Re: Thank goodness for "tooted"
Since that pretty much means farted in the UK. I think they got it right.
1508 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Apr 2011
"For whoever it was who downvoted a man from mars."
Downvoted because it's mostly senseless bot crap. I'm sure it's feelings won't be hurt, although it does reply in defence of itself when faced with criticism which is mildly entertaining. As with all aManFromMars posts, read it all twice and then try and say it made complete sense.
Have you considered that it might be because you posted a link to a news site that you 'might' have to log in to and not because of any homophobic sentiment in these forums?
I'm not wasting my time clicking on an article I'd have to pay to see, and that in turn makes it a pointless reference to back up your claims which most people may not have heard before.
This is what happens when people rush to think the worst before thinking.
I came here to say this. Why on earth so they not know, what's with the 'may'. If they don't know what will definitely work with the software they're responsible for creating then what bloody hope do any of us have? We seem to always have to deal with Microsoft Voodoo every single day, will this work, will that do what it's meant to, will that password sync to Azure update immediately or will even after manually running the connector will I still have to give up and wait for a few hours.
It's getting more and more frustrating to support Microsoft stuff and I'm tired of it. You don't need to spend time trying to make stuff that should just work, especially on their own bloody system, when you've got other more pressing issues. I find myself having to explain Microsoft foibles every damn day knowing to the user it actually just makes my department look completely incompetent.
The worst thing Amazon ever did was allow third party sellers. I rarely even bother with them anymore as there's a strong likelihood that you will not get it, it will arrive ridiculously late from some Chinese seller lying about delivery times, arrive damaged, it will be fake or poor quality.
What I tend to do more now is find suppliers of the product I want, off Amazon completely.
So get your terminals in place for "free" in a PR stunt. Then bait and switch and expect payment for something they're already using and embedded. Utterly dick move from a man who whilst is unquestionably brilliant when it comes to ambition and vision, is also one of the world's greatest morons.
I hate to be that cynic. What can he actually do as a none executive director? He has a voice yes, but no power to do anything (hence none exec) or force anything through, other than persuasion.
Not sure how their Constitution works but I feel he's going to end up feeling somewhat frustrated after a short time.
I sincerely wish that wasn't the case, because it needs to be dealt with after all the shenanigans recently.
Basically the way Virgin Media eventually came in to being. The likes of Comtel/Telewest becoming ntl then Virgin. It is history repeating itself. Infrastructure costs a fortune and the only sensible way out in the end if you're not covering your costs is to sell up to a bigger fish.
Exactly Phil. They dig out this hyperbole about their job being so important just because it's related to the emergency services. I think being a content moderator for the likes of Facebook is probably more traumatising and challenging than 999 operator. It's the people on the business end of the calls who should be paid more, and even then they chose to do it as a job, they weren't forced.
Yeah, even the BOFH got the treatment. It's like British readers are no longer deemed important despite the roots of this site. What's the betting this site is being taken over by Conde Nast soon and becomes the tabloid version of Ars Technica? There's actually nothing unique or special about the Register anymore that draws me to it. Sad times.
My first thought was that this was going to use Steganography to hold a digital certificate actually in the image. I can't really see how it would work otherwise as anything added to the file could presumably be stripped. It's actually a really cool idea and I can see it taking off to being implemented in other products if they licensed it. Manipulation of images is a big worry in this day and age, you simply cannot know if you can trust one.
Mastadon has the same flaw as Twitter. It needs cash to run it. Hence why it asks for supporters on patreon. It has a CEO, it may well be a nonprofit now. How long will that last. Who will be able to afford to run the nodes it needs to function, those with money perhaps? It's never quite as simple as that. Nothing is free.
If you let any social network get to the point of affecting your mental health, you're part of the problem. By that point you should be ditching all forms of it entirely instead of looking for more of it. What exactly do you think this new service is going to do when it realises it needs to earn some real money? Or are you going to try and tell me this mastadon is not indeed burning through startup cash until such a day. Or does it have a magic money tree to support all you users of it? Is it not going to end up just as bad as Twitter if everyone followed your advice and moves to a new echo chamber?
"paying workers a full-time five-day-a-week salary for four days a week of work."
When they get out of this mindset, maybe the average worker will be happier. Pay me a salary to do my job, and not pin it down to some arbitrary and archaic idea of how long I should be physically present somewhere. If I don't do my job, then eventually fire me. How long I spend in one place makes no difference. My work wants bums on seats again, I'm in IT support, I work better at home dealing with people remotely without distractions and demands made up on site.
Not every job can go this route understandably, but it seems like a childish exec mentality where if I have to suffer then so should everyone else. Shouldn't you want your staff to be happier where you can give that gift. If you can't, then pay them more out of your profits maybe?
What on earth has that got to do with the article? When the phone is powered off you wouldn't expect it to ring or do generally anything at all.
This news is hardly a surprise anyway, anyone wanting to stay dark and covert would never have a phone with a connected battery around them if they wanted to stay hidden. This is precisely why.
You've clearly got to have no fear or respect for your own life, let alone anyone else's to sit in a self drive car without being the slightest bit worried about what's going on outside. Or she was too trusting of the technology, which is an equally insane state of mind.
This is entirely her fault so far as I'm concerned. You're sat there in a moving vehicle and you're meant to intervene if things go wrong. You can't do that if you can't be bothered to look anywhere but your phone.