Rather computers than cars
Just imagine what our roads would be like if people had he same problems with their cars as with their computers. But for some reason that does not seem to happen. It is not as if cars are idiot-resistant, far from it.
1535 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Oct 2010
Re; tone and emotions.
I have toyed with two well-known sites that check one's writing: Grammarly and ProWritingAid. Both assess submitted texts on spelling, grammar, complexity, general readability, etc. They also judge the tone of the work: formal, semi-formal, casual, etc.
Spreadsheets are ideal for data. But it is a pity they could not use a generic spreadsheet that will work equally with Libre Office, Google Office, Softmaker Office, ONLYOFFICE, or even good old Gnumeric.
When I was claiming Gift Aid tax rebates for a small charity, I downloaded the appropriate spreadsheet from HMRC. There was one version for Excel and one for Libre Office Calc. Other spreadsheets were unsupported. The problem seems to be the manic desire to incorporate macros within spreadsheets.
Not an article I can agree with.
"… it's impossible to imagine how the global pandemic would have played out without it [the Internet]".
Many of us remember the Asian Flu pandemic of 1957. People either stayed at home or got on with life. The Government did not make a fuss. Pity that was not remembered from 2020 onwards, especially now we have all had our arms pierced. 2020 vision, what a joke!
"… with power comes responsibility …"
Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and others have greatness thrust upon them. The last is especially true in the computer trade, and greatness has been thrust upon many who subside under the challenge.
In 1953 a famous experiment by a scientist named Miller showed that hydrides of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen could form simple organic compounds if in the absence of free oxygen they were exposed to sparks or UV light, etc. But that is a long way from the highly structured DNA or proteins.
That gap is yet to be bridged.
Freedom of speech is a right. But in Britain you have to accept responsibility for the consequences. This is fair and reasonable, unlike the USA where freedom of speech is a cynical shibboleth used to defend outrageously harmful words.
Back in the 1990s, I worked at a place out in the countryside. (One day I saw a fox stroll past the window.) Frequently we would arrive Monday morning to find the electricity had gone down over the weekend, and all our computers were 'resting'.
Our internal network had 'just grown', with many interdependencies. It took most of a Monday morning to restart the computers in the right sequence. Eventually we recruited an experienced network engineer to sort us out.
The so-called Splinternet is a real possibility, because some national authorities insist on censorship for political or religious reasons. Then there are the commercial interests discussed in this article.
The Old Internet was a tribute to American and academic idealism, But few others share those ideals.
The government take care to protect government secrets e.g. cups of tea served per day. But it seems the Treasury refuse to allocate money to protect personal data. This incident is just one of many. I hope, forlornly, that some Treasury official gets sacked and loses their pension.
When elections are decided by "first past the post", you can indeed vote against someone. But in many places they have "proportional representation", whereby the voters go through the motions and then the politicians take the real decisions on what sort of carve-up will do for the time being.