expressly legal to implement an API for the purposes of compatibility, which is exactly what Android does, so whilst it is hugely entertaining for us to watch the lawyers slag it out, the reality is that if the US really is in two minds about this then they'll probably elect to follow the EU lead because it would clearly be daft to gratuitously differ on such an important issue.
When the US lets go of the keys to the internet, what about our protocols?
Re: So ...
"The current setup involves a huge number of participants. [...] It's a sodding huge and actually rather delicate pack of cards - do you have any idea what a gentleman's agreement BGP is?"
So what you are saying is that ICANN haven't actually ever been in control. So it hardly matters if their oversight passes to a different body who isn't ever in control either.
No, the Linux leap second bug WON'T crash the web
Re: Antivaxers and Y2K deniers
Any departures and reservations system that couldn't cope with Y2K would have spent most of the final few months of 1999 increasingly unable to accept "new" bookings. The same goes for most other time-dependent software. If you are tracking time, you usually need to be able to handle the near-future as well as the present or the recent past. Y2K was never likely to result in a midnight shutdown and always likely to be a case of systems showing their inadequacy a (short) while before they became totally unusable.
In addition, the vast majority of genuine Y2K bugs could be easily tested for in advance, once it had occurred to you to do so, just as it is already possible to test systems for leap-second compliance or Y2038 compliance.
Y2K wasn't *all* hype and smoke, but Gartner's 11-digit dollar estimate for them to solve the problem most certainly was, and they weren't alone in brazenly trying to cash in.
Windows XP beats 8.1 in December market share stats
Erik Meijer: AGILE must be destroyed, once and for all
Re: @ TkH11
"Which is a nice way of saying "guessing your way to the answer"."
Actually, no. It's a nice way of saying "guessing your way to the original question", since the hardest bugs will turn out to be the ones where you were given the wrong spec in the first place and enshrined that in the architecture. If Agile promotes "letting the customer use something as early as possible", then it probably avoids quite a lot of that kind of problem.
I say "if" because I confess I lost interest in software methodology when it suddenly became trendy enough for marketing folks to get involved and it became a tool I could buy (and keep on my shelf) rather than a method I could use on my own.
Boffins open 'space travel bureau': Come relax on exoplanet Kepler-16b, says NASA
Re: Red grass?
Also note that the window for the visible spectrum on Earth is actually dictated by the molecules in the atmosphere, and the chemistry of any photosynthetic pigment is dictated by the same laws of physics and chemistry as here on Earth. Life on other planets may be very similar to life on Earth, at the cellular level.
Police radios will be KILLED soon – yet no one dares say 'Huawei'
Re: Huawei
"GCHQ should be able to reverse engineer out any backdoors in the pile of circuits and firmware, if they can't what is their reason for existence?"
Indeed. In almost any other context, commentards would be repeating the mantra that physical access trumps all security, so it should be impossible for Huawei to include a back door without us noticing.
I suspect the real reason for the scare stories about Huawei is that they are now making stuff that is good enough to put Western suppliers out of business. It's protectionism masquarading as security, and it makes it less likely that we'll believe the real security issues when they come up.
Yes, we need two million licences - DEFRA
" "You know MySQL is free right?"
If your time has no value."
To judge from the article, the cost of using Oracle will include someone whose full-time job is tracking Oracle's latest licensing regime and making sure that you don't get screwed. So I suppose the real question is, do you want to hire someone full-time to manage your DB or hire someone full-time to manage your DB vendor?
If Europe is against US's Irish email grab, it must pipe up now
Is the EU an interested party?
The sovereignty in question is Irish and the Irish government has already replied (if only to rather snarkily remind everyone that they needn't have done). So maybe the EU doesn't reckon that it has anything more to contribute. Or maybe it is replying through diplomatic channels and saying "Look guys, we know you can't tell the judge what to say, but you *really* don't want to push this one much further.".
Page:
- ← Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- Next →