* Posts by tom dial

2187 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jan 2011

Assange granted asylum by Ecuador after US refused to rule out charges

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Tough laws in Sweden

Not at all a bad observation, although I think it might be difficult to prosecute Mr. Assange, an Australian citizen, for publishing materials he "found" in Iceland or Sweden (or someplace else not the U. S). On the other hand, taking him down would not likely discourage Wikileaks from publishing additional information they might "find" in the future - Wikileaks, whether you like it or not, is more than, and probably not dependent on, Julian Assange. He may now, in fact, be a liability for Wikileaks. And these materials would not have been "found" but for unauthorized actions of somebody like PFC Bradley Manning who, if convicted of the charges he faces, will provide a far better example to discourage others.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Tough laws in Sweden

Correction: Most of what I saw in the NYT >already was known< or amounted to diplomatic gossip about people who mostly knew what the U. S. thought of them but might have preferred that it not be published.

tom dial Silver badge
Stop

Re: Tough laws in Sweden

Two cases, that is, of having sex with a woman without her permission. That fits the usual definition of rape fairly well in both cases and especially well in the second, which fails to remotely approach consensual sex. Away with him.

If the Swedish legal system finds otherwise and releases him, Ecuador probably has an embassy there if the U. S. wants to extradite. I rather doubt that the US has much interest in Julian Assange, as most of any damage already is done - there is no such thing as an unleak - and most of what I saw in the New York Times amounted to diplomatic gossip about people who mostly knew what the U. S. thought of them but might have preferred that it not be published. There's been a great deal of noise about the U. S. being upset, but there likely are many others, some with fewer scruples.

Judge begs Apple, Samsung to get a room, or trial will end in tears

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Who wants to bet

And at that point, Apple and Samsung would have the option of doing what Judge Koh suggested and reaching an agreement. Apple would have the additional option of refiling, using the knowledge they have gained during the present trial. Does anyone think they wouldn't?

tom dial Silver badge
Linux

Re: Why no specialised court in US?

There is a specialized appeals court - the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - for patent matters. Patents are a federal issue not affected by states' rights considerations.

Specialized government organizations like the Patent and Trademark Office and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit present a risk of something like regulatory capture. The PTO exists for the purpose of issuing patents, and in combination with the fact that it is far more costly to reject a patent application than to grant the patent, and granting the patent is easier to measure for employee productivity purposes, it is unsurprising that a good many patents are issued that some might consider questionable or unwarranted. The CAFC exists to decide appeals of patent decisions in lower courts; it has little incentive to draw clear distinctions or reduce the scope of patentable subject matter. And the ever growing population of patent attornies works diligently to increase the workload at the PTO and, eventually, in the courts and at the CAFC.

So we get what we got.

Microsoft and NYPD install big data crime-fighting system

tom dial Silver badge

Re: I don't like systems like this but....

But getting ~1 second response time for each of thousands of concurrent users is standard for a mainframe, and probably more than adequate for 911 - type systems where the users operate at human speeds. Mainframes (e. g., zSeries) also have reliability, availability, and servicibility that lesser hardware may not have.

I'm not saying mainframes are best for an emergency call handling service, just that it might not be an unreasonable choice.

tom dial Silver badge
FAIL

Re: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Based on the average of election results, this statement is false.

Apple pounces on Samsung doc as proof of 'slavish copy' claims

tom dial Silver badge

100 +/- 20 people bought Samsung in error thinking they were getting an iPhone; 10 +/- 2 bought an iPhone in error thinking it was a Samsung. Many more bought a Samsung either because they preferred it, or an iPhone because they preferred thar. The goal of Apple's lawsuit is to enlist the government's aid in obtaining a monopoly in the high-end cell phone market by removing their more successful (sales count) although less profitable competition. The lawyers' goal is to win or lose (and not care which) at a billable rate of $1K+ per hour. And the expert witnesses' goal is to support whichever litigant is paying them at a rate of a few hundred dollars an hour. The Patent and Trademark Office's goal, of course, is to issue the patents that fuel this part of the economy.

The main losers are all the rest of us.

Copyright bot boots NASA rover vid off YouTube

tom dial Silver badge
Stop

Re: Copyright

Except for research contract data and reports paid for by taxpayer money, frequently available only by purchasing $$$ professional journal subscriptions (or $$ for individual reprints). I believe the researcher also often obtain patents for their or their institution's exclusive benefit.

Size does matter: Outlook.com punters want meatier passwords

tom dial Silver badge

The security of long or complex passwords is overrated. Even for short passwords the probability of guessing a password randomly is low if only a few failed tries are allowed before the account is locked (source IP should be ignored for this). The guessing process becomes costly per account if a delay of several seconds is enforced after an unsuccessful attempt, especially if the few seconds occurs between the attempt and the failure notification and the notification provides no information to distinguish between failure to match an account at all and failure to give the correct password for an existing account. My previous employer required, at one time, 8 character passwords with a 62 character alphabet (UC, LC, Numeric, Special, two from each group), changed at least every 60 days. The account was locked on the third consecutive fail, requiring administrator intervention to unlock the account, and a new password was required at that time. The new password could not be any of the most recent 10 or have been valid during the previous 365 days and was failed if found in a password dictionary. By my reckoning, the probability of randomly guessing the password of a known account under these conditions is in the order of 1 in 10^13. The actual probability likely is several orders of magnitude larger, but still small enough to be ignored for many purposes.

The risk that concerns me is that the provider might store the password hashes insecurely or worse store them reversibly encrypted or not encrypted at all, and that the file would fall into the hands of someone with technical skills and nasty intentions. For plain text or reversibly encrypted passwords, password length has no benefit in this case. For hashed passwords, and only those, is length of significance, and should be enough to make finding any account/password combination economically unfeasible.

So I am leery of, and within reason avoid, services that

(1) can tell me my forgotten password (and think twice about those who can tell me my forgotten userid);

(2) respond in under several seconds if I make a mistake or respond to an error faster than a good login;

(3) allow more than a small number of failed attempts;

(4) do not require a new password after administrative action to unlock the account.

I am much less concerned with required length or complexity, but do use more of each for such critical accounts as those with banks or credit card issuers.

Am I wrong here?

Samsung tells Apple: Quit your 'frivolous' whining over court doc leak

tom dial Silver badge
Thumb Up

Re: re: It came from Groklaw, btw.

But The Register, and especially the comments, have entertainment value not to be found in Groklaw. I read both.

Will Samsung's patent court doc leak backfire spectacularly?

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Good Point!

Unfortunate example. In such cases the prosecutor nearly always argues, often successfully, that the convict should serve the time, and don't bother anyone with the DNA evidence.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Part of a larger problem.

In the U. S. the argument was made successfully that a specific appeals court should be established that had expertise in patent matters - the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Federal court in the Eastern District of Texas, by virtue of considerable experience in adjudicating patent law cases, presumably has developed expertise as well. See where that got us, then discuss further whether we need specially knowledgeable juries here.

I claim the outcome was better in Oracle v. Google, in the Northern District of California, and Apple v. Samsung, dismissed recently by Judge Richard Posner (7th Circuit).

Gabe Newell: Windows 8 is a 'catastrophe' for PC biz

tom dial Silver badge

Re: I believe the MS is getting a unusually bad rap here on this one.....

Clarification, second paragraph: "If the PC/Mainboard manufacturers do UEFI Secure Boot the minimal Microsoft-compliant way ...

tom dial Silver badge
Linux

Re: I believe the MS is getting a unusually bad rap here on this one.....

All true, as far as I have been able to determine. However, I consider the last item completely unacceptable for equipment that I own. Accordingly, I do not expect to purchase any Windows RT/ARM hardware unless to establish standing to join a lawsuit aimed at overturning that requirement.

The problem (on x86 type hardware) is in how UEFI implementors and PC manufacturers choose to arrange secure boot configuration. If they do the Right Thing, and supply the platform key with the mainboard or PC, there really is not a problem. Anyone wanting to install a different OS can use the platform key to apply necessary updates to the security database and install what they want and take advantage of secure boot. I do not doubt that Linux (and others like FreeBSD and NetBSD) distributors can come up with decent installation packaging to do that, although it would be nice to see them working together on it. If they do it the minimal Microsoft-compliant way, it will deny users advantages of secure boot, such as they may be. In that case, my issue would be with the manufacturer who declined to give me information needed to control my own hardware,

not with Microsoft.

Facebook's Zuckerberg awarded privacy patent

tom dial Silver badge
Flame

Shameful (and obvious, too)

Now I've read through the patent gibberish once, I am further appalled. On initial reading, this appears to be a patent on a computer application not significantly different from quite a few that my colleagues and I worked on during the '80s - '00s that established, updated, and displayed data stored in a database (or some in a file based purpose-built data store). Although most of those I worked to support were account and finance applications, the patent does not really describe something a lot different. And standard mainframe access control systems like IBM RACF, CA ACF2 and CA Top Secret seem *very* like Mr. Zuckerberg's "invention", which appears to be essentially a particularization to the "privacy" domain of a generic database-based application. Any moderately capable and experienced application designer would have "invented" something similar.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Prior Art

Not to mention George Boole (1815 - 1864).

Samsung SMACKDOWN: US appeals court keeps ban on Galaxy Tab

tom dial Silver badge

Re: The patent

Indeed it is. Respectable academic research suggests that the societal value of patents *at all* is questionable. To claim that matters of design and appearance contribute to "Progress of Science and useful Arts" is absurd; such patents contribute, at most, to the profits of the patent holder, at the expense of the class of all consumers of similar products.

Court findings aside, there is no reasonable probability that anyone of normal intelligence would mistakenly buy a Samsung Galaxy Tab thinking it an iPad. I conclude that Apple's real concern is that more people than they like would consider the two, decide that the Samsung is a better product, and therefore choose not to buy the iPad.

Congress, however, makes the basic patent rules for the US and must be the one to make any serious corrections.

CentOS penguins maul Oracle's Linux migration pitch

tom dial Silver badge
Linux

No.

A couple of years ago I wanted to run an Oracle test instance and gain experience installing Oracle 11. Thinking it might be easiest, I averted my eyes and installed Oracle Linux to a fresh VM. This turned out to be pretty much a mistake, with Oracle Linux requiring more than a few tweaks and kernel parameter changes even to start the install, which failed at the end due to missing bits I mercifully have forgotten, but as I recall it I could not get them without an Oracle support contract.

Because Oracle DBMS depended on RPM packaging, I switched to CentOS. Huge difference. Easier install, no problem downloading and adding the missing pieces, fewer necessary kernel changes from the default, and a straightforward Oracle install that worked the first time. Oracle Unbreakable Linux is not the answer to any question I care to ask.

Google ordered to censor 'torrent', 'megaupload' and more words

tom dial Silver badge
Black Helicopters

A foot in the door

Even though the decision doesn't address search results, the French Supreme Court has provided a clear precedent for additional internet search engine censorship. This particular instance is pretty inconsequential, but the tenth or hundredth one on may not be. We have already the examples of China, Russia, and now France. SOPA, PIPA, and ACTA have been deferred, but the **AA and the like doubtless are busily arguing their cause to US Senators and Congresspersons, and will get their way as soon as they come up with a way that doesn't raise a large enough hue and cry to make the legislators feel insecure in their jobs. Unfettered low cost privacy secure (?) communications are as frightening to governments as to copyright rent-seekers. Holding them at bay will require constant attention and objection to the smallest incursion.

iPhone 5 poised to trounce Android, devastate BlackBerry?

tom dial Silver badge
Stop

I believe I remember seeing, quite recently, that the smart phone population is about 2/3 Android, 1/4 Apple, and the rest all the others. Or maybe that was current sales, to which the installed base should be asymptotic. The survey sample (considering only smart phone users) had about 3/5 Apple, 1/3 Android, close to the reverse.

The sample is badly skewed and the results are therefore, shall we say, suspect of being seriously off, and any conclusions drawn from them not worth much attention. There are other good reasons for thinking there is trouble ahead for Blackberry and other current and prospective smart phone vendors.

How to fix the broken internet economy: START HERE

tom dial Silver badge
Holmes

Re: Game of Thrones

The argument made was that many/most would have paid a reasonable price willingly but were not willing to wait for an indeterminate period until they could purchase on physical media or stream or download it for such a reasonable price. So they averted their eyes and downloaded it where they could. So the distributors passed on an opportunity to take in possibly substantial amounts from honesty-inclined consumers who succumbed to their frustration, probably the great majority. Instead, they set up barriers and whine about "piracy."

If they were rational economic actors they would operate to maximize income. That probably would entail making the movie/program/music available, setting up an easy way for consumers to buy the product, and setting a reasonable price for it. They could recognize, as stores for physical goods do, that some people are going to cheat, and institute some reasonable measures to limit that, but if the price is right and purchasing is easy, most people will take the honest path.

For all the favorable comments about book publishers, I don't think they are a lot better than the MPAA and RIAA, what with DRM encumbered eBook prices much the same as those for printed books. Most eBooks should carry a price significantly lower than their printed and bound equivalents, because they are distinctly inferior to paper in that they are not transferable or lendable (or, for libraries, can only be lent a fixed number of times before they die).

Most "content" producers have devoted great effort to various to enforcing and perpetuating their monopolies and not nearly so much to selling products to their potential paying customers.

tom dial Silver badge
Holmes

Re: Its a Minefield

Assuming the above statements are correct as to the licensing requirements, I would like to add that the example song, "You'll Never Walk Alone" was written about 1945 (67 years ago) and the authors, whose contributions to "the Progress of Science and useful Arts" are being promoted by the copyright protection, in fact died 52 (Oscar Hammerstein) and 33 years (Richard Rodgers) ago.

What is this really if not simply the result of (extremely successful) rent seeking activities by those who, for the most part, contribute nothing beyond economic friction?

Shuttleworth: Why Windows 8 made us ditch GPL Linux loader

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Windows 8

Pedantically correct. However, an issue here is one's control of the hardware one bought with one's own money. Microsoft grudgingly requires that on Windows-certified kit you be able to disable secure boot on x86 type, but on ARM type requires that you cannot. The distinction between Windows 6 (for Intel-like) and Windows RT (for ARM) is secondary. Most readers of this comment thread will have understood that with reminding.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Um.

Canonical are required to provide the source code for their signed object module. If a someone else distributes it in a device context that requires the signed code to be verified, the someone else, not Canonical, is required to provide both the source code and the installation information needed to install a possibly modified version of the compiled object. The someone else could satisfy their GPL v3 obligation by providing to the user the capability to sign and install code compiled from source. The only circumstance in which Canonical's private key would be required is if the Canonical public key in the target device could not be replaced by the user. In that case, the "someone else" would be out of compliance with the GPL and might be compelled to stop distributing the product. Canonical would not have a GPL problem, any more than Fedora will have a problem with the object modules they sign using the key they obtained from Verisign. Microsoft's signing key is not at issue in this context because they do not knowingly provide source code for their programs.

tom dial Silver badge
Thumb Up

Re: Clarifications: please understand the *actual* Microsoft Secure Boot requirements

Thank you for the reference and clear summary of the facts, which might bring some clarity to the discussion.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Boot Loader Locking

There are two issues here. For ARM, secure boot can't be turned off. Now, I might like a Surface - it is an interesting piece of hardware - but if I don't have the freedom to install a different OS, I don't fully own it.

For x86, I might want to secure boot my own OS. There actually are some possible advantages to secure boot. Just turning it off disables a feature which, if I bought the hardware, I feel I should be entitled to use.

tom dial Silver badge
Stop

A "boot sector infector" was, by any reasonable understanding, a primitive example of a bootloader rootkit. We had these way back in the late years of the 20th century, although mostly MS-DOS target had no security.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: But

I don't think so. My understanding is that PCs (x86) are the ones at issue here. An ARM based thingy with W8 certification won't boot anything MS doesn't sign. Fedora got a key from Verisign, signed using the MS key, so Fedora might be a possibility on ARM, depending on the hardware manufacturer. Canonical created its own key, which probably won't be on any W8 certified ARM device, and since Secure Boot can't be disabled on those, I don't expect Ubuntu to be installable on them.

Grub2 is for PCs. MS requires that Secure Boot can be disabled on those, so any Linux can be installed. The real issue is a usability one. If the appropriate keys are on the hardware/firmware, the candidate Linux user won't have to do any scary stuff like installing keys or changing EFI security settings.

For my hardware, however, the FSF proposal seems the right one: I should be able to produce and install my own platform key and, after that, maintain my own software key store. Without that the hardware is not really fully mine and is more or less deficient from its design.

tom dial Silver badge
Linux

Secure Boot and Grub2

I assume Mr. Shuttleworth refers to conditions in GPL 3, para. 6 ("Conveying Non-Source Forms") which requires, in part, that "installation information" be conveyed with covered object code in cases where the object code is part of a "user product." In such cases, source code and installation information must be provided, and for secure boot that could be read so as to possibly require including the private signing key corresponding to the public key installed in the product.

I believe this interpretation is incorrect with the remotely possible exception of such user products as Canonical might develop and offer. I have not heard of such products, either present or planned, and the Ubuntu GNU/Linux distribution itself does not appear to be a user product as defined in the paragraph. Otherwise, it is incumbent on the manufacturer of the product (not Canonical) to provide the required source code and installation information. Nothing requires the manufacturer to install Canonical's public key in the product, but if they do, they probably can comply with the GPL (V3) only by providing the source with information about how to create, install, and use user-generated keys. It is hard to imagine that they could compel Canonical to help them out of *their* GPL v3 violation. (This is the example Mr. Shuttleworth's gave in answer to my question.)

Alternatively, a manufacturer could generate and use their own keys to sign the software. If they do so, they can comply with the GPL by providing their signing key (not likely) or (again) by providing the purchaser a means to generate and install keys and sign software. The user then could install Canonical's public key to enable update of Canonical's distributed software. Canonical's private key would be unnecessary.

It might be good to have laws that exempt all private keys from disclosure, but I don't see the security and police establishments buying into that.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: pah

ARM is not "their" (i. e., Microsoft's) tablet. The first W8 tablet was announced a few weeks ago by either Acer or Asus (I don't remember which).

And the W8 certification requirement for ARM-based equipment is that secure boot may not be disabled. I am not clear whether it allows installation of alternative product keys on W8 certified hardware, but guess probably not. For x86, the corresponding requirement is that disabling secure boot must be allowed, but there is no requirement I am aware of that it be possible to install keys to enable secure boot of other operating systems.

Secure boot is not an intrinsically bad thing, but Microsoft's W8 certification requirement appear to have a substantial anticompetition component in addition to possibly questionable security benefits.

Lowery: The blue-collar musician at the eye of the copyright storm

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Some good points, but a big mistake about "property"

Jefferson referred to the monopoly conferred by the U. S. Constitution (Article I, Section VIII, Paragraph 8) as an embarassment. And so it is, justified only by the presumption that it promotes "the Progress of Science and useful Arts."

Copyrighting material for a period that extends 70 years beyond the creator's death chokes off such progress.

Samsung fails to stall Galaxy Nexus sales ban

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Eh?

Daniel Ravicher gave a Google Tech talk in April:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfH8iyNjpYo

One of the interesting statistics given was that of the litigated patents, about 30% were on prior art and ~40% were simply obvious (there is overlap). Far from clear that "if a patent gets this far, it's a pretty good patent."

Another: USPTO agrees in about 92% of patent reexamination requests that there is a substantial question of patent validity.

These statistics were for all U. S. patents, but those for software patents probably are worse. They also don't say anything about the particular patents involved here, but do suggest something is fundamentally wrong with the process.

HP asks court to force Oracle to obey Itanium contract

tom dial Silver badge

Re: After the Google lawsuit

I would stay away from any Oracle product, including MySQL. Concur about probable scarcity of happy or satisfied Oracle customers, however. Many probably are feeling a bit trapped now owing to their embrace of Oracle features like PL/SQL.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Realistically HP are on to a loser.

If I were an Oracle customer with relatively new Itanium hardware, I would be quite unhappy with Oracle and not much comforted by the prospect of my software maintenance being done under compulsion of a court. I might even be open to other options like Postgresql which offer almost all the functionality for almost none of the licensing cost. If I were a large organization like, say the U. S. Department of Defense, I might realize that the cost of a reasonably sized support staff and its training might be far less than Oracle's $15K/CPU license fee and $3K/CPU annual maintenance cost.

If I were Hewlett-Packard, I might think that providing services and support for other-than-Oracle DMBS could be helpful to my loyal customers.

If I were Oracle, I might think about such things but, narcissist that I am, probably would not.

Apple wins US ban on Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1

tom dial Silver badge

Re: A ban based on a design patent??

Actually, there are. None of them for use in polite company, however.

Microsoft's Surface plan means the world belongs to Android now

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Ummmmm, yeahhhhh.......

Looks like about 2/3 IOS and 1/3 everything else for tablets. Almost all of "everything else," of course, would be Android. Not a complete rout, then.

Assange: Australian neglect made me flee to Ecuador embassy

tom dial Silver badge
Stop

Re: Assange the journalist...

Calling Julian Assange a journalist is an insult to the thousands of men and women who actually are.

Australia sanguine on Assange-to-Ecuador, would fight US extradition

tom dial Silver badge
FAIL

Re: Hang the Bradley Mannings?

Whatever Bradley Manning might have done, it certainly was not civil disobedience. He was a military service member obligated to follow lawful orders which included preserving the secrecy of classified materials. It is alleged that he did not do so, and he is being tried by a military court. Possibly the lawfulness of the orders will be questioned, but I doubt that would be an effective defense. It still has to be proved that a crime was committed and that Pvt. Manning committed it. He isn't likely to be hanged or otherwise terminated, though.

Surface: Because Microsoft does so well making hardware?

tom dial Silver badge
Stop

Re: Hmmm

edlin was a POS poor imitation of ed. Vi is an enormously capable text editor for a wide range of purposes, far better for many purposes than anything Microsoft ever produced, like notepad, wordpad, or Word. It, or a similar editor is available on every Unix/Linux system and can be used where necessary (by one who has the knowledge), to fix configuration files, although I haven't had to do that in the last several years on Debian, Ubuntu, HP-UX or Solaris, as they have curses or gui tools that are up to most tasks.

Did most of this come from a Microsoft Announcement? The Windows UI 8 is inferior in usability (for this user) to: MacOS, OS/X, Linux with Gnome 2, Windows 7 and its predecessors back to Windows 2000, and even (although marginally) Linux with Gnome 3 or Ubuntu with Unity.

Bradley Manning in court as lawyers wrestle over secret docs

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Too bad the death penalty isn't on the table.

PFC Manning was operating in a legally established chain of command that defined his role. By his oath, he agreed to subject himself and his actions to the chain of command and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. While he was, as a human being, free to reach his own conclusions about the meaning of protecting and defending the Constitution, he was not legally free to act on that. And now, if convicted of illegal acts, he will have to accept the defined punishment.

Microsoft forbids class actions in new Windows licence

tom dial Silver badge
Linux

Re: Consumer Purchase Agreement

Upvoted it, but don't think it can be workable. I'm not a lawyer, but think such things as checks for partial payment marked "paid in full" fail, and this sounds a bit like that. However there are credit cards that provide some additional warranty that might help.

The out I like best is to refuse the license agreement, try to get a refund if you want, and install your favorite Gnu/Linux (mine's Debian)

Motorola Mobility loses to Microsoft in German patent battle

tom dial Silver badge
Holmes

Re: Breaking up something large is PATENTED?

Can't necessarily blame the lawyers, though. Oracle had some pretty good ones; see what it got them.

I haven't found the particular patent, but thought splitting messages should have been obvious prior art, though. Heart, Kahn, Ornstein, Crowther, and Walden discussed it at some length in 1970 in "The interface message processor for the ARPA computer network" (easily available from the Association for Computing Machinery digital library). The research was done on a U. S. Government contract, I believe, and if patents were issued or relied upon they expired long ago.

MPs wrestle slippery bureaucrats in intellectual property Jell-O

tom dial Silver badge

Nothing about "IP Law" requires sharing. If I understand correctly, the formula for Coca Cola syrup is neither copyrighted nor patented but is a very closely kept trade secret. Google could copyright their searching algorithms, but that would not be useful because someone else could reimplement them with minor changes and no infringement. As algorithms, they are not (in the US, yet) patentable. Their utility, like that of the Coca Cola formula, is tightly connected to their secrecy.

In the US, the chief benefit of patents is supposed to be that the clever idea is disclosed, allowing others to build upon it, in exchange for a time-limited inventor's exploitation right, and the same is true, more or less, for copyrights. In both cases, the monopoly grant to the author or inventor presumably is to reward work accomplished, not (as seems often to be the case) to prevent others from doing like things and ensure a long-lived revenue stream to companies, heirs, and other hangers-on. In the particular case of copyright, it is genuinely difficult to see how a copyright period that extends for 70 years beyond the death of the author is an effective incentive for further creative work outside of law offices and corporate legal departments.

Facebook IPO plunge sparks tidal wave of lawsuits

tom dial Silver badge
Stop

Re: Rules of investing

Those who bought and held companies like Microsoft (in the past), IBM, Apple, HP, Intel, Texas Instruments, or AT&T, just to name a few tech companies, haven't done too badly over time. On the other hand, I expect that day traders, on average, have done rather poorly.

In which category would we place Warren Buffett?

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Rules of investing

I also upvoted Andyf (#13; don't work on Wall Street and do belong to the 99%). Nothing in the post is pro-fraud and the rules given are common-sense that all security investors should internalize and follow. Also:

5. if it isn't clear how the company will make profits, avoid it.

Gamblers who bought in at $38+ anticipating a quick 10% - 20% gain on the post-IPO bump will have to wait, maybe for a long time. Most of the money here was from high-stakes gamblers or institutional investors. The gamblers may need to seek help with their problem, although a lawyer would not be the appropriate professional. Institutional investors may need to be reminded of their fiduciary duty, and their customers might want to engage lawyers for that.

Antitrust probe looms over Windows RT 'browser ban'

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Kindle?

From my perspective, the difference is that Amazon (and Apple, and Microsoft/Xbox360) are selling a bundle consisting of hardware and OS (firmware, really), whereas Microsoft (WinRT/Windows 8 on ARM) are selling a piece of software for other manufacturers to install on their hardware. And they are requiring that it be "impossible" to install alternative OS or components, or that the add-in software be at a disadvantage to their bundled applications. I consider both to be offensive, the first a bit less so than the second. Either way, you don't "own" the machinery in the same sense as if you buy a Dell or HP desktop or build your own. The same is true, sort of, for much of the Android stuff, but I haven't heard that the providers lean especially on those who root their device and install alternative firmware.

tom dial Silver badge

Re: Kindle?

From my perspective, the difference is that Amazon (and Apple, and Microsoft/Xbox360) are selling a bundle consisting of hardware and OS (firmware, really), whereas Microsoft (WinRT/Windows 8 on ARM) are selling a piece of software for other manufacturers to install on their hardware. And they are requiring that it be "impossible" to install alternative OS or components, or that the add-in software be at a disadvantage to their bundled applications. I consider both to be offensive, the second a bit more so than the first. Either way, it's clear that you don't "own" the machinery in the same sense as if you buy a Dell or HP desktop or build your own. The same is true, sort of, for much Android stuff, but I haven't heard that the providers lean especially on those who root their device and install alternative firmware.

Ubuntu will hit the big time on Amazon: Here's how

tom dial Silver badge

Re: What does Ubuntu offer?

Also: Plan9, CentOS, gentoo, FreeBSD, and Minix 3 run quite decently; qemu/kvm on Debian is a quite acceptable virtualization platform.

Haven't yet figured out what Ubuntu has to offer over native Debian, though.

Sony stock slides to 30-year low after record loss

tom dial Silver badge
Linux

Re: Ah, the usual anti-Sony fanbois are out in force.

I thought well of Sony until their obtuse management let go the rootkit. I still like my PS3, which hasn't had a firmware upgrade to disable OtherOS; and I still run Yellow Dog Linux on it from time to time. When they strong armed NetFlix to disable the DVD software load for streaming, I bought a Samsung - not Sony - network enabled BD player, although I still use the PS3 to play DVD and BD discs. When they took their action against George Hotz, I resolved never to buy another of their products, which by then had little left to recommend them beyond excessive price for a name that no longer indicates above average design and build quality.