Re: Could be worse...
But you have to make it unassuming and hidden, otherwise that bad guys will know what to protect to get the data. Hiding the kill switches amongst the light switches! Thats how you do it, no one will think to protect those!
3904 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2007
While the MRO data provides a good overview and helped to select a site, the resolution doesnt really tell us anything about what the soil is like. From Wikipedia:
"...[MRO's SHARARD Radar Instrument] allows it to resolve layers as thin as 7 m (23 ft) to a maximum depth of 1 km (0.6 mi). It has a horizontal resolution of 0.3 to 3 km (0.2 to 1.9 mi)."
A resolution of 300m is not great for determining sand grain sizes... ;) :P
The Mole operates basically like a jack hammer. Internally, you have a rotating cam that loads a heavy weight against a spring. At a certain point the spring "slips", releasing the heavy weight with the pent up force of the spring. This sharp shock drives the entire Mole deeper very quickly. The Mole of course bounces back a little bit from this, but at a slower speed where the effect of friction can kick in to grab the Mole and stop it bouncing back to its previous height. Thats the simple version of how it works. :)
As for, do we actually know if it will work - straight up answer - Nope. The mole is strong, it will go through most things so long as it doesnt hit dead on, it will also slide around objects if theres a slope to allow it. It left very nice little furrows in concrete blocks we used for testing just those very scenarios. Still if we hit something dead on, it could be dead in the water, or it could smash its way through - its impossible to know what lies beneath the surface, as Rich Speed writes we havent been deeper than 22cm before. So its all pretty unknown and unknowable.
The Mole itself can be pretty quick, it depends on the soil - i remember one test where we went 5m in about 45mins. When soil conditions are perfect, its fast, other times it can take 12 hours to do the same trip. We just dont know what the soil is like, not exactly. We've designed for a wide variety and tested as many as we could, but you still never know if it works. The talk of a couple of weeks is because every 0,5-1m the Mole will stop for a few days to allow the temperature sensors to do their thing.
A final comment - anything over 3m depth is a successful mission. Science can be done with anything over about 1m if i remember correctly, but 3m means full success. We are actually not allowed to progress beyond 5m. Thats a hard limit put in for planetary protection purposes - to explain that, beyond 5m is so far out of the realm of the known that if we wanted to go further than that, (and technically there is nothing to say the mole couldnt go further with a longer tether), we would have had to go one cleanliness class higher, and that would have upped the costs of the project massively. It just wasnt feasible, so discretion is better part of valour and all that, we'll find out whats past 5m next time... ;)
Hi guys, I can answer this (I'm an ex-InSight HP3 (i.e. the mole) team member). The Seismometer goes first because, they can actually use the shocks we create with the mole to make measurements of the local geology. The shocks we create, whilst not being that large, create waves which can be picked up by Seis and the reflections of those shocks as they travel through the local area can also be picked up.
Please dont ask me for the exact science involved, I'm a mechanical design engineer, not a geologist! Still they're pretty confident that they can get some good readings based on our short sharp shocks...
You've gone to all the trouble of setting up fake accounts, identifying inteliigence operatives, swiped legitimate photos and done all of the hard work of getting those identified intelligence operatives to friend you (and thus identify further people for analysis, etc), and then you go and send a message like that???
It seems the term intelligence agent (on both sides of the conflict) is something of an oxymoron....
Just curious - if all traffic into russia must go through russian government controlled servers, then I'm assuming all outgoing traffic must also pass through those servers. So if we simply block those servers, that should cut out all of those russian hackers, scammers, and phishers right? Well until they add in some vpn tunneling or what not, but it would at least take care of the lazy ones... Thoughts on a postcard...
If you're trying to convince the boss that he really should be forking out for a professional to do all this, turning up in full Scuba kit - Tank, regulator, dry suit, face mask - should work a treat. It might also convince him to get the cleaners in more regularly as well, which is rarely a bad thing...
"so that people in Germany continue to benefit fully from all our services".
I'm looking really hard, but I can't quite see how Facebook collecting reams about my surfing habits, and creepily following me around the internet is going to help me "benefit fully" from their services...
I'm not sure they're using the word "benefit" correctly there...
You seem to be assuming that this was atcually run like an actual company, i.e. CEO's, CFO's, a finance department, etc. etc.
Everything i read makes this sound like a garage operation - "Bob over there is IT, Tom is Sales, Jenny creates the flash website to get people in, Randy is customer support. And I'm the boss. I hold the purse strings. Cant trust any of these buggers with the codes, so we keep em offline on my laptop, no way a hacker can get in there! What do you mean, what happens if i die? Im only 30, geez. And what do you mean what if someone breaks in and steals my laptop? It's encrypted. And the Police around here a good at recovering stolen property. It's all fine...."
Hey hey hey, dont you go trying to bring your ladi-da European "solutions" into this here Blighty. We do things our own way. No means No. etc etc.
Bloody Frenchies pushing their disease control and pigeon wrangling. The Pigeons are probably foreigners, anyway, no self respecting British pigeon would go pooing in a kids mouth. It's outright rude. I mean its just not cricket...
"The figures swell to 53 per cent when surveying global frontline workers in the retail, hospitality and entertainment industries..."
Not to be too hard on the poor dears, but is anyone in the frontline of retail, hospitality or entertainment likely to be handling anything confidential or sensitive?
FB and Google lost access for 24 hours (was it even a full 24 hours?).
Apple have made a lot of noise, got some headlines, caused a mild inconvenience, thats it.
They havent really taken anyone to task have they? Remove the keys for a fortnight, that would have been taking FB and Google to task. OK make it just one week. Long enough to cause significant pain without convincing them to redesign their products without you. But doing it for 24 hours? It's just a publicity stunt.
If this was any other firm who's breached the rules, they'd have lost their keys forever. But now, Apple have opened themselves up to the lawsuit from the next infringer who gets their keys taken away. Since FB has done pretty much the largest breaking of the rules possible and only lost the keys for 24 hours, than any other firm should only get the same treatment...
Ah no. ITAR only applies to American products, or any product containing any American products. That does mean if you have even one tiny resistor in a small electronic box on the side of your big huge rocket thats American, then you are stuck with ITAR. Thats why there is a massive push to make sure you dont have any ameriacn components whatsoever in your kit, at least if your looking to sell anywhere in the world except America...
Actually its more like this: based on an allegation that Mr Lei apparently stole a colleagues bank card and withdrew money from it, although neither the police nor the bank have even been asked if a bank card was ever used at the supposed time or was reported stolen, and that the person whose card was used, has left the organisation, fled to china, and disappeared from contact (considering China's surveillance state, i find that one of the more astounding claims), then lei has been suspended and investigated. Whilst Gurry who was found (not suspected, but proven) to have used undue influenced and broke the organisations procurement rules is free to go about his duties.
Lets hope the Swiss, can give the WIPO a good kicking, no-one else seems to be able to.
By the way, what is it with IPO organisation that attracts such scum bags to the top? Gurry and Batastelli must be two peas in a pod...
I think, considering the cramped conditions, you were well within your rights to call that person out.
Having once worked in a similar situation (minus the national security implications and blessedly only for a couple of weeks), we laid down some ground rules at the start, and it made the entire experience much more enjoyable for all involved. Saved the smoker a packet as well, since being forced to go outside for his smoke, meant he cut back. At least until the after work trip to the pub..
Since these ads were being served from "...two top-tier ad exchanges used by a quarter of the top 100 publisher websites..." I assume those 2 ad exchanges will be reimbursing everyone who was harmed by these ads and paying compensation?
No? In what other industry can you sell a product to consumers, and then if it turns out to be damaging or harmful, do absolutely nothing about it and get away with it?
In the words of the late great Bill Hicks - "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing… kill yourself. No really, there’s no rationalisation for what you do and you are Satan’s little helpers. Okay – kill yourself – seriously. "
From the review i read over at RPS (https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2019/01/22/samsung-970-evo-plus-review/), they actually found the 970 Plus to be slower than the 970.
That was running the 970 Plus version which doesnt come with a heat sink, and they had planned to rerun the tests once they had an appropriate heatsink version, (I'm at work so cant access to check if they updated the review or not), but if your planning to get the non heatsink one, then you are at least according to RPS advised to stick with the regular 970.
Geez, I wish the government would give ME a goodwill bonus of $2.9 million. I mean, I've produced the same amount of usable work as this project, and I havent cost the government a penny, Heck you could say that for the same work I've SAVED them $34 million. I'll be waiting for that goodwill bonus in the mail, then shall i?
I think they are saying Vendor/Contract staff are not made aware of the policies on "safety, discrimination and sexual misconduct". That means if they suffer discrimination or harrassment, they dont know what to do about it, and are expected to suffer in silence. I assume on that account they just want those staff to receive info about the policies (probably in the company handout they give new employees), so that if they suffer these things, they know who to report it to.
Not so difficult to understand, but a bit confusing when they've rolled it in to their complaints about forced arbitration...
The specific problem in this case was that whilst the cops have two suspects, the fuzz wanted the right to look at EVERY device in the building including those not related to the suspect. That is ridiculous overeach and the judge quite rightly shut it down.
As for your comment about not opening your safe, you are under no obligation to open your safe just because police ask. If police want to open a safe, they need a warrnat and then to call in the relevant authority in opening the device (a locksmith, etc). Why should it be any different for a phone?
Just because the ISS doesnt get any major publicity doesnt mean it's not producing great science:
here's a short highlight of things they're working on now:
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/SSSH_17dec18
If you cant be bothered reading that (it's not that long!), there's experiments on the effect of space flight on humans (strength, grip/agility, and immune system testing), experiments to research into asthma and other airway/lung disease, experiments into loss of bone density (as experienced by millions of the elderly world wide), research into compounds that cause parkinsons disease, research into aerogels and their ability effectiveness to be a healing patch. Plus a number of others. Go read the article.
None of those experiments could be done by robots alone. The ISS does a ton of great science, arguably more than sending another probe to have a look at a dead rock we've already visited 30 years ago. But because it's slow and steady research it doesnt get the excitement factor and thus the publicity. Have a look into some of those experiments in detail and you'll see they are very interesting and offer a lot of potential for making people on Earth's lives much better.
The ISS deserves all the funding it can get (and more)!
Is China using the same moon landing set in Arizona as NASA? It looks far too similar to be coincidence! Or is this another one of those things Trump says China are stealing? Coming in and stealing the plans of NASA's moon landing set, its just despicable ain't it? Taking all of America's hard work faking the Moon Landings and here they are pretending they've landed on the Moon as well. Disgraceful!
If a thief broke into a house and stole a Rembrandt worth a few million or lets say some bank robbers broke into a bank after hours and stole a few million from the safe. Without violence or much in the way of property damage, they would still be looking at 5-10 years hard time minimum. This guy from the safety of his own home caused millions of dollars in damage to a telco, inconvenienced hundreds of thousands of customers, took down the internet for an entire country, AND is implicated in similar attacks on other firms (including banks) and he gets less than 3 years.
I guess the lesson is, If you're going to be a criminal, be a white collar ciminal...
I think you're over stating the case. If the Democrats rely on Ms Ocasio-Cortez voting in parliament, then they will see to it that she has somewhere to stay in DC. She can crouch surf at one of the richer politicians places, without a doubt.
But my question would be, why shouldnt she (or any other politician) be disadvantaged, when they are disadvantaging 800,000 regular government workers? I dont see the politicians gathering around to offer funding/housing for these people to survive the month without pay. Only the polticians can solve this problem, those 800,000 cant (at least not until the next election, but thats 2 years away).
When someon you know is seen to be struggling because of something you're doing, you are more likely to try and fix it. That 800,000 are a faceless number to the Senators and Congressmen/women. but make them see a fellow Senator/Congressman/woman struggling and suddenly their's a much more human face on the suffering you're causing, and that would lead to a much faster compromise....
(on a side note: 800,000 people being furloughed is an insane number. Think about this, the population of the US is ~325 million (source Wikipedia). So effectively 1 in every 400 people in the US is currently furloughed. not 1 in 400 workers. 1 in every 400 people! According to statista.com there are ~130 million full time employees in the US, and i think its safe to say the vast majority of government workers would count as full time employees, so that works out at 1 in every 160 full time employees in the US is furloughed. That is f%&king insane!)
And those without private incomes will become the voices of reason to push for any shutdown to end.
At the very least, even if all of the politicians are rich enough to survive without their pay, at least they're not being rewarded for severely hurting regular government workers.
I wasnt having a go at you Timmy, but I was expecting a sh*t ton of comments along the lines of, "yeah they had way more. it's disgraceful, never happened before for a republican, its not trumps fault, yadda yadda".
Just thought I'd get the numbers in place, so it was clear this is not a new thing, although the lengths have on average been getting longer...
Just to add some facts to the discussion-
Clinton had the longest shutdown in history 21 days. (Trump will beat that if this one lasts 2 more days). He also had a 5 day shutdown.
Obama had a single 16 day shutdown.
Bush Jnr suprisingly didnt have a shutdown
Bush Snr had a single 3 day shutdown
Reagen had 8 shutdowns! Ranging in size from 1 days to 3 days (total 14 days). He pretty much had one Every single year of his presidency!
Trump has so far had 3 shutdowns (in only 2 years!), 1 day, 3 days and currently 20 days. He's 2 shutdown days short of equalling Clinton's total shutdowns over 8 years, in just 2 years.
(Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46827555 - scroll down a bit and you'll see the table)
Even if it is "gesture politics" (although i challenge you to name any act in politics which wouldnt fit the defintion of "gesture politics"!), a policy that means Senators and Congressmen/women dont get paid whilst there's a government shutdown, would act as a strong incentive for them not to allow a government shutdown in the future. Because Senators and Congressmen/women are, by definition, greedy twats.
Hit them where it hurts, their wallets, and they wont allow that to happen again!