Re: Tesla never said it's driverless
"The 'car' doesn't call it autopilot"
Go eyeball the controls for yourself. Looks like it says "Autopilot" to me.
26710 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
"The 'car' doesn't call it autopilot"
Go eyeball the controls for yourself. Looks like it says "Autopilot" to me.
Pretty fucking thick. Which Tesla owners all seem to be, at least from a technological perspective. And sadly, the so-called "autopilot" seems to be better at controlling the vehicle than most of the dim-bulbs behind the wheel.
(Source: Direct observation in Marin, Sonoma and Napa counties these last several years.)
Ben Nevis is nobut an 'ill, lass.
Tioga Pass in California is over twice that height at 3,031m ... and that's a pass, not a peak. Tioga Road, aka Highway 120, is a very a pretty drive, being the Eastern entrance to Yosemite. Recommended. (Note that it's currently closed for winter. Check CalTrans for road conditions before setting out.)
To be fair, California has by far the largest population of any state in the Union with about 40 million people. The second most (Texas, with about 75% of Califonia's population) also is a hot-bed of nutters. As is the third (Florida, with about half). And the fourth and fifth (New York and New Jersey, with just under half and under a third, respectively).
Large populations equal a large number of stark raving loonies, at least in a fairly free society. Only stands to reason; it's the ol' bell shaped curve, innit. Try to remember, the mundane lives of the vast majority of us don't make the news in your tiny little corner of this dampish rock that we live on ... you just hear about the statistically meaningless ones that are out of the ordinary (or "newsworthy" if you prefer).
So-called "creation science" is not even wrong, and you know it.
I've got code running one of my greenhouses that I wrote around 40 years ago. For the first 30-odd years it ran on a Z80/S-100 system with no problems. That's one machine, non stop, except with power-offs for a routine vacuuming out once in a while. The code is pretty much unchanged after all these years (it ain't broke ...), but is now running under emulation on an old headless Slackware laptop. The whole kit & caboodle is going to be replaced with a dedicated system based on the ATmega328 RealSoonNow[tm]. Maybe.
The Maxtor 120 Meg drive of that vintage would have been an ST506 compatible full height 5.25" MFM drive, probably an XT-1140 (143Megs unformatted capacity). In 2010, it should have been readable (on suitable hardware, of course) using Linux or BSD. I pull data off old systems like that several times per year. It's quite a lucrative side job.
One thing you might want to add to that ... deposit an off-site backup onto the server you have hung off your favorite Great Aunt in Duluth's DSL line[0]. Offer to pay for her DSL (she'll probably decline), and promise to only use the bandwidth once per day in the wee hours Duluth time so you don't interrupt her viewing of cute cat videos. Offer to similarly backup her data (and cute cat pics) onto your home equipment. Automating both to happen at 3AM Duluth time should be trivial. Use the encryption method of your choice.
Why bother? Because that home "fire safe" probably won't protect your data in a Tubbs-type event, but an easy to make off-site backup will. You can guess how I know this.
Also, you can invite other relatives into your "circle of archive protection". Once you've got yours and the Great Aunt's automated, adding a few more archive sites is trivial. The first time it's needed, by any any one of them, for any reason, the minimal effort will have been worth it.
[0] Insert other favorite elderly relative+city to meet your needs. An old, low power draw, headless laptop is ideal for this kind of thing. I run a very minimalistic BSD on mine, YMMV.
... why I should have to upload ANYTHING generated by me, or equipment that I own, into "the cloud" (any cloud, not just the gookid's) before I can make use of it? Shirley it should initially be deposited on MY server, not somebody else's?
One wonders if the GreatUnwashed will ever realize they are being played for suckers by the entire "cloud" thing.
Except that hamsters weren't a Middle Ages pet in Blighty. In fact, they weren't recognized by Western Science until the mid 1800s ... and weren't actually bred in Europe until the late 1930s. I suspect that a middle-ages insult based on supposed promiscuity would be more lagomorphic in nature.
As for smelling of elderberrys, other than the obvious[0], this could have two meanings. In the first, the bruised leaves, stems and unripe fruit of the elder have a rather awful smell sometimes described as fetid, thus "your dad stinks!". In the second, the flowers and ripe fruit have a rather sweet smell, suggesting a woman's perfume, thus "your dad is effeminate!".
Note that drinking too much elderberry wine doesn't actually make you smell of elderberrys; it just makes you stink like a drunk. If you don't believe me, it's easy enough to try for yourself ... but try to find a wine that is fermented out, and has little residual sugar. That'll minimize the hangover, which can be horrendous with this kind of plonk. Don't say I didn't warn you. Like most of the poor in the Middle Ages, I suggest sticking to Ale.
[0] The obvious being the Knight is French and is demonstrating his poor ability with idiomatic English, in typical Pythonesque fashion. In other words, the insult was made up by the Pythons for the sketch and had no actual place in history. Hold the Holy Handgrenades, I'm leaving of my own accord.
... might crunch a bit (or bits) of your local mechanic if it fails. The mechanic is fully aware of the state of his jack, and sees no real need to have it inspected. (Does any government actually have a Department of Floor Jack Inspection? Wouldn't surprise me, in today's "please protect me from myself because I'm stupid and I like it that way" society ... )
When Windows fails in a POS (or other "used by the masses" system), there is a non-zero chance that it will compromise the financial security of the intended end-user.
Spot the difference and win a beer.
Last time I checked, there were plenty of distros without the systemd cancer. And there always will be, as long as the systemd cancer isn't a dependency of the kernel. Which will be forever, according to Linus, and he should know.
Poethead hasn't managed a coup, nor will he. Stop spreading FUD.
In addition to imanidiot's excellent advice ... It's all in the care and handling of the lead. If it was abused in shipping and handling, the entire batch might have micro-cracks, and thus display the results that you observe. My solution has been to purchase my leads from a rather high-end arts & crafts store habituated by actual artists, as opposed to bored housewives. Ask a local Architect (real one, who knows how to draw on paper) where he gets his.
"They'd invented t-shirts back when OS/2 was around?"
OS/2 is still around. I use it in several places, where it makes sense. See eComStation and ArcaOS for more, if you are interested.
With that said, OS.2 was released in late '87 ... I have a Big Brother and the Holding Company tshirt from 1968 and a Country Joe and the Fish from 1969.
It's about 2:20 AM Pacific time. I'll bet a plugged nickle that that one downvote will change to about 4 inside 10 hours. That's what the pattern has been, anyway ... suggesting that there are a total of only 4 pro-Trump ElReg commentards. Maybe there's hope for the lot of us yet?
Those 7900 drives were early '80s, while SPARC was late '80s ... amazing how much shrinkage storage experienced in those few years, no?
I wonder how far behind we'd be if today's elfin safety nazis had come into existence in that decade. Probably still stuck with the VLB bus and half height 5.25 drives ... with silicon being built on 6" (`150mm to you euro-types) cookies.
Drifted back to what the article was about? I refer you to the first six words of the first paragraph of the article. To wit "Penetration testers looking at commercial shipping".
And I refer you to the comment in this thread that I was responding to: "It's been nearly 40 years since Superman 3 yet no one seems to have done the 'hack ships to do stuff' thing in anger.".
I know SCADA stuff is vulnerable. I've been bitching about it (on land, sea and air) for literally decades.
I did not pick clear weather. I even mentioned cloud cover, at night.
The McCain incident should never have happened. It's cause was, quite simply, high ranking muck-a-mucks putting entirely too much faith in unproven technology. Again, I'm pretty sure I'm agreeing with you on the underlying issue at hand ...
No. It's a transform fault. One side is moving North, the other is moving South. There is no vertical movement to speak of.
Roger's Creek hasn't moved in a century, or thereabouts. When it finally shifts, it might take the Healdsburg fault (the Northern extension of the combined fault zone) and the Hayward Fault with it (Rogers and Hayward are joined under San Pablo Bay) ... a total distance of about 120 miles could rupture, probably producing a Mag 7.5ish quake, which will pretty much cock up the entire San Francisco Bay Area.
I'm hoping for smaller pressure-relief type quakes, but I'm prepared for the worst. Not paranoid, pragmatic.
Since when did one need a license to use weapons on the high seas? Who is the licensing authority? How is it enforced, and by whom?
I've seen this on most commercial ships that travel in dangerous parts of the world. I wouldn't expect to see it on shipping between, say, France, England and Denmark.
From what I understand from the Captains who actually do it, jettisoning "illegal" weaponry when entering the waters of countries where they are frowned upon is routine. Guns are cheap, cargo is not.
Apparently you have never hear the term "topic drift". It's part and parcel of online forums, and I would wager a guess that it's the reason most commentards use this forum.
I'm on record as saying that I've been telling manglement that PLCs (and other bits of industrial SCADA haberdashery) should never be reachable from outside the local network. Here's a link to one ElReg post of mine on the subject from way back in 2011 ...
Yes, I know how common rail engines work. They should not be accessible outside the LAN if they are being used in critical systems. Making them accessible to all and sundry is effectively slapping a large KICK ME note on your own back. Sounds like I agree with you, no?
Every merchant vessel I've worked on had a gun locker of one description or another. Granted, I only worked on them in port or on delivery and test runs, not while going about their business (coms, computers & controls mostly).