"the wrong serial cable for the UPS"
Anybody know if the APC C* who signed off on that 'orribly advised decision has ever "worked" in the industry again? I'd like to avoid anything he or she has his or her name on ...
26680 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
"quite small (about 30 centimetres long, with a 3cm diameter) but definitely dangerous looking lasers."
Sounds like a late '70s or early '80s design HeNe. Red beam, 632.8nm, most likely under 5mW. The power supply for these can give you quite the zap (around 2500V at 5mA), but the output is fairly benign, as long as you keep it away from the eyes. Useful at over 1000 yards/meters under ideal conditions with proper collimation. Cheep and cheerful, but bulky by today's standards.
Many moons ago, maybe 1983 bright and early one fine morning I was on the roof of the old Ford Aerospace Building One on Fabian in Palo Alto, trying to re-align a new laser network link to a building across Hwy 101. I got tackled by a couple largish MPs ... Seems that some military big-wigs were about to arrive to inspect one of our satellites (unlaunched, being built in the high-bay), and the two security guys heard someone talk about "jake's up on the roof with the laser, that should sort 'em out". Myself and the two talking about me were detained, taken to a small room & questioned. Seems the security detail wasn't all that versed in the power output of a 5mW HeNe laser, in their tiny little brains we were conspiring to roast the brass.
We had the last laugh. The laser link was part of the demo that the brass was there to observe. We were "rescued" from the grilling after about an hour, and allowed to get on with it. The security guys got a very public dressing-down from a rather technologically cluefull Colonel (in full dress) for wasting his time ... After we concluded the demo, the Colonel sent the security guys to get pizza for lunch and sat & ate with us, discussing the ins & outs of "modern" wireless (laser) networking.
Back in December of 1993 I was setting up a laser T1 link between Redwood City and Newark. The clueless owner brought me a burrito for lunch ... and hung the bag on the fucking laser!
I swore, he grabbed tor the bag, and got greasy fingerprints all over the glass.
Have acetone, ethanol, DI water, q-tips and lens paper, will travel ...
Cooling fan(s). Of the same era (maybe a trifle earlier), think Cisco AGS routers and desktop PDP-11 kit. Early 1980s to mid 1990s was peak fan noise, when processor and bus speed nearly outran the technology to be air-cooled. Lots of money went into heat transfer technology in this time period. Such tech also helped with the physical down-sizing of lasers and etc.
Some Prius 12V "auxilliary" batteries are in the trunk (boot), some under the hood (bonnet), depends on the model/year.
For a battery under the hood (bonnet), jump as usual.
For those with the battery in the trunk (boot), there is a positive tab specifically for jumpstarting inside the fuse/relay panel under the hood (bonnet). It has a red cover on it marked with a + ... connect your positive (red) jumper cable to this point, the other (black) to any unpainted surface under the hood (bonnet). Pretty much everything else about jumping the car is the same as it always was.
If the above doesn't work, you can also connect directly to the battery in the trunk (boot). Jump as usual.
As always, read your operators manual, as variations can exist from year to year, model to model and trim level to trim level.
Source: Client with a dead car in the barnyard and a minute or so with DDG.
... the lack of parts and repair services, range anxiety, buggy software, no recycle path, the sheer uglyness of all (most?) offerings ... need I go on?
That and the market is pretty much saturated. Those that want one, have one ... and most of those don't want another. (Based on my observances here in Sonoma, Napa, Mendocino and Lake Counties, California.)
It's not soil amendments that the folks in charge of the RDPs live for, rather it's rule amendments. So I rather suspect that the answer would be a highly qualified "yes" ... with no actual way to meet the qualifications. But they'll spend YEARS working on it. Taxpayer money isn't going to spend itself!
"Come on Cops you have the CCTV... why don't you prosecute them. It is not as it you have to go out in the rain and cold to nab them is it?"
Have you seen the sorry images that most .gov controlled CCTV cameras produce? It's almost impossible to see what people are doing on those cheap-ass pieces of shit, much less ID a perp or read a plate ... and that's before all the the bird crap & etc. that builds up on the lenses.
The things might be a deterrent, but it's not because they produce usable pictures.
Here in California, Tesla drivers are taking over from the holier-than-thou Subaru drivers who think that "doing their part to save the world" means they can ignore all driving laws whenever they like. BMW drivers take a back seat to the other two in this travesty of a triumvirate.
... could have predicted this debacle. NOBODY!
Except the collective wisdom of the ElReg commentardariat, of course.
"Wireless charging is significantly less efficient than charging via wire, requiring as much as 50 percent more energy by some measures."
Shirley all the greenaholics should be whining about how wireless charging is destroying the climate/environment? Why the deafening silence on the subject?
To be fair, the entire PDP-10 line could use from 1 to 36 bit bytes at the whim of the programmer.
For example, ASCII was usually stored in 4 8-bit fields (7 for ASCII, 1 for parity) per 36 bit word, leaving 4 bits at the whim of the coder (see: SAIL's SAILDART archive system [WAITS on PDP-10], for example).
"certain classes of problems don't arise"
One man's problems are another man's clever kernel hacks.
Not all clever kernel hacks lead to show-stoppers ... but Rust removes some of that capability from the hands of experienced coders.
Nobody with a brain ever said production kernel coding is a neophyte sport. Nor should it be.
The problem is that their scheduling includes multi-point loops, as opposed to most other airlines, which use use hubs. Means that the other airlines usually have an aircrew available for any given aircraft that is ready to fly, but these clowns have a miss-match between available aircraft and crews, and when many aircraft are grounded due to weather it compounds.
"And flight volumes were 1/10th of what they are today."
In the same time, computers have gone from thousands of instructions per second (IBM's System/360 Model 30 could do 34,500 IPS in 1964) to many billions of IPS in modern multi-core mainframes. Memory, storage and I/O have more or less kept up. Between them, they should cover the change in flight volume more than adequately.
"Crew/Aircraft scheduling systems make 3D Chess look simple."
The basic algorithm for passenger aircraft hasn't changed appreciably since it became an issue in the '50s... and 3-D chess doesn't really exist as a thing (Star Trek's famous "tri-dimensional chess" was just a prop, with no rules to go along with it).
VLSI and SCO were both founded in 1979. Both companies made some really awesome hacks, used all over the industry. Later in life they were sold, and then sold again. Along the way, they stopped being useful in the technology world. Both now only exist as shadows, just names on paper that are used to sue people for using technology they claim as their own.
"Because jurors make the very best patent examiners."
Especially jurors in Texas, apparently. The judges there must be specially trained to instruct the jurors in the fine points of each patent. I wonder how much that training costs ... and who pays, and who gets paid, and what the going rate is.
Last time I checked (10 years ago (ish)), SAIL's original DECtape "Permanent Files" from 1966 to 1972 and then the 7-bit DART tape archives (Dump And Restore Technique ... essentially full system backups of the SAIL PDP-10), from 1972 to 1990, were available to researchers at Stanford's Green Library (in "The Digital Collection"). Access is (was? see below) restricted to people who have permission from the original authors.
I know there was some effort to put all that into a more modern archive format, and then put the results online, right around the turn of the century. I do not know how far the effort managed to get.
Note that the interaction between SAIL and SLAC (and The Big Dish folks) mostly wasn't official, but tapes between the three were exchanged fairly regularly. SAIL mostly helped with knotty algorithm wrestling on large (for the time!) data sets, robotics, and imaging..
The following map shows how close these three campuses are to each other, with the main Stanford Campus upper right. The now sadly demolished D.C. Power[0] building, where SAIL was located, is currently home to Portola Pastures, a horse establishment (bottom center).
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.4071914,-122.1815786,4723m/data=!3m1!1e3
[0] Nothing to do with Electricity ... it was named after Donald C. Power, a corporate director of GT&E, who had built the building as a research lab, and then gifted it to Stanford. Lore has it that SAIL (originally SAIP, "Project") got the last part of it's name from the building ...
"I wish Musk would just stick to what he is good at."
What would that be? I've seen no evidence of anything but luck to date ...
"Rockets"
US Government (CIA/NSA?) front. Musk is not really in charge, he just thinks he is.
"Cars"
Bought, not built. Seems to have run it's course.
I don't really give a shit either ... but when you think about it, "edge" suggests a physical location somewhere. And yet "edge" is rather nebulous, although not as much so as "cloud". I rather suspect this lack of spacial location makes the word fucking useless in this context.
I propose a better word for the same products: STUFF.
Marketing would love it "Here's our new line of STUFF!"
Management would love it "I don't know what STUFF is or does, but it's selling!"
Sales would love it "People are stupid, look at all the STUFF they are buying!"
ElReg would love it, they wouldn't have to change acronyms "Junk Widget Co. Has released a new line of IoS!"
ElReg Commentards would love it "Don't you wish all these idiots would STUFF it?"
That's Digital Equipment Computer Users Society.
Yes, DECUS had symposiums. Yes, the late-night back rooms were where the action was. (Where do you think CES attendees got the idea?) I was one of the guys babbling about BSD on PDP-11 to anyone who was interested. Still am, come to think of it ...
Close. It was an updated daughter board that a graphics tablet plus collaborative whiteboard plugged into. The underlying computer was a Sun2 "deskside" workstation (2/170? I don't remember, but it was Multibus, not VME). The whiteboard was an early variation on Xerox PARC's whiteboard technology. In theory, collaboration could happen anywhere your network reached[0] ... but in reality, the latency back then made it pretty much confined to on-campus use. Also in theory, it could handle up to 15 separate locations, but I never saw it work with more than five, and even then it slowed to a crawl. Primitive, in a first-world kinda way.
[0] In 1985, companies like IBM, Boeing, Ford, GM and the like had their own internal world-wide networks. The Internet of the time was still very young, somewhat flaky, slowish and not exactly friendly to businesses. Not much has changed.
"What's the real difference between a cheap Casio digital watch and a Rolex or other high end watch?"
Speaking only for myself, if I had to choose between two people for a job, and the only difference between them was a Rolex and a Casio, I'd pick the Casio. But then I tend to be more interested in practicality than bling, and hire accordingly.
If there were a third equal person, and s/he had no watch at all, they would undoubtedly get the job over the two watch wearers. A job interview is no place to someone to be worrying about the time. (Likewise, I have passed over people who play with their telephone when on the premises for an interview.)
"I have lots of pre-IBM-PC keyboard experience"
So do I.
I also still have and use lots of pre-IBM PC keyboards. Your memory is perhaps viewed through rose tinted glasses? There is no way I would consider any of the pre-F keyboards that I own and/or have used superior to the F as shipped with the 5150. The backslash key placement never really bothered me. The wells in the keycaps just assisted with feedback for a touch-typist. IMO, of course.
And of course there were so many new keyboards appearing at that time that we were used to switching between them.
The AT version of the Model F, that one pissed me off and I had to do some serious keyboard remapping. I never did find out what idiot decided that the <esc> key belonged with the 10-key. From that point onward I just re-mapped pretty much every keyboard to suit myself. Even the Model M that eventually replaced the Model F in the AT line.
I still primarily use a (remapped) Model M. Best keybR0ad ever made for the touch-typist, IMO.