Re: Finally Euorpe united
Actually: it *IS* Amricanisation, as the USA calls itself "America" while America is in reality 2 continents (North and South) with ~20 countries. Yet, Brazilians and Canadians are not "Americans"
1011 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Nov 2010
Governments have to step in to prevent people who do harm themselves from harming others
like ... refusing an experimental vaccine against a harmless virus while said vaccine doesn't actually prevent contagion to others ? No thanks: my kids have TikTok and they have learned to live with it. I call it Darwinian selection: kids whose parents are too stupid to teach them to use stuff with caution will get lost. Tough but that's life, and no reason to – pretend to – protect me against myself. This is the typical case where the cure is worse that the decease.
If that's all true, then why do western governments all converge to do all public actions – taxes, banking, social-security, doctor… – on the Internet ? My mum can't handle all the stuff she's supposed to do online, and there is nowhere to go personally. Heck, you need an online account to get a rendez-vous for a in-person meeting ! Blaming TikTok for what the government (also) does seems quite strange to me
@Torben Mogensen : I don't know why you were downvoted for that sensible suggestion. I'd add another suggestion: attach to the ISS an inflatable hangar where all the pieces can be safely assembled without the astronauts risking to lose grip.
I think that the biggest problem will be the refueling of spaceships with cryogenic fluids, and such a hangar wouldn't help there.
If everybody just downloads the source, there's no revenue
Are you sure many clients paid to download the actual source-code ? And then compiled it locally in-house ?
I think here lies the misunderstanding : open-source is not equal to free binaries. People pay for the executable binaries, very rarely for the source code itself.
I don't understand how all this invested money would repay itself. I do understand Nvidia's business model - they're selling the shovels of this gold rush - but how is OpenAI ever going to earn truckloads of money ? I did try some of these generative things (images and texts), and while sometimes funny the results were invariably useless. Like 100% useless.
And don't come with Google : their service was useful at the very first day. They drifted away from it but at the beginning it was good, even though I didn't understand their free business model either.
... the child preditation instruction material ...
1) when I was a kid – a long long time ago in a country far far away – my parents told me to never accept gifts, especially candy, from strangers, as one never knows what can be behind such apparently benevolent behaviour. This actually makes me suspicious of free Internet "services" : what's the purpose of this gift ? who pays the bills ? Therefore, no "instruction" would have been effective on me as a kid. And that was way before Internet, don't current parents not teach basic precaution to their children ?
2) How does one, in practice, give advice on how to "seduce" children ? Where did the chatbot find the relevant information ? LLMs can't "invent" new stuff, only re-purpose existing material. Were those "real" predatory instructions, or some made-up fantasy stories that one could find in typical children books ?
All-in-all, the remedy seems far worse than the problem, to me.
What I mean is: "the fact that was 2 years in the planning... " Do you think that people who plan such a vast operation only target ONE (1) package ? 2 years in the planning and they would take chances with a single library ? You can bet that there are dozens (if not hundreds) of packages variably affected.
you forgot the obligatory XKCD reference
We need to be on the lookout for the Chinese trying to work around these sanctions
that's actually easy: buy ALL machines that AMSL is able to produce and set up semiconductor fabs ourselves. Here. Why don't we do that instead of preventing other people from manufacturing stuff that we manufactured before ? I'm really fed-up with such lazy pussycats
Or we can accept the 1/2 century old international policy of recognizing that Taiwan is part of China and let them sort it out. You (*) already buy your iPhone made-in-PRC, why would you be worried that the CPU also comes from PRC ?
(*) my phone comes from Korea
face-it : China will not back down from Taiwan anymore than Russia didn't back down from Ukraine. Actually, Ukraine is a demonstration to the Taiwanese of what awaits them if they don't go voluntarily with China : "see, do you think the USA will be better able to protect you from us than they were able to protect Ukraine from Russia ? We might have a hard time invading you but your country will be destroyed "
and explicitly states that it's a parody account
no, it doesn't, please stop this lie. It falsely states that it was shared on X by a parody account , whereas it was created by that parody account (I hope you get the joke about Trump inventing the wheel). This is cheap political propaganda and ElReg should laugh about such pictures – may-be even participating in the joke noting the obvious factual error of Trump not wearing the black turtle-neck – rather than being snowflakes about such trivialities. This doesn't look like "biting the hand that feeds IT " but more like "barking with the dogs "
I think that's the crux of the matter : marketing droids of a company buy adverts from other marketing droids in an ad-broker company. And they rake in billions doing that, which increases the price of the products of said company by as much, that every-body *ELSE* has to pay somehow. That's the very definition of parasites: they suck the blood of the host. The entire advertising business is a parasitic behavior, quite identical to the former Soviet propaganda : if the products were indeed as good as advertised, advertisement wouldn't be necessary in the first place
where said internationally recognized borders is also an interesting matter when considering Israel. May-be NSO should re-locate to Gaza so they're in a no-man's-land that doesn't belong to any country and thus can be exempted from any international jurisdiction ?
why the downvotes ?
1) no mention of Kwin which is probably currently the best Linux window manager.
2) no mention of Dolphin, which is currently the best file manager on the planet, including ANY other OS
3) no mention of Kmail which is currently the best Linux mail app
4) as for the looks, KDE (or Plasma) can be made to look and behave like any modern or oldtimer DE (including CDE ! try that on Windows) ... if you spend enough time to optimise your desktop
in short, you look at the defaults but most users either make their own configs or use themes found online.
@Liam : I agree somehow that you seem to miss some of the killer features of KDE each time, and you concentrate on the default aesthetic look-and-feel (which is important I agree, but not solely) :
1) Kmail, Korganiser, Kontact: this is the ONLY usable Linux mail and calendar app that is professionally capable. From what I see, it's on par with what MacOS can propose (dunno about MS Outook). What other Linux offering do you know of that can sync with a Zimbra server online and on your Android phone ? (use DavX) Thunderbird used to sort-of do some of it but it's mostly unmaintained.
2) Kio-slaves: this is even better, because you can use your local desktop (the Dolphin file manager) for remote accesses to FTP, SFTP ... servers as if you were local. I've not seen anything approaching this in usability, surpassing anything that Windows or MacOS can provide.
3) Dolphin can also be made to be used as the legendary MidnightExplorer file manager, including remote server access: what other modern DE do you know that offers natively such a workflow ?
highly paid and trained engineers
1) they might not be those deciding
2) I'd be interested in the "highly paid" figures
3) didn't all other failed aeronautical and space projects have those highly paid engineers ?
All-in-all, mistakes happen. I think there was a recent aircraft carrier that was designed and built too short for the aircraft that it was designed to carry, they had to "extend" the ship. And think of the 737 Max fiasco, or the Piaggion Avanti with its noise due to the propellers on the trailing edge. The world of (aerospace) engineering is full of "oh sh***t didn't think of that " moments.
the engines were throttled down well below maximum thrust
you mean that the rocket exploded despite not being at full power ? So when they decide that the rocket is "ready" then they'll launch it with full payload and full throttle, something they will never have tested before ? You can't be serious
As for 100T payload, a 5x5x5m water ballast would do the job, no security or other dangers on re-entry.
If it had had a payload, it would have made it to orbit ... Starship was approximately 150 km up and traveling at around 24,000 kph at the time
but if it indeed did have a 100T payload, then it would have been that much heavier and thus it wouldn't have made it to orbit either. Also, Oxygen doesn't burn by itself, it needs some fuel: where was that supposed to come from ?
All-in-all, I persist in saying that this will never make it to orbit, let alone to the Moon.
The oft-repeated claim that they're "Iran-backed"
the problem with this claim is not only that it's unproven, but that the same label is not used for other "forces" in play : when did you ever hear about "NATO backed Ukraine" ? Or "USA backed Israel" ? As for Iraq, is it USA-backed or Iran-backed now ?
Such "Iran-backed" (or Russia-backed) narrative is only here to build hatred towards the target country by association : nothing concrete is said, but the repeated subtle propaganda settles in. The same could be seen with Julian Assange: he was depicted as an ars****le for years, even here, so there was no sympathy left for him once the extradition to the USA – which he fought against from the beginning – was announced. It's straight from the Nazi propaganda book: repeat a lie often enough and people will start believing it. I find it somehow uncomfortable that ElReg plays that game
I've been a 3D CAD user for twenty years [...] which I appreciate is niche
millions of people do 3D CAD, so no it's not "niche". And the difficult bit about CAD is not the CA part – Computer Assisted – but the D one – Design. You need to know and understand (both !) the mechanics and physics behind the design choices, and the computer will only assist you in the drawing part, which is admittedly easier than with a pen and paper. Actually, it's not easier but more forgiving : you don't have to redraw everything if you make a small mistake. BUT: if you're not able to do a good design on paper, you won't be able to do a good design in 3D CAD. These glasses will not help the tiniest bit in doing 3D CAD.
Even worse: you can't buy nitro anymore because some "terrorists" made bombs with it. You can't even buy the gasoline for those RC cars with more than 16% nitro where I live. Used to be 25% some time ago.
But aaaahhhhh .... the noise ! And the smell !!!! Electric cars might be faster - dunno - but hell are they boring