You can relax.
He isn't reading here. He doesn't even know this place exists.
Even if he did, why would he pay any attention to your post?
26683 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
"Could that be the end of Facebook"
Don't be daft. Facebook could drop out of Oz completely and not see a blip in their profits. Nor their prophets, both the employed ones and the volunteers.
" and boom of self-hosted personal blogs in Australia?"
Of course not. That would be hard, and people would have to actually learn something.
... Does Australia's High Court have facebook presence? Or any other so-called "social" media presence?
If not, it seems to me this is legislation without representation.
If so, I hope their censors editors have plenty of red pencils, and overtime has been authorized.
Just sayin' ...
Maybe if they encouraged the kids who are interested in the subject and stopped trying to force it on all and sundry?
In my experience, the kids who are interested in it are disgusted at being held back by their peers who have no interest in the subject matter whatsoever.
The "no kid left behind" concept is ruining an entire generation. Fact is, we are NOT all the same, and we are NOT all capable of the same work.
The problem is marketing and management want coding to be inexpensive. So easy, in fact, that kids can be taught to program by a teacher with a certificate to teach general education.
Unfortunately for them, computers are the single most complex tool HomoSap has managed to invent. They are inherently difficult to program. And there is no easy way around that ... regardless of language.
"Ah, so you didn't teach her Perl then."
She discovered perl on her own. Back in early 1988 she was subscribed to comp.sources.unix and read Larry's first post on the subject. She emailed me and suggested that it would be fun to join in from the beginning. I agreed, and so we learned it together.
Ignoring the mystique and FUD surrounding perl, after all these years it's still a fun and useful language that runs on damned near everything. Recommended.
I don't know about you, but I spoke to my kid in English right from the git-go, not the cut-down version some people call "baby talk". As a result, she learned to speak, read and write proper English much earlier than her peers. Go figure.
When the time came, I extended the concept to programming languages. It seems to have worked.
I landed a contract to install two big, garage sized, Memorex tape backup robots at a large number-crunching outfit once. Before I bid on the job, the VP of operations gave me the grand tour. He was proud of all his redundancy. He had two power lines coming in to two separate rooms, with a motor-generator, a large battery consisting of dozens of telco-style lead-acid batteries, a generator, and monitoring systems for each room-full of gear. The 48 Volts was switched by a box at the corner where the two rooms met, brought into the main building via a 5" conduit, where it was switched to two separate computer rooms. Even the links between outlying offices were redundant T-1 and T-3 lines. There was a third "data center" that was dark, to be used for spares "just in case". It was designed to provide non-stop operations, and it did a pretty good job of it. Even the Halon had built-in redundancy.
Until a semi-truck carrying some of my Memorex kit backing into the receiving dock went off course & cut the 5" conduit. The security cameras caught the sparks quite nicely :-)
Two weeks after installing the tape robots, I had a proposal for a more geographically diverse version of the same thing on the VP's desk. I didn't land that contract, alas.
Both senses of the word are derived from the Latin "Primus", meaning "of the first rank, chief, or principal" ... The reasoning behind naming the Church boss is obvious. Ihe Human version comes from the rather Victorian concept that humans are the highest order of mammals.
Presumably the people bitching about the Facebook AI are racists who don't think that black people can be first at anything, much less a higher order animal.
Insemination.
About four years ago my large animal Vet came in with a funny bit of advertising. This guy's in his second career, he became a Vet after 25 years as a DBA working for IBM. He knows I'm a computer guy, and thought I'd be amused. The ad was for a large animal veterinary practice management software package "NOW WITH AI!!!"
The Vet was laughing, and wondered how many times the company in question got Vets inquiring about their new Artificial Insemination package. Without a pause, I dialed the 800 number ... the answer was over 80% of calls! The guy on the other end wasn't amused when I suggested they fire their marketing genius and hire an AI expert ...
"Yankee" was originally a disparaging name for Dutch pirates, probably from "Janke", which means "little John". Later, Dutch settlers in New Amsterdam (now New York) gave the name to the English settlers in Connecticut in the early 1680s. It became a general term of contempt for New Englanders by the mid 1750s, and then the British decided to use it as a contemptuous term for all of us upstart colonists when we were busy kicking their asses back to England. As often happens in such cases, the newly landed Americans took the name as a battle trophy ... Except those in the South who tried without success to turn it back into a disparaging term during the Civil War[0].
Today, most Americans acknowledge it as a generic handle and don't look on it as a negative.
"Yank", the short form of Yankee, is from the 1770s.
"Yank" as in jerk or pull is Scottish from the 1820s, of unknown etymology.
That's half a dozen brain cells none of you will ever get back. Have a beer :-)
[0]Worst term ever. There is absolutely nothing civil about war.
"It costs Spring nothing to deny on spurious grounds"
On the contrary, it has cost them at least one sale, and probably many other potential sales based on bad publicity. For a small company, where margins are thin, that might be enough to tip them into insolvency.
"permitting something that breaches a bogus, inadmissible but nevertheless approved trademark"
The trademarks in question are not bogus, nor are they inadmissible. They are legal and above board. This is not in question. What IS in question is how Spring has decided that one portion of said trademark is somehow the whole, "IBM" is a trademark. However, not even IBM's landsharks would consider suing Intel, Brother and Mitsubishi if they used their initial letter as a portion of their trademark and copyright package.
Again, re-read the article. The whole issue is that Spring has no clue, and is jumping to conclusions based on ignorance of the law surrounding copyright.
Affinity is perfectly clear about what they expect with regard to third parties using their clients legal copyright and trademarks. Spring has over-reacted.
"There is definitely a need to review and remove all the stupid patents and trademarks"
This is true. The USPTO is in serious need of repair, for a LOT of reasons.
"so that the rest of the world can get on with its business."
Perhaps, if your business involves getting Spring to print t-shirts for you. May I suggest an alternative vendor for your shirts? There is nothing in Law stopping you from getting them printed, just in Spring's brain-dead handling of the issue.