I'm assuming...
that these two organizations subcontracted the research in this case to one Jim Coleman?
1972 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jul 2011
a spherical loaf of bread dough, not yet risen. Put it in a gravity-free environment and place raisins all over the surface of the dough. Now let it rise.
Imagine that the raisins are two-dimensional creatures whose sight travels along the surface of the sphere. They each would see all of the other raisins moving away from them as the dough expands, and so might conclude that they are at the center of their expanding universe. But in reality there is no discernible center; the center actually lies perpendicular to them in a dimension beyond their perception. From their viewpoint, space is expanding everywhere in all directions.
That's the way I convince my brain to believe what the scientists are telling me.
Menai definitely agree with you. Whoever installed the thing must have lost his bering. Perhaps if it wasn't tumbling en-dover-end when they communicated with it, they could have righted it. As it is, the whole affair is so messina wonder Medvedev wanted to find who was responsible and cook his bass.
'Dell have been getting a bit silly with this lately, offering the choice of *not* having the OS recovery media and saving a couple of quid off the order.
Frankly, I don't see the point'
The point is for organizations that DON'T have volume license agreements, but still buy lots of systems with the same config. For example, buy 50 of model A, get two with recovery media and save money on the other 48 (since it's the same disc.)
"MS moved from full recovery disks some time ago. What you got was a reduced version that restored from a hidden partition on the harddrive. This presumably to reduce 'piracy'. If you replaced the HD the the restore CD didn't work. Tough luck on the enduser I guess. I figure Comet were providing full recovery CDs ..."
Microsoft provides several options for OEMs bundling Windows from including a full install disc to various forms of recovery discs. While some OEMs may make their recovery discs dependent upon the installed HDD, most of them don't.
All of the systems I've reinstalled to recently (some Dell, Toshiba, Lenovo, HP models) installed from the recovery disc to a completely blank HDD fine. If you have a specific example (Brand/model) where the recovery disc would not install to a blank HDD, please let me know, and I'll make sure to avoid that brand.
"Surely this is another Anonymous manage to hack someone who has poor security story?" Yes, it is.
"How is this an Emperor's new clothes story?" Because Stratfor's "primary focus is to help clients with security" [wikipedia]. The rest of the logic is left as an exercise for the reader.
"The top three rated contract phones on Amazon.com are all Windows Phones"
The top three rated unlocked phones on Amazon.com are all Android Phones.
Amazon.com ratings are not a reliable measure of the quality of a phone OS. They are not dependent upon a consistently applied metric (i.e, your 4 star rating doesn't mean the same thing as my 4 star rating) and there is precious little Amazon can do to ensure that the reviews are honest.
Beyond about 1,000 apps, size of app store is equally meaningless-- there are at best a few dozen useful apps (not already bundled with the OS) in any app store; the rest are all toys, games, marketing tools, or spyware.
As for awards, yes I'd love to see your list of awards, including source and testing methodology, please.
From wikipedia (not authoritative, but a good starting point):
Geomagnetic Reversal:
"The latest [geomagnetic reversal], the Brunhes–Matuyama reversal, occurred 780,000 years ago."
Homo Sapiens:
" Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago, reaching full behavioral modernity around 50,000 years ago."
So we have not been exposed to a geomagnetic reversal in the short timeframe of our species existence. The article is correct.
"... all the ass jokes come off as crude and amateurish."
Crude I'll give you, but I know from years of reading this rag that it is definitely not amateurish. If any group of people have taken crudity to professional levels, it's Reg hacks.
Amateurish is more like dragging your icons into the comments box rather than just clicking on them, which is all that is necessary. Indeed, if you'd previewed before submitting your comment,
you'd have seen the extraneous URL as text, viz:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/Design/graphics/icons/comment/you_dont_have_to_drag_the_bloody_icon_into_the_comment_box.png
"Mutation implies some evolutionary changes resulted in changes that survive through natural selection."
Yes. And in your example, Noah Webster instigated a change (mutation) which survived through an evolutionary process (in this case, the decision-making process of the US population in choosing his dictionary as a reference.)
The concept of evolution does not require changes to be small in scale, or to be isolated, or to happen over an extended period of time. In fact, in the field of biological evolution, while it is generally agreed that the timescale is large, many experts believe there were periods of major mutations, followed by "quiet" periods where natural selection weeded out the unfavorable mutations. There are also many examples of traits that appear to have no value but have survived solely because they're linked (by dint on being on the same allele) to a trait which is favorable.
"A mouse is better on a cable if you are forgetful of having spare batteries, charging etc."
I use my wireless mouse (Logitech M505) for hours every day, and have had to change the batteries (2AA) exactly 0 times in the past year. My wife has had hers for about a year longer than I've had mine, and she's had to change the batteries once.
It's amazing what they can do with power-saving tech nowadays.
you can already get an off-brand wireless mouse for around $15, or a name brand one for around $20. So Ozmo (NOT a recognizable name brand) would have to price their mouse at or less than $15 -- most likely selling it at a loss.
The name brands would have to see a demand for the technology before they invest in a new answer to a problem that's already been solved.
You're confusing "options" with "requirements".
None of these apps are required to use an Android device (which is why they are not included in the OS.) They're just available for those users who might want to use them.
Do you not agree that a "consumer-oriented" device should allow the consumer to choose how they use it? How, exactly, is it a bad thing to allow those consumers to choose to dig into these things if they so wish, as long as you are not requiring all consumers to do so?
As far as "just working" is concerned, that's just an outright lie. I've never seen a device that "just works", and I've worked extensively with devices from the manufacturer most notable for that particular attribute. There's always a support site, document, application, or person that you will need to refer to at some point -- and that's a good thing. After all, would you use a car extensively without ever taking it to a mechanic (even if the mechanic is yourself)?
"Even if you tuned a CSS attack to a given browser whose rendering behavior you understand, it would take many frame times to determine the value of a single pixel and even then I think the accuracy and repeatability would be very low,"
Possibly even lower if the browser does use hardware acceleration, because then you need to also understand and account for differences between makes and models of GPUs and the various driver versions and settings.
Not to mention the make/model of the CPU. Plus the amount and speed of RAM. Oh, and what other tasks might be running.
No, the only way I see this as feasible is if you have a target pool of a million or more devices, all with the same hardware profile, running the same OS, with few to no options to tweak graphics settings, with a lack of or severe constraints on multitasking, and which are only allowed to run one specific browser. But who would be stupid enough to buy something so obviously crippled as that?
The so-called Cosmic Cannonball, a neutron star moving at over three million miles an hour, has been captured in a new satellite image ...
...the neutron star, which is too faint to be seen in the photograph, ..."
So it's been captured in an image that doesn't show it?
I've captured an image of a leprechaun for you...
"Yet even when IT security audits are offered at no cost..."
In my experience, "at no cost" usually means "for an ulterior motive", such as a government agency offering "free" audits to companies they have or want regulatory power over or a security firm offering "free" audits to companies they want to sell security products to.
So I would be less likely to accept a "free" audit than one I pay for -- and can hold accountable for using certified seasoned professionals to do the work, as you mentioned.
"Others, particularly supporters of NoSQL, would argue RDMS is not suited to large systems."
The size of the system isn't the point. The nature of the data is. RDMS works well with structured data which can be at least somewhat normalized and which is queried primarily on the structured bits. RDMS does not work so well with non-structured data. NoSQL technologies, on the other hand, work better with non-structured data, but aren't as efficient as an RDMS can be with structured data.
From this article:
"...in reality the internet is far from neutral already. The larger ISPs increasingly do deals with the big content providers to host their content closer to the edge of their networks, while smaller content providers languish in the depths of the internet and smaller ISPs struggle to compete.
Ofcom's position [PDF] is not only that this is fine and fair, but that it is inevitable, so the question moves on to the best way to deal with the situation. As Ofcom puts it:
'The question is not whether traffic management is acceptable in principle...'"
That comes pretty close to describing what Chad H. described as traffic management, as I see it.
This summary article is almost a carbon copy of IBM's press release [at http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/35891.wss -- thanks for including that by the way] with just a sprinkling of assumption thrown in between the loose facts of the original and used to support an unproven conclusion.
Here are the two key assumptions (granted, made because IBM's press release is very vague) as I see them:
Assumption 1: the data center uses the entire 50kW of power supplied by the solar array. IBM's press release never mentions how much power the data center actually draws (only that it runs off of the solar array and that the solar array provides 50kW), but makes a big deal of mininizing AC-DC/DC-AC conversions and other power conservation methods. So benchmarking based on a traditional data center would be useless. In order to draw a rational conclusion as to the viability of this system, this would need to be cleared up because:
Assumption 2: the solar system does not store any excess power. This, too, is not mentioned in the press release from IBM. But if the system did store excess power, it will be able to run for more than 20% of the time -- how much depends on the actual answer to assumption 1 and the efficiency and capacity of the storage system.
Because a regular pattern would be 100% useless for orientation purposes. To fully orient a camera in 3 dimensions from a two-dimensional image, you need an image that appears unique however it is rotated in any of those three dimensions, If there are any two rotations that create the same (or roughly similar depending on the effective resolution) two-dimensional image, then the camera can't be sure how it's oriented.
It's also important that the image be unique in comparison to other subjects of the camera, so that, for example, a satellite camera doesn't mistakenly try to orient itself to the ridge patterns of a mountain range or the street patterns of a major city.