Re: Catherine
We did that one already. But thanks for playing.
26690 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
"There is definitely a need to review and remove all the stupid patents and trademarks"
This is true. The USPTO is in serious need of repair, for a LOT of reasons.
"so that the rest of the world can get on with its business."
Perhaps, if your business involves getting Spring to print t-shirts for you. May I suggest an alternative vendor for your shirts? There is nothing in Law stopping you from getting them printed, just in Spring's brain-dead handling of the issue.
"Did you see what they did there?"
Hard to miss it ... My neighbor's new twin sprog sport these occasionally:
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/222473404073?hash=item33cc72bea9:g:GIUAAOSwB21c8sMS
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/264481022088?hash=item3d944c2088:g:oFUAAOSwF2hcnrSN
Why do you think it's inevitable? Sensible t-shirt printers don't filter on single words (much less letters) ... or if they do, they at least have a cognizant human vet the results so as not to lose business.
As for your alternative, screen printing your own shirts is quite doable in a spare bedroom/garage. It's actually quite profitable. Why do you think there are so many small companies doing it?
"I think they're taking themselves too seriously."
They do. And they prove it by drinking entirely too much, puking out of the upstairs windows, and then falling down the stairs and puking some more all over the front lawn.
As Groucho Marx wrote in a telegram resigning from the Delaney Club "PLEASE ACCEPT MY RESIGNATION. I DON’T WANT TO BELONG TO ANY CLUB THAT WILL ACCEPT ME AS A MEMBER."
Futhorc was Frisian (probably, although it may have developed inland from there).
The closest equivalent in Old English was the ever-so-logical "stæfræw" (row of letters) or "stæfrof" (array of letters).
The Irish Monks brought the Latin "alphabetum" over long before 1475, although I cannot find an exact date ... certainly by the foundation of Iona in 563.
Alphabetum, futhorc and stæfræw/stæfrof were used concurrently for around 600 years.
"I'd have taken my business to another T-shirt shop, rather than capitulate."
YES! When you see this kind of stupidity, vote with your wallet. I usually drop them an email and/or a good, old fashioned telephone call explaining why they did not get my business.
"but does appear to work as it is supposed to."
"Supposed to" is relative. According to who? Microsoft's financial department? Their advertising department? Their "collect as much info about the users as possible" department?
It certainly doesn't work the way I think an OS is supposed to work ...
My one remaining Redmond computer runs Win2K, which is in my mind peak Microsoft.
The only reason I run it is because I used AutoCAD2K to document this place and a couple others, and have seen no need to "upgrade" ... like Win2K, ACAD2K is peak AutoDesk. On the rare occasion that I need it, the twenty year old box runs LibreOffice adequately.
The system is airgapped.
I know of several other businesses that keep Win2K around for various reasons.
A lot of my day-to-day business is easily handled by a near 18 tear old HP laptop running Slackware-current and the recent LibreOffice. The rest is run from a similar era desktop. Neither machine has ever given me any trouble.
To you nay-sayers: How much money has running Redmond products cost you in the last nearly twenty years? Make sure you include the cost of waiting on updates, recovering from crashes, unnecessary reboots, hardware upgrades (or replacements) when MS rolls a rev., malware problems, and all the other bits and bobs that waste your time and money.
It continues to amaze me that the Corporate World still lets the thing in the door ...
Why do you think your music "requires" Windows? I have no issues[0] with music on Linux (including production), and haven't for a long time now.
[0] Other than the underlying code being aesthetically ugly ... if we ever have the time, my daughter and I might make it our job to pretty it up a bit as a learning tool for her daughter.
"Now to install MS Office all the software that actual businesses use to actually run"
None of the businesses I consult for run MS-anything. Why do you think MS is necessary, when it is quite clear that reality says otherwise? Is it a religious thing for you?
"(and maybe a few recent games)"
Playing games at work? You're fired.
"Scrap a PC that otherwise works well, or stick with Windows 10"
Or perhaps put up-to-date and modern Slackware or BSD on it and just use the bloody thing until it falls apart, and THEN scrap it. Unless you enjoy throwing away perfectly good tools just because a multi-billion dollar international marketing company's advertising tells you to, of course, in which case carry on, consumer.
"increasingly dangerous because of its black-box lack of transparency."
In my mind it is increasingly dangerous because people treat the results like religious dogma, as if it were automagically irrefutable because the computer said it was true.
Scary, that.
With me, the black Levis are a hair tighter than the blue (pre-shrunk 501s). So I usually get the original shrink-to-fit variation ... which incidentally seem to last a trifle longer than the pre-shrunk ones, and are a hair cheaper. Win-win.
Don't forget shoes ... Different manufacturers use different sized lasts. And plants on different continents belonging to the same manufacturer also seem to use different sized lasts. The only good way to purchase shoes is to physically try them on.
Last time I bought "walking the dawgs" shoes, I tried on four identically labeled pairs. One pair was too small, one too big, and two fit. I bought the two. They were made in Mexico, the large pair was made in Malaysia, and the small pair was made in Taiwan. Caveat emptor.
Because Samsung's marketing department (which knows nothing of AI, it's just a buzzword to them) insisted that it be included in the description on product roll-out. And that is the ONLY reason.
Sticking a label on something doesn't automagicaly confer that attribute on the thing. The map is not the territory.
"We are teetering on the brink of a golden age of AI. It must be true, we keep being told so."
And have been since the early 1960s.
Methinks the Marketing bozos have cried "wolf" enough for a couple decades. Time to let this subject matter rest, it stinks like last week's fish. Methinks we're heading into another so-called "AI winter", and about time, too!
.... how about they swallow their pride, admit their product is nowhere near ready for prime-time (and probably never will be!), and hire a few actual drivers?
Dumb-ass motherfuckers ... Toyota obviously thinks corporate pride is far more important than human life. I've just put them on my personal "do not ever buy" list. Hopefully I'm not alone.
"I haven’t bought a new computer since 2017. I haven’t bought any new software, either."
Quite frankly, I do not remember the last time I purchased software for any of the systems at home or for my myriad interlocking businesses. I'm thinking perhaps around the turn of the Century? I remember purchasing Win2K and AutoCAD2K and Office2000 ... after that? I honestly can't remember any purchases after that.
Has it really been over 20 years? Time flies ...
Just to shut up the trolls, no I don't pirate software.
I wonder how many El Reg commentards still have an RPN calculator in/on their desk, and still use it. Mine's an HP-45, my birthday present to me in 1974 ... The HP-35 also still works, but is stored under glass sans batteries (Dad's gift to me, Xmas '72 ... one of the few bits of hardware I treasure).