Re: Jeebus, got me worried there
Hardware manufacturers have been shipping systems requiring more money to activate "dark" hardware since IBM started doing it in the 1950s.
26707 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
"certain classes of problems don't arise"
One man's problems are another man's clever kernel hacks.
Not all clever kernel hacks lead to show-stoppers ... but Rust removes some of that capability from the hands of experienced coders.
Nobody with a brain ever said production kernel coding is a neophyte sport. Nor should it be.
The problem is that their scheduling includes multi-point loops, as opposed to most other airlines, which use use hubs. Means that the other airlines usually have an aircrew available for any given aircraft that is ready to fly, but these clowns have a miss-match between available aircraft and crews, and when many aircraft are grounded due to weather it compounds.
"And flight volumes were 1/10th of what they are today."
In the same time, computers have gone from thousands of instructions per second (IBM's System/360 Model 30 could do 34,500 IPS in 1964) to many billions of IPS in modern multi-core mainframes. Memory, storage and I/O have more or less kept up. Between them, they should cover the change in flight volume more than adequately.
"Crew/Aircraft scheduling systems make 3D Chess look simple."
The basic algorithm for passenger aircraft hasn't changed appreciably since it became an issue in the '50s... and 3-D chess doesn't really exist as a thing (Star Trek's famous "tri-dimensional chess" was just a prop, with no rules to go along with it).
VLSI and SCO were both founded in 1979. Both companies made some really awesome hacks, used all over the industry. Later in life they were sold, and then sold again. Along the way, they stopped being useful in the technology world. Both now only exist as shadows, just names on paper that are used to sue people for using technology they claim as their own.
"Because jurors make the very best patent examiners."
Especially jurors in Texas, apparently. The judges there must be specially trained to instruct the jurors in the fine points of each patent. I wonder how much that training costs ... and who pays, and who gets paid, and what the going rate is.
Last time I checked (10 years ago (ish)), SAIL's original DECtape "Permanent Files" from 1966 to 1972 and then the 7-bit DART tape archives (Dump And Restore Technique ... essentially full system backups of the SAIL PDP-10), from 1972 to 1990, were available to researchers at Stanford's Green Library (in "The Digital Collection"). Access is (was? see below) restricted to people who have permission from the original authors.
I know there was some effort to put all that into a more modern archive format, and then put the results online, right around the turn of the century. I do not know how far the effort managed to get.
Note that the interaction between SAIL and SLAC (and The Big Dish folks) mostly wasn't official, but tapes between the three were exchanged fairly regularly. SAIL mostly helped with knotty algorithm wrestling on large (for the time!) data sets, robotics, and imaging..
The following map shows how close these three campuses are to each other, with the main Stanford Campus upper right. The now sadly demolished D.C. Power[0] building, where SAIL was located, is currently home to Portola Pastures, a horse establishment (bottom center).
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.4071914,-122.1815786,4723m/data=!3m1!1e3
[0] Nothing to do with Electricity ... it was named after Donald C. Power, a corporate director of GT&E, who had built the building as a research lab, and then gifted it to Stanford. Lore has it that SAIL (originally SAIP, "Project") got the last part of it's name from the building ...
"I wish Musk would just stick to what he is good at."
What would that be? I've seen no evidence of anything but luck to date ...
"Rockets"
US Government (CIA/NSA?) front. Musk is not really in charge, he just thinks he is.
"Cars"
Bought, not built. Seems to have run it's course.
"Just give it a rest."
They can't. It's all they've got.
If you really want 'em to shut up, ask 'em about the chain of custody. Or lack thereof.
The Biden laptop is a non-issue, and always has been, simply because of the lack of a clear chain of custody. It is not admissible as evidence in any court in the US. Won't stop the anti-American folks in charge of the next Congress from wasting the next two years trying to prove otherwise, though.
I was thinking Joe "Tailgunner" McCarthy.
"Twitter is infested with Commentards. I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to Saint Elon as being members of the Commentardariat and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy here at Twitter."
Or maybe J Edgar Hoover ... that fetching little black dress would help pacify at least some of the crowd.
I don't really give a shit either ... but when you think about it, "edge" suggests a physical location somewhere. And yet "edge" is rather nebulous, although not as much so as "cloud". I rather suspect this lack of spacial location makes the word fucking useless in this context.
I propose a better word for the same products: STUFF.
Marketing would love it "Here's our new line of STUFF!"
Management would love it "I don't know what STUFF is or does, but it's selling!"
Sales would love it "People are stupid, look at all the STUFF they are buying!"
ElReg would love it, they wouldn't have to change acronyms "Junk Widget Co. Has released a new line of IoS!"
ElReg Commentards would love it "Don't you wish all these idiots would STUFF it?"
That's Digital Equipment Computer Users Society.
Yes, DECUS had symposiums. Yes, the late-night back rooms were where the action was. (Where do you think CES attendees got the idea?) I was one of the guys babbling about BSD on PDP-11 to anyone who was interested. Still am, come to think of it ...
Close. It was an updated daughter board that a graphics tablet plus collaborative whiteboard plugged into. The underlying computer was a Sun2 "deskside" workstation (2/170? I don't remember, but it was Multibus, not VME). The whiteboard was an early variation on Xerox PARC's whiteboard technology. In theory, collaboration could happen anywhere your network reached[0] ... but in reality, the latency back then made it pretty much confined to on-campus use. Also in theory, it could handle up to 15 separate locations, but I never saw it work with more than five, and even then it slowed to a crawl. Primitive, in a first-world kinda way.
[0] In 1985, companies like IBM, Boeing, Ford, GM and the like had their own internal world-wide networks. The Internet of the time was still very young, somewhat flaky, slowish and not exactly friendly to businesses. Not much has changed.
About a billion years ago (in Internet time, call it 1985ish), I was booked on an "emergency" flight to LAX to fix some computers for Disney. I got the call at noon, was in the air by 1PM. Unfortunately for me, the Disney offices were in Glendale, so I should have been flown into BUR ... which might as well be on another continent at 4PM on a Wednesday if you're using wheeled transportation.
Fortunately, helicopters exist. I was only 2 hours late. My fault, naturally.
Did the job, staff came in Thursday morning & were happy with the change, customer signed off on it at noon, and I was home in time for supper. Job well done, right? Maybe not ...
The PM (or necropsy, as I prefer to call such things) showed the temporary secretary assumed that everything in the LA area had to go through LAX ... but it was my fault anyway, as I should have known better & flagged the bogus destination before I boarded, This despite the fact that my instructions were oral "Take this briefcase full of hardware, fly to LA and install it. You will be met at the airport and taken to the site. Further instructions by telephone will follow." I didn't even know the name of the destination company until I was on the ground in LA. But my fault, so no bonus for the emergency call. It was right about then that I started thinking about going freelance ... it was also the incident that caused the company to outfit us emergency field service guys with new-fangled DynaTACs.
It's not a fee to drive somebody out of the airport. It's a standard fee to drive to a specific location. One fee for Manhattan, one for The Bronx, one for Yankee Stadium, etc. This is to stop unscrupulous cabbies[0] from doing several laps around Central Park, followed by a quick lap of Hoboken, just to to bump up the fee.
And quite frankly, fifty two bucks from JFK into lower Manhattan (13-14 miles, a trifle over half an hour on a good day) is a fair price[1] ... Sure beats walking!
[0] Not that such a thing would ever exist, of course. Honest as the day is long, those NYC hacks ...
[1] Drive it yourself once to find out. You'll never do it again ... Guess how I know.
"What's the real difference between a cheap Casio digital watch and a Rolex or other high end watch?"
Speaking only for myself, if I had to choose between two people for a job, and the only difference between them was a Rolex and a Casio, I'd pick the Casio. But then I tend to be more interested in practicality than bling, and hire accordingly.
If there were a third equal person, and s/he had no watch at all, they would undoubtedly get the job over the two watch wearers. A job interview is no place to someone to be worrying about the time. (Likewise, I have passed over people who play with their telephone when on the premises for an interview.)
"I have lots of pre-IBM-PC keyboard experience"
So do I.
I also still have and use lots of pre-IBM PC keyboards. Your memory is perhaps viewed through rose tinted glasses? There is no way I would consider any of the pre-F keyboards that I own and/or have used superior to the F as shipped with the 5150. The backslash key placement never really bothered me. The wells in the keycaps just assisted with feedback for a touch-typist. IMO, of course.
And of course there were so many new keyboards appearing at that time that we were used to switching between them.
The AT version of the Model F, that one pissed me off and I had to do some serious keyboard remapping. I never did find out what idiot decided that the <esc> key belonged with the 10-key. From that point onward I just re-mapped pretty much every keyboard to suit myself. Even the Model M that eventually replaced the Model F in the AT line.
I still primarily use a (remapped) Model M. Best keybR0ad ever made for the touch-typist, IMO.
In 1982, every keyboard but the one you were used to using was strange. As such things went, the F was less jarring than many others. For one thing, it actually had an <esc> key! Kinda handy for us vi users ...
Is the inital design of the LK201 further proof that Ken Olsen hated UNIX?
In my case, almost an eternity ...
I high-sided a bike at Thunderhill once. At about 140 MPH ... a friend & I were practicing drafting, and swapping the lead back and forth ... He cut in a trifle early and my front tire hit his rear as we were accelerating out of a sweeper. Not good with hot sticky race rubber. I remember thinking "Well THAT was a daft thing to do! This is going to hurt. Pull in your arms & legs & get ready to roll. Shit, the wedding is in a week, SWMBO is going to be PISSED! I wonder if I'll be able to get a beer in the ER? Hopefully Doug will get the bike back to the house for me." and then I hit the deck and was rolling through gravel. I wasn't in the air for more than a tenth of a second or so.
No hospital, just a badly bruised knee. I drove myself+bike home. Made the wedding.
SWMBO still laughs at my limp in the videos.
That reminds me, I must call and ask if one can get a beer in the ER ... and if not, fix it.
"Even proving working code from a year ago probably needs changes because the language, IDE, or engine has been updated."
No mention of the underlying solution to the problem at hand? Is the algorithm not important anymore?
We used to make it work, then make it pretty. These days, it's the opposite ... and strangely enough the finances STILL seem to run out before that second phase is implemented properly.
The only issue with that quote is that programming is NOT about putting code on paper. Programming is finding a solution to a problem, and then translating that solution to code.
Writing code is EASY, any idiot can do it. Even AI.
However, there is no lowering of the barrier to finding the initial solution.
What else is new? People have been believing everything they see on the computer, because the computer is always right, since the advent of computers.
Or was that everything they hear from shamans? Is there really any difference? Magic is magic, after all ...
It must be true, I read it on the Internet!