Re: Curated web already a thing for many people
"I gave up contributing."
After reading "the rules" and discovering that Wikipedia was just another online game, I decided not to participate at all.
26716 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
If you search on my real name with alphagoo (a rather unusual name, mind), you'll get nothing but stale information, most of which was never valid in the first place (some of which I intentionally seeded in odd places decades ago), until you get to page five (sometimes six) when the papers and publications I have been involved with start showing up.
Alphagoo is worse than useless for many things. Has anyone told the advertisers yet?
"Why didn’t they just use pneumatic lights if they already had air hoses for their hand tools?"
Perhaps because they didn't know such a thing exists?
For the copy/paste folks: https://www.airtools.com/products/pneu-light/
To be perfectly fair, Microsoft didn't invent autorun ... autorun is a logical extension to bootable media. My old PDP 11 can be told to automatically run code loaded from paper tape or card decks ... if the correct code is at the beginning of the media. Earlier DEC kit could, too. IBM kit could do the same in the '50s, as could the rest of that era computers.
All sane kernels can be compiled with various levels of debugging information turned on. These are nominally just for lab use, but sometimes one (or more) makes it out into the wild when it shouldn't. On the bright side, there are usually (always these days) boot options to turn these on or off (all at once, or individually) as needed.
I do not know of any OS that does crash dumps to "random" disks. The disk(s) to dump to is(are) always specified, somewhere (and in what order). However, it might look random to a non-aware observer.
That happened in NZ, I remember it well. Fortunately, I wasn't the guy who got yelled at. (Hi, Mike!) Was an easy fix, and nothing was lost.
I did get yelled at in late 1977 when I managed to take down all the PDP10 kit at Stanford and Berkeley with a software upgrade. Effectively split the West coast ARPANet in half for a couple hours. Not fun having bigwigs from Moffett and NASA Ames screaming because they couldn't talk to JPL and Lockheed without going through MIT ...
Janitorial staff having the keys to the entire kingdom (as it were) was the norm until we in the glass room started putting our collective foot down in the late 1970s/early 1980s. It wasn't until the late 1980s that it became uncommon. By the late 1990s it was as rare as hen's teeth. The last time I witnessed a janitor coming unannounced into a data center "in the wee hours" at a place I was consulting for was 2005 ...
Trump's a blithering idiot, if you hadn't noticed. His opinion is not useful, to anyone. Including himself, apparently.
And the so-called "off grid survivalists" are too busy trying to be off-grid and survive (it's Winter, you know) to have time for the kind of time-sink you propose.
I seriously doubt the North Carolina (National) Guard would even notice the power outage if they had to come in and keep the peace. Which they didn't, primarily because most people in Moore County are law abiding and more interested in helping their neighbors than they are helping to implement the fantasies of a failed President.
Why waste money on concrete? It's easy to add a privacy screen to a chainlink fence. You can't hit what you can't see ... and there is a lot more air than there is hardware in a substation, so blazing away randomly would waste money (ammo ain't free) and likely not hit anything important. Besides, the shooter(s) wouldn't get to see the pretty light show.
"Foot pedals, the only choice for a gentleman"
I fiddled about with a foot pedal input device way back when. Was a Moog Taurus originally[0], but I modified it so various chords became control, alt & shift keys, Fx keys, Sun's "L" keys, and a couple other key bindings depending on the computer it was plugged into. It was an attempt to bring sanity to EMACS, among other things.
Even when working well, it turned out to be more trouble than it was worth, so I never pursued it. A friend of mine took my breadboard rig and code & used the basic idea for an alternative input device for disabled folks while getting his Masters at Stanford.
[0] Don't swear at me, I didn't wreck it! Somebody else had cannibalized most of the electronics, I found the carcass in a pile of trash outside SAIL's DC Power building when we were moving out in 1980. The idea of making it an input device flashed into my mind as soon as I set eyes on it.
"BUT, I am definitely cringing at looking at what I wrote all those years ago."
Don't cringe. Pat yourself on the back instead. And have a beer! It did the job it was required to do, and more. Can't ask for more than that.
Besides, you should see the garbage code the other guy was cranking out.
Back in roughly 1975, one of my Big Iron mentors had a bumper-sticker:
Tabs are for typewriters!
A woman from the typing pool who much preferred Fresca to Tab took exception to the comment, so he offered to buy her lunch in compensation for the perceived slight. They are still married.
A few years later, another mentor opined "Feelthy TABs are the devil's work, unless you are using them on your Smith Corona".
Personally, I prefer spaces, but I'll use tabs where required. When in Rome & all that.
I was working on early UNIX (pre-BSD) at Berkeley when one of the professors bellyached at me for including too many comments, as in his opinion it wasted paper.
"Yeah, well, get me a glass tty and I'll stop using the '33 ... "
I had a second-hand VT52 on my desk the following morning. JOY! :-)
The very same professor still demanded weekly dead-tree printouts. Naturally.
Don't worry, you'll live. And also eventually get over the horror.
Wait until you get hate-email from somebody lambasting code you wrote 40 years prior that hasn't been used for at least thirty years to your knowledge, and only runs on a processor that has been out of support for about as long.
"I'm still not sure how they could be certain it was unused before it was restored"
I can think of two ways ... Either no scratch marks on the connectors and perfect/no threads in the standoffs, or they built it in their garage the evening before.
"I wouldn't hold out a lot of hope for it having an enduring continuing run"
I can see it ... That board is particularly easy to debug to component level, and all the parts are available, either as period-correct New Old Stock from various used equipment warehouses, OR as brand-new, made last week parts.
"as it's still unlikely that someone will buy this in order to turn it on."
It will never run again. It's an investment(??), not a computer.
I suspect that more than one of the "original, working" Apple-1 boards that has sold for umpteen thousand currency units is a fake.
Consider that I could easily make a reproduction that would fool "experts" for under US$1,000. The Woz gave out the board design and parts list at a Homebrew Computing meeting in '76. It's not like the technology is a big secret or anything, and all the necessary parts are still readily available. I might not even have to leave this property to collect period-correct examples. Next, throw in a little unscrupulous silk screening of copyright notice, and Bob's yer Auntie.
Before anyone says it, you can't tell from serial numbers ... thanks to bad record keeping, and a general lack of giving a shit about that kind of documentation back then, nobody knows for certain what the numbers were. I doubt the "verified Jobs handwriting" means much ... it consists of three numeric characters and a dash written with a Sharpie on fiberglass/epoxy.
Not that I would recommend committing such a forgery, of course. But you've got to wonder every time one of these things turns up ... especially one in working condition.
"Well, apart from my not having a clue what "TINU" means"
"There Is No Us", a tongue-in-cheek reference to the Backbone Cabal, which pushed through the Great Renaming of Usenet, and generally kept network abuse[0] to a background murmur in the 1980s. The folks involved publicly denied their own existance in order to cut down on conspiracy theory bullshit clogging up the pipes. Most cognizant users (including the Cabal membership) would sign their Usenet posts on the subject with "There Is No Cabal". It's an odd fact of history that the TINC acronym came into wide-spread use after the Cabal split up in roughly 1988 (the mailing list stopped at that point, but most of the regulars maintained contact for technical matters for decades after. Still do, in most cases. TINC.).
"If you really did design the internet"
Hold up there, pardner. I said no such thing. I have never stated that I designed The Internet. However, I was an engineering student at Berkeley and Stanford from the mid '70s through the '80s, and did contribute. As did many other people.
"Although if you have an internet 2.0 plan lying around"
We are using it as I type. Internet 2 went live on January 1st, 1983, when we switched from NCP to TCP/IP. I was discussing a redesign from a technical perspective would be necessary for a non-research, secure network. The Human part of the equation is out of our reach, thankfully. THAT kind of engineering I'm not interested in.
Beer?
[0] That's abuse OF the 'net, not abuse ON the 'net, if you get the distinction.
Yes, it is bollocks.
What she did was pretty much single-handedly make DEC networking work. Not the Internet, which had already been evolving for some time, and was working nicely, before she joined DEC in 1980. Basically, she made all the little LANs dotted around DEC's world-wide campus play nicely with each other. Not a mean feat, that. But it was all on a private network, not The Internet at large. That's part of the reason none of her early work is written up in RFCs, it was all proprietary DEC. (Yes, DEC sold this technology to other people who needed similar WAN capability with their LANs. But this was early '80s, the Internet wasn't exactly business friendly at the time.)
That is not to say her STP (and many, many other things ... Check out her prolific RFCs from 2008 to 2018) didn't help out the Internet later on. Far from it. She's a godmother of modern networking, make no mistake, and someone I will always look up to.
As I've been saying in this forum for years, the Internet is nothing more than an insecure research platform gone mad.
When we built this thing, we knew there were issues, even pre-BARRNet and NSFnet. It was not ready for prime-time back then, and it's still not ready for prime-time. In fact, it'll never be ready for prime-time, no matter how many bandaids we apply. It'll remain an insecure research platform, at least until it is redesigned from the ground up. At which point it will no longer be The Internet.
We tried to keep the corporate world out of it because of this, but we were naive. We failed. We apologize.
I'm 99.9% certain that I can speak for us on this matter, especially seeing as TINU.